Fantastic alternative to the abo welcome to country, and much more fitting for a grand final. Round of applause to Senator Papahatziharalambrous.

https://youtu.be/6CF7sQR8sy8

Anyone who thinks that Giorgia Meloni will resurrect fascism is out of their mind. She’s a Zionist and what she’s saying is no different to what Trump said in 2016.

https://t.me/CIG_telegram/23377

Ah Yes, the usual retarded « the Pope is infallible and he said something stupid!!! » argument. What is this, a child who just learnt to argue?

It’s too early in the morning for this kind of idiocy, for goodness sake…

Mussolini coping because Medkikes were banned from entering America

https://twitter.com/pompilivs/status/1429330467959025672?s=20&t=X2IpqgA4qwPTvDMczJ3zQA

Hanover, Germany, the Turkish Mayor passes legislation meaning that 30 per cent of jobs must go to FOREIGN BORN individuals.
The native Germans are officially second class citizens.

Wtaf lol

Here’s a funny description of the backward and primitive ‘New Barbarians’ that were swarming America at the time, said to have come in droves from the “defective and delinquent classes of Europe (especially Southern Italy and Eastern Europe) who couldn’t keep pace at home” given by prominent Eugenicist Edward Alsworth Ross in "The Old World in the New" (1914):

"It is fair to say that the blood now being injected into the veins of our people is 'subcommon.' To one accustomed to the aspect of the normal American population, the Caliban type shows up with a frequency that is startling. Observe immigrants, not as they come travel-wan up the gang-plank, nor as they issue toil-begrimed from pit-mouth or mill-gate, but in their gatherings, washed, combed, and in their Sunday best. You are struck by the fact that from 10 to 20 per cent are hirsute, low-browed, big-faced persons of obviously low mentality. Not that they suggest evil. They simply look out of place in black clothes and stiff collar, since clearly they belong in skins, in wattled huts at the close of the Great Ice Age. These ox-like men are descen- dants of those who always stayed behind.

To the practised eye, the physiognomy of certain groups unmistakably proclaims inferiority of type. I have seen gatherings of the foreign-born in which narrow and sloping foreheads were the rule. The shortness and smallness of the crania were very noticeable. There was much facial asymmetry. Among the women, beauty, aside from the fleeting, epidermal bloom of girlhood, was quite lacking. In every face there was something wrong-lips thick, mouth coarse, upper lip too long, cheek-bones too high, chin poorly formed, the bridge of the nose hollowed, the base of the nose tilted, or else the whole face prognathous. There were so many sugar-loaf heads, moon-faces, slit mouths, lantern jaws, and goose-bill noses that one might imagine a malicious jinn had amused himself by casting human beings in a set of skew-moulds discarded by the Creator." — Lothrop Stoddard, Re-forging America, pp. 170-172

Lothrop Stoddard on the work of Prescott F. Hall, another prominent Eugenicist who echoed similar sentiments, and was the first to really bring the issue into the spotlight, brutally opposing mass immigration from Asia and Southern and Eastern Europe:

“Every true American should know about this great patriot, who, though he lived and died practically unknown to the general public, was, more than any other man, the preparer of that "great awakening" which, beginning in 1914, culminated in the Johnson Act of 1924, which closed our gates to mass-immigration and thus saved America from impending ruin. Prescott F. Hall was unquestionably the first to grasp the full peril of the “ New Immigration.” He came to this conclusion as far,back as the late eighties, when he was barely grown to man’s estate. Once his keen vision had pierced to the heart of the matter, he devoted his whole life to this supremely vital cause. At first he stood quite alone. Gradually he gathered about him a small group, mostly young men of Boston and vicinity, like himself, who founded the Immigration Restriction League in the year 1894. From then on this little band fought a discouraging fight, apparently making scant headway against the prevailing temper of the times, but in reality sowing seeds which were to produce a rich harvest of “success. Of course, it was always the leader, Prescott Hall, who bore the brunt of the battle. Renouncing a brilliant legal career (he is the author of standard legal text-books and was considered one of the ablest minds of the Massachusetts bar), Prescott Hall devoted his modest means and delicate health to the patriotic cause with an intensity which unquestionably shortened his days. His untimely death, early in the year 1921, prevented him from witnessing the triumph of the Johnson Act of 1924. Yet he died in the serene conviction that the tide had definitely turned and that victory was nigh. It was the author’s deep privilege to have personally known this great spirit, though only in his last days. Perhaps when future generations come to realise the debt they owe him, Prescott F. Hall wiil be remembered os he surely was: one of the saviors of our country.”

Being a Globalist (mainly, what it implies) and anti-Patriotic/Nationalist is a sin in Catholic Moral Theology.

It is Catholic Doctrine that nations have the right to self-preservation, and to maintain their sacred differences. Those who would oppose their government’s laws prohibiting miscegenation, etc, would be acting contrary to the Catholic Faith.

« Disrespect for one’s country is felt when one is imbued with anti-nationalistic doctrines (e.g., the principles of Internationalism which hold that loyalty is due to a class, namely, the workers of the world or a capitalistic group, and that country should be sacrificed to selfish interests; the principle of Humanitarianism, which holds that patriotism is incompatible with love of the race; the principle of Egoism which holds that the individual has no obligations to society); it is practiced when one speaks contemptuously about country, disregards its good name or prestige, subordinates its rightful pre-eminence to a class, section, party, personal ambition, or greed, etc. »

- McHugh and Callan, Moral Theology, Volume II, p. 414

What Keith Woods and Joel Davis just don’t understand about our position on UBI is that it will be digital and come with strings attached, therefore it’s not free money, it’s all part of the move toward a cashless society where we don’t even have ownership or a legal claim to our own money in our own bank accounts to spend as we wish.

UBI will not be free money, because it’s NOT money. Think of it more like digital coupons that will most likely have “use by” dates and are only accepted at select stores — no gun stores ;). That might still sound fine to you, but imagine this becoming the norm for our people. This is how they will ease us further into slavery.

You could argue that we already use digital money via credit/debit cards, and that obviously is a problem, but at least it’s still legally our money in our digital accounts — we still have a legal claim to this digital money, to say that this is ours to spend as we wish — but that won’t be the case with UBI, we can’t even say that “this UBI money is our money” because it won’t be ours and it won’t even be money as we know it. Again, It’ll be more like digital coupons or foodstamps rather than money we can spend freely on whatever we want.

We got a taste of this already here in America with attempts by gun control advocacy groups lobbying credit card companies to track firearms purchases. Why would the people that hate us do such a thing? We all know why. This issue will be even worse with UBI.

The system is already pushing for legislation (without much luck thankfully) to further track and control how we spend our own money when it’s digital numbers in a bank’s database, imagine how much more control they’ll have when instead of money, we’re all hooked on UBI coupons that we think are money while there’s less real money circulating within the NWO-UBI-saturated economy.

This is true, but then again I don’t think anyone is advocating for the sort of strings-attached UBI that the system is trying to implement, not even Keith.

I find it bizarre how many on the DR instantly assume that Keith and Joel have the worst possible intentions regarding UBI, and don’t just want to give struggling white-working class families, especially mothers, free money with no strings attached.