To touch on Vietnam as well; my Grandfather recently told me that the reason why him and all of his mates were fighting was not because America or Britain said so, but rather because they believed that if they did not fight, Australia would be in danger of becoming Asian and Communist.

They did not fight for subsequent governments to dismantle the policy without notice, or for tolerance and inclusion; they fought for what our founders and the men of Kokoda, Jerusalem, Gallipoli, the Somme, and the Fromelles fought for; the advancement and defence of White Australia.

Lmao

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/i-ll-stop-your-bloodline-anti-semitism-reports-grow-across-sydney-schools-20220909-p5bgrf.html

For the record, anti-white Immigration Minister Hubert Opperman was a committed Freemason who was initiated into Stonnington Lodge, a part of the United Grand Lodge of Victoria, on 23 December 1925.

And on top of that, anti-white traitor Don Dunstan, who is credited for changing Labour’s stance on immigration, was ‘a liberated bisexual man’ married to a Jewess. As the 35th Premier, Treasurer, and 38th Attorney General of South Australia, Dunstan also helped to abolish the death penalty, relax obscenity and drinking laws, recognise ‘aboriginal land rights’, decriminalise homosexuality, and appoint the first female judge.

Important to note as well that Jews were also instrumental in the destruction of the WAP, not just faggots, bourgeois liberal/labour politicians, and masons: https://t.me/jewsdotcomau/12 https://t.me/jewsdotcomau/26

Taylor Marshall is a pedantic Q-tier boomer con who should stick to making theology videos

Happy 123rd birthday to Corneliu Zelea Codreanu,

Today is the birthday of St Corneliu Zelea Codreanu.

I wonder what he would say about Christians today, from the Pope down to Republican congress creatures, who make dirty deals with Jews and cynically use religion as an instrument of anti-fascism.

He probably wouldn't say much. Let's leave it at that.

I recently watched the 2012 film 'Lincoln' and it's genuinely one of the worst films I've ever seen. Historically inaccurate to the point of comedy, complete propaganda for the current American regime.

Even Lincoln fans wouldn't enjoy the film, as it paints Lincoln (and his ministers) as modern liberals whose entire existence revolved around Black people. Even Lincoln's critics have to laugh at that idea.

Abraham Lincoln was more racist than any pro-slavery southern leader at the time. He didn’t free the negro so that they could benefit and have the same rights as Whites (which is the typical liberal civil rights line), but rather to alleviate Whites from having them around. Without getting into the whole reconstruction debate, here are some quotes which clearly highlight this point:

“I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races, [applause]---that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will for ever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality.” (Abraham Lincoln, 1858)

“I say to you in all frankness, gentlemen, that in my opinion a negro is not a citizen, cannot be, and ought not to be, under the constitution of the United States. . . . I say that this government was established on the white basis. It was made by white men, for the benefit of white men and their posterity forever, and never should be administered by any except white men.”
(Fourth Lincoln-Douglas Debate: Douglas' Reply, in Abraham Lincoln: Speeches and Writings 1832-1858, p. 673)

“The signers of the Declaration of Independence never dreamed of the negro when they were writing that document. They referred to white men, to men of European birth and European descent, when they declared the equality of all men” (Fifth Lincoln-Douglas Debate: Douglas' Speech, in Abraham Lincoln: Speeches and Writings 1832-1858, p. 697)

“I will, to the very last, stand by the law of the State which forbids the marrying of white people with negroes." (Abraham Lincoln. Speech at Columbus, Ohio, September, 1859.)

Reminder

Northerners were far more hostile to blacks compared to pro-slavery Southerners according to a Spanish historian who travelled across America before the Civil War.

https://t.me/WhiteAmerica14/54

“The proposal to introduce Kanaka labor was never made by Christian gentlemen, but by renegades, who, anxious to make fortunes by obtaining a year’s work for a sum of money that would not pay an honest white man honest wages for a month, are willing to displace their own, see Anglo-Saxon workman become idle, and Anglo-Saxon women thrown on to the world through the inability of their husbands and fathers to earn decent livings. It is a criminal and unchristian-like act — a damnable scheme evolved in the brain of a traitor to his race, and supported by men whose study of self-interest has withered national aspiration.

The Parliaments of Australia should protest against this black introduction of slavery to our very midst; the people should indignate from one end of the continent to the other; and if need be, the workers of Queensland should take the law into their own hands and fight for rights, which, despite the almost criminal silence of the church are those which God would support since humanity created, and inhumanity would seek to destroy them.

The Kanaka should never be allowed to pollute the shores of Australia; the sordid soul of the Queensland planter should never be permitted to stain the purity of our national strain of our white manhood and womanhood by the introduction for selfish reasons, of coolie labor. The black race cannot live with the white; it is against all reason to expect it; and only cruel, heartless, and unchristian men would think of enforcing it.”...

“The introduction of the nigger in Queensland will do worse for us. It will create in this country the most serious of all questions affecting a nation — the purity of the race. Let us be wise by study of the experiences of others, and profit thereby. In the United Slates of America the black question has become the question. A few years ago the African was admitted to the southern States for exactly the same reason which has influenced the Queensland planter to fight for the introduction of Kanaka labor in his country. The nigger was cheap, his work remunerative and fortune-making for his barbarous master. The Carolina cotton planter fifty years ago thought only of his pocket, the future of his race never troubled him, and now America is paying the penalty of having allowed him to make his fortune at the expense of the purity of the race.

In Queensland, if this black tide be allowed to deluge the northern shores, history will have repeated itself, and though a few sugar-growers may possibly accumulate vast wealth, in fifty years’ time a national Australian parliament will be wrought over the question: How are we to purify the national blood, the sordid infamy of the past, stained and keep back the aggressive spread of a colored race?”

- The National Advocate (Bathurst, NSW), 25 April 1892, p. 3 (Second Edition) https://www.australianculture.org/the-black-streak-in-queensland-1892/

Interesting how union‘s and the Australian press around the time of the Shearer’s strike were completely against the introduction of cheap Islander labour and slavery across Queensland. There was not one politician or figurehead that advocated for slavery and cheap labour who was also for the advancement of White Australia and the expulsion of Chinamen and Kanakas.

https://t.me/PaxTube/3883

The only abolitionists who were truly enthusiastic about the ‘all men are created’ idea were radicals like Thaddeus Stephens, and this was heavily resisted inside the Republican Party by moderates, including Abraham Lincoln, who even went so far as to say that the negro cannot be a citizen. Lothrop Stoddard, a prominent Klansmen, even admitted this in his book Re-forging America by saying that barely any republicans supported total amalgamation and equality with the white man.

From the quotes I provided above, it’s clear that Lincoln wasn’t for negro equality in any sense whatsoever, and even called those who didn’t want to be shipped back to Africa ‘selfish’ (https://t.me/WhiteAmerica14/93). However, as Pax said, it’s true that the black right to vote, serve on juries, equal protection, etc. was forced on the South by Grant. That’s what the Klan was resisting during Reconstruction, what the South always firmly resisted up until the 70s, and is certainly not what I’m defending. Nobody should be defending these things being enshrined into the Constitution. All I’m saying is that the typical narrative about the North being a safe-haven for negros and most Republicans being staunch civil rights activists is nonsense, and one of the biggest lies liberals have ever come up with.

As to the point about voting, Alex de Toqueville, who travelled throughout both the North and South prior to the Civil War in 1838, stated that although voting rights were granted to negros and slavery was abolished, if any of them would try and come forward to vote - among other things -, their lives would be in danger. He then goes to explain how negro intolerance was much more extreme in the North than in the slavery-ridden south (https://t.me/WhiteAmerica14/54), even stating that “The negro is free, but he can share neither the rights, nor the pleasures, nor the labour, nor the afflictions, nor the tomb of him whose equal he has been declared to be; and he can not meet him upon fair terms in life or in death.” There’s no evidence to suggest that this ever changed after the Civil War either. Practically speaking, Negros never had the same privileges as whites anywhere, even in the North, where there were virtually no blacks (which is part of why they were more intolerant). They wanted to keep the mass of blacks as far away as possible from the White man and keep their lands virtually 100% White, and they took legislative measures to ensure this (especially in Lincoln’s Illinois).

Congressmen Samuel Cox put it this way: “I have been taught in the history of this country that these Commonwealths and this Union were made for white men ; that this Government is a Government of white men ; that the men who made it never intended, by any thing they did, to place the black race on an equality with the white” (https://t.me/WhiteAmerica14/64)

Also quite startling is this quote from Senator Lyman Truball, who stated: “I, for one, am very much disposed to favor the colonization of such free negroes as are willing to Central America. I want to have nothing to do with the free negro or the slave negro. We, the Republican Party, are the white man's party. [Great applause.]  We are for free white men, and for making white labor respectable and honorable, which it never can be when negro slave labor is brought into competition with it. [Great applause.] We wish to settle the territories with free white men, and we are willing that this negro race should go anywhere that it can to better its condition, wishing them God speed, wherever they go. We believe it is better for us that they should not be among us. I believe it will be better for them to go elsewhere.” (https://t.me/WhiteAmerica14/53)

The last thing I’ll say is that Pax is correct in saying that the notion men like Stephens and Grant were so enthusiastic about did win out in the end, more than 100 years after the civil war. Nevertheless, it was not the idea Unionists campaigned or fought and died for, or were particularly excited about.