Girolamo Zanchi on the question of whether God is the author/cause of sin, a claim commonly yet falsely attributed to the Reformed and Thomistic traditions regarding predestination:
“God, as the primary and efficient cause of all things, is not only the Author of those actions done by His elect as actions, but also as they are good actions, whereas, on the other hand, though He may be said to be the Author of all the actions done by the wicked, yet He is not the Author of them in a moral and compound sense as they are sinful; but physically, simply and sensu diviso [1] as they are mere actions, abstractedly from all consideration of the goodness or badness of them.
Although there is no action whatever which is not in some sense either good or bad, yet we can easily conceive of an action, purely as such, without adverting to the quality of it, so that the distinction between an action itself and its denomination of good or evil is very obvious and natural.
In and by the elect, therefore, God not only produces works and actions through His almighty power, but likewise, through the salutary influences of His Spirit, first makes their persons good, and then their actions so too; but, in and by the reprobate, He produces actions by His power alone, which actions, as neither issuing from faith nor being wrought with a view to the Divine glory, nor done in the manner prescribed by the Divine Word, are, on these accounts, properly denominated evil. Hence we see that God does not, immediately and per se, infuse iniquity into the wicked;...”
“Every work performed, whether good or evil, is done in strength and by the power derived immediately from God Himself, “in whom all men live, move, and have their being” (Acts 17:28). As, at first, without Him was not anything made which was made, so, now, without Him is not anything done which is done. We have no power or faculty, whether corporal or intellectual, but what we received from God, subsists by Him, and is exercised in subserviency to His will and appointment. It is He who created, preserves, actuates and directs all things. But it by no means follows, from these premises, that God is therefore the cause of sin, for sin is nothing but άνομία, illegality, want of conformity to the Divine law (1 John 3:4), a mere privation of rectitude; consequently, being itself a thing purely negative, it can have no positive or efficient cause, but only a negative and deficient one, as several learned men have observed....
Every action, as such, is undoubtedly good, it being an actual exertion of those operative powers given us by God for that very end; God therefore may be the Author of all actions (as He undoubtedly is), and yet not be the Author of evil. An action is constituted evil three ways—by proceeding from a wrong principle, by being directed to a wrong end, and by being done in a wrong manner. Now, though God, as we have said, is the efficient cause of our actions as actions, yet, if these actions commence sinful, that sinfulness arises from ourselves. Suppose a boy, who knows not how to write, has his hand guided by his master and nevertheless makes false letters, quite unlike the copy set him, though his preceptor, who guides his hand, is the cause of his writing at all, yet his own ignorance and unskillfulness are the cause of his writing so badly. Just so, God is the supreme Author of our action, abstractedly taken, but our own vitiosity is the cause of our acting amiss.”
“God, as the primary and efficient cause of all things, is not only the Author of those actions done by His elect as actions, but also as they are good actions, whereas, on the other hand, though He may be said to be the Author of all the actions done by the wicked, yet He is not the Author of them in a moral and compound sense as they are sinful; but physically, simply and sensu diviso [1] as they are mere actions, abstractedly from all consideration of the goodness or badness of them.
Although there is no action whatever which is not in some sense either good or bad, yet we can easily conceive of an action, purely as such, without adverting to the quality of it, so that the distinction between an action itself and its denomination of good or evil is very obvious and natural.
In and by the elect, therefore, God not only produces works and actions through His almighty power, but likewise, through the salutary influences of His Spirit, first makes their persons good, and then their actions so too; but, in and by the reprobate, He produces actions by His power alone, which actions, as neither issuing from faith nor being wrought with a view to the Divine glory, nor done in the manner prescribed by the Divine Word, are, on these accounts, properly denominated evil. Hence we see that God does not, immediately and per se, infuse iniquity into the wicked;...”
“Every work performed, whether good or evil, is done in strength and by the power derived immediately from God Himself, “in whom all men live, move, and have their being” (Acts 17:28). As, at first, without Him was not anything made which was made, so, now, without Him is not anything done which is done. We have no power or faculty, whether corporal or intellectual, but what we received from God, subsists by Him, and is exercised in subserviency to His will and appointment. It is He who created, preserves, actuates and directs all things. But it by no means follows, from these premises, that God is therefore the cause of sin, for sin is nothing but άνομία, illegality, want of conformity to the Divine law (1 John 3:4), a mere privation of rectitude; consequently, being itself a thing purely negative, it can have no positive or efficient cause, but only a negative and deficient one, as several learned men have observed....
Every action, as such, is undoubtedly good, it being an actual exertion of those operative powers given us by God for that very end; God therefore may be the Author of all actions (as He undoubtedly is), and yet not be the Author of evil. An action is constituted evil three ways—by proceeding from a wrong principle, by being directed to a wrong end, and by being done in a wrong manner. Now, though God, as we have said, is the efficient cause of our actions as actions, yet, if these actions commence sinful, that sinfulness arises from ourselves. Suppose a boy, who knows not how to write, has his hand guided by his master and nevertheless makes false letters, quite unlike the copy set him, though his preceptor, who guides his hand, is the cause of his writing at all, yet his own ignorance and unskillfulness are the cause of his writing so badly. Just so, God is the supreme Author of our action, abstractedly taken, but our own vitiosity is the cause of our acting amiss.”
Forwarded from Soldiers of the Precious Wounds of Jesus
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Teaching Leo how to drive on gas and practice transitions
Forwarded from Soldiers of the Precious Wounds of Jesus
How can we say that Adolf was a humble man when he commanded complete obedience? When he repeatedly affirmed his right to rule and proclaimed that he himself was the movement how can we say that he had humility?
Because what he was saying was nothing less than the truth. Any act of greatness is the vision and will of a great man, no matter how many people support it, it is the vision of the genius whom God has elected for some great purpose.
Why did he read voraciously? Because he was participating in the aristocracy of geniuses and great minds of the ages. It was not leisure but counsel and great minds cannot be counseled by anything but other great minds. This is why it’s so important to read and to listen to those who came before, those men whose valor and intellect has been proven correct by the passage of time.
I do not put any stake into any man, no matter how articulate or bold, who does not pay his respect to the aristocracy of the past to the great men of the ages and what they have to teach.
Because what he was saying was nothing less than the truth. Any act of greatness is the vision and will of a great man, no matter how many people support it, it is the vision of the genius whom God has elected for some great purpose.
Why did he read voraciously? Because he was participating in the aristocracy of geniuses and great minds of the ages. It was not leisure but counsel and great minds cannot be counseled by anything but other great minds. This is why it’s so important to read and to listen to those who came before, those men whose valor and intellect has been proven correct by the passage of time.
I do not put any stake into any man, no matter how articulate or bold, who does not pay his respect to the aristocracy of the past to the great men of the ages and what they have to teach.
Pray for Taylor Marshall, one of the few men who will always stand up for the Church and defend it.
https://twitter.com/taylorrmarshall/status/1492374176015040515?s=21
https://twitter.com/taylorrmarshall/status/1492374176015040515?s=21
Twitter
Dr Taylor Marshall™️
@TridentineBrew @TaylorRMarshall I’d rather not be talking about heresy, and just go back to teaching Saint Thomas Aquinas. But I don’t want my children and grandchildren to inherit confusion and idolatry. twitter.com/J3dwar/status/…
Ummmm based? Taken from a letter decrying the ‘horrible crimes’ of priests (😂), dated Belgrade, February 8, 1942, quoted on pages 57 and 58 of Ally Betrayed, by David Martin, (Prentice Hall, New York, 1946, foreword by Rebecca West) where it reads in part:
“In all these unprecedented crimes, worse than pagan, our Catholic Church has also participated in two ways. First, a large number of priests, clerics, friars and organized Catholic youth actively participated in all these crimes; but more terrible, even, Catholic priests became camp commanders and, as such, ordered or tolerated the horrible tortures, murders and massacres of a baptized people. One Catholic priest slit the throat of an Orthodox Serbian priest. None of this could have been done without the permission of their Bishops, and, since it was done, they should have been brought to the ecclesiastical court and unfrocked. Since this did not happen, then obviously the Bishops gave their consent, by acquiescence at least.
Friars and nuns carried Ustashi knives in one hand and a cross and a prayer-book in the other. The province of Srem is covered with the leaflets of Bishop Aksamovic, which were printed in his own print shop at Djakovo. He calls upon the Serbs, through these leaflets, to save their lives and property, recommending the Catholic faith to them.. .. In our country not one Bishop has decried the fate of the innocent Christian Serbs who have suffered more than the Jews in Germany…. “I write you this … to save my soul and I leave it to you to find a way to save your soul.”
“In all these unprecedented crimes, worse than pagan, our Catholic Church has also participated in two ways. First, a large number of priests, clerics, friars and organized Catholic youth actively participated in all these crimes; but more terrible, even, Catholic priests became camp commanders and, as such, ordered or tolerated the horrible tortures, murders and massacres of a baptized people. One Catholic priest slit the throat of an Orthodox Serbian priest. None of this could have been done without the permission of their Bishops, and, since it was done, they should have been brought to the ecclesiastical court and unfrocked. Since this did not happen, then obviously the Bishops gave their consent, by acquiescence at least.
Friars and nuns carried Ustashi knives in one hand and a cross and a prayer-book in the other. The province of Srem is covered with the leaflets of Bishop Aksamovic, which were printed in his own print shop at Djakovo. He calls upon the Serbs, through these leaflets, to save their lives and property, recommending the Catholic faith to them.. .. In our country not one Bishop has decried the fate of the innocent Christian Serbs who have suffered more than the Jews in Germany…. “I write you this … to save my soul and I leave it to you to find a way to save your soul.”
Mass conversions and pillages of ortho dogs led by monks and priests? Based.
Forwarded from 𝘊𝘢𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘤 𝘈𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘤
“In his political farsightedness he did not seek contacts with politicians, but with great men, with the leader of Italy and with the leader of the German people … God who dissects the destiny of nations and controls the hearts of Kings has given us Dr. Ante Pavelic and moved the leader of a friendly and allied people, Adolf Hitler, to use his victorious troops to disperse our oppressors and enable us to create the Independent State of Croatia. Glory be to God, our gratitude to Adolf Hitler and infinite love and loyalty to chief Dr. Ante Pavelic!”
- Dr. Felix Niedzielski, appointed president of the Crusader Organization for Banja Luka by Abp. Stepinac in 1937 (Nedelja, April 27, 1941).
- Dr. Felix Niedzielski, appointed president of the Crusader Organization for Banja Luka by Abp. Stepinac in 1937 (Nedelja, April 27, 1941).
Forwarded from 𝘊𝘢𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘤 𝘈𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘤
“Until now, God spoke through papal encyclicals, numerous sermons, cathechisms, the Christian press, through missions, through the heroic examples of the saints, and so on … And? They closed their ears. They were deaf. Now God has decided to use other methods. He will prepare missions. European missions- ! World missions! They will be upheld not by priests but by army commanders led by Hitler. The sermons will be well heard with the help of cannons, machine guns, tanks and bombers. The language of these sermons will be international. No one will be able to complain that he did not understand it, because all people know very well what death is, and what wounds, disease, hunger, fear, slavery and poverty are.”
- Fr. Petar Pajic in the diocesan newspaper (The Catholic Weekly, No. 35, of August 31, 1941.) of the Archbishop of Sarajevo, Ivan Saric.
- Fr. Petar Pajic in the diocesan newspaper (The Catholic Weekly, No. 35, of August 31, 1941.) of the Archbishop of Sarajevo, Ivan Saric.
Forwarded from 𝘊𝘢𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘤 𝘈𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘤
“The Serbs have only three ways out: to accept the Catholic faith, to move out or to be cleansed with the metal broom.”
- Fr. Ante Djuric
- Fr. Ante Djuric
𝘊𝘢𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘤 𝘈𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘤
“The Serbs have only three ways out: to accept the Catholic faith, to move out or to be cleansed with the metal broom.” - Fr. Ante Djuric
“Before our escape, all (Serbian) government employees and teachers received an order from priest Djuric to submit their petitions for conversions to Catholicism or to leave their residence and posts. After they applied for conversion they were told confidentially to coerce all other Serbs to accept Catholicism or else to move wherever they could if they wanted to escape execution.
In this manner, all heads of families were compelled to come to their local teacher, with a 10 dinar tax stamp, to make out a petition for conversion to Catholicism for themselves and their families….
The Serbs in the District of Dvor na Uni shook with fear at the mention of the name of Priest Djuric, who imprisoned the Serbs in his stable and barn where he tortured them with hunger and whipping until they accepted Catholicism.”
- Serbian Orthodox priests, Mladen Ostojic of Zirovac, and Ilija Vranjesevic of Ljubina on Fr. Djuric's activities
In this manner, all heads of families were compelled to come to their local teacher, with a 10 dinar tax stamp, to make out a petition for conversion to Catholicism for themselves and their families….
The Serbs in the District of Dvor na Uni shook with fear at the mention of the name of Priest Djuric, who imprisoned the Serbs in his stable and barn where he tortured them with hunger and whipping until they accepted Catholicism.”
- Serbian Orthodox priests, Mladen Ostojic of Zirovac, and Ilija Vranjesevic of Ljubina on Fr. Djuric's activities
The Case of Archbishop Stepinac
Published by the Embassy of the Federal Peoples Republic of Yugoslavia Washington, 1947
http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/62/123.html
Published by the Embassy of the Federal Peoples Republic of Yugoslavia Washington, 1947
http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/62/123.html
Interesting how primary sources are used here, and not post-war third party ones, which anti-NS Catholics love to use to try and prove Stepinač wasn’t a collaborator. They quite literally have nothing more than university professors.
Whenever I see them use evidence from the Ustashi period, they don’t actually give a citation, just a date and Stepinac’s name next to it.
Whenever I see them use evidence from the Ustashi period, they don’t actually give a citation, just a date and Stepinac’s name next to it.
Forwarded from banned: go to @paganbad6
The following are excerpts from Lokasenna, a poem within the Poetic Edda. This is from Jackson Crawford's translation.
It's a poem of Loki showing up to Odin's hall in Asgard, getting drunk, and insulting everyone by "airing out their dirty laundry".
It is clear Loki is trying to trigger the other gods with his taunts but curiously, nobody accuses him of lying and one person actually acts defensive about what they're accused of saying "it's not that bad at least I didn't do x".
The Norse-gods are quite comfortable with their non-virtuous non-traditional lifestyles where they fornicate and even racemix with every man, woman and creature in Asgard; including their own siblings.
It's a poem of Loki showing up to Odin's hall in Asgard, getting drunk, and insulting everyone by "airing out their dirty laundry".
It is clear Loki is trying to trigger the other gods with his taunts but curiously, nobody accuses him of lying and one person actually acts defensive about what they're accused of saying "it's not that bad at least I didn't do x".
The Norse-gods are quite comfortable with their non-virtuous non-traditional lifestyles where they fornicate and even racemix with every man, woman and creature in Asgard; including their own siblings.