God’s Providence is made clear when it comes to the different races; what right has a man to put together what God has torn apart? Or, why would a man of superior ancestry be so morally corrupt as to forsake his noble duties to his Fatherland, Nation and Race, for the sake of his inferior carnal impulses?
If not to speak of the supernatural, then would natural considerations, pure pragmatism, not be enough to dissuade the intellect from such a poor, subverted and selfish enterprise?

« Honour thy Father and thy Mother »

Just as God’s commandment is not limited to your individual father and mother, but means also superiors, teachers, patrons, etc; so too does it not apply only to individuals, but means to honour the Fatherland, your ancestors, and to bring not shame on them.

And who would be so corrupt as to be without the natural God-given moral impulse of affection first for those who are kin and similar to you?

"Our Lord designed and built His Church in such a way that the Pope alone can rescue His Church.

Many poor Catholics today wish that traditionalists would not argue so much with one another.

They wish that all Catholic traditional priests would get together and agree instead of fighting one another and so on.

But there’s only one person who is designed by Our Lord to pull together Catholic priests and lead them and that’s the Holy Father.

If he doesn’t do it, there’s no one else who can do it - not even one of the greatest Archbishops in the history of the Church can do it.

Only the Pope has authority over the complete Church, the complete Catholic Church.

We pray ardently for the restoration of the faith, and if not this Pope, then his successor."

- Bishop Williamson, July 1988

Your wickedness makes you as it were heavy as lead, and to tend downwards with great weight and pressure towards hell; and if God should let you go, you would immediately sink and swiftly descend and plunge into the bottomless gulf, and your healthy constitution, and your own care and prudence, and best contrivance, and all your righteousness, would have no more influence to uphold you and keep you out of hell, than a spider’s web would have to stop a falling rock. Were it not for the sovereign pleasure of God, the earth would not bear you one moment; for you are a burden to it; the creation groans with you; the creature is made subject to the bondage of your corruption, not willingly; the sun does not willingly shine upon you to give you light to serve sin and Satan; the earth does not willingly yield her increase to satisfy your lusts; nor is it willingly a stage for your wickedness to be acted upon; the air does not willingly serve you for breath to maintain the flame of life in your vitals, while you spend your life in the service of God’s enemies.”

Jonathan Edwards

"I love the energies bro im soooooo patristic, unlike the Latins!"

Not that I’m going anywhere, but if my online presence is remembered for anything I’d like it to be remembered for popularizing the argument for the Incarnation I’ve articulated over the years, as I think this is a necessary piece of the puzzle when it comes to effectively evangelizing non-believers

Historical arguments for the resurrection are crucial, of course, but if it all comes down to a set of contentious historical probabilities, it may come across as insufficiently equipped to convince someone to overturn their entire view of the world

It’s important to supplement the historical arguments as indispensable as they are with philosophical ones in order to build a logical bridge between the classical arguments for God’s existence and the central doctrine of the Christian Faith.

If it can be successfully argued that the God of classical theism would plausibly unite Himself to a human nature given who He is in relation to the Cosmos, then one can with much more ease come to the realization that this has been fulfilled in history as reliably witnessed by the the Apostles and Evangelists. These men went to their deaths not for any philosophical abstraction, but for their own claim to have witnessed the historical, risen Christ in the flesh, Whose claim to Divinity just so happens to cohere perfectly with what can already be plausibly hoped for by way of reasoned metaphysical argument

You can watch my presentation of this argument here:

https://youtu.be/Zp7gAm6TxFw

https://youtu.be/eLj6W-jMF_k

We need the clean cut boys from the suburbs
We need the hooligans who learned on the streets first hand why we need white unity.
We need the blue collars and white collars pulling in the same direction. We need to respect a diversity of tactics. We need our men and our women, working in different ways according to their roles but working towards the same 14 words.

As a Catholic I believe we need Christ and to pray for our people but we need to remember the motto “Ora et Labora” pray and work. Show the glory of God to your racial brothers and sisters by fighting for them and your own progeny. You have nothing to lose and everything to gain. We did not set the terms the enemy did, we will win or we will be wiped out, victory or death. I say Hail Victory

 Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends
John 15:13

Pope Leo XIII.

"The equal tolerance of all religions... is the same as atheism."

Where are you going to get the Sacraments?

“It is also the duty of the bishops to prevent writings infected with Modernism or favorable to it from being read when they have been published, and to hinder their publication when they have not.”

- St. Pope Pius X, Pascendi Dominici Gregis

Pope Pius XII was truly in accord with St. Pope Pius X, for he not only restricted the writings of Modernists, but also issued the encyclical “Humani Generis” in response to their new “theology.” As a further example, Yves Congar, a propagator of this new “theology” and suspect of heresy, found his writings restricted for a decade under Pope Pius XII and his book “True and False Reform in the Church” (recently cited by Jorge Bergoglio) forbidden by the Vatican. Furthermore, Congar was entirely prevented from teaching and publishing after 1954.

However, a mere decade after the publication of “Humani Generis,” Angelo Roncalli called this man to serve on the preparatory theological commission of the Second Vatican Council and to participate in the Council itself as a theological expert where he exerted great influence.

Bishop Barron even acknowledges Congar’s influence by saying, “By most accounts, he (Yves Congar) proved the most influential theologian at the epic gathering (Vatican II), contributing mightily to the documents on the Church, on ecumenism, on revelation, and on the Church’s relation to the modern world.”

How could it be one suspected of heresy, restricted from publication, and barred from teaching was able to exert immense influence within a Council of the Church if a dramatic shift had not taken place? “Humani Generis” condemns the new “theology” and the errors which serve as its bases, and this is in accord with encyclicals from St. Pope Pius X, like Pascendi and “Notre Charge Apostolique,” which outline the principle errors of Modernism and their influence in the social sphere while also providing means to guard the Church from such errors. Angelo Roncalli not only completely disregarded the warnings and condemnations of his immediate predecessors, but also did the exact opposite of their instruction. What naturally followed was the ushering in of an age of chaos, confusion, and the ascension of Modernism, the effects of which we, who are truly faithful to the Church, must continue to combat today.

Jewish Paganism seems to be growing thanks to a new generation of young rabbis.

https://forward.com/articles/1743/jewish-paganism-oxymoron-or-innovation/