Forwarded from Beauty Endures
“I am a dreamer. I know so little of real life that I just can't help re-living such moments as these in my dreams, for such moments are something I have very rarely experienced. I am going to dream about you the whole night, the whole week, the whole year….
May your sky always be clear, may your dear smile always be bright and happy, and may you be for ever blessed for that moment of bliss and happiness which you gave to another lonely and grateful heart. Isn't such a moment sufficient for the whole of one's life?” - White Nights, Fyodor Dostevsky
May your sky always be clear, may your dear smile always be bright and happy, and may you be for ever blessed for that moment of bliss and happiness which you gave to another lonely and grateful heart. Isn't such a moment sufficient for the whole of one's life?” - White Nights, Fyodor Dostevsky
Muh Nazism was pagan bro!!!
>The Holy Reich: Nazi Conceptions of Christianity, 1919-1945, By Richard Steigmann-Gall, 2003, pp 151-152.
The DG's (Deutsche Glaubensbewegung's aka German Faith Movement's) insistence that it was the religious expression of Nazism was not taken kindly in the NSDAP. [...]
*Finally, in August 1935, Heydrich forbade all rallies and other public meetings of the DG across the Reich.*
>The Holy Reich: Nazi Conceptions of Christianity, 1919-1945, By Richard Steigmann-Gall, 2003, pp 151-152.
The DG's (Deutsche Glaubensbewegung's aka German Faith Movement's) insistence that it was the religious expression of Nazism was not taken kindly in the NSDAP. [...]
*Finally, in August 1935, Heydrich forbade all rallies and other public meetings of the DG across the Reich.*
Part of the umbrella organization was the Verein Deutschvolk (German Volk Society), founded 1930. Its purpose was to disseminate Mathilde Ludendorff’s science-based religious views called Gotterkenntnis (God-knowledge or - cognition). These two organizations which shared many ideas with National Socialism were, for that very reason, *prohibited in 1933* (Haack, 1981:139).
An article in a 1995 issue of the Australian Odinist magazine Renewal:
From the beginning of the Third Reich, Odinists (pagans) were generally suppressed. In 1933, Rudolf von Sebottendorff was *arrested and exiled.* The works of Odinist writers such as Lanz von Liebenfels, Ernst Issberner-Haldane and Reinhold Ebertin *were banned. Former membership of an Odinist congregation disqualified anyone from holding rank or office within the NSDAP.* In 1936 Friedrich Marby, a runemaster and follower of [Wotan worshipper Guido] von List, *was arrested and sent to a camp at Flossenberg;* he was released from Dachau in 1945. He was not alone. *But the full power of the state was not focused on religious minorities until the 9th of June 1941 when the head of the security police, [Reinhardt] Heydrich, banned a large number of spiritual practices.* Among the victims were followers of Rudolf Steiner, followers of von List, and traditional Odinists. *Their organizations were dissolved, their property confiscated, and many of their leaders arrested.”* http://truthforgermans.com/?cat=71
From the beginning of the Third Reich, Odinists (pagans) were generally suppressed. In 1933, Rudolf von Sebottendorff was *arrested and exiled.* The works of Odinist writers such as Lanz von Liebenfels, Ernst Issberner-Haldane and Reinhold Ebertin *were banned. Former membership of an Odinist congregation disqualified anyone from holding rank or office within the NSDAP.* In 1936 Friedrich Marby, a runemaster and follower of [Wotan worshipper Guido] von List, *was arrested and sent to a camp at Flossenberg;* he was released from Dachau in 1945. He was not alone. *But the full power of the state was not focused on religious minorities until the 9th of June 1941 when the head of the security police, [Reinhardt] Heydrich, banned a large number of spiritual practices.* Among the victims were followers of Rudolf Steiner, followers of von List, and traditional Odinists. *Their organizations were dissolved, their property confiscated, and many of their leaders arrested.”* http://truthforgermans.com/?cat=71
“It furthermore declares, that this power has ever been in the Church, that, in the dispensation of the sacraments, their substance being untouched, it may ordain, or change, what things soever it may judge most expedient, for the profit of those who receive, or for the veneration of the said sacraments, according to the difference of circumstances, times, and places.”
- Sess. 21, c. 2, Council of Trent.
Here, then, we have the Council declaring that the Church has the authority to determine and make changes to the administration of the sacraments in everything except their substance, that is, everything except the essentials of the sacraments: their matter and form.
- Sess. 21, c. 2, Council of Trent.
Here, then, we have the Council declaring that the Church has the authority to determine and make changes to the administration of the sacraments in everything except their substance, that is, everything except the essentials of the sacraments: their matter and form.
Absolutely. If you deny this then you’re denying dogma and are a heretic:
“If anyone says that the one, true God, our Creator and Lord, cannot be known with certainty from the things that have been made, by the natural light of human reason: let him be anathema.” - VI, ch. 2, c. 1.
If someone has never heard of Christ, it’s not because a missionary hasn’t been sent or they don’t have the Bible or Catechsim, but because he has rejected the grace God has graciously given him (if it’s even offered) so that he may be able to come to know Him. God knows and gives the means to every one of his elect to attain salvation. He will certainly give man the grace to come to know of Christ if he is one of the elect, and that knowledge can also be bolstered through the things that have been made, as Vatican I dogmatically teaches. However, this cannot be done apart from grace, as Trent teaches. You cannot have any knowledge of God without the gift of faith and God’s grace, thus making it a prerequisite for knowing God by the light of natural human reason, which Christ can use as a tool for the elect to better understand Him and His Creation. Paul is also clear that all know of God and of the moral law (Rom. 1:19-20).
https://twitter.com/_arrus/status/1480379903014965248?s=21
“If anyone says that the one, true God, our Creator and Lord, cannot be known with certainty from the things that have been made, by the natural light of human reason: let him be anathema.” - VI, ch. 2, c. 1.
If someone has never heard of Christ, it’s not because a missionary hasn’t been sent or they don’t have the Bible or Catechsim, but because he has rejected the grace God has graciously given him (if it’s even offered) so that he may be able to come to know Him. God knows and gives the means to every one of his elect to attain salvation. He will certainly give man the grace to come to know of Christ if he is one of the elect, and that knowledge can also be bolstered through the things that have been made, as Vatican I dogmatically teaches. However, this cannot be done apart from grace, as Trent teaches. You cannot have any knowledge of God without the gift of faith and God’s grace, thus making it a prerequisite for knowing God by the light of natural human reason, which Christ can use as a tool for the elect to better understand Him and His Creation. Paul is also clear that all know of God and of the moral law (Rom. 1:19-20).
https://twitter.com/_arrus/status/1480379903014965248?s=21
Twitter
arrus
Would someone living on a remote island in the middle of no where and never heard of Christianity, go to hell? — Stark difference between one who never heard of Christ and one who refused him.
↟ Modernists Go To Hell ↟
Absolutely. If you deny this then you’re denying dogma and are a heretic: “If anyone says that the one, true God, our Creator and Lord, cannot be known with certainty from the things that have been made, by the natural light of human reason: let him be anathema.”…
The amount of Catholics that deny this specific canon is scary.
A lot of Catholics also have a very funky, open theist esque view of predestination and free will.
↟ Modernists Go To Hell ↟
Absolutely. If you deny this then you’re denying dogma and are a heretic: “If anyone says that the one, true God, our Creator and Lord, cannot be known with certainty from the things that have been made, by the natural light of human reason: let him be anathema.”…
It must be specified though that one who does not have any knowledge of God as a consequence of rejecting/not receiving grace—therefore not being a part of the elect—or does not know that he is rejecting the true religion, has not committed a mortal but a venial sin, and is thus not subject to the flames of hell, but rather the flames of purgatory (still a damnable state as they are temporarily excluded from the beatific vision). Which, it is important to note, are no better than the flames of hell. This then leads to us having to affirm the distinction between mortal and venial sin, a doctrine that we find in St. John’s epistle:
“He that knoweth his brother to sin a sin which is not to death, let him ask, and life shall be given to him, who sinneth not to death. There is a sin unto death: for that I say not that any man ask. All iniquity is sin. And there is a sin unto death.” - 1 John 5:16-17
Affirming this is the only way to escape the Protestant error of saying that those who aren’t of the elect of God, by not receiving the grace needed in order to truly know Him - which is offered to His elect - are condemned to hell.
“He that knoweth his brother to sin a sin which is not to death, let him ask, and life shall be given to him, who sinneth not to death. There is a sin unto death: for that I say not that any man ask. All iniquity is sin. And there is a sin unto death.” - 1 John 5:16-17
Affirming this is the only way to escape the Protestant error of saying that those who aren’t of the elect of God, by not receiving the grace needed in order to truly know Him - which is offered to His elect - are condemned to hell.
Forwarded from Based Book Excerpts
A Kingdom For Christ: Saint Fernando lll by James Fitzhenry
A brief narrative on the division of Spain that enabled the Muslim conquest and then beginning of the reconquest
Because the author dealt with such a long span of time in a single chapter he left out the collaboration of Jews as an essential component in the conquest of Spain, without which such a conquest would have never been possible in such short time and so completely.
A brief narrative on the division of Spain that enabled the Muslim conquest and then beginning of the reconquest
Because the author dealt with such a long span of time in a single chapter he left out the collaboration of Jews as an essential component in the conquest of Spain, without which such a conquest would have never been possible in such short time and so completely.
Forwarded from Based Book Excerpts
The Plot Against the Church by Maurice Pinay published 1962
The Power Concealed Behind Freemasonry
. Freemasonry as enemy of the church
. Jews as founders of freemasonry
. Jews as the leaders of freemasonry
. The doctrines, signs, and degrees of freemasonry come from Jewry
. The freemasonic respect for Jews
The Power Concealed Behind Freemasonry
. Freemasonry as enemy of the church
. Jews as founders of freemasonry
. Jews as the leaders of freemasonry
. The doctrines, signs, and degrees of freemasonry come from Jewry
. The freemasonic respect for Jews
Forwarded from Based Book Excerpts
Between the Lines of Drift: Memoirs of a Militant by Eric Rudolph
Eric talks about his days in the army
and afterward when he became blackpilled and hypocritical Christians who say abortion is murder but care more about the killing of one abortion doctor than a thousand babies
Eric talks about his days in the army
and afterward when he became blackpilled and hypocritical Christians who say abortion is murder but care more about the killing of one abortion doctor than a thousand babies