Since the crackdown on the traditional offering of the Roman Rite from Cardinal Cupich, some interesting videos have been surfacing from the Archdiocese of Chicago.
Nickelodeon Fuentes is from Chicago. Last night on his show he denounced the SSPX and the traditional movement within the Church in general as “akin to Protestantism” for opposing the modernists in Rome and abroad. This should go without saying, but stay as far away from him and his “movement” as possible.
This is the result of being complicit in the diabolical takeover of the Church. This is not Catholicism, but a caricature of the true faith.
Nickelodeon Fuentes is from Chicago. Last night on his show he denounced the SSPX and the traditional movement within the Church in general as “akin to Protestantism” for opposing the modernists in Rome and abroad. This should go without saying, but stay as far away from him and his “movement” as possible.
This is the result of being complicit in the diabolical takeover of the Church. This is not Catholicism, but a caricature of the true faith.
Forwarded from Soldiers of the Precious Wounds of Jesus
Currently working on a design for a flag that represents my unique commitment to the prowhite cause from a Catholic angle, I intend to use the swastika, why?
“Saint Peter, the Martyr, writing on the earth with his rapidly ebbing lifeblood the great Catholic word of faith, "Credo," is but a link in the perfect chain of devoted Christians who have sacrificed their lives willingly for the God given religion they have received.
In the earliest days of persecution when only the gloomy Catacombs could be counted on for asylum, the hunted Christians made use of secret symbols to safeguard the disclosure of themselves to friends and brothers in Christ. The ichthus I-X-0-Y-2, fish, is a well-known illustration of this ; and so also perhaps the swastika, the most ancient prophetical symbol of our Blessed Lord's coming, was also found of value in concealing the sign of the cross from those ready to betray or destroy any Christian whose profession became known.”
“Saint Peter, the Martyr, writing on the earth with his rapidly ebbing lifeblood the great Catholic word of faith, "Credo," is but a link in the perfect chain of devoted Christians who have sacrificed their lives willingly for the God given religion they have received.
In the earliest days of persecution when only the gloomy Catacombs could be counted on for asylum, the hunted Christians made use of secret symbols to safeguard the disclosure of themselves to friends and brothers in Christ. The ichthus I-X-0-Y-2, fish, is a well-known illustration of this ; and so also perhaps the swastika, the most ancient prophetical symbol of our Blessed Lord's coming, was also found of value in concealing the sign of the cross from those ready to betray or destroy any Christian whose profession became known.”
Forwarded from SERVIAM- I Will Serve
Quote from Karl Marx, praising Luther.
Without Luther, communism would have never stood a fighting chance!
Without Luther, communism would have never stood a fighting chance!
Forwarded from banned: go to @paganbad6
It is strange that anyone would believe Heinrich Himmler was anything but a devoted Roman Catholic.
"but he was just pretending to be Christian to gather public support"
He was pretending in his own private diary that only he would read? Forget the obviously fake Table Talks for a moment and think about this diary entry. Written before his political career and private to himself.
There was no one for him to convince and no reason to. But he still wrote to himself about being Christian? It's almost as if he was infact Christian.. crazy concept..
Unfortunately there is still many National Socialists today who believe in Allied propaganda. They have at least realised the Holocaust was fake with forged documents as proof; but they still buy into other Allied propaganda that NSDAP (despite n.24/ NSDAP plan being Christian) was anti-Christian and so was it's leadership. Yet the only proof of such is poorly translated "hearsay," Table Talks published by the Allies after the fall of WW2..
Victors write the history
"but he was just pretending to be Christian to gather public support"
He was pretending in his own private diary that only he would read? Forget the obviously fake Table Talks for a moment and think about this diary entry. Written before his political career and private to himself.
There was no one for him to convince and no reason to. But he still wrote to himself about being Christian? It's almost as if he was infact Christian.. crazy concept..
Unfortunately there is still many National Socialists today who believe in Allied propaganda. They have at least realised the Holocaust was fake with forged documents as proof; but they still buy into other Allied propaganda that NSDAP (despite n.24/ NSDAP plan being Christian) was anti-Christian and so was it's leadership. Yet the only proof of such is poorly translated "hearsay," Table Talks published by the Allies after the fall of WW2..
Victors write the history
Forwarded from Beauty Endures
“I am a dreamer. I know so little of real life that I just can't help re-living such moments as these in my dreams, for such moments are something I have very rarely experienced. I am going to dream about you the whole night, the whole week, the whole year….
May your sky always be clear, may your dear smile always be bright and happy, and may you be for ever blessed for that moment of bliss and happiness which you gave to another lonely and grateful heart. Isn't such a moment sufficient for the whole of one's life?” - White Nights, Fyodor Dostevsky
May your sky always be clear, may your dear smile always be bright and happy, and may you be for ever blessed for that moment of bliss and happiness which you gave to another lonely and grateful heart. Isn't such a moment sufficient for the whole of one's life?” - White Nights, Fyodor Dostevsky
Muh Nazism was pagan bro!!!
>The Holy Reich: Nazi Conceptions of Christianity, 1919-1945, By Richard Steigmann-Gall, 2003, pp 151-152.
The DG's (Deutsche Glaubensbewegung's aka German Faith Movement's) insistence that it was the religious expression of Nazism was not taken kindly in the NSDAP. [...]
*Finally, in August 1935, Heydrich forbade all rallies and other public meetings of the DG across the Reich.*
>The Holy Reich: Nazi Conceptions of Christianity, 1919-1945, By Richard Steigmann-Gall, 2003, pp 151-152.
The DG's (Deutsche Glaubensbewegung's aka German Faith Movement's) insistence that it was the religious expression of Nazism was not taken kindly in the NSDAP. [...]
*Finally, in August 1935, Heydrich forbade all rallies and other public meetings of the DG across the Reich.*
Part of the umbrella organization was the Verein Deutschvolk (German Volk Society), founded 1930. Its purpose was to disseminate Mathilde Ludendorff’s science-based religious views called Gotterkenntnis (God-knowledge or - cognition). These two organizations which shared many ideas with National Socialism were, for that very reason, *prohibited in 1933* (Haack, 1981:139).
An article in a 1995 issue of the Australian Odinist magazine Renewal:
From the beginning of the Third Reich, Odinists (pagans) were generally suppressed. In 1933, Rudolf von Sebottendorff was *arrested and exiled.* The works of Odinist writers such as Lanz von Liebenfels, Ernst Issberner-Haldane and Reinhold Ebertin *were banned. Former membership of an Odinist congregation disqualified anyone from holding rank or office within the NSDAP.* In 1936 Friedrich Marby, a runemaster and follower of [Wotan worshipper Guido] von List, *was arrested and sent to a camp at Flossenberg;* he was released from Dachau in 1945. He was not alone. *But the full power of the state was not focused on religious minorities until the 9th of June 1941 when the head of the security police, [Reinhardt] Heydrich, banned a large number of spiritual practices.* Among the victims were followers of Rudolf Steiner, followers of von List, and traditional Odinists. *Their organizations were dissolved, their property confiscated, and many of their leaders arrested.”* http://truthforgermans.com/?cat=71
From the beginning of the Third Reich, Odinists (pagans) were generally suppressed. In 1933, Rudolf von Sebottendorff was *arrested and exiled.* The works of Odinist writers such as Lanz von Liebenfels, Ernst Issberner-Haldane and Reinhold Ebertin *were banned. Former membership of an Odinist congregation disqualified anyone from holding rank or office within the NSDAP.* In 1936 Friedrich Marby, a runemaster and follower of [Wotan worshipper Guido] von List, *was arrested and sent to a camp at Flossenberg;* he was released from Dachau in 1945. He was not alone. *But the full power of the state was not focused on religious minorities until the 9th of June 1941 when the head of the security police, [Reinhardt] Heydrich, banned a large number of spiritual practices.* Among the victims were followers of Rudolf Steiner, followers of von List, and traditional Odinists. *Their organizations were dissolved, their property confiscated, and many of their leaders arrested.”* http://truthforgermans.com/?cat=71
“It furthermore declares, that this power has ever been in the Church, that, in the dispensation of the sacraments, their substance being untouched, it may ordain, or change, what things soever it may judge most expedient, for the profit of those who receive, or for the veneration of the said sacraments, according to the difference of circumstances, times, and places.”
- Sess. 21, c. 2, Council of Trent.
Here, then, we have the Council declaring that the Church has the authority to determine and make changes to the administration of the sacraments in everything except their substance, that is, everything except the essentials of the sacraments: their matter and form.
- Sess. 21, c. 2, Council of Trent.
Here, then, we have the Council declaring that the Church has the authority to determine and make changes to the administration of the sacraments in everything except their substance, that is, everything except the essentials of the sacraments: their matter and form.
Absolutely. If you deny this then you’re denying dogma and are a heretic:
“If anyone says that the one, true God, our Creator and Lord, cannot be known with certainty from the things that have been made, by the natural light of human reason: let him be anathema.” - VI, ch. 2, c. 1.
If someone has never heard of Christ, it’s not because a missionary hasn’t been sent or they don’t have the Bible or Catechsim, but because he has rejected the grace God has graciously given him (if it’s even offered) so that he may be able to come to know Him. God knows and gives the means to every one of his elect to attain salvation. He will certainly give man the grace to come to know of Christ if he is one of the elect, and that knowledge can also be bolstered through the things that have been made, as Vatican I dogmatically teaches. However, this cannot be done apart from grace, as Trent teaches. You cannot have any knowledge of God without the gift of faith and God’s grace, thus making it a prerequisite for knowing God by the light of natural human reason, which Christ can use as a tool for the elect to better understand Him and His Creation. Paul is also clear that all know of God and of the moral law (Rom. 1:19-20).
https://twitter.com/_arrus/status/1480379903014965248?s=21
“If anyone says that the one, true God, our Creator and Lord, cannot be known with certainty from the things that have been made, by the natural light of human reason: let him be anathema.” - VI, ch. 2, c. 1.
If someone has never heard of Christ, it’s not because a missionary hasn’t been sent or they don’t have the Bible or Catechsim, but because he has rejected the grace God has graciously given him (if it’s even offered) so that he may be able to come to know Him. God knows and gives the means to every one of his elect to attain salvation. He will certainly give man the grace to come to know of Christ if he is one of the elect, and that knowledge can also be bolstered through the things that have been made, as Vatican I dogmatically teaches. However, this cannot be done apart from grace, as Trent teaches. You cannot have any knowledge of God without the gift of faith and God’s grace, thus making it a prerequisite for knowing God by the light of natural human reason, which Christ can use as a tool for the elect to better understand Him and His Creation. Paul is also clear that all know of God and of the moral law (Rom. 1:19-20).
https://twitter.com/_arrus/status/1480379903014965248?s=21
Twitter
arrus
Would someone living on a remote island in the middle of no where and never heard of Christianity, go to hell? — Stark difference between one who never heard of Christ and one who refused him.
↟ Modernists Go To Hell ↟
Absolutely. If you deny this then you’re denying dogma and are a heretic: “If anyone says that the one, true God, our Creator and Lord, cannot be known with certainty from the things that have been made, by the natural light of human reason: let him be anathema.”…
The amount of Catholics that deny this specific canon is scary.
A lot of Catholics also have a very funky, open theist esque view of predestination and free will.
↟ Modernists Go To Hell ↟
Absolutely. If you deny this then you’re denying dogma and are a heretic: “If anyone says that the one, true God, our Creator and Lord, cannot be known with certainty from the things that have been made, by the natural light of human reason: let him be anathema.”…
It must be specified though that one who does not have any knowledge of God as a consequence of rejecting/not receiving grace—therefore not being a part of the elect—or does not know that he is rejecting the true religion, has not committed a mortal but a venial sin, and is thus not subject to the flames of hell, but rather the flames of purgatory (still a damnable state as they are temporarily excluded from the beatific vision). Which, it is important to note, are no better than the flames of hell. This then leads to us having to affirm the distinction between mortal and venial sin, a doctrine that we find in St. John’s epistle:
“He that knoweth his brother to sin a sin which is not to death, let him ask, and life shall be given to him, who sinneth not to death. There is a sin unto death: for that I say not that any man ask. All iniquity is sin. And there is a sin unto death.” - 1 John 5:16-17
Affirming this is the only way to escape the Protestant error of saying that those who aren’t of the elect of God, by not receiving the grace needed in order to truly know Him - which is offered to His elect - are condemned to hell.
“He that knoweth his brother to sin a sin which is not to death, let him ask, and life shall be given to him, who sinneth not to death. There is a sin unto death: for that I say not that any man ask. All iniquity is sin. And there is a sin unto death.” - 1 John 5:16-17
Affirming this is the only way to escape the Protestant error of saying that those who aren’t of the elect of God, by not receiving the grace needed in order to truly know Him - which is offered to His elect - are condemned to hell.
Forwarded from Based Book Excerpts
A Kingdom For Christ: Saint Fernando lll by James Fitzhenry
A brief narrative on the division of Spain that enabled the Muslim conquest and then beginning of the reconquest
Because the author dealt with such a long span of time in a single chapter he left out the collaboration of Jews as an essential component in the conquest of Spain, without which such a conquest would have never been possible in such short time and so completely.
A brief narrative on the division of Spain that enabled the Muslim conquest and then beginning of the reconquest
Because the author dealt with such a long span of time in a single chapter he left out the collaboration of Jews as an essential component in the conquest of Spain, without which such a conquest would have never been possible in such short time and so completely.