Forwarded from -
"𝐑𝐚𝐜𝐞 𝐅𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭" 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐒𝐨𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐦
The assertion that a National Socialist should place race above religion and God has recently been advocated by Pagans and other non-Christians, while Christian National Socialists have argued that this is nonsense. So what is the truth?
We first consider a quote by Walter Gross from a radio speech on August 7, 1935. Gross was the head of the Office for Racial Policy at the time of the Reich and thus the highest person concerning racial questions.
"For now in recent times the reproaches are accumulating that the race doctrine of National Socialism may be correct and it may also be justifiable from the pedagogical and moral point of view, but in the name of faith, religion and piety it must be rejected, because, so it is rumored, we are about to put the idol blood in the place of God and thus a human theory or at best body and substance in the place of the eternal power of the spirit. [...]
...No accusation can be more dishonest or silly than the one we just spoke of. [...] No one thinks of making an idol out of the given fact of race and of slaying genuine piety with it."
"No accusation can be more dishonest or silly..." I think that alone says enough. But there are other things we need to look at.
In an article from the Schwarze Korps on January 7, 1937, we find the words: "One unshakeable fact stands out—namely, that it is of primary importance for the future of the Race that Religion, as a servant of the Race, should shape new spiritual formulas calculated to assist in realising the heroic "life-ideals" of our Race."
This only says that religion must serve the blood and actively support our life ideals. Nowhere is it said that the race is placed above the religion only because the religion serves the race.
Artur Dinter a best-selling Christian völkisch author and former Gauleiter (District leader) of Thuringia published in 1919 the book The sin against the blood which was later also quoted in other NS books.
He said as follows:
"Race, together with my religion, is the highest and most sacred thing I possess. Yes, I possess my religion only through my race, because it is only my race that makes my religion possible for me and opens up the deepest understanding for me.
Race and religion are one!"
So, as a National Socialist, it is possible to put race on the same level as religion but not above it.
But what word is as important as the word of the Führer? None. Thus, his word and opinion stand above all other words of all other National Socialists without discussion.
Adolf Hitler in a speech at an NSDAP meeting in Kaiserslautern on April 16, 1931: "And if the common citizen implies: you are sinning, because you are putting the people over the religion, we say: It’s the opposite."
Final Conclusion:
To be truly faithful to the word of the Führer, one puts blood below religion, but it is possible as a National Socialist to put religion and race on the same level. Religion serves the race but is inviolable and therefore above the race. To place race above religion is contrary to the spirit of National Socialism.
@Christianityandfascism
The assertion that a National Socialist should place race above religion and God has recently been advocated by Pagans and other non-Christians, while Christian National Socialists have argued that this is nonsense. So what is the truth?
We first consider a quote by Walter Gross from a radio speech on August 7, 1935. Gross was the head of the Office for Racial Policy at the time of the Reich and thus the highest person concerning racial questions.
"For now in recent times the reproaches are accumulating that the race doctrine of National Socialism may be correct and it may also be justifiable from the pedagogical and moral point of view, but in the name of faith, religion and piety it must be rejected, because, so it is rumored, we are about to put the idol blood in the place of God and thus a human theory or at best body and substance in the place of the eternal power of the spirit. [...]
...No accusation can be more dishonest or silly than the one we just spoke of. [...] No one thinks of making an idol out of the given fact of race and of slaying genuine piety with it."
"No accusation can be more dishonest or silly..." I think that alone says enough. But there are other things we need to look at.
In an article from the Schwarze Korps on January 7, 1937, we find the words: "One unshakeable fact stands out—namely, that it is of primary importance for the future of the Race that Religion, as a servant of the Race, should shape new spiritual formulas calculated to assist in realising the heroic "life-ideals" of our Race."
This only says that religion must serve the blood and actively support our life ideals. Nowhere is it said that the race is placed above the religion only because the religion serves the race.
Artur Dinter a best-selling Christian völkisch author and former Gauleiter (District leader) of Thuringia published in 1919 the book The sin against the blood which was later also quoted in other NS books.
He said as follows:
"Race, together with my religion, is the highest and most sacred thing I possess. Yes, I possess my religion only through my race, because it is only my race that makes my religion possible for me and opens up the deepest understanding for me.
Race and religion are one!"
So, as a National Socialist, it is possible to put race on the same level as religion but not above it.
But what word is as important as the word of the Führer? None. Thus, his word and opinion stand above all other words of all other National Socialists without discussion.
Adolf Hitler in a speech at an NSDAP meeting in Kaiserslautern on April 16, 1931: "And if the common citizen implies: you are sinning, because you are putting the people over the religion, we say: It’s the opposite."
Final Conclusion:
To be truly faithful to the word of the Führer, one puts blood below religion, but it is possible as a National Socialist to put religion and race on the same level. Religion serves the race but is inviolable and therefore above the race. To place race above religion is contrary to the spirit of National Socialism.
@Christianityandfascism
Forwarded from -
The statement "Race first" itself was popularized by a Pagan that publicly promoted Satanism and O9A stuff. The Australian National Socialist Thomas Sewell (head of the National Socialist Network and founder of the Lads Society) made a public statement on March 13, 2021, in which he also spoke out against Satanists:
"I am race first. Not because some other guy on the internet made the statement and popularised it. [...]
I say it because I am a National Socialist..."
So you, Sewell, say "race first" because you are a National Socialist, but where does it say that as a National Socialist you have to say that? Why do the people who advocate and support this "race first" thing act as if it were in the preface of Mein Kampf that you must put race above religion? I want to make it clear that I have no particular problem with Sewell and am only using him as an example. It is simply a shame that a National Socialist with such a wide reach said something so wrong in public. Personally, I think that the people who advocate "race first" are not really in the spirit of National Socialism. In my observation, it was these two groups of National Socialists who supported race first:
People who pretend to have a deep faith in God because National Socialism demands it, but who are in fact closet atheists who probably just wanted to appear as "very radical" but in the end just spread nonsense that is incompatible with National Socialism. The other group I see as confused believers with a lack of knowledge of our worldview who supposedly tried to be good National Socialists and went along with the fundamental wrong thought that the other mentioned group has spread.
Why I think the first group are actually atheists, because I used to be agnostic (Gottgläubig) and had a belief in God, I would never have put anything above that God. For me, anyone who puts something above God does not believe in God or has not really realized what "God" is. God is the Eternal, the First and the Last and His own creation (our race) is not above Him. And here it must be mentioned again that the first group were overwhelmingly Pagans.
Of course, everyone has to settle such things with himself and his faith, but we National Socialists must not tolerate such a thing in our ranks because it contradicts our worldview. The Führer has said, we do not put religion under the blood, that is our the law.
If you too, dear reader, have supported "race first" in the past, there is no shame in standing by your mistakes and misunderstanding of National Socialism.
Follow my Backup:
@Christianityandfascism2
"I am race first. Not because some other guy on the internet made the statement and popularised it. [...]
I say it because I am a National Socialist..."
So you, Sewell, say "race first" because you are a National Socialist, but where does it say that as a National Socialist you have to say that? Why do the people who advocate and support this "race first" thing act as if it were in the preface of Mein Kampf that you must put race above religion? I want to make it clear that I have no particular problem with Sewell and am only using him as an example. It is simply a shame that a National Socialist with such a wide reach said something so wrong in public. Personally, I think that the people who advocate "race first" are not really in the spirit of National Socialism. In my observation, it was these two groups of National Socialists who supported race first:
People who pretend to have a deep faith in God because National Socialism demands it, but who are in fact closet atheists who probably just wanted to appear as "very radical" but in the end just spread nonsense that is incompatible with National Socialism. The other group I see as confused believers with a lack of knowledge of our worldview who supposedly tried to be good National Socialists and went along with the fundamental wrong thought that the other mentioned group has spread.
Why I think the first group are actually atheists, because I used to be agnostic (Gottgläubig) and had a belief in God, I would never have put anything above that God. For me, anyone who puts something above God does not believe in God or has not really realized what "God" is. God is the Eternal, the First and the Last and His own creation (our race) is not above Him. And here it must be mentioned again that the first group were overwhelmingly Pagans.
Of course, everyone has to settle such things with himself and his faith, but we National Socialists must not tolerate such a thing in our ranks because it contradicts our worldview. The Führer has said, we do not put religion under the blood, that is our the law.
If you too, dear reader, have supported "race first" in the past, there is no shame in standing by your mistakes and misunderstanding of National Socialism.
Follow my Backup:
@Christianityandfascism2
Forwarded from -
"Where does the NSDAP stand on the Christian worldview?
The NSDAP is grounded in the Christian worldview, without being bound to a particular
denomination."
𝐉𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐩𝐡 𝐆𝐨𝐞𝐛𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐬
Propaganda Minister and Gauleiter (district leader) of Berlin in The little Abc of the National Socialist, 1925.
@Christianityandfascism
The NSDAP is grounded in the Christian worldview, without being bound to a particular
denomination."
𝐉𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐩𝐡 𝐆𝐨𝐞𝐛𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐬
Propaganda Minister and Gauleiter (district leader) of Berlin in The little Abc of the National Socialist, 1925.
@Christianityandfascism
Forwarded from SERVIAM- I Will Serve
https://youtu.be/p0RRWJNNos0
This is a service approved by the Archdiocese of Chicago.
It is not a mass. It is pure protestant nonsense.
Cardinal Blazin' Cupcake (Blaise Cupich) is trying to fully implement traditions custodes in that diocese. What happens there will have a trickle down effect on the rest of the US.
This is a service approved by the Archdiocese of Chicago.
It is not a mass. It is pure protestant nonsense.
Cardinal Blazin' Cupcake (Blaise Cupich) is trying to fully implement traditions custodes in that diocese. What happens there will have a trickle down effect on the rest of the US.
Forwarded from Alítheia Xediplóthike's Library of Alexandria
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Medieval hymn for Saint Joseph — "
Caelitum Ioseph".I always here this argument from Reformed people: ‘Depictions of Our Lord will stir up thoughts of worship toward the image.’
I could just as easily say that writing down God's name stirs up thoughts of worship towards the written word but it doesn't.
Ironically, this is the exact same argument Jews use for not saying the name of God. Now please go ahead and tell me how Protestants aren’t Judaizer’s.
I could just as easily say that writing down God's name stirs up thoughts of worship towards the written word but it doesn't.
Ironically, this is the exact same argument Jews use for not saying the name of God. Now please go ahead and tell me how Protestants aren’t Judaizer’s.
Forwarded from Based Book Excerpts
Luther’s Revolt, the material enticements and cultural background that brought forth the division of Christendom in Europe.
From Dawson’s “The Dividing of Christendom” published 1965
From Dawson’s “The Dividing of Christendom” published 1965
Forwarded from Based Book Excerpts
St Pious X tells the founding father of Zionism (Theodor Herzl) that Catholics cannot condone Zionism.
Jews have no ethnic or religious right to Israel both the Old Testament and New Testament center on Christ. There can be no true peace until the Holy Land is occupied by Catholics
Jews have no ethnic or religious right to Israel both the Old Testament and New Testament center on Christ. There can be no true peace until the Holy Land is occupied by Catholics
Forwarded from Alternative History 2039 (⚡️Based Historian 2039 ⚡️)
'I asked Herman Goering one day, "What is this I am hearing that Germany is killing Jews?" Goering responded angrily, 'A totally outrageous lie made up by the British and American press. It will be used as a rope to hang us someday if we lose the war.' -Hanna Reitsch, in a 1970's interview with Ron Laytner
Forwarded from banned: go to @paganbad6
Olaf Tryggvason was a viking who converted to Christianity after meeting a warrior-priest named Thangbrand.
When he became king of Norway in 995, he strove to win converts to Christ—sometimes by force, but other times by preaching.
By commissioning missionaries and baptizing visiting dignitaries, Olaf was able to introduce Christianity to the Shetland, Faroe, and Orkney islands and to Iceland and Greenland.
At an assembly in Tunsberg, King Olaf ordered the expulsion of all magicians, sorcerers, and warlocks from Norway. Those that remained were burned to death or drowned.
Later that year, at Maerin, he entered a pagan temple filled with idols, which he and his men knocked from their pedestals.
When he became king of Norway in 995, he strove to win converts to Christ—sometimes by force, but other times by preaching.
By commissioning missionaries and baptizing visiting dignitaries, Olaf was able to introduce Christianity to the Shetland, Faroe, and Orkney islands and to Iceland and Greenland.
At an assembly in Tunsberg, King Olaf ordered the expulsion of all magicians, sorcerers, and warlocks from Norway. Those that remained were burned to death or drowned.
Later that year, at Maerin, he entered a pagan temple filled with idols, which he and his men knocked from their pedestals.
“There is no word, no feeling to properly express our gratitude to our liberators and their Leader, Adolf Hitler, who restored the freedom of religion, returned to the believers the churches of God taken away from them, and gave them back their human dignity.”
Церковное обозрение (Church Review) 4-6, 1942
Церковное обозрение (Church Review) 4-6, 1942
↟ Modernists Go To Hell ↟
“There is no word, no feeling to properly express our gratitude to our liberators and their Leader, Adolf Hitler, who restored the freedom of religion, returned to the believers the churches of God taken away from them, and gave them back their human dignity.”…
“This icon of ‘Ataulf of Munich, Martyr of Berlin’ was created by the Catacomb Church of the True Orthodox Christians, ‘whos mere name is equivalent to a diagnosis.’ However, it should be remembered that in 1941 many people in the Soviet Union understood and experienced the German invasion as a liberation from the godless Bolsheviks, and still remember it like that.”
http://riowang.blogspot.com/2014/01/apocryphal-icons.html?m=1
http://riowang.blogspot.com/2014/01/apocryphal-icons.html?m=1
Blogspot
Apocryphal icons
In connection with the absurd phenomenon of the cult of Stalin resurging in Russia, the representations of Stalin made in the...
Forwarded from 𝕳eilfrau
Steigmann-Gall, Richard. The Holy Reich: Religious Dimensions of Nazi Ideology, 1919–1945. PhD thesis. University of Toronto, 1999. pp. 236–237.
Quote
Therefore, in a 1937 memorandum marked "to all SS leaders from Standartenführer up," Himmler instructed: "In ideological training I forbid every attack against Christ as a person, since such attacks or insults that Christ was a Jew are unworthy of us and certainly untrue historically."¹²⁹ He then added significantly: "I desire that SS men be convinced of the worth of our own blood and our past, through knowledge of the actual history of our Volk, the prehistory of our Volk, the greatness and culture of our ancestors, so that they will totally root themselves in the value of the past, present, and future." Not only Christ, but belief in Christ as a part of German history, was to be respected in the SS. Such proclamations were not simply for public consumption. When a Hitler Youth wrote to Himmler asking if he was to believe a Nazi lecturer who claimed that Jesus was a Jew, Himmler's secretary Karl Brandt replied, indicating: "The Reichsführer-SS is of the conviction that Jesus was not a Jew. You must have misunderstood the speaker..."¹³⁰
Citations
129. Bundesarchiv Berlin-Zehlendorf, Sammlung Schumacher: 245/2/150 (28 June 1937: Berlin).
130. Bundesarchiv Berlin-Zehlendorf, NS 19, Persönlicher Stab Reichsführer-SS: 3134/2 (16 June 1937: Berlin).
Quote
Therefore, in a 1937 memorandum marked "to all SS leaders from Standartenführer up," Himmler instructed: "In ideological training I forbid every attack against Christ as a person, since such attacks or insults that Christ was a Jew are unworthy of us and certainly untrue historically."¹²⁹ He then added significantly: "I desire that SS men be convinced of the worth of our own blood and our past, through knowledge of the actual history of our Volk, the prehistory of our Volk, the greatness and culture of our ancestors, so that they will totally root themselves in the value of the past, present, and future." Not only Christ, but belief in Christ as a part of German history, was to be respected in the SS. Such proclamations were not simply for public consumption. When a Hitler Youth wrote to Himmler asking if he was to believe a Nazi lecturer who claimed that Jesus was a Jew, Himmler's secretary Karl Brandt replied, indicating: "The Reichsführer-SS is of the conviction that Jesus was not a Jew. You must have misunderstood the speaker..."¹³⁰
Citations
129. Bundesarchiv Berlin-Zehlendorf, Sammlung Schumacher: 245/2/150 (28 June 1937: Berlin).
130. Bundesarchiv Berlin-Zehlendorf, NS 19, Persönlicher Stab Reichsführer-SS: 3134/2 (16 June 1937: Berlin).
Forwarded from CF
In the National Socialism Docuмentation Center in Munich, it shows that the largest imprisonment of Catholic clergy involved an intensive NS investigation in 1936-37 into pedophilia at Catholic boarding schools and religious houses. Between May 1936 and July 1937 there were 270 prosecutions of monks and priests for sex crimes involving minors.
Contrary to the Jewish media, Catholic clergy were locked up for subversive activity against the Reichskonkordat & pedophilia... Not just because they were Catholic.
Lock em up
The Catholic Integralist
Contrary to the Jewish media, Catholic clergy were locked up for subversive activity against the Reichskonkordat & pedophilia... Not just because they were Catholic.
Lock em up
The Catholic Integralist