Forwarded from banned: go to @paganbad6
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
[OC]
↟ Modernists Go To Hell ↟
“We were convinced that the people needs and requires this faith. We have therefore undertaken the fight against the atheistic movement, and that not merely with a few theoretical declarations: we have stamped it out.” - Adolf Hitler, Speech in Berlin,…
Reminder that 95% of the German population at the time was Christian so he couldn’t have been referring to anything other than Christianity.
Forwarded from Based Book Excerpts
No Longer the Chosen People: for the Christian Zionist who has been mislead about the Jews and the covenant with God. From Synagogue Rising by Hugh Akins
Forwarded from Alítheia Xediplóthike's Library of Alexandria
Forwarded from Alítheia Xediplóthike's Library of Alexandria
I didn't know this had to be said, but please, no anime profile pictures, as they're inherently sinful. If I see one, it's a remove automatically.
↟ Modernists Go To Hell ↟
Garmarna - Topic – Herr Mannelig
One of my favourite songs
Anime is a creation of the devil and gooks so therefore it’s bad, and no, I will not be elaborating.
Forwarded from The Exaltation of Beauty
"People in those old times had convictions; we moderns only have opinions. And it needs more than a mere opinion to erect a Gothic cathedral."
~Heinrich Heine
~Heinrich Heine
Forwarded from 𝘊𝘢𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘤 𝘈𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘤
“A council convened to condemn nothing and define nothing, and of which not a single decree in the nineteenth century had the episcopal permission to publish, but most of it had landed on the list of banned books, and so on is not a council! This is Pistoia No. 2, the second robber's synod. Nothing else. And in the future, when we again have a Catholic as pope, they will be scrapped, and then we will be rid of all that junk and will not have to spend the evening here, instead of bowling. - - So I do not go bowling, I go to the model railway club!"
- Fr. Gregory Hesse
- Fr. Gregory Hesse
𝘊𝘢𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘤 𝘈𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘤
“A council convened to condemn nothing and define nothing, and of which not a single decree in the nineteenth century had the episcopal permission to publish, but most of it had landed on the list of banned books, and so on is not a council! This is Pistoia…
“The Council was very ambiguous. This has been condemned by Pope Pius VI in his encyclical “Auctorum Fide” where he condemns the Council of Pistoya saying the trick of the Modernists is to write in such a way as something can be interpreted in two ways. Pius VI says the purpose of a Council is to clarify doctrine. Pius X similarly condemns this ambiguity in Paschendi Dominici Gregious saying that one of the Modernist tricks is to give you some Catholic doctrine on one hand but take away some Catholic doctrine on the others. St. Cyprian says that if one point of Catholic doctrine is denied then all are denied and they are outside the Church. Therefore Protestants are outside the Church and cannot really be called Christian. All you can do is pray that they convert and come into the one true Church. The same can said for those Catholics who accept Vatican II and the Novus Ordo Missae. which was written up by Annibale Bugnini
(a known Freemason) & seven Protestant ministers amongst others. These persons who accept Vatican II & the new mass are in material schism with the Church.”
- Fr. Hesse
(a known Freemason) & seven Protestant ministers amongst others. These persons who accept Vatican II & the new mass are in material schism with the Church.”
- Fr. Hesse
Curious to see what religion my subscribers are, so here it goes:
Anonymous Poll
20%
Catholic (FSSP/ICKSP)
43%
Catholic (SSPX)
10%
Catholic (Sedevcantist)
9%
Normie Catholic (VII and Norvus Ordo fan)
5%
Protestant
1%
Agnostic
0%
Atheist
12%
Other
Forwarded from -
"𝐑𝐚𝐜𝐞 𝐅𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭" 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐒𝐨𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐦
The assertion that a National Socialist should place race above religion and God has recently been advocated by Pagans and other non-Christians, while Christian National Socialists have argued that this is nonsense. So what is the truth?
We first consider a quote by Walter Gross from a radio speech on August 7, 1935. Gross was the head of the Office for Racial Policy at the time of the Reich and thus the highest person concerning racial questions.
"For now in recent times the reproaches are accumulating that the race doctrine of National Socialism may be correct and it may also be justifiable from the pedagogical and moral point of view, but in the name of faith, religion and piety it must be rejected, because, so it is rumored, we are about to put the idol blood in the place of God and thus a human theory or at best body and substance in the place of the eternal power of the spirit. [...]
...No accusation can be more dishonest or silly than the one we just spoke of. [...] No one thinks of making an idol out of the given fact of race and of slaying genuine piety with it."
"No accusation can be more dishonest or silly..." I think that alone says enough. But there are other things we need to look at.
In an article from the Schwarze Korps on January 7, 1937, we find the words: "One unshakeable fact stands out—namely, that it is of primary importance for the future of the Race that Religion, as a servant of the Race, should shape new spiritual formulas calculated to assist in realising the heroic "life-ideals" of our Race."
This only says that religion must serve the blood and actively support our life ideals. Nowhere is it said that the race is placed above the religion only because the religion serves the race.
Artur Dinter a best-selling Christian völkisch author and former Gauleiter (District leader) of Thuringia published in 1919 the book The sin against the blood which was later also quoted in other NS books.
He said as follows:
"Race, together with my religion, is the highest and most sacred thing I possess. Yes, I possess my religion only through my race, because it is only my race that makes my religion possible for me and opens up the deepest understanding for me.
Race and religion are one!"
So, as a National Socialist, it is possible to put race on the same level as religion but not above it.
But what word is as important as the word of the Führer? None. Thus, his word and opinion stand above all other words of all other National Socialists without discussion.
Adolf Hitler in a speech at an NSDAP meeting in Kaiserslautern on April 16, 1931: "And if the common citizen implies: you are sinning, because you are putting the people over the religion, we say: It’s the opposite."
Final Conclusion:
To be truly faithful to the word of the Führer, one puts blood below religion, but it is possible as a National Socialist to put religion and race on the same level. Religion serves the race but is inviolable and therefore above the race. To place race above religion is contrary to the spirit of National Socialism.
@Christianityandfascism
The assertion that a National Socialist should place race above religion and God has recently been advocated by Pagans and other non-Christians, while Christian National Socialists have argued that this is nonsense. So what is the truth?
We first consider a quote by Walter Gross from a radio speech on August 7, 1935. Gross was the head of the Office for Racial Policy at the time of the Reich and thus the highest person concerning racial questions.
"For now in recent times the reproaches are accumulating that the race doctrine of National Socialism may be correct and it may also be justifiable from the pedagogical and moral point of view, but in the name of faith, religion and piety it must be rejected, because, so it is rumored, we are about to put the idol blood in the place of God and thus a human theory or at best body and substance in the place of the eternal power of the spirit. [...]
...No accusation can be more dishonest or silly than the one we just spoke of. [...] No one thinks of making an idol out of the given fact of race and of slaying genuine piety with it."
"No accusation can be more dishonest or silly..." I think that alone says enough. But there are other things we need to look at.
In an article from the Schwarze Korps on January 7, 1937, we find the words: "One unshakeable fact stands out—namely, that it is of primary importance for the future of the Race that Religion, as a servant of the Race, should shape new spiritual formulas calculated to assist in realising the heroic "life-ideals" of our Race."
This only says that religion must serve the blood and actively support our life ideals. Nowhere is it said that the race is placed above the religion only because the religion serves the race.
Artur Dinter a best-selling Christian völkisch author and former Gauleiter (District leader) of Thuringia published in 1919 the book The sin against the blood which was later also quoted in other NS books.
He said as follows:
"Race, together with my religion, is the highest and most sacred thing I possess. Yes, I possess my religion only through my race, because it is only my race that makes my religion possible for me and opens up the deepest understanding for me.
Race and religion are one!"
So, as a National Socialist, it is possible to put race on the same level as religion but not above it.
But what word is as important as the word of the Führer? None. Thus, his word and opinion stand above all other words of all other National Socialists without discussion.
Adolf Hitler in a speech at an NSDAP meeting in Kaiserslautern on April 16, 1931: "And if the common citizen implies: you are sinning, because you are putting the people over the religion, we say: It’s the opposite."
Final Conclusion:
To be truly faithful to the word of the Führer, one puts blood below religion, but it is possible as a National Socialist to put religion and race on the same level. Religion serves the race but is inviolable and therefore above the race. To place race above religion is contrary to the spirit of National Socialism.
@Christianityandfascism
Forwarded from -
The statement "Race first" itself was popularized by a Pagan that publicly promoted Satanism and O9A stuff. The Australian National Socialist Thomas Sewell (head of the National Socialist Network and founder of the Lads Society) made a public statement on March 13, 2021, in which he also spoke out against Satanists:
"I am race first. Not because some other guy on the internet made the statement and popularised it. [...]
I say it because I am a National Socialist..."
So you, Sewell, say "race first" because you are a National Socialist, but where does it say that as a National Socialist you have to say that? Why do the people who advocate and support this "race first" thing act as if it were in the preface of Mein Kampf that you must put race above religion? I want to make it clear that I have no particular problem with Sewell and am only using him as an example. It is simply a shame that a National Socialist with such a wide reach said something so wrong in public. Personally, I think that the people who advocate "race first" are not really in the spirit of National Socialism. In my observation, it was these two groups of National Socialists who supported race first:
People who pretend to have a deep faith in God because National Socialism demands it, but who are in fact closet atheists who probably just wanted to appear as "very radical" but in the end just spread nonsense that is incompatible with National Socialism. The other group I see as confused believers with a lack of knowledge of our worldview who supposedly tried to be good National Socialists and went along with the fundamental wrong thought that the other mentioned group has spread.
Why I think the first group are actually atheists, because I used to be agnostic (Gottgläubig) and had a belief in God, I would never have put anything above that God. For me, anyone who puts something above God does not believe in God or has not really realized what "God" is. God is the Eternal, the First and the Last and His own creation (our race) is not above Him. And here it must be mentioned again that the first group were overwhelmingly Pagans.
Of course, everyone has to settle such things with himself and his faith, but we National Socialists must not tolerate such a thing in our ranks because it contradicts our worldview. The Führer has said, we do not put religion under the blood, that is our the law.
If you too, dear reader, have supported "race first" in the past, there is no shame in standing by your mistakes and misunderstanding of National Socialism.
Follow my Backup:
@Christianityandfascism2
"I am race first. Not because some other guy on the internet made the statement and popularised it. [...]
I say it because I am a National Socialist..."
So you, Sewell, say "race first" because you are a National Socialist, but where does it say that as a National Socialist you have to say that? Why do the people who advocate and support this "race first" thing act as if it were in the preface of Mein Kampf that you must put race above religion? I want to make it clear that I have no particular problem with Sewell and am only using him as an example. It is simply a shame that a National Socialist with such a wide reach said something so wrong in public. Personally, I think that the people who advocate "race first" are not really in the spirit of National Socialism. In my observation, it was these two groups of National Socialists who supported race first:
People who pretend to have a deep faith in God because National Socialism demands it, but who are in fact closet atheists who probably just wanted to appear as "very radical" but in the end just spread nonsense that is incompatible with National Socialism. The other group I see as confused believers with a lack of knowledge of our worldview who supposedly tried to be good National Socialists and went along with the fundamental wrong thought that the other mentioned group has spread.
Why I think the first group are actually atheists, because I used to be agnostic (Gottgläubig) and had a belief in God, I would never have put anything above that God. For me, anyone who puts something above God does not believe in God or has not really realized what "God" is. God is the Eternal, the First and the Last and His own creation (our race) is not above Him. And here it must be mentioned again that the first group were overwhelmingly Pagans.
Of course, everyone has to settle such things with himself and his faith, but we National Socialists must not tolerate such a thing in our ranks because it contradicts our worldview. The Führer has said, we do not put religion under the blood, that is our the law.
If you too, dear reader, have supported "race first" in the past, there is no shame in standing by your mistakes and misunderstanding of National Socialism.
Follow my Backup:
@Christianityandfascism2
Forwarded from -
"Where does the NSDAP stand on the Christian worldview?
The NSDAP is grounded in the Christian worldview, without being bound to a particular
denomination."
𝐉𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐩𝐡 𝐆𝐨𝐞𝐛𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐬
Propaganda Minister and Gauleiter (district leader) of Berlin in The little Abc of the National Socialist, 1925.
@Christianityandfascism
The NSDAP is grounded in the Christian worldview, without being bound to a particular
denomination."
𝐉𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐩𝐡 𝐆𝐨𝐞𝐛𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐬
Propaganda Minister and Gauleiter (district leader) of Berlin in The little Abc of the National Socialist, 1925.
@Christianityandfascism