Forwarded from 𝘑𝘶𝘥𝘢𝘪𝘴𝘮 𝘌𝘹𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘥
“A girl who is three years and one day old whose father arranged her betrothal can be betrothed with intercourse, as, despite her age, the legal status of intercourse with her is that of full-fledged intercourse. And in a case where the childless husband of a girl three years and one day old dies, if his yavam (brother) engages in intercourse with her, he acquires her as his wife...as despite her age she is legally considered to be a married woman.”
- Sanhedrin 69a
“If a girl is less than three years old, it is permitted to be secluded with her. Likewise, if a boy is less than nine years old a woman is permitted to be alone with him.”
- Kitzur Shulchan Aruch: A Classic Guide to Jewish Law (Metsudah Publications, 1996) v. 2, p. 1023
“If a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl, it is nothing, for having intercourse with a girl less than three years old is like putting a finger in the eye.”
- Ketubot 11b
“…intercourse with a boy under nine years old is not considered a significant sexual act…”
- Ketubot 11b
- Sanhedrin 69a
“If a girl is less than three years old, it is permitted to be secluded with her. Likewise, if a boy is less than nine years old a woman is permitted to be alone with him.”
- Kitzur Shulchan Aruch: A Classic Guide to Jewish Law (Metsudah Publications, 1996) v. 2, p. 1023
“If a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl, it is nothing, for having intercourse with a girl less than three years old is like putting a finger in the eye.”
- Ketubot 11b
“…intercourse with a boy under nine years old is not considered a significant sexual act…”
- Ketubot 11b
Forwarded from 𝘑𝘶𝘥𝘢𝘪𝘴𝘮 𝘌𝘹𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘥
“We hate Christianity and the Christians. Even the best amongst them must be considered as our worst enemies. ... Down with love of our neighbours. What we need is hatred. We must learn to hate: this is they way in which we will conquer the world.”
- USSR’s 1933 New Anti-Religious Manual in Hill, Kent R. The Puzzle of the Soviet Church: An Inside Look at Christianity & Glasnost. Multnomah Press, Oregon. 1989, page 92.
“The Russian intelligentsia . . . saw in the philosophy of Judaism the germs of Bolshevism —the struggle of... Judaism versus Christianity.”
- Leon Dennen, in The Menorah Journal (New York, July-September 1932, p. 105
- USSR’s 1933 New Anti-Religious Manual in Hill, Kent R. The Puzzle of the Soviet Church: An Inside Look at Christianity & Glasnost. Multnomah Press, Oregon. 1989, page 92.
“The Russian intelligentsia . . . saw in the philosophy of Judaism the germs of Bolshevism —the struggle of... Judaism versus Christianity.”
- Leon Dennen, in The Menorah Journal (New York, July-September 1932, p. 105
Audio
The Decline and Fall of Western Art
Introductory Excerpt
Written by Mr. Brendan M.P. Heard
Narrated by Alexander Sangmoore
The Reality Report
Introductory Excerpt
Written by Mr. Brendan M.P. Heard
Narrated by Alexander Sangmoore
The Reality Report
Forwarded from 𝘑𝘶𝘥𝘢𝘪𝘴𝘮 𝘌𝘹𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘥
MORE THAN JUST MALE AND FEMALE: THE SIX GENDERS OF ANCIENT JEWISH THOUGHT:
Mishnah Bikkurim 4:1
(1) An Androginus (a hermaphrodite, who has both male and female reproductive organs) is similar to men in some ways and to women in other ways, in some ways to both and in some ways to neither.
Mishnah Bikkurim 4:2
(2) In what ways is s/he similar to men? Like a man, s/he is considered unclean through semen; is required to perform yibum (to marry the widow of a childless brother) like a man; dresses and cuts hair like a man; marries others and is not married off, like a man; and is obliged to perform all the commandments in the Torah, like a man.
Mishnah Bikkurim 4:3
(3) In what ways is s/he similar to women? Like a woman, s/he is considered unclean through menstrual flow; s/he must not be alone in the company of men; and does not share [the inheritance] with sons; and cannot eat most of the holy sacrifices, like a woman...
Mishnah Bikkurim 4:1
(1) An Androginus (a hermaphrodite, who has both male and female reproductive organs) is similar to men in some ways and to women in other ways, in some ways to both and in some ways to neither.
Mishnah Bikkurim 4:2
(2) In what ways is s/he similar to men? Like a man, s/he is considered unclean through semen; is required to perform yibum (to marry the widow of a childless brother) like a man; dresses and cuts hair like a man; marries others and is not married off, like a man; and is obliged to perform all the commandments in the Torah, like a man.
Mishnah Bikkurim 4:3
(3) In what ways is s/he similar to women? Like a woman, s/he is considered unclean through menstrual flow; s/he must not be alone in the company of men; and does not share [the inheritance] with sons; and cannot eat most of the holy sacrifices, like a woman...
Forwarded from 𝘑𝘶𝘥𝘢𝘪𝘴𝘮 𝘌𝘹𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘥
Mishnah Yevamot 8:4
(4) Rabbi Yehoshua said: I have heard that a saris (eunuch) undergoes Chalitzah [the ceremony releasing the widow of a childless man from the obligation of Levirate marriage] and that one undergoes Chalitzah for his wife; and that a eunuch does not undergo Chalitzah and that one does not undergo Chalitzah for his wife, but I am unable to explain this. Rabbi Akiva said: I will explain it: a man-eunuch [castrated by a person] undergoes Chalitzah and one undergoes Chalitzah for his wife because there was a time when he was fit [to have children]; a sun-eunuch [who was born that way] does not undergo Chalitzah nor does one undergo Chalitzah for his wife since there was never a time when he was fit. Rabbi Eliezer says: Not so! Rather, a sun-eunuch undergoes Chalitzah and one undergoes Chalitzah for his wife because because there is a cure; a man-eunuch does not undergo Chalitzah nor does one undergo Chalitzah for his wife since he has no cure. Rabbi Yehoshua ben Betiera testified concerning Ben Megusat who was a man-eunuch in Jerusalem and they performed Yibum [Levirate marriage wherein a man weds his childless brother's widow] for his wife, to uphold the opinion of Rabbi Akiva.
(4) Rabbi Yehoshua said: I have heard that a saris (eunuch) undergoes Chalitzah [the ceremony releasing the widow of a childless man from the obligation of Levirate marriage] and that one undergoes Chalitzah for his wife; and that a eunuch does not undergo Chalitzah and that one does not undergo Chalitzah for his wife, but I am unable to explain this. Rabbi Akiva said: I will explain it: a man-eunuch [castrated by a person] undergoes Chalitzah and one undergoes Chalitzah for his wife because there was a time when he was fit [to have children]; a sun-eunuch [who was born that way] does not undergo Chalitzah nor does one undergo Chalitzah for his wife since there was never a time when he was fit. Rabbi Eliezer says: Not so! Rather, a sun-eunuch undergoes Chalitzah and one undergoes Chalitzah for his wife because because there is a cure; a man-eunuch does not undergo Chalitzah nor does one undergo Chalitzah for his wife since he has no cure. Rabbi Yehoshua ben Betiera testified concerning Ben Megusat who was a man-eunuch in Jerusalem and they performed Yibum [Levirate marriage wherein a man weds his childless brother's widow] for his wife, to uphold the opinion of Rabbi Akiva.
Forwarded from 𝘑𝘶𝘥𝘢𝘪𝘴𝘮 𝘌𝘹𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘥
Mishnah Yevamot 8:5
(5) The eunuch neither undergoes Chalitzah nor performs Yibum. Similarly, an aiylonit [a woman with arrested sexual development who cannot bear children] neither performs Chalitzah nor undergoes Yibum. [If] a eunuch underwent Chalitzah from his Yevama [a woman whose husband died childless and whose brother-in-law must marry or dismiss her] he does not disqualify her [from subsequently marrying a priest]. If he had relations with her he does disqualify her since this is licentious relations [because she is forbidden to him]. Similarly, [if] brothers underwent Chalitzah from aiylonit they do not disqualify her [from marrying a priest]. If they had relations with her they do disqualify her since this is licentious relations.
(5) The eunuch neither undergoes Chalitzah nor performs Yibum. Similarly, an aiylonit [a woman with arrested sexual development who cannot bear children] neither performs Chalitzah nor undergoes Yibum. [If] a eunuch underwent Chalitzah from his Yevama [a woman whose husband died childless and whose brother-in-law must marry or dismiss her] he does not disqualify her [from subsequently marrying a priest]. If he had relations with her he does disqualify her since this is licentious relations [because she is forbidden to him]. Similarly, [if] brothers underwent Chalitzah from aiylonit they do not disqualify her [from marrying a priest]. If they had relations with her they do disqualify her since this is licentious relations.
Forwarded from 𝘑𝘶𝘥𝘢𝘪𝘴𝘮 𝘌𝘹𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘥
Mishnah Yevamot 8:6
(6) [If] a priest who was a sun-eunuch married the daughter of an Israelite, he confers upon her the right to eat Terumah [a portion of a crop given to a priest which becomes holy upon separation and may only be consumed by priests and their households]. Rabbi Yose and Rabbi Shimon said: [If] a priest who was an androginos [person with both male and female sexual organs. It is halachically uncertain whether such a person is male, female or, perhaps, has a uniquely defined halachic gender] married the daughter of an Israelite, he confers upon her the right to eat Terumah . Rabbi Yehudah said: [If] a tumtum [person with recessed sexual organs whose gender is therefore impossible to determine, presently, by external examination. It is halachically uncertain whether such a person is male or female] was torn and found to be male he may not undergo Chalitzah because he is like a eunuch. An androginosmay marry [a woman] but may not be married [to a man]. Rabbi Eliezer said: [If one has relations with] an androginos he is liable to be stoned like one [who has relations with] a male.
(6) [If] a priest who was a sun-eunuch married the daughter of an Israelite, he confers upon her the right to eat Terumah [a portion of a crop given to a priest which becomes holy upon separation and may only be consumed by priests and their households]. Rabbi Yose and Rabbi Shimon said: [If] a priest who was an androginos [person with both male and female sexual organs. It is halachically uncertain whether such a person is male, female or, perhaps, has a uniquely defined halachic gender] married the daughter of an Israelite, he confers upon her the right to eat Terumah . Rabbi Yehudah said: [If] a tumtum [person with recessed sexual organs whose gender is therefore impossible to determine, presently, by external examination. It is halachically uncertain whether such a person is male or female] was torn and found to be male he may not undergo Chalitzah because he is like a eunuch. An androginosmay marry [a woman] but may not be married [to a man]. Rabbi Eliezer said: [If one has relations with] an androginos he is liable to be stoned like one [who has relations with] a male.
Forwarded from 𝘑𝘶𝘥𝘢𝘪𝘴𝘮 𝘌𝘹𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘥
What better proof of Judaim's perverse and satanic nature than the fact that they invented trannies?
https://www.sefaria.org/sheets/37225?lang=bi
https://www.sefaria.org/sheets/37225?lang=bi
www.sefaria.org
More Than Just Male and Female:
The Six Genders in Ancient Jewish Thought
| Sefaria
The Six Genders in Ancient Jewish Thought
| Sefaria
A source sheet created with Sefaria's Source Sheet Builder
Forwarded from 𝘑𝘶𝘥𝘢𝘪𝘴𝘮 𝘌𝘹𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘥
“Medieval Jewish works of astrology list a variety of human spheres that the moon affects with its waxing and waning. The ideal time for sexual intercourse is the new moon, because it would have a positive influence on a child conceived at that time. The best time to construct an amulet is determined by the phases of the moon; the same is true for performing certain medical procedures. The moon represents Malchut/Shekinah in the sefirotic Godhead.”
[Sof. 4:5; Suk. 29a; Sanh. 42a; Zohar1: 236b]. (The Encyclopedia of Jewish Myth, Magic and Mysticism, "Moon")
[Sof. 4:5; Suk. 29a; Sanh. 42a; Zohar1: 236b]. (The Encyclopedia of Jewish Myth, Magic and Mysticism, "Moon")
image_2021-12-16_01-13-40.png
661.9 KB
John Calvin hated Catholicism to the point he hated it more than Judaism. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250013600_French_Calvinism_and_Judaism
John Calvin (2).PNG
85.2 KB
This is honestly not surprising considering John Calvin believed usury is perfectly licit.
Forwarded from 𝘑𝘶𝘥𝘢𝘪𝘴𝘮 𝘌𝘹𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘥
“The [Pharisaic-Rabbinic] schools believed that in heaven God and the angels studied Torah [i.e., Talmud/Kabbalah] just as the rabbis did on earth. God donned phylacteries like a rabbi. He prayed in rabbinic mode ... He guided the affairs of the world according to the rules of the Torah, like the rabbi in his court. One exegesis of the Creation-legend taught that God had looked into the Torah and therefrom had created the world. Moreover, heaven was aware above of what the rabbis in particular thought, said, and did below. The myth of the Torah was multi-dimensional. It included the striking detail that whenever the most recent rabbi was destined to discover through proper exegesis of the tradition was as much of a part of the way revealed to Moses as was a sentence of Scripture itself...
Forwarded from 𝘑𝘶𝘥𝘢𝘪𝘴𝘮 𝘌𝘹𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘥
It was therefore possible to participate in the giving of the law, as it were, by appropriate, logical inquiry into the law. God himself, studying and living by Torah, was believed to subject himself to these same rules of logical inquiry, so if an earthly court overruled the testimony, delivered through some natural miracles, of the heavenly one, God would rejoice, crying out, ‘My sons have conquered me! My sons have conquered me!’”
- Rabbi Jacob Neusner, “The Phenomenon of the Rabbi in Late Antiquity: II The Ritual of ‘Being a Rabbi’ in Later Sasanian Babylonia,” Numen, Vol.17, Fasc. 1., Feb., 1970, pp.3-4
“... The rabbi constituted the projection of the divine on earth. Honor was due him more than to the scroll of the Torah, for through his learning and logic he might alter the very content of Mosaic revelation. He was Torah, not merely because he lived by it, but because at his best he constituted as compelling an embodiment of the heavenly model as did a Torah scroll itself.”
- [Rabbi Jacob Neusner, “The Phenomenon of the Rabbi in Late Antiquity: II The Ritual of ‘Being a Rabbi’ in Later Sasanian Babylonia,” Numen, Vol.17, Fasc. 1., Feb., 1970, pp.3-4]
Note the casual admission that both “qabbalah and massoret [the vaunted, but bowdlerized, ‘Hebrew Bible’]” change Scripture through “process,” “traditioning.” In Judaism tradition is not fixed or faithful, but is an ever-changing “process” that is described as “traditioning.” This is why “the latest Responsa and homiletical interpretations of the rabbis” are Torah, hence authoritative in Judaism. Thus, the rabbis “bury Moses” (Tikkunei haZohar 1:27a) and “defeat God.” They too admit in Bava Metzi’a 59b that the Oral Torah (Mishnah, Talmud) supersede the word of God.
Even then, ‘Attaching the system to scripture was secondary’, and that Rabbinism is not the ‘organic unfolding of Scripture.’ The Rabbis also pridefully admit that ‘The complex of rabbinically ordained practices … including most of the rules for the treatment of Scripture itself–do not derive from Scripture at all.’ (Rabbis Jacob Neusner & William Scott Green, Rabbinic Judaism: Structure and System, ISBN 9780800629090, Fortress Press, 1995, pp. 31-34.)
““The return from Babylon [following the Captivity, about 538 B.C.], and the adoption of the Babylonian Talmud, marks the end of Hebrewism, and the beginning of Judaism.”
Roger Rusk, The Other End of the World: An Alternate Theory Linking Prophecy and History (Plano, Texas: Le Book Company, Inc., 1988), 182.
Also remember that their Written Torah bears no similarity at all to the original texts and was formed after the destruction of Jerusalem by Rabbi Akiva ben Yosef and Codified in the 10th century by Rabbi Aaron ben Asher and given the stamp of approval by Maimonides, the most famous Talmudic scholar. Even then, they still put that as secondary. And they hate Christian translations even more. It even says for Jews to burn the ‘Torah scrolls of the heretics’ in Shabbat 116a.
The Septuagint quotes the Dead Sea Scrolls not the Masoteric Jewish Tanakh. They also censor the fuck out of non-Judaist versions of the Old Testament. I’m pretty sure it’s illegal to get them in Israel. Their Tanakh (written Torah- their version of old testament) is just as disgusting as the Talmud, worse because it’s a total perversion. All of this was done as a way to undermine the legitimacy of Christianity and attack Christ and our sacred texts.
- Rabbi Jacob Neusner, “The Phenomenon of the Rabbi in Late Antiquity: II The Ritual of ‘Being a Rabbi’ in Later Sasanian Babylonia,” Numen, Vol.17, Fasc. 1., Feb., 1970, pp.3-4
“... The rabbi constituted the projection of the divine on earth. Honor was due him more than to the scroll of the Torah, for through his learning and logic he might alter the very content of Mosaic revelation. He was Torah, not merely because he lived by it, but because at his best he constituted as compelling an embodiment of the heavenly model as did a Torah scroll itself.”
- [Rabbi Jacob Neusner, “The Phenomenon of the Rabbi in Late Antiquity: II The Ritual of ‘Being a Rabbi’ in Later Sasanian Babylonia,” Numen, Vol.17, Fasc. 1., Feb., 1970, pp.3-4]
Note the casual admission that both “qabbalah and massoret [the vaunted, but bowdlerized, ‘Hebrew Bible’]” change Scripture through “process,” “traditioning.” In Judaism tradition is not fixed or faithful, but is an ever-changing “process” that is described as “traditioning.” This is why “the latest Responsa and homiletical interpretations of the rabbis” are Torah, hence authoritative in Judaism. Thus, the rabbis “bury Moses” (Tikkunei haZohar 1:27a) and “defeat God.” They too admit in Bava Metzi’a 59b that the Oral Torah (Mishnah, Talmud) supersede the word of God.
Even then, ‘Attaching the system to scripture was secondary’, and that Rabbinism is not the ‘organic unfolding of Scripture.’ The Rabbis also pridefully admit that ‘The complex of rabbinically ordained practices … including most of the rules for the treatment of Scripture itself–do not derive from Scripture at all.’ (Rabbis Jacob Neusner & William Scott Green, Rabbinic Judaism: Structure and System, ISBN 9780800629090, Fortress Press, 1995, pp. 31-34.)
““The return from Babylon [following the Captivity, about 538 B.C.], and the adoption of the Babylonian Talmud, marks the end of Hebrewism, and the beginning of Judaism.”
Roger Rusk, The Other End of the World: An Alternate Theory Linking Prophecy and History (Plano, Texas: Le Book Company, Inc., 1988), 182.
Also remember that their Written Torah bears no similarity at all to the original texts and was formed after the destruction of Jerusalem by Rabbi Akiva ben Yosef and Codified in the 10th century by Rabbi Aaron ben Asher and given the stamp of approval by Maimonides, the most famous Talmudic scholar. Even then, they still put that as secondary. And they hate Christian translations even more. It even says for Jews to burn the ‘Torah scrolls of the heretics’ in Shabbat 116a.
The Septuagint quotes the Dead Sea Scrolls not the Masoteric Jewish Tanakh. They also censor the fuck out of non-Judaist versions of the Old Testament. I’m pretty sure it’s illegal to get them in Israel. Their Tanakh (written Torah- their version of old testament) is just as disgusting as the Talmud, worse because it’s a total perversion. All of this was done as a way to undermine the legitimacy of Christianity and attack Christ and our sacred texts.
Forwarded from 𝘑𝘶𝘥𝘢𝘪𝘴𝘮 𝘌𝘹𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘥
Erubin 21b: "My son, be more careful in the observance of the words of the Scribes than in the words of the Torah"
The Koliner rebbe, a 17th century rabbi of Prague, also states:
“Our Zaddikim’s [famous Orthodox rabbis] words are more important than the Torah of Moses As our Sages teach: A Zaddik decrees, and God obeys.”
- Jeremy Dauber, Antonio’s Devils: Writers of the Jewish Enlightenment and the Birth of Modern Hebrew and Yiddish Literature, Stanford University, 2004, 276, also documented in Judaism Discovered, p. 298
“The Holy One, Blessed be He, speaks Torah out of the mouths of all rabbis.” Haggadah 15b
“...the Babylonian Talmud represents God in the flesh...” Rabbi Jacob Neusner, Rabbinic Judaism, Minneapolis MN: Augsburg Fortress, 1995. p. 62
"Further, without the Talmud, we would not be able to understand passages in the Bible... God has handed this authority to the sages and tradition is a necessity as well as scripture. The Sages also made enactments of their own... anyone who does not study the Talmud cannot understand Scripture." - Rabbi Yehiel ben Joseph
Moral of the story is that all 6 parts of the Oral Torah (homiletical interpretations of Rabbis, Responsa, Haggadah, Aggadah, Talmud/Mishnah/Midrash/Kabbalah and the totemic scroll paraded around the synagogue) supersede the perverse Mastoeric texts, which they call the ‘Hebrew Bible.’ Which is only for women and children btw.
The Koliner rebbe, a 17th century rabbi of Prague, also states:
“Our Zaddikim’s [famous Orthodox rabbis] words are more important than the Torah of Moses As our Sages teach: A Zaddik decrees, and God obeys.”
- Jeremy Dauber, Antonio’s Devils: Writers of the Jewish Enlightenment and the Birth of Modern Hebrew and Yiddish Literature, Stanford University, 2004, 276, also documented in Judaism Discovered, p. 298
“The Holy One, Blessed be He, speaks Torah out of the mouths of all rabbis.” Haggadah 15b
“...the Babylonian Talmud represents God in the flesh...” Rabbi Jacob Neusner, Rabbinic Judaism, Minneapolis MN: Augsburg Fortress, 1995. p. 62
"Further, without the Talmud, we would not be able to understand passages in the Bible... God has handed this authority to the sages and tradition is a necessity as well as scripture. The Sages also made enactments of their own... anyone who does not study the Talmud cannot understand Scripture." - Rabbi Yehiel ben Joseph
Moral of the story is that all 6 parts of the Oral Torah (homiletical interpretations of Rabbis, Responsa, Haggadah, Aggadah, Talmud/Mishnah/Midrash/Kabbalah and the totemic scroll paraded around the synagogue) supersede the perverse Mastoeric texts, which they call the ‘Hebrew Bible.’ Which is only for women and children btw.
This is why pagans get so mad when you prove how the words of Rabbis can’t just simply be ignored when it comes to their own system
Forwarded from 𝘑𝘶𝘥𝘢𝘪𝘴𝘮 𝘌𝘹𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘥
“Judaism was not evolved in Judah; it was in Babylon that Judaism first became that which it was and still is.”
– “The Hebrew Peoples” written by Jewish authors Dr. H. Winckler, L.M. King, Dr. R. G. Brandis, and H. R. Hall. On pages 1781-4, Vol. 3, appearing in Harmsworth’s “History of the World”
– “The Hebrew Peoples” written by Jewish authors Dr. H. Winckler, L.M. King, Dr. R. G. Brandis, and H. R. Hall. On pages 1781-4, Vol. 3, appearing in Harmsworth’s “History of the World”
Forwarded from 𝘑𝘶𝘥𝘢𝘪𝘴𝘮 𝘌𝘹𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘥
“We Jews, we the destroyers, will remain the destroyers forever. Nothing that you do will meet our needs and demands. We will forever destroy, because we want a world of our own, a God-World, which it is not in your nature to build.”
- Maurice Samuel , You Gentiles, p. 155
- Maurice Samuel , You Gentiles, p. 155
Forwarded from Militia Immaculata Knight