“Gentile souls are of a completely different and inferior order. They are totally evil, with no redeeming qualities whatsoever… their material abundance derives from supernal refuse. Indeed, they themselves derive from refuse, which is why they are more numerous than the Jews…”

- Abraham Foxbrunner. Habad: The Hasidism of Schneur Zalman of Lyady. Northvale NJ: Jason Aronson Inc., 1983. Pp. 108-109.

“...‘living soul’ designates Israel because they are children of the Almighty, and their souls, which are holy, come from Him. From whence come the souls of other peoples? R[abbi] Eleazar said: ‘They obtain souls from those sides of the left which convey impurity, and therefore they are all impure and defile those who have contact with them.’...‘living soul’ refers to Israel, who have holy living souls from above, and ‘cattle and creeping things and beasts of the earth,’ to the other peoples who are not ‘living soul,’ but who are as we have said.”

- Zohar, Bereshith I 47a

Hakirah, The Soul of a Jew and the Soul of a Non-Jew, p. 51

“The Jew by his source and in his very essence is entirely good. The goy, by his source and his very essence, is completely evil. This is not simply a matter of religious distinction, but rather of two completely different species.”

- Rabbi Saadya Grama, Romemut Yisrael Ufarashat Hagalut (“Jewish Superiority and the Question of Exile”) 2003.
 
“Souls of non-Jews come entirely from the female part of the Satanic sphere. For this reason souls of non-Jews are called evil.”

- Yesaiah Tishbi, Torat ha-Rave-ha-Kelippahnbe-Kabbalat ha-Ari (The Theory of Evil and the Satanic Sphere in Kabbalah) 1942, reprinted 1982]

“The thesis of this book is that Judaism and Christianity do not form a common tradition, ‘the Judeo-Christian tradition.’ They are not compatible ... only now, for reasons of politics and sociology, have some representatives of Judaism maintained otherwise....”

- Rabbi Jacob Neusner, Jews and Christians: the myth of a common tradition, Binghamton NY: Classics in Judaic Studies

“When a Jewish man rapes a gentile woman, it is a capital offense, but the rapist is not executed. The victim, even a child victim (if she is above the age of 3), is the one to be executed:”

Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Issurei Biah - Chapter Twelve, §9 & 10
https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/960660/jewish/Issurei-Biah-Chapter-Twelve.htm

You read that correctly. In Jewish law, even a child victim of rape is executed.

Sanhedrin 54b:17

“The Gemara asks: What does it mean that the Torah does not deem a younger boy to be like an older boy? Rav says: It means that the Torah does not deem the intercourse of one who is less than nine years old to be like the intercourse of one who is at least nine years old, as for a male’s act of intercourse to have the legal status of full-fledged intercourse the minimum age is nine years. And Shmuel says: The Torah does not deem the intercourse of a child who is less than three years old to be like that of one who is three years old.”

Sanhedrin 54b:21-22

“...If a child who is less than nine years old engages in homosexual intercourse passively, the one who engages in intercourse with him is not liable.”

“.... the halakha of a male who engages in intercourse passively is like that of a woman; just as the intercourse of a woman has the halakhic status of intercourse from when she is three years old, the same is true with regard to a male who engages in intercourse passively.”

On the permissible rape of gentiles, we also find an expression from Bar-Ilan University Prof. Mordecai Kedar who is on record stating:

‘The only thing that can deter terrorists...is the knowledge that their sister or their mother will be raped.’ (Kedar is also a research fellow at the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies at Bar-Ilan).
 
“First, the rape target must be classified as a zonah (prostitute) or a nokri (hostile alien). The supreme Ashkenazic halachic authority, Rabbi Moses Maimonides, rules that a Judaic soldier may rape this type of female POW (yefas to’ar) when he is not actively fighting a battle (Hilchos Melachim 8:3). For more on this line of thought consult Judaism Discovered, p. 904. …
 
Eyal Karim (also spelled ‘Qarim’), the Israeli military’s chief rabbi, agrees:

‘Just so, war removes some of the prohibitions on sexual relations (gilui arayot), and even though fraternizing with a gentile woman is a very serious matter, it was permitted during wartime (under the specific terms) out of understanding for the hardship endured by the warriors. And since the success of the whole at war is our goal, the Torah permitted the individual to satisfy the evil urge (yetzer ha’ra), under the conditions mentioned, for the purpose of the success of the whole.’

https://972mag.com/idf-colonel-rabbi-implies-rape-is-permitted-in-war/39535
The Babylonian Talmud’s hateful attitude toward non-Judaic women
by Michael Hoffman, May 08, 2018
https://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2018/05/talmuds-view-of-non-judaic-women.html

Further, Rabbi Dov S. Zakheim, the Pentagon Comptroller 2001-2004 on the ‘ethics’ of rape of Gentile women during wartime:

“It is the consensus of many halakhic [rabbinic law] decisors that the yefat to’ar [Gentile female prisoners] can be subject to involuntary intercourse [rape], though only once, after which she must undergo a specific regimen prescribed in the Torah [i.e. Talmud], conversion and marriage, before her [Judaic] captor is permitted further sexual relations with her.”

- Dov S. Zakheim, “Confronting Evil: Terrorists, Torture, The Military and Halakhah,” published by Yeshivat Chovevei Torah Rabbinical School http://tinyurl.com/zh6wvyq
http://www.yctorah.org/component/option,com_docman/task,doc_view/gid,304

Hmm I wonder why 92% of Rape Investigations in Israel Are Closed Without Charges

“A girl who is three years and one day old whose father arranged her betrothal can be betrothed with intercourse, as, despite her age, the legal status of intercourse with her is that of full-fledged intercourse. And in a case where the childless husband of a girl three years and one day old dies, if his yavam (brother) engages in intercourse with her, he acquires her as his wife...as despite her age she is legally considered to be a married woman.”

- Sanhedrin 69a
 
“If a girl is less than three years old, it is permitted to be secluded with her. Likewise, if a boy is less than nine years old a woman is permitted to be alone with him.”

- Kitzur Shulchan Aruch: A Classic Guide to Jewish Law (Metsudah Publications, 1996) v. 2, p. 1023
 
“If a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl, it is nothing, for having intercourse with a girl less than three years old is like putting a finger in the eye.”

- Ketubot 11b

“…intercourse with a boy under nine years old is not considered a significant sexual act…”

- Ketubot 11b

“We hate Christianity and the Christians. Even the best amongst them must be considered as our worst enemies. ... Down with love of our neighbours. What we need is hatred. We must learn to hate: this is they way in which we will conquer the world.”

- USSR’s 1933 New Anti-Religious Manual in Hill, Kent R. The Puzzle of the Soviet Church: An Inside Look at Christianity & Glasnost. Multnomah Press, Oregon. 1989, page 92.

“The Russian intelligentsia . . . saw in the philosophy of Judaism the germs of Bolshevism —the struggle of... Judaism versus Christianity.”

- Leon Dennen, in The Menorah Journal (New York, July-September 1932, p. 105
 

MORE THAN JUST MALE AND FEMALE: THE SIX GENDERS OF ANCIENT JEWISH THOUGHT:

Mishnah Bikkurim 4:1

(1) An Androginus (a hermaphrodite, who has both male and female reproductive organs) is similar to men in some ways and to women in other ways, in some ways to both and in some ways to neither.

Mishnah Bikkurim 4:2

(2) In what ways is s/he similar to men? Like a man, s/he is considered unclean through semen; is required to perform yibum (to marry the widow of a childless brother) like a man; dresses and cuts hair like a man; marries others and is not married off, like a man; and is obliged to perform all the commandments in the Torah, like a man.

Mishnah Bikkurim 4:3

(3) In what ways is s/he similar to women? Like a woman, s/he is considered unclean through menstrual flow; s/he must not be alone in the company of men; and does not share [the inheritance] with sons; and cannot eat most of the holy sacrifices, like a woman...

Mishnah Yevamot 8:4

(4) Rabbi Yehoshua said: I have heard that a saris (eunuch) undergoes Chalitzah [the ceremony releasing the widow of a childless man from the obligation of Levirate marriage] and that one undergoes Chalitzah for his wife; and that a eunuch does not undergo Chalitzah and that one does not undergo Chalitzah for his wife, but I am unable to explain this. Rabbi Akiva said: I will explain it: a man-eunuch [castrated by a person] undergoes Chalitzah and one undergoes Chalitzah for his wife because there was a time when he was fit [to have children]; a sun-eunuch [who was born that way] does not undergo Chalitzah nor does one undergo Chalitzah for his wife since there was never a time when he was fit. Rabbi Eliezer says: Not so! Rather, a sun-eunuch undergoes Chalitzah and one undergoes Chalitzah for his wife because because there is a cure; a man-eunuch does not undergo Chalitzah nor does one undergo Chalitzah for his wife since he has no cure. Rabbi Yehoshua ben Betiera testified concerning Ben Megusat who was a man-eunuch in Jerusalem and they performed Yibum [Levirate marriage wherein a man weds his childless brother's widow] for his wife, to uphold the opinion of Rabbi Akiva.

Mishnah Yevamot 8:5

(5) The eunuch neither undergoes Chalitzah nor performs Yibum. Similarly, an aiylonit [a woman with arrested sexual development who cannot bear children] neither performs Chalitzah nor undergoes Yibum. [If] a eunuch underwent Chalitzah from his Yevama [a woman whose husband died childless and whose brother-in-law must marry or dismiss her] he does not disqualify her [from subsequently marrying a priest]. If he had relations with her he does disqualify her since this is licentious relations [because she is forbidden to him]. Similarly, [if] brothers underwent Chalitzah from aiylonit they do not disqualify her [from marrying a priest]. If they had relations with her they do disqualify her since this is licentious relations.

Mishnah Yevamot 8:6

(6) [If] a priest who was a sun-eunuch married the daughter of an Israelite, he confers upon her the right to eat Terumah [a portion of a crop given to a priest which becomes holy upon separation and may only be consumed by priests and their households]. Rabbi Yose and Rabbi Shimon said: [If] a priest who was an androginos [person with both male and female sexual organs. It is halachically uncertain whether such a person is male, female or, perhaps, has a uniquely defined halachic gender] married the daughter of an Israelite, he confers upon her the right to eat Terumah . Rabbi Yehudah said: [If] a tumtum [person with recessed sexual organs whose gender is therefore impossible to determine, presently, by external examination. It is halachically uncertain whether such a person is male or female] was torn and found to be male he may not undergo Chalitzah because he is like a eunuch. An androginosmay marry [a woman] but may not be married [to a man]. Rabbi Eliezer said: [If one has relations with] an androginos he is liable to be stoned like one [who has relations with] a male.

What better proof of Judaim's perverse and satanic nature than the fact that they invented trannies?

https://www.sefaria.org/sheets/37225?lang=bi

“Medieval Jewish works of astrology list a variety of human spheres that the moon affects with its waxing and waning. The ideal time for sexual intercourse is the new moon, because it would have a positive influence on a child conceived at that time. The best time to construct an amulet is determined by the phases of the moon; the same is true for performing certain medical procedures. The moon represents Malchut/Shekinah in the sefirotic Godhead.”

[Sof. 4:5; Suk. 29a; Sanh. 42a; Zohar1: 236b]. (The Encyclopedia of Jewish Myth, Magic and Mysticism, "Moon")

John Calvin hated Catholicism to the point he hated it more than Judaism. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250013600_French_Calvinism_and_Judaism

This is honestly not surprising considering John Calvin believed usury is perfectly licit.