The head can be seperate from the moral body in any physical body. A Pope cannot be disregarded without church judgment, a council being called, and a sentence issued if he has professed heresy in the formal sense.

If a Pope becomes a heretic, he is then, as you know, placed outside of the moral body of the Church. However, this doesn’t change the fact that he does not lose jurisdiction until a council issues a sentence.

Papal documents should not be hidden from the faithful under any circumstances.

We did it once. We'll do it again.

There is now VIP seating in Catholic Churches: 🙄 https://t.co/Lf29xJ9X3g
— Dr Taylor Marshall (@TaylorRMarshall) March 28, 2021

Pregnant Mother Arrested during Mass: interview with Dr. Taylor Marshallhttps://t.co/KfzNtXTtfw
— Dr Taylor Marshall (@TaylorRMarshall) March 27, 2021

>rare moral stature
>says there is something in God that is not of God

Palamas’ satanic doctrine of God has been refuted by so many Thomist and Reformed theologians it’s unbelievable.

Y’know, contrary to popular opinion, Palamas was actually condemned by the Council of Nicea when it said that God is wholly immutable and non-composite.

Marriage is a religious vocation too, brother. Courting a girl should be treated the exact same way as entering into the seminary.

https://t.me/nationalist_homestead/816

I soon saw that James was fighting a caricature of the Catholic Church: his arguments attacked an ascribed to the Catholic Church, but his anti-Catholic rhetoric left the real teachings of the Church unscathed. His characterization of the Eucharist as a repeated sacrifice of Christ demonstrated his ignorance of Catholic doctrine and an earthbound view of heavenly reality. You cannot repeat a sacrifice that exists perpetually in the eternal present of heaven! [Endnote 3]
He called the sacrifice of the Mass a denigration of the finished work of Christ on the cross, showing his failure to see that the sacrifice of the Mass is Christ’s once for all work applied to our lives within the earthbound limits of time. Although examples of temporal punishment for sin fill Scripture, he denied the existence of Purgatory. His arguments against the Communion of Saints and devotion to Mary demonstrated a superficial understanding of the biblical evidence as well as of the Catholic teaching that in the mystical body of Christ, each of us is called to intercede on behalf of each other.
It was clear that he had never looked at scripture or history from a Catholic perspective. Neither had I until recently. And while that change of perspective made all of scripture and history make perfect sense for me, he continued to wield his pen in defense of his truncated, innovative
protestant perspective. Having grasped the Catholic perspective, his ranting seems senseless and vicious to me. Rather than turn me away from the Catholicism, my brother’s books only confirmed and deepened my interest in it.

https://www.catholicconvert.com/wp-content/uploads/Documents/Story%20Patty%20Bonds.pdf

Some of you may not know, but James White’s Sister converted sometime ago to The Catholic Faith. Patty’s story is quite a good read.

Again, you’re failing to make the distinction between moral/supernatural bodies and physical bodies.The head can be seperate from the moral body in any physical body. In order to understand Bellarmine, this distinction must be made. And where did you get the idea that a council is above the Pope?

We’re talking about the deposition of the Pope from the physical body of the church here. Which requires, like St. Bellarmine said, for the Pope to be formally judged and deposed by a council. How does this imply that a council is above the Pope both supernaturally and physically in the bodily sense? It doesn’t. Bellarmine speaks about this. Maybe you should actually read him instead of cherry-picking quotes.

https://t.me/Catholicismus/1228

The head can be seperate from the moral body in any physical body. A Pope cannot be disregarded without church judgment, a council being called, and a sentence issued if he has professed heresy in the formal sense.

If a Pope becomes a heretic, he is then, as you know, placed outside of the moral body of the Church. However, this doesn’t change the fact that he does not lose jurisdiction until a council issues a sentence.

I have already dealt with this issue on twitter and I shall now transcribe it here to, YET AGAIN, prove that not only is sedevacantism incorrect, it is found NOWHERE in the old theologians, who all prescribe a far different course of action regarding a heretical Pope than the rash, prideful and many times heretical notion of sedevacantism.