Forwarded from Patria & Fides
Why does blood and soil matter for a Christian? ⬇️
Forwarded from 𝘊𝘢𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘤 𝘈𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘤 (Ella)
“One should not say that it is impossible to reach a virtuous life; but one should say that it is not easy. Nor do those who have reached it find it easy to maintain.” ~St. Anthony the Great
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
I think Christians should actually read the Bible for themselves and stop relying on some pansy behind a pulpit pandering for Jews. The Jews are an eternally cursed people according to the New Testament, there is no room for interpretation.
Matthew 27:24–25
So when Pilate saw that he was gaining nothing, but rather that a riot was beginning, he took water and washed his hands before the crowd, saying "I am innocent of this man’s blood; see to it yourselves." And all the people answered, ((("His blood be on us and on our children!")))
Matthew 27:24–25
So when Pilate saw that he was gaining nothing, but rather that a riot was beginning, he took water and washed his hands before the crowd, saying "I am innocent of this man’s blood; see to it yourselves." And all the people answered, ((("His blood be on us and on our children!")))
Nah, we were better off when only clergy had access to sacred scripture
↟ Modernists Go To Hell ↟
Nah, we were better off when only clergy had access to sacred scripture
He’s talking about Protestant pastors it seems like, because of the word pulpit, not the Holy Fathers or Church.
Forwarded from Alítheia's Archive
This is why only the clergy should be allowed to have access for interpretation of the Bible. The Bible is extremely hard to interpret, especially when there's so many incorrect versions, mostly Protestant, brought out as infallible truth.
Forwarded from Classical Theist
I know most of you are aware, but as I still get asked how Christianity coheres with classical theism, I do have a (so far) three part series on a) the existence of God b) a philosophical argument for the Incarnation and c) the atonement:
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXbTJn6BGgw94T2UvAm7rnUPgm1_2_Glr
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXbTJn6BGgw94T2UvAm7rnUPgm1_2_Glr
Classical Theist
I know most of you are aware, but as I still get asked how Christianity coheres with classical theism, I do have a (so far) three part series on a) the existence of God b) a philosophical argument for the Incarnation and c) the atonement: https://youtu…
YouTube
Scotus and Aquinas on Why God Became Man
I expand here on an earlier video I did on the Incarnation but comparing and contrasting Scotus and Aquinas' view on whether the Incarnation would have happened if man didn't sin.
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/classicaltheist
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/classicaltheist
Forwarded from This Day in Jew History
1389: On the eve of Easter Sunday, a priest was carrying a communion container to a sick resident of Prague. As the priest was walking past the city’s jewish quarter, a resident of that quarter threw a pebble at him. At the same time, several Jews attacked the communion wafer, scattering its pieces on the ground, while mocking the priest.
All but the youngest jews were slaughtered, in many cases with their limbs being cut off. According to at least one source, even when the town council tried to impose a curfew, the good citizens of Prague proclaimed of their own initiative their intent to have “the whole people all attack at once for the plunder and extermination of the jews.”
The Prague Pogrom led to the deaths of many. Estimates range from 900 to 3,000 jews. Furthermore, the council, concerned “lest the city be infected with air corrupt with the stench of usurious [that is, jewish] fat,” ordered that the bodies of all the dead be burned, together with any living jews who survived.
All but the youngest jews were slaughtered, in many cases with their limbs being cut off. According to at least one source, even when the town council tried to impose a curfew, the good citizens of Prague proclaimed of their own initiative their intent to have “the whole people all attack at once for the plunder and extermination of the jews.”
The Prague Pogrom led to the deaths of many. Estimates range from 900 to 3,000 jews. Furthermore, the council, concerned “lest the city be infected with air corrupt with the stench of usurious [that is, jewish] fat,” ordered that the bodies of all the dead be burned, together with any living jews who survived.
Forwarded from BELLUM CONTRA HÆRÉTICOS
"Orthodox" false-christian Church refuted
Pope St. Leo the Great, dogmatic letter to Flavian [449], Council of Chalcedon, 451:
"For there are three who give testimony – Spirit and water and blood. And the three are one. (1 Jn. 5:4-8) IN OTHER WORDS, THE SPIRIT OF SANCTIFICATION AND THE BLOOD OF REDEMPTION AND THE WATER OF BAPTISM. THESE THREE ARE ONE AND REMAIN INDIVISIBLE. NONE OF THEM IS SEPARABLE FROM ITS LINK WITH THE OTHERS.” One must be baptized to be saved. Whoever does not take the mark of the Father takes the mark of the devil in one form or another.
Here we have Pope Leo speaking ex cathedra, from the chair of Peter, long before the "Orthodox" and "Protestant" reformation came into existence; which shows that the papacy, the office of pope, existed during the early centuries. It was promulgated by the Council of Chalcedon [two years later]. This is the famous letter which, when read aloud at the infallible Council of Chalcedon, caused all of the fathers of the council [more than 600] to rise to their feet and proclaim: “This is the faith of the Fathers, the faith of the apostles; PETER [the office of Peter's primacy of pope] has spoken through the mouth of [Pope] Leo.” So when "Orthodox" heretics say, "we do not listen to anything else but the council of Chalcedon and therefore we reject the Filioque", tell them to be a bit more precise, since this very council was conducted by the Roman Pontiff [before "Orthodox" conciliary existed], agreed with by the Eastern Patriarchs and bishops, and is the Council of the Catholic Church today.
Around 50 years later, we have Pope St Gelasius speaking ex cathedra again, promulgating the former dogmatic statement, binding on the whole Church, east and west.
Pope St. Gelasius, Decretal, 495: “Also the epistle of blessed Leo the Pope to Flavian… if anyone argues concerning the text of this one even in regard to one iota, and does not receive it in all respects reverently, let him be anathema.”
Don't just look with eyelids, but do something about it. Time is ticking against you. Whoever is caught in mortal, in a lie, in an abomination, a sect, including the Vatican II and "Orthodox" sect, will be slain. The Councils cannot lie. Your fathers and Vatican II can lie, but not the Councils, wherefore Christ says, "Whoever has ears, let them hear what the Spirit says to the churches." [Rev 2:29].
Pope St. Leo the Great, dogmatic letter to Flavian [449], Council of Chalcedon, 451:
"For there are three who give testimony – Spirit and water and blood. And the three are one. (1 Jn. 5:4-8) IN OTHER WORDS, THE SPIRIT OF SANCTIFICATION AND THE BLOOD OF REDEMPTION AND THE WATER OF BAPTISM. THESE THREE ARE ONE AND REMAIN INDIVISIBLE. NONE OF THEM IS SEPARABLE FROM ITS LINK WITH THE OTHERS.” One must be baptized to be saved. Whoever does not take the mark of the Father takes the mark of the devil in one form or another.
Here we have Pope Leo speaking ex cathedra, from the chair of Peter, long before the "Orthodox" and "Protestant" reformation came into existence; which shows that the papacy, the office of pope, existed during the early centuries. It was promulgated by the Council of Chalcedon [two years later]. This is the famous letter which, when read aloud at the infallible Council of Chalcedon, caused all of the fathers of the council [more than 600] to rise to their feet and proclaim: “This is the faith of the Fathers, the faith of the apostles; PETER [the office of Peter's primacy of pope] has spoken through the mouth of [Pope] Leo.” So when "Orthodox" heretics say, "we do not listen to anything else but the council of Chalcedon and therefore we reject the Filioque", tell them to be a bit more precise, since this very council was conducted by the Roman Pontiff [before "Orthodox" conciliary existed], agreed with by the Eastern Patriarchs and bishops, and is the Council of the Catholic Church today.
Around 50 years later, we have Pope St Gelasius speaking ex cathedra again, promulgating the former dogmatic statement, binding on the whole Church, east and west.
Pope St. Gelasius, Decretal, 495: “Also the epistle of blessed Leo the Pope to Flavian… if anyone argues concerning the text of this one even in regard to one iota, and does not receive it in all respects reverently, let him be anathema.”
Don't just look with eyelids, but do something about it. Time is ticking against you. Whoever is caught in mortal, in a lie, in an abomination, a sect, including the Vatican II and "Orthodox" sect, will be slain. The Councils cannot lie. Your fathers and Vatican II can lie, but not the Councils, wherefore Christ says, "Whoever has ears, let them hear what the Spirit says to the churches." [Rev 2:29].