Forwarded from Logos Pilled ///
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Elijah Yasi
Immaculate Conception and Original Sin in East and West Part 1
https://youtu.be/LuGi2rD1fjw
Immaculate Conception and Original Sin in East and West Part 1
https://youtu.be/LuGi2rD1fjw
YouTube
Part 1: Immaculate Conception and Original Sin In East and West
We dive into the topics of Original Sin and the Immaculate Conception from both the Eastern and Western tradition of the Church. We answer why the Eastern O...
Might do some posts on the heretical Eastern “Orthodox” dogma of Palamism in the future. Just know that Gregory Palamas is simply the cringe version of Aquinas.
Vaticancatholic (MHFM)—who are heretics and sedes, yes—have done many videos exposing this false doctrine of God, which I recommend you all watch.
They even made Jay Dyer change his entire stance on Palamism. On the one hand, before they exposed him, he said that the Father and the Son are not the essence of God and not a part of the nature of God. Which Palamas says in the Triads. Then, a day after the video, he says the exact opposite 🤣.
Vaticancatholic (MHFM)—who are heretics and sedes, yes—have done many videos exposing this false doctrine of God, which I recommend you all watch.
They even made Jay Dyer change his entire stance on Palamism. On the one hand, before they exposed him, he said that the Father and the Son are not the essence of God and not a part of the nature of God. Which Palamas says in the Triads. Then, a day after the video, he says the exact opposite 🤣.
Very interesting topic if I do say so myself. Still studying it.
Oh, and for people who may not be aware. Gregory Palamas is one of three pillars of Orthodoxy alongside Photius and Mark of Ephesus, who is also named as a Doctor and Father of the Orthodox Church (so basically just the EO bootlegged heretical version of Aquinas)
Forwarded from Racist Cath
Get ready to see much more of this. Especially in France.
https://twitter.com/gegelsmr/status/1364619941736042502?s=21
https://twitter.com/gegelsmr/status/1364619941736042502?s=21
Twitter
GGLS💊
Right now they are demolishing the Chapelle Saint-Joseph in Lille, France. See below 👇 https://t.co/4SQ8ccIuPF
Forwarded from Racist Cath
The Chapelle Saint Joseph
Forwarded from ChristianTactics
Francis, who is not a practicing Catholic, has sided with the Usurers of the Synagogue of Satan.
I still don't understand how the Orthodox--whilst venerating the Holy Mother of God as being sinless and a perpetual virgin who was assumed into heaven--will continue to deny the dogma of the Immaculate conception and say that Mary was under the dominion of the devil since her conception. As opposed to her being under the dominion of the Holy Spirit since the moment of her conception, untainted by the spiritual consequences of Original Sin. I would not even begin to utter the words out of my mouth that the Mother of God was a Child of [the devil] Wrath ever since the moment of her conception. Yet these people have no problem in doing so, despite acknowledging her PERPETUAL virginity.
↟ Modernists Go To Hell ↟
I still don't understand how the Orthodox--whilst venerating the Holy Mother of God as being sinless and a perpetual virgin who was assumed into heaven--will continue to deny the dogma of the Immaculate conception and say that Mary was under the dominion of…
Yes yes I know the Orthodox today have a different understanding of Original Sin.
However, if what the Orthodox say is guilt inheritance when talking about our understanding of original sin then they are calling their very own Saints and Fathers heretics, such as Palamas and St. Symeon.
We don't believe that Original Sin was completely removed from The Blessed Mother, she just did not possess the Spiritual defects/consequences of Original Sin (Concupiscence) from the moment of her very conception. Which, since the latter, was under the dominion of the Holy Ghost, not Wrath. You cannot ignore this aspect of Original Sin. I mean, the Synod of Jerusalem (1672) even affirms Augustine’s view of Original Sin in Decree 16 (XVI)
However, if what the Orthodox say is guilt inheritance when talking about our understanding of original sin then they are calling their very own Saints and Fathers heretics, such as Palamas and St. Symeon.
We don't believe that Original Sin was completely removed from The Blessed Mother, she just did not possess the Spiritual defects/consequences of Original Sin (Concupiscence) from the moment of her very conception. Which, since the latter, was under the dominion of the Holy Ghost, not Wrath. You cannot ignore this aspect of Original Sin. I mean, the Synod of Jerusalem (1672) even affirms Augustine’s view of Original Sin in Decree 16 (XVI)
Logos Pilled ///
Message
Technically they can, yes. Though I have yet to come across one who upholds the Augustinian view of Original Sin and the dogma of the Immaculate Conception.