That's enough on dispelling the Schismatic myths about Papal Infallibility and Roman Primacy for today I think, you guys get the picture.

Daniel said antichrist would claim equality with the Lord Jesus

11 He even exalted himself as high as the Prince of the host; and by him the daily sacrifices were taken away, and the place of [f]His sanctuary was cast down.

Daniel 8:11

sounds like the pope again

Not a real quote. These people love to lie and deceive.

"We anathematize alike those inventors of new error, that is, Theodore Bishop of Pharan, Cyrus of Alexandria, Sergius, Pyrrhus, Paul, Peter, plotters against, rather than Prelates of the Church of Constantinople; and also Honorius, who did not illumine this Apostolical Church with the doctrine of Apostolical Tradition, but by a foul betrayal attempted to subvert its spotless Faith." --Letter of Pope St. Leo II (+683) to Emperor Constantine IV

Pope Honorius (+638) was condemned at the Constantinople III in 681 for supporting Monothelitism. Here are the pertinent letters.

Bruh moment.

This condemnation of Pope Honorius was recited at the 7th Ecumenical Council of Nicaea (787) and Constantinople IV (869), as well as by the oath taken upon entering Papal office by all the Pontiffs throughout the 8th to the 11th centuries. That said, Pope Leo II also recognizes the truth of Pope St. Agatho’s letter which contained clear and explicit statements of Papal infallibility and the inability of the Roman Church to err in faith due to the promise of Jesus Christ in blessed Peter.

"The letter of Honorius, even if it does contain error, only means that there is a difference between the Pope writing in his official capacity , but not yet fully intending on his decree to binding upon the whole church. But there is very good evidence to suggest Honorius was not a monothelite. Be that as it may, the Council still condemned him as a heretic, and so believed it was possible for a Pope to be a heretic. And yet, isn’t this what Catholics even believe today? Those of us who believe God draws straight through crooked lines , even with those institutions which He created, can see that the Papacy had brought peace and unity to the Church on several occasions, even if at the cost of many times being an absolute failure. The veracity of the Papacy is not born from its effectiveness, but from its being divinely instituted."

NON PRAEVALEAT INFERNUM

Never let people like this spread such lies. They want you to become a schismatic heretic.

I wonder what their next claim will be lol, probably something to the likes of "the Immaculate Conception dogma is just made-up papal nonsense."

“Do not despair. One of the thieves was saved. Do not presume. One of the thieves was damned.”
- St. Augustine

Since this debate was on Roman Primacy I assume he would’ve said too that he would need to be convinced that the dogmas of the Immaculate Conception and Filioque were not taught by the Church Fathers.

Hint: they were.

Give me one Church Father who adhered to Modern Orthodox ecclesiology. 🤣