Kek

Too much talk about ‘youth crime’ and not enough talk about aboriginal crime. These rats in parliament will literally spend days on end drawing up policies and debating about youth crime without even mentioning aboriginals, how they have an average IQ of 62, and go around breaking into everybody’s cars in places like Townsville, regional/rural WA and the NT, despite being privileged by the system in almost every way imaginable.

They will also never admit that after 50 years of implementing failed aboriginal policies, the 1967 referendum, the establishment of National Aboriginal Consultative Committee in 1972, the department of Aboriginal Affairs in 1973, the National Aboriginal Conference in 1977, the Aboriginal Development Commission in 1981, and the Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation in 1991 have resulted in nothing. Parliaments working with dozens and dozens of land councils, giving them Native Title rights, ridiculous amounts of other benefits and programs to try and help them, implementing ATSIC, launching the recognition project, closing the Mabo case, having parliament take advice from 100s of aboriginal organisations, Kevin Rudd issuing a national apology, the First Nations National Constitutional Convention, an aboriginal affairs minister, etc. have all been total disasters. And the things that do help, like the basics card Jacinta Price (aboriginal MP) introduced, which was a card remote aboriginal community members had to have, where you couldn’t buy alcohol, etc. are scrapped by labour.

On this point, John Stone says: Since the “achievements” of Aboriginal hunter-gatherers prior to European settlement are hard to discern, and since the less said the better about their fundamentally violent and payback-ridden “culture”, one might have thought this body would have had its “appreciation” work cut out. It did however provide well-remunerated positions for both Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal activists. Throughout these twenty-five years of change, three things remained unchanging: the constant flow of public money, at first a trickle, building to a river, within which the Aboriginal industry has its being; the fact that, despite the money lavished upon them, the situation of “real” Aborigines does not seem to have improved; and the fact that, as each demand has been granted, it has been succeeded by a new on.”

Important to note that there are also multiple aboriginal MP’s in parliament, and look what that’s done - fuck all. You have to be insane to think that enshrining aboriginals into the constitution, setting up a de-facto seperate parliament whereby no bill gets passed without consulting this new ‘advisory body’, Albanese wants to implement, will change anything and not just end up like ATSIC.

Now, the reason why the aboriginal problem hasn’t been solved, isn’t because the government just hasn’t got the right policy, since they have quite literally tried everything; it’s because of their genetic makeup and their violent alcoholic culture and kinship system. And if you recognise these things, you are completely ostracised and shut down instantly. It doesn’t matter how many times you say sorry and let these people ‘welcome’ you into your own country.

It’s time the White Aussie tax-payer stands up to this nonsense and stops being robbed of his money just so that these violent, low IQ criminal delinquents can keep buying ciggies, alcohol, weed, bashing elderly White women and wagging school.

Anyone, and especially Greens voters, who think that these people deserve a voice should be taken to Alice Springs or rural Western Australia/Northern Queensland and be forced to spend a month there living amongst them.

> Average aboriginal IQ = 62
> Mental retardation threshold = 70

Checks out

Do these people really deserve a voice in Parliament?

Fantastic interview. Glad there’s more people coming out now and exposing this radical, neurotic, psychopathic anti-white, anti-Christian agenda being perpetuated and forced upon students in British universities. Bravo to this lady. Here’s the crowdfund for her court case:

http://gofundme.com/f/standuptowoke

At least we're not speaking German!

Give it 5 years and the Churchill monument in Parliament Square will be pulled down

Very interesting development. If Rishi actually delivers and goes full counter-jihad on pakis it will be the funniest shit ever.

https://twitter.com/wasiquk/status/1584973794803851266?s=46&t=cW6tUyjUG_M7JMEkxZOu3g

It’s going to be a party in the UK soon lads!

This is hilarious. This guy is too autistic to realise he's violating the most sacred taboo in the west just giving an honest analysis of Jewish power

https://youtu.be/weTZFx0Dt1M

🇮🇹🏴 100 Years anniversary of March on Rome

100 years ago on this day, thousands of fascists and Nationalists marched into Rome to seize total control of the Italian government

Clarification:

The threshold I.Q. level for a diagnosis of mental retardation has been progressively lowered over the years, in part because of awareness of the damaging social prejudice suffered by those labeled "retarded." In 1959, the American Association on Mental Deficiency set 85 as the I.Q. below which a person was considered to be retarded. In 1992, the renamed American Association on Mental Retardation lowered the mental retardation "ceiling" to an I.Q. of 70-75. This means the average aboriginal IQ of 62 is actually 23 points below the threshold for retardation, not eight.

https://www.hrw.org/reports/2001/ustat/ustat0301-01.htm

Great debate exposing the complete fabrication of frontier history and stories of mass genocide against Aborigines by mainstream historians, especially by Henry Reynolds, the one who popularised the myth and grandiose claims in 1981. The same myths that are now accepted as gospel by the system and have led to crippling White guilt and the waste of billions of tax-payers money as a part of ‘reconciliation.’

One of the most poignant points in this debate that Keith makes is that from his research in the Tasmanian archives and all the history available on it, he found that Aboriginals killed twice as many Whites as Whites killed blacks. Ironically, Henry doesn’t apply the same logic he does to Queensland - whereby he claims that in order to know how many blacks were killed by Whites, you multiply the amount of Whites killed by blacks tenfold until you get some ridiculous number -, as he does to Tasmania. Henry also tends to ignore that the Native Police were a force of peace in Victoria, and that the Native Police records in Queensland are missing. The same Native Police who are blamed for for sooo many massacres in Queensland. Based on what evidence? Well, we aren’t told. You just have to accept it. You just have to be content with pseudo-history; and if you say it’s that, you’re an evil racist.

On another note, Keith goes onto mention that a lot of these killings by Whites were the result of Aborigine murder and abduction of children, based on aboriginal ‘oral legends’ written down by Whites in the 60s and 70s, and that the future of this nation hinges on this debate.

The conclusion he makes regarding the death counts are also based on regional studies, records, and not baseless assumptions, which is how you do history apparently; well, at least according to Henry Reynolds it is. However, that’s of course not true, and Keith has gone to great lengths to tell the real story, so I recommend checking out his books and the many articles on quadrant.org.au on the subject.

All around great points on both sides. It’s a shame that televised public debates like this are no longer allowed. Quite weird how you’re not allowed to question the official narrative anymore without being completely ostracised from society, isn’t it?

https://youtu.be/dD4IUgFWH_g

“The debate over what happened to the Aborigines is not only about them. Ultimately, it is about the character of the Australian nation and the calibre of the civilisation that Britain brought to these shores in 1788. Pretty obviously, my own work is a defence of the integrity of both the nation itself and the civilisation from which it derives. This is probably why I have been so vilified by my opponents. For some reason, they want to portray their own country as the moral equivalent of Hitler’s Germany or Stalin’s Russia. They are entitled to their opinion but they are not entitled to invent the facts on which that opinion is based. Nor are they entitled to deceive their students and the public at large, both white and black, as they have been doing over the past 30 years.”

- Keith Windschuttle

A new Rome is coming. 100 years after thousands of Italian blackshirts marched on Rome to bring a new epoch to Europe, we remember their sacrifices. But on this day we remember primarily that of Italy, the brave Italians that took the first step, a step which others followed. And 100 years later we hope that someone new will come and take that first step again. And that this time, all of Europe follows.

Revolutionary Arts
Revolutionary Chat