Vi er innen 5–10 år en minoritet i egen hovedstad, og i mange av våre største byer.

Within 5–10 years, we will be a minority in our own capital, and in many of our largest cities.

Det ble avlagt 1 601 doktorgrader ved norske universiteter og høgskoler i 2021, 33 færre enn i 2020. Nesten 700 av de nye doktorene var utenlandske statsborgere, det tilsvarer 44 prosent. Andelen har mer enn doblet seg de siste 20 årene, og har aldri vært høyere enn i fjor https://perma.cc/362U-6DWB

Foreigner change https://t.me/TerrorismTelegram/531
BUT for example 🇵🇰 Pakistan (one of your biggest enemy) before Utøya and now IS IDENTICAL! ...
https://t.me/NorgeTelegramFreaks/129

1,601 doctorates were awarded at Norwegian universities and colleges in 2021, 33 fewer than in 2020. Almost 700 of the new doctors were foreign nationals, which corresponds to 44 per cent. The share has more than doubled in the last 20 years, and has never been higher than last year

Fengslingsrate pr. 100 000 innbyggere alle aldersgrupper
- 103 for alle nyinnsettelser i fengsel (alle
innsettelser)
- 127 for iverksatte dommer (alle ubetinget
dommer, fengsel og samfunn)
- 57 for gjennomsnittlig antall innsatte

Imprisonment rate per 100,000 inhabitants of all age groups
- 103 for all new admissions to prison (all
insertions)
- 127 for enforced judgments (all unconditional
judge, prison and society)
- 57 for the average number of inmates

Gjennomsnittlig sittetid i 2022 var 79 dager, gjennomsnittet for 2021 var pa 94 dager.

The average sitting time in 2022 was 79 days, the average for 2021 was 94 days.

Foreigners in prison: from 51.3% to 30.3%

Rape
https://t.me/RapeTelegram/1316
https://t.me/RapeTelegram/1641
https://t.me/RapeTelegram/1642

Recidivism
https://t.me/TerrorismTelegram/620
to
https://t.me/TerrorismTelegram/634

Conclusion: yes Breivik, foreigners are increasing, BUT WE NEED TO CONSIDER EVEN THE NATIONALITY etc. Criminality is decreasing. What you said before is "wrong"!

but there is still the question "did Norway set a limit after Utøya?"

Remember that human rights are exactly like ethical dilemma!
https://t.me/DefenceTelegram/413

Do we need to give human rights to a criminal or human rights to the population, means keeping safe the population against a criminal that once released could repeat the same exact crime ... like around ⅓ of the prisoners are doing ...

Do we need to give support to people doing illegal migration, or do we prefer give the money to homeless people in our countries?
https://t.me/WomenRightsTelegram/582

Well, the best solution is to try to do the best for both sides (if this is possible), so that we don't discriminate both.

No matter what, we are still of the opinion that NO CRIMINALS SHOULD GET PRIORITY! Obviously it depends from the situation ...
https://t.me/AmnestyBullshit/527

Plus there are some things, that for other people make no difference at all. Means if for example abortion is legal, there is no difference at all for all other people! especially because physiologically a fetus is not a kid able to live alone ...
https://t.me/HumanRightsChecklist/111

It's a decision that the mother should take, if she wants or not the kid! Not a random person or a politician, who don't need to pay food, university, clothes, educate / support the kid, etc. for x years! Such dudes have NOTHING to do with the decision of making abortion or other things! Instead they are doing a CRIME saying "Nope, you cannot do that"!

No matter what, at some point we have the situation "human rights of 1 person" vs "human rights of x persons", like the picture with the train.

Should we put our country in danger just for one people in hostage by terrorists or ...
Maybe such person is in hostage for irrational way of acting ...

One thing is still sture. There are cases, where there is NO ethical dilemma anymore. In such cases we have 100% proof and criminals are even PROUD to do such things!

For all other cases, it always depends from the type of crime and the deep of the crime
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/20

NEVER FORGET BOTH SIDES!