Israel is committing genocide and burning an innocent protestor.

ED's plea against Kejriwal bail mentioned before court.

Senior Advocate Vikram Chaudhari for Kejriwal: This was highly unjustified and unwarranted mentioning (by ED). We don't want to miss the bus by the evening.

Singhvi requests court to hear matter urgently.

Court: Just wait for 10-15 minutes.

Posting only relevant comments in the court.

ASG:

Full opportunity has not been given. The parameter has not been dealt with. Kindly come to my petition. When the turn of my learned friend came, he said he'll be brief. He was brief. He didn't address the court in detail. When I argued, the court said I have to deliver judgment. Be brief.

Chaudhari: How to argue and what to argue is my prerogative.

ASG: I said it will take at least half an hour. I couldn't argue in detail.

ASG: In the impugned order, the court doesn't hear us. It says records are voluminous. And passes the order. You don't hear us.

ASG: You don't hear me. You don't look at the reply saying it's bulky. There can't be a more perverse order than this.

ASG: Without going through documents filed by both sides, without giving us opportunity the matter is decided. It is the duty of court to pass order in accordance with law. Without going to documents how can you say it's relevant or not relevant?

ASG: If you'd gone to documents you would have known that the ECIR was registered in August. So there was no question of material being available in July.

ASG: On Wrong facts, wrong dates, you come to a conclusion that mala fide. But why, the reason is missing. My note not considered, not allowed to argue.

Note: Chaudhari+ Singhvi is appearing for Kejriwal and ASG Raju for ED

ASG: The arrest was challenged. The remanding court said the arrest was correct. It was challenged before this court. The single judge said nothing wrong with the arrest.

ASG: We pointed out that the SC didn't say that the findings of High Court ought not to be considered. Those were binding findings not stayed by the SC.

ASG: In Sanjay Singh case, SC says uninfluenced by order of the High Court. Please look at that order. That is missing in this case therefore that judgment stands.

ASG: In face of the Delhi High Court order, the trial court could not have decided in his favour.

ASG: Compare the judgment with the findings. This court says no mala fide. She gives a finding on mala fide on same facts. SC has not said that you decide uninfluenced by that judgment.

ASG: Mala fide is demolished by the High Court judgment.

('She' is Judge Niyay Bindu who ordered bail)

ASG: We showed material but nothing considered. There are two ways when bail can be cancelled. If relevant facts are not considered and irrelevant facts considered, that is a ground for cancellation of bail.

ASG: I am not on cogent reasons. I am on irrelevant circumstances considered. Which is a seperate ground for cancellation of bail.

ASG: I am saying look at the soundness of the order. Could have granted bail but not in this manner. Totally perverse order.

Court: You are saying all these points were not considered? You are saying the points which were elaborately dealt with by the HC have not been considered?

ASG: Yes.

Court: We will continue after lunch.

Tejaswi Yadav's PS Pritam Kumar questioned by Bihar EOU over NEET paper Leak

Bihar Deputy CM Vijay Sinha