Macro Trader
5.71K subscribers
1.79K photos
6 videos
4 files
1.11K links
Download Telegram
Payrolls Dash Pivot Hopes as Investors Throw In Towel.
White House Adds New Restrictions on Chip Exports to China.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Did you know that some whales create bubble nets to catch their food? ๐Ÿ‹
Bottom-line: ํˆฌ๊ธฐ๋“ฑ๊ธ‰ ์ฑ„๊ถŒ ๋‚ด์—์„œ ๋“ฑ๊ธ‰ ๊ฐ„ ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ  ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ํ™•๋Œ€๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Œ. ์ด๋Š” CCC ๋“ฑ๊ธ‰์˜ ํšŒ์‚ฌ์ฑ„๊ฐ€ ์ง€๋ถˆ๋ถˆ๋Šฅ์˜ ์‚ฌํƒœ์— ๋น ์งˆ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์šฐ๋ ค๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ„. ์ƒํ™ฉ์€ ํˆฌ์ž๋“ฑ๊ธ‰ ์ฑ„๊ถŒ๋„ ๋‹ค๋ฅด์ง€ ์•Š์€๋ฐ, ๋งˆ์ฐฌ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋“ฑ๊ธ‰ ๊ฐ„ ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ  ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ํ™•๋Œ€๋˜๋ฉฐ ํˆฌ์ž๋“ฑ๊ธ‰ ์ฑ„๊ถŒ์ด ํˆฌ๊ธฐ๋“ฑ๊ธ‰์œผ๋กœ ๋–จ์–ด์ง€๋Š” '์ถ”๋ฝํ•œ ์ฒœ์‚ฌ'๊ฐ€ ๋  ์—ผ๋ ค๊ฐ€ ๋…น์•„์žˆ์Œ.

Credit markets faded the weekโ€™s rally after payrolls data left bonds increasingly exposed to downgrades and defaults as the Fed stays hawkish. The gap between higher and lower rated bonds is widening as funding costs surge and earnings weaken. The rising tide from last weekโ€™s highly stressed credit market levels didnโ€™t lift all boats. A stubborn gulf between CCC spreads and the next rating tier up highlights investor fears that those bonds wonโ€™t pay back. In investment grade, the gap between AA and A rated debt remains stretched on fears that lower-rated bonds will slip to BBB, where funding costs -- and the risk of falling to junk -- are elevated. High-grade downgrades are seen accelerating as the economy slows, leaving investors taking cover in better quality bonds.
Ben S. Bernanke, Douglas W. Diamond and Philip H. Dybvig were awarded the 2022 Nobel Prize in economic sciences โ€œfor research on banks and financial crises.โ€. The three will share the 10 million-kronor ($900,000) award, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences said in Stockholm on Monday.
Bottom-line: ์—ญ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ๋Œ์•„๋ณด๋ฉด, ํ†ตํ™”์ •์ฑ…์˜ ๊ฐ‘์ž‘์Šค๋Ÿฌ์šด ์„ ํšŒ(1998๋…„ LTCM, 2008๋…„ ๊ธˆ์œต์œ„๊ธฐ, 2020๋…„ ๋ฐ”์ด๋Ÿฌ์Šค ๋Œ€ํ™•์‚ฐ)๋Š” ๊ฑฐ์‹œ๊ฒฝ์ œ ์ง€ํ‘œ์˜ ์•…ํ™”๊ฐ€ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ๊ทน๋‹จ์˜ ์‚ฌ๊ฑด์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ–ˆ์Œ. ์•…๋ช…์œผ๋กœ ๋‚จ์€ 2018๋…„ ํŒŒ์›”์˜ ์ž˜๋ชป ๋œ ์ •์ฑ… ์„ ํšŒ๋Š” ์ค‘์•™์€ํ–‰์ด ์‹œ์žฅ์— ์ •์ฑ…์„ ์ „๋‹ฌํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ์–ด๋ ค์›€์„ ๊ฐ€์ค‘์‹œํ‚ค๊ณ , ์ž์‹ ๋“ค์˜ ์ •์ฑ…์„ ์ฆ๋ช…ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๋” ๋†’์€ ๊ธˆ๋ฆฌ์ธ์ƒ์„ ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋Š” ์ƒํ™ฉ์„ ๋งŒ๋“ค์—ˆ์Œ. ์‹œ์žฅ ์ฐธ์—ฌ์ž๋“ค์ด ์ •์ฑ… ์„ ํšŒ์— ๋ฒ ํŒ…ํ•  ๋•Œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํฐ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋Š”, ์ค‘์•™์€ํ–‰์ด ์›ํ•˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ค€๊นŒ์ง€ ์ž์‚ฐ๊ฐ€์น˜๊ฐ€ ํ•˜๋ฝํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์ด๋ฉฐ, ๊ทธ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ธˆ์œตํ™˜๊ฒฝ ์ž์ฒด๊ฐ€ ์™„ํ™”์ ์ธ ์ƒํƒœ์— ๋จธ๋ฌด๋ฅธ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž„.

Historyโ€™s clear pivots (after the Long-Term Capital Management crisis in 1998; in 2008 as the credit crisis grew extreme; and in the desperate hours of the Covid shutdown in March 2020) have been driven by extreme events, and not by deteriorating macro numbers. And in general, a pivot is not exactly a consummation devoutly to be wished. Changes in the macro lead to changes in policy, but both tend to be gradual. The infamous โ€œPowell Pivotโ€ of late 2018, when the Fed was bullied into changing course by a savage December stock selloff, may be most to blame. It fostered the impression that this Fed would turn on a dime. That earlier pivot has made it harder for the Fed to convince markets of its intentions, and may well mean that it has to hike more than it wishes just to prove itself. There is a final problem with betting on a pivot, which is that it makes one less likely. Higher equity valuations contribute to an easing in financial conditions. The Fed is hoping that it can rein in inflation via the means of tighter financial conditions. So each little burst of optimism makes it harder for the central bank to move. Bloombergโ€™s own measure shows that US financial conditions are now more than one standard deviation tighter than the mean for the last decade, and their tightest in that time โ€” with the very significant exception of March 2020.
Romance With Fed Pivot Breaks Investor Hearts.
Bottom-line: ์˜ต์…˜ ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜ ์†์— ๊ทธ ์˜๋„๋ฅผ ๋ถ„๋ช…ํžˆ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๊ธฐ๋ž€ ๋ถˆ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์— ๊ฐ€๊นŒ์›€. ๋‹ค๋งŒ, ์†Œ์ˆ˜์˜ ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜์ž๋“ค์ด ์œ ๋™์„ฑ์ด ์ ์€ ์ผ๋ถ€ ์ฃผ์‹์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜๊ฐ€ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜๋Œ€๊ธˆ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„ํ–ˆ์„ ๋•Œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๊ทœ๋ชจ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜์ž๋“ค์˜ ์ง‘๋‹จ์  ์›€์ง์ž„์€ ์ฃผ์‹œ์˜ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž„. ์ด๋“ค์€ ์ตœ๊ทผ ๊ฐœ๋ณ„์ฃผ์‹์˜ ํ’‹ ์˜ต์…˜์„ 100์–ต ๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ด์ƒ ๋งค์ˆ˜ํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜ ๊ธฐ๋ก์„ ์„ธ์›€. ์ด ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜๋Ÿ‰๋งŒ ๋†“๊ณ  ๋ณด์ž๋ฉด ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํ•œ ํ•˜๋ฝ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋˜ ์—ญ์‚ฌ์  ์ตœ์•…์˜ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ๋Œ€๋น„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ทธ๊ฒƒ๊ณผ ๋‹ค๋ฆ„์ด ์—†์–ด๋ณด์ž„.

With a lumbering bear market whipping up volatility, the biggest traders are wringing stock options for all theyโ€™re worth. The largest players on the options market bought more than $10 billion in puts on individual stocks last week, a record for that group and close to the most ever by any cohort of traders, according to Sundial Capital Research. The rush for protection came as the S&P 500 slumped into the weekend and the Cboe Volatility Index spiked above 32 to the highest level since June. Discerning a clear signal from any such action in the options market is nearly impossible. The flurry of buying could have been a straight grab for protection against further equity losses or an attempt to exploit anomalies opening up as markets lurch from one massive move to the next. But the sheer volume is another indication that markets in 2022 have started trading in ways comparable to some of the worst periods in recent history. โ€œIf the trades are due to relatively few trades on a few stocks, e.g. a part of some huge complicated arbitrage or other strategy,โ€ then there might be no takeaway from the data, Jason Goepfert, chief research officer at Sundial, said. โ€œIt doesnโ€™t seem to be the case, though, so the suggestion is that they are betting very heavily on a severe, sudden decline.โ€
Macro Trader
Bottom-line: ์˜ต์…˜ ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜ ์†์— ๊ทธ ์˜๋„๋ฅผ ๋ถ„๋ช…ํžˆ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๊ธฐ๋ž€ ๋ถˆ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์— ๊ฐ€๊นŒ์›€. ๋‹ค๋งŒ, ์†Œ์ˆ˜์˜ ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜์ž๋“ค์ด ์œ ๋™์„ฑ์ด ์ ์€ ์ผ๋ถ€ ์ฃผ์‹์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜๊ฐ€ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜๋Œ€๊ธˆ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„ํ–ˆ์„ ๋•Œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๊ทœ๋ชจ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜์ž๋“ค์˜ ์ง‘๋‹จ์  ์›€์ง์ž„์€ ์ฃผ์‹œ์˜ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž„. ์ด๋“ค์€ ์ตœ๊ทผ ๊ฐœ๋ณ„์ฃผ์‹์˜ ํ’‹ ์˜ต์…˜์„ 100์–ต ๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ด์ƒ ๋งค์ˆ˜ํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜ ๊ธฐ๋ก์„ ์„ธ์›€. ์ด ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜๋Ÿ‰๋งŒ ๋†“๊ณ  ๋ณด์ž๋ฉด ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํ•œ ํ•˜๋ฝ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋˜ ์—ญ์‚ฌ์  ์ตœ์•…์˜ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ๋Œ€๋น„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ทธ๊ฒƒ๊ณผ ๋‹ค๋ฆ„์ด ์—†์–ด๋ณด์ž„. With a lumberingโ€ฆ
๋ฐฑ์–ต ๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ๋ฅผ ๋ฐฑ๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ ์ ์—ˆ๋Š”๋ฐ... ๋ฐฑ๋งŒ๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ๋„ ํฐ ๊ทœ๋ชจ๋กœ ์ƒ๊ฐํ•ด์„œ ์•„๋ฌด๋„ ์˜คํƒ€๋ฅผ ์•Œ๋ ค์ฃผ์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๊ฒƒ์ผ๊นŒ.

$10bil = 14์กฐ์› ๊ทœ๋ชจ์˜ ํ’‹ ์˜ต์…˜ ๋งค์ˆ˜์ž„.
Bottom-line: ํ•œ๊ตญ 10์ผ ์ˆ˜์ถœ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ์ „๋…„ ๋Œ€๋น„ -20.2%๋กœ ํฐ ํญ ๋ถ€์ง„ํ–ˆ์Œ. ์ ์žํญ ๋˜ํ•œ 38์–ต ๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ๋กœ ํ™•๋Œ€๋์Œ. ์ด ๋‰ด์Šค์— ์›ํ™”์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋งค๋„๊ฐ€ ์ด์–ด์กŒ์ง€๋งŒ, ๊ณ„์ ˆ์กฐ์ •์„ ๊ฑฐ์น  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ „์›” ๋Œ€๋น„๋กœ๋Š” -1.6% ๊ฐ์†Œ์ž„.

South Koreaโ€™s 10-day exports experienced a large y/y slump on a headline basis, and the trade deficit widened to $3.8b from $2.4b from the corresponding period. Korean won NDFs sold off on the news. The read across to global activity is also negative, with these numbers 36% correlated with US ISM in changes terms. That said, the underlying export numbers are not quite as bad as the headline suggests. The day-count and seasonally adjusted series fell only -1.6% m/m, according to my calculation, a mere 0.2 standard deviation decline for this extremely volatile series.
Bottom-line: 24์กฐ์›์— ๋‹ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฏธ๊ตญ ๊ตญ์ฑ„์‹œ์žฅ์˜ ๊ฑฐ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋งค์ˆ˜์ž๋“ค์ด ๋ชจ๋‘ ๋“ฑ์„ ๋Œ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์žˆ์Œ. ์ผ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ธˆํŽ€๋“œ์—์„œ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ƒ๋ช…๋ณดํ—˜์‚ฌ, ์™ธ๊ตญ ์ •๋ถ€์— ์ด๋ฅด๊ธฐ๊นŒ์ง€ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ ๊ตญ์ฑ„์— ์˜์กดํ•˜๋˜ ๊ทธ๋“ค์ด ๋ฌผ๋Ÿฌ์„œ๊ธฐ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•˜๋Š” ์™€์ค‘์— ์ค‘์•™์€ํ–‰ ๋˜ํ•œ ๋งค๋„์ž๋กœ ๋ฐ”๋€ ์ƒํƒœ์ž„. ์ด๋“ค ์ค‘ ํ•œ ๋‘๊ณณ๋งŒ ํ™•์‹คํ•œ ์ˆ˜์š”์ž๊ฐ€ ๋˜์–ด์ค€๋‹ค๋ฉด ๋ชจ๋ฅด๊ฒ ์œผ๋‚˜, ๋†’์€ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ๊ณผ ์•…ํ™” ๋œ ์œ ๋™์„ฑ, ๋‚ฎ์€ ์ž…์ฐฐ๋ฅ ์ด ๋ชจ๋‘๊ฐ€ ํ›„ํ‡ดํ•˜๋Š” ์ƒํ™ฉ์— ์šฐ๋ ค๋ฅผ ํ‚ค์šฐ๊ณ  ์žˆ์Œ. 1970๋…„๋Œ€ ์ดํ›„ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํฐ ํญ ํ•˜๋ฝํ•œ ๊ตญ์ฑ„ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ตฌ๋งค์ž๊ฐ€ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์ง€ ์•Š๊ธฐ์— ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ๊ณ ํ†ต์ด ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ž€ ๋œป์ž„. ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ตฌ๋งค์ž๊ฐ€ ๋ˆ„๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋А ์ˆœ๊ฐ„ ์ง„์ž…ํ• ์ง€ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์—†์ง€๋งŒ, ๊ทธ๋“ค์€ ๋ถ„๋ช… ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์— ๋”์šฑ ๋ฏผ๊ฐํ•œ ์ƒํƒœ์ผ ๊ฒƒ์ž„.

Everywhere you turn, the biggest players in the $23.7 trillion US Treasuries market are in retreat. From Japanese pensions and life insurers to foreign governments and US commercial banks, where once they were lining up to get their hands on US government debt, most have now stepped away. And then thereโ€™s the Federal Reserve, which a few weeks ago upped the pace that it plans to offload Treasuries from its balance sheet to $60 billion a month. If one or two of these usually steadfast sources of demand were bailing, the impact, while noticeable, would likely be little cause for alarm. But for every one of them to pull back is an undeniable source of concern, especially coming on the heels of the unprecedented volatility, deteriorating liquidity and weak auctions of recent months. The upshot, according to market watchers, is that even with Treasuries tumbling the most since at least the early 1970s this year, more pain may be in store until new, consistent sources of demand emerge. Itโ€™s also bad news for US taxpayers, who will ultimately have to foot the bill for higher borrowing costs. โ€œWe need to find a new marginal buyer of Treasuries as central banks and banks overall are exiting stage left,โ€ said Glen Capelo, who spent more than three decades on Wall Street bond-trading desks and is now a managing director at Mischler Financial. โ€œItโ€™s still not clear yet who that will be, but we know theyโ€™re going to be a lot more price sensitive.โ€
US stocks erased gains and bonds fell as Bailey's warning rattled investors. The S&P 500 slid for a fifth day amid renewed selling in tech shares. Treasury yields rose, with 10-year notes jumping 5 bps to almost 3.94%.
Bottom-line: ์ธํ…”์€ ์ˆ˜์ฒœ๋ช…์— ๋‹ฌํ•˜๋Š” ์ธ์› ๊ฐ์ถ•์„ ๋ฐœํ‘œํ•  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์•Œ๋ ค์ง. ๊ฐœ์ธ์šฉ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ์˜ ์ˆ˜์š” ๋‘”ํ™”์™€ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ ํšŒ์‚ฌ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์‹œ์žฅ ์ ์œ ์œจ์„ ์ž ์‹ ๋‹นํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ด๋ฏธ ์‹ค์  ์ „๋ง์„ ๋‚ฎ์ถ˜ ๋ฐ” ์žˆ๋Š” ์ด ํšŒ์‚ฌ๋Š” ๋น„์šฉ์„ ๊ฐ์ถ•ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ค„์–ด๋“œ๋Š” ์ˆ˜์š”์— ๋Œ€์‘ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ธ์›์„ ๊ฐ์ถ•ํ•  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์ž„. ๋งˆ์ผ€ํŒ…์ด๋‚˜ ํŒ๋งค ๋ถ€์„œ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํ•ด๋‹น ์ธ์› ๊ฐ์ถ•์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋ถ€์„œ์˜ 20% ์ด์ƒ์ด ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์˜ˆ์ƒ๋จ.

Intel Corp. is planning a major reduction in headcount, likely numbering in the thousands, to cut costs and cope with a sputtering personal-computer market, according to people with knowledge of the situation. The layoffs will be announced as early as this month, with the company planning to make the move around the same time as its third-quarter earnings report on Oct. 27, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the deliberations are private. The chipmaker had 113,700 employees as of July. Some divisions, including Intelโ€™s sales and marketing group, could see cuts affecting about 20% of staff, according to the people. Intel is facing a steep decline in demand for PC processors, its main business, and has struggled to win back market share lost to rivals like Advanced Micro Devices Inc. In July, the company warned that 2022 sales would be about $11 billion lower than it previously expected. Analysts are predicting a third-quarter revenue drop of roughly 15%. And Intelโ€™s once-enviable margins have shriveled: Theyโ€™re about 15 percentage points narrower than historical numbers of around 60%.
Docent: ํˆฌ์žํšŒ์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ ์œ„ํƒ ๋ฐ›์€ ์ž๊ธˆ์„ ํˆฌ์žํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๊ณ  ๋‚จ์•„๋Œ ๋•Œ ์ด๋ฅผ '๋“œ๋ผ์ด ํŒŒ์šฐ๋”(Dry Powder: ๋“œ๋ผ์ดํŒŒ์šฐ๋”๋Š” ๊ฑด์กฐ๋œ ํ™”์•ฝ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๋œป์œผ๋กœ ์ „ํˆฌ์—์„œ ๋ฐ”๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ํ™•๋ณดํ•ด ๋†“๋Š” ์‹คํƒ„์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ์—์„œ ์œ ๋ž˜)'๋ผ ์นญํ•จ. ์ด๋Ÿฐ ๋“œ๋ผ์ด ํŒŒ์šฐ๋”๊ฐ€ ์ ์  ๋Š˜์–ด๋‚œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๋ณด๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‚˜์˜จ์ง€ ์–ผ๋งˆ ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์‹œ์ ์—์„œ ์ด ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ๋ณด๋ฉด ์‹œ์‚ฌ์ ์ด ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ž„. ์ง€๋‚œ ๋ช‡๋…„ ๊ฐ„ ์Šคํƒ€ํŠธ์—… ์„ธ๊ณ„์—์„œ๋Š” ์–ธ์ œ ์œ ๋‹ˆ์ฝ˜์ด ๋ ์ง€๊ฐ€ ํ™”๋‘์˜€์ง€๋งŒ, ์ด์ œ๋Š” ์ƒํ™ฉ์ด ์™„์ „ํžˆ ๋ฐ”๋€ ์ƒํƒœ๋ผ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ. ์‹ ๊ทœ ํˆฌ์ž๊ฐ€ ์‚ฌ๋ผ์ง€๊ธฐ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ์ƒ์กด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ ์ž์ฒด๊ฐ€ ์˜๋ฌธ์Šค๋Ÿฌ์šด ์ƒํƒœ, ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์œ ๋‹ˆ์ฝ˜์ด ์•„๋‹Œ '๋ฐ”ํ€ด๋ฒŒ๋ ˆ'๊ฐ€ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ™”๋‘๊ฐ€ ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Œ. ์ปจํผ๋Ÿฐ์Šค์— ๋ชจ์ธ ์Šคํƒ€ํŠธ์—… ๊ด€๊ณ„์ž๋“ค์€ ์ด์ œ ํ˜„๊ธˆํ๋ฆ„์„ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๊ด€๋ฆฌํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ถˆํˆฌ๋ช…ํ•œ ๋ฏธ๋ž˜๋ฅผ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ์ค€๋น„ํ• ์ง€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ด์•ผ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์ฃผ๋กœ ํ•จ. ์ด์ œ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋ฐ”ํ€ด๋ฒŒ๋ ˆ์˜ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด๋ผ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ, ํ–ฅํ›„ 2~3๋…„๊ฐ„ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ๋“  ์‚ด์•„๋‚จ์•„ ๋ฒ„ํ‹ฐ๋ฉด ๋ฒˆ์ฐฝํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ ํฌ๋งํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ž„. ์ง€๋‚œ 3๋ถ„๊ธฐ ์Šคํƒ€ํŠธ์—… ํˆฌ์ž ๊ธˆ์•ก์€ 745์–ต ๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ๋กœ 9๊ฐœ ๋ถ„๊ธฐ ์ค‘ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ ์„ ๋ฟ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ๋ถ„๊ธฐ ๊ฐ„ -34% ๊ฐ์†Œ๋กœ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํฐ ๊ฐ์†Œํญ์„ ๋ณด์˜€์Œ.

For years, becoming a unicorn was the main goal of startups. Now, with venture funding drying up and many young firmsโ€™ survival in doubt, another creature is the talk of the town: the cockroach. Venture capitalists and technology chieftains converged in Singapore in recent weeks to hobnob over a number of high-profile annual conferences, marking the city-stateโ€™s grand coming-out-of-Covid party. Yet gone was glamor and talk of blitzscaling, and participants instead focused on the drastic need for conserving cash and a dimming future. โ€œItโ€™s cockroach time -- do whatever it takes to survive,โ€ Tessa Wijaya, co-founder of Xendit, a digital payments firm valued at $1 billion, said during a panel discussion moderated by Square Peg Capital partner Piruze Sabuncu. โ€œItโ€™s a little bit gross but it kind of works. If you can survive the next two, three years, youโ€™re probably going to thrive.โ€. In the past several years, Southeast Asia attracted abundant capital from investors eager to bet on one of the fastest-growing internet economies. Perpetually growing teams was the norm at richly funded companies and for many young leaders and staff, this was the only environment theyโ€™ve ever known. Now the startup ecosystem is facing headwinds. Global venture funding slumped to $74.5 billion in the past three months, its lowest level in nine quarters, according to CB Insights. That represents a 34% quarterly drop, the biggest in a decade.
Bottom-line: 7์›” 50bp ๊ธˆ๋ฆฌ์ธ์ƒ ํ›„ ๋†’์€ ๊ธˆ๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ๊ฒฝ์ œ์— ๋ฏธ์น  ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์šฐ๋ คํ•˜๋ฉฐ 8์›”์—๋Š” 25bp ๊ธˆ๋ฆฌ์ธ์ƒ์„ ํ–ˆ๋˜ ํ•œ๊ตญ ์ค‘์•™์€ํ–‰์ด ๊ฒฝ์ œ์œ„๊ธฐ์—๋‚˜ ์žˆ๋˜ ํ™˜์œจ ์ˆ˜์ค€์„ ๋ฐฉ์–ดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‹ค์‹œ ํ•œ ๋ฒˆ ํฐ ํญ ๊ธˆ๋ฆฌ์ธ์ƒ์„ ๋‹จํ–‰ํ•จ. 19๋ช…์˜ ๊ฒฝ์ œ ์˜ˆ์ธก๊ฐ€ ์ค‘ 16๋ช…์ด 50bp ๊ธˆ๋ฆฌ์ธ์ƒ์„, ๋‚˜๋จธ์ง€ 3๋ช…์€ 25bp ๊ธˆ๋ฆฌ์ธ์ƒ์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ–ˆ์—ˆ์Œ.

The Bank of Korea returned to outsized interest-rate increases as it sought to shore up a currency that has been driven to crisis-era lows by the Federal Reserveโ€™s aggressive policy tightening. The South Korean central bank raised its seven-day repurchase rate by a half-percentage point to a 10-year high of 3% on Wednesday, as expected by 16 of 19 economists surveyed by Bloomberg. The remaining three had forecast a quarter-point move. The BOK is the latest central bank to respond to the Fedโ€™s doubling down on large rate hikes to try to crush inflation. The BOK had already increased its rate by a half-point in July, before downshifting to a quarter-point move in August amid concerns over the impact of larger rate hikes on the wider economy.