In order to preserve and cultivate White identity, it will have the consequence, however regrettable, of many Jews, Blacks, mixed-race people and women being offended—though this effect is not intended, it is foreseen and to be expected. We should not shy away from it. Anything else is racial suicide.

Their taking offense at something that is objectively moral and good, racial preservation within a Catholic framework, is merely their subjective, errant response. The objective order, ultimately, is most important. Certain excesses should be avoided, but there is a place for rhetoric, even an inflammatory kind, particularly in discussions of public policy. Conversations about public policy that are distinct from private interactions.

This racial program will require both a positive and negative aspect, and it is the latter, the stigmatization of racial intermarriage, using only moral means (attitudes, manners, custom and public policy) and absent any racial hatred, that will have the greatest negative reaction. That said, the positive side deserves the most emphasis, which is saying we want to marry our own kind and raise healthy, White Catholic families.

While avoiding the grave errors of racial excess, outlined in Mit brennender Sorge by Pope Pius XI, we should remember that he simultaneously identified “race” as a “fundamental value of the human community” which plays a “necessary and honorable” role in human affairs. Certainly, marriage is one of these!

Original post on X 🔗

— Further Reading
• The Problems of Racial Intermarriage
• Do you love White people?
• How to handle the accusation of racism

Cinema

The ADL deleted their "Glossary of Extremism and Hate"... it's afraid...

Jews consider Christianity to be their greatest threat and prefer the safer company of Pagans (1:50).

@paganbad8