⚡️ — POLL: Channel direction — your call.
Anonymous Poll
60%
🟢 YES - I want daily war and conflict updates here.
40%
🔴 NO - Stay focused on analysis, investigation, predictions.
❤3
— Intel Slava (Viktor Leonov)
@IntelSlava
@LeonovZ
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤11🔥5👏2
Intel Slava
officials estimate 10 to 20 million mourners across the multi-day ceremonies
- IRGC resistance to Israeli and US aggression has made Iranians think twice, even many opposition members have now shifted their views to "Iran first" and supporting the regime, instead of hoping for Epstein's friends to devastate Iran.
@IntelSlava
@LeonovZ
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍20🔥4❤1
Intel Slava
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬17🔥4👍1👏1
@IntelSlava
@LeonovZ
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬13🔥3
@IntelSlava
@LeonovZ
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬14❤4👌2👍1
Intel Slava
@IntelSlava
@LeonovZ
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬10❤5👍1
Viktor Leonov
@IntelSlava
@LeonovZ
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬8🤯4
Iran's position was that all passage through the Strait of Hormuz should be coordinated with Iran, Oman, and the Gulf states. According to Tehran, Article 5 of the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) recognized Iran's role in this coordination.
However, Iran believed the United States was quietly pursuing a different strategy. By escorting ships along a route closer to Oman's side of the strait, Washington was, in Iran's view, trying to create an alternative shipping lane that would reduce Iran's leverage over the Strait of Hormuz.
From Iran's perspective, this was a violation of the spirit of the MoU. Although the agreement recognized Iran's coordinating role, the new route was seen as an attempt to bypass that arrangement without formally changing the agreement.
Under this interpretation, Iran's attacks on ships using the Omani-side route were a response to what it considered the first breach of the MoU. The core argument is that creating an alternative corridor weakened Iran's agreed role in coordinating passage through the strait, making it a form of passive aggression against Iran's strategic position.
@IntelSlava
@LeonovZ
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍19🤯4🔥3❤2
Intel Slava
@IntelSlava
@LeonovZ
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍16🔥12❤4
Remember, he confidently laughed while saying the war had cost many Russian lives and its best investment.
Remember when he advocated for the assassination of Putin, and Russia put him on its terrorist list.
Remember that he was one of the major influencers behind the assassination of Ayatollah Khamenei.
He died in Kyiv, some hours before his death was announced by his family. A hotel in Kyiv and a drone factory were targeted by Russia — said to be the same factory he visited. There is no evidence that he returned to the USA. Zero evidence.
@IntelSlava
@LeonovZ
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏179🔥95👍46❤28🤯13👌13⚡8🥰2
Intel Slava
@IntelSlava
@LeonovZ
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥27👍13👏5🤯3❤1
🇸🇦🇾🇪🇾🇪 ⚡️ — SAUDI ARABIA’S FAILED STRIKE ON SANA’A
Saudi Arabia reportedly launched around ten Storm Shadow cruise missiles — roughly $2 million each — from a safe standoff distance to hit the runway at Sana’a airport. Despite the cost and firepower, the strike failed to achieve its main objective.
The decision to strike from maximum range rather than risk closer engagement speaks directly to Riyadh’s fear of Yemeni air defenses.
The more revealing detail is political, not military. Saudi Arabia has declined to claim the attack — instead, its proxy in Aden has taken credit, as though that faction possessed Storm Shadow cruise missiles or the fighter jets to deliver them. The fiction fools no one. A power confident in its position claims its strikes. Riyadh’s refusal to do so points to one thing: fear of Yemeni retaliation.
Two conclusions stand out. First, the operation failed on its own terms — expensive munitions expended for no decisive result. Second, and more tellingly, Saudi Arabia is unwilling to own the attack, outsourcing responsibility to a proxy to shield itself from the consequences. That is not the posture of a confident aggressor — it is the posture of one that fears what comes next.
- Viktor Leonov
@IntelSlava
@LeonovZ
Saudi Arabia reportedly launched around ten Storm Shadow cruise missiles — roughly $2 million each — from a safe standoff distance to hit the runway at Sana’a airport. Despite the cost and firepower, the strike failed to achieve its main objective.
The decision to strike from maximum range rather than risk closer engagement speaks directly to Riyadh’s fear of Yemeni air defenses.
The more revealing detail is political, not military. Saudi Arabia has declined to claim the attack — instead, its proxy in Aden has taken credit, as though that faction possessed Storm Shadow cruise missiles or the fighter jets to deliver them. The fiction fools no one. A power confident in its position claims its strikes. Riyadh’s refusal to do so points to one thing: fear of Yemeni retaliation.
Two conclusions stand out. First, the operation failed on its own terms — expensive munitions expended for no decisive result. Second, and more tellingly, Saudi Arabia is unwilling to own the attack, outsourcing responsibility to a proxy to shield itself from the consequences. That is not the posture of a confident aggressor — it is the posture of one that fears what comes next.
- Viktor Leonov
@IntelSlava
@LeonovZ
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍54❤28🔥10👌2👏1
@LeonovZ
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬77🤯11❤9🔥2😱2👍1
Jordan has quietly become the center of US operations in the region. As the war escalated, Washington moved forces out of Bahrain, the UAE, and Qatar, more exposed and harder to rely on politically, and shifted them into Jordan. Other Gulf allies also started limiting US basing and overflight rights, which left Jordan as the main hub for American air operations across Syria, Iraq, and beyond.
That's why Iran is hitting it now. The US concentrated its forces in one place, so that place became the obvious target. The strikes on Azraq and King Faisal aren't really about the bases themselves, they're meant to make hosting American troops more trouble than it's worth, and to put pressure on the one location Washington thought was safe.
The pace shows the intent: four attacks in five days, dozens of US troops wounded, and a significant number of US Blackhawk helicopters damaged, according to NYT. Iran isn't just making a point, it's showing it still has plenty of missiles and can now reach a place the US assumed was out of range.
@LeonovZ
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤136👍53🔥32👏17🥰8🤬3⚡1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
@IntelSlava
@LeonovZ
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤26🔥10👍4