Next person should interrupts gets banned

This has been Part 3 (TimeJets) ⬆️ portalling
https://t.me/AzazelNews/575160
Scalar Interferometer Part 3
Material based on T. Bearden, Fer de Lance
Understanding the basics of electromagnetism

#SCALARELECTRODYNAMICS101
#SCALARELECTROMAGNETICS101
#scalarelectromagneticwarfare #scalarelectromagneticfield
#scalarelectromagneticwaves
#scalarelectrodynamics
#scalarelectromagneticweapons
CREATING AN INERTIAL FIELD (ANTIGRAVITY)

Part 2
https://t.me/AzazelNews/574340

Part 1
https://t.me/AzazelNews/573957

VIBRATE HIGH

Thank you to French Wizard 🧙🏻‍♂️🇫🇷and our new Martian friends👩‍🚀☄️

Scalar Interferometer Part 4
Material based on T. Bearden, Fer de Lance
Understanding the basics of electromagnetism

#SCALARELECTRODYNAMICS101
#SCALARELECTROMAGNETICS101
#scalarelectromagneticwarfare #scalarelectromagneticfield
#scalarelectromagneticwaves
#scalarelectrodynamics
#scalarelectromagneticweapons
https://t.me/AzazelNews/578086

SCALAR RESONANCE or electrogravitational resonance
First, imagine we have a standard resonant cavity, represented by the two walls in our diagram. In this cavity we have a resonant EM wave moving back and forth, represented by the forward-most plane. We show the E-field vector and the B-field vector at right angles in this moving wave front. As the wave front moves back and forth, the vectors vary back and forth; however, at any one point between the walls, the two vectors always have the same value. Thus our resonant EM wave forms a standing wave in the cavity.

A second wave front, precisely like the first and of the same frequency, is superposed over the first wave front and travels along with it. This second wave -- the "antiwave" -- has its force vectors 180 degrees out of phase with the force vectors of the reference wave. Hence the E-fields and B-fields of the two superposed waves always sum to vector zeros.

Thus the energy density of vacuum varies with x. But, rigorously, since the resultant E and B fields are zero, this describes a standing gravitational wave. Hence we have a standing EG wave, existing in the resonant cavity. This is an example of scalar resonance. Rigorously the cavity has mass and inertia, to an outside observer, as a result of the two warps in spacetime it contains.

Note that in one half-cycle the energy density of vacuum is greater than ambient, and in the other half-cycle it is less. In the region of one half-cycle, time flows at a faster rate than to the ambient observer, and in the other half-cycle time flows at a slower rate than to the ambient observer.

One half-cycle appears to contain negative electrical charge, and the other appears to contain positive charge.

One half-cycle appears to contain a north pole (positive magnetostatic scalar potential), and the other half-cycle appears to contain a south pole (negative magnetostatic scalar potential).

Perhaps now one can begin to understand why a continuously accelerated orbital electron in the atom does not radiate EM energy, completely in violation of Maxwell's equations. The electron is naught but a complex aspect of a standing scalar resonance, existing between the nucleus and the orbit.

Scalar resonance is a particular zero-summed multi-resonance, electromagnetically, so that it does not act in an electromagnetic manner.

A scalar resonance is a standing electrogravitational wave. It can be made electrically, but it is not electrical in behavior.

In any scalar resonance, spacetime is curved, and it is the magnitude (and direction) of this spacetime curvature that is oscillating in "standing wave" fashion.

MASS
In respect to stress of the vacuum medium, one half of a standing sine wave of scalar resonance is tensile; the other half is compressive. However, this is with respect to the local ambient stress of vacuum.

"Mass" of a particle is just a characteristic exhibited by a trapped scalar resonance. Usually this trapping is done by the "spin" of the individual particle.

The concept of "mass" may be compared to the concept of "capacitance." That is, a mass is an accumulator for scalar waves; that is, for scalar resonances. It is continually being "charged" and "discharged" by absorption and emission of scalar waves from and to the ambient vacuum scalar wave flux.

The concept of mass can be quantitatively described by the rate at which it absorbs and emits energy, termed here as "switching" (with absorption signifying a "switch in" and emission a "switch out"). Bearden proposed a model where the mass of an object is directly related to the net rate of these switches,. According to this model, a mass of one kilogram is equivalent to a switching rate of approximately \(1.7053 \times 10^{50}\) switches per second. An object resides within a Lorentz frame when its rates of absorption and emission are balanced in a specific direction. Moreover, an object is deemed "stationary" relative to a Lorentz observer if the rates of absorption and emission remain constant in all directions. Conversely, if these rates vary across different directions, the object is considered to be in a region of curved spacetime from the perspective of a Lorentz observer, indicating either local spacetime warping or the object's presence in an accelerated frame.

In standard linear spacetime, the processes of "charging" and "discharging" scalar waves are balanced in all directions, leading to a uniform mass perception from any perspective.

From the viewpoint of an external observer, a moving object experiences an augmented scalar wave flux rate in its motion direction, similar to how it would encounter more raindrops per second moving through a rainstorm compared to being stationary. This increased encounter rate with scalar wave flux necessitates the object to absorb and emit scalar waves more rapidly along its motion trajectory. Consequently, to the external observer, the object appears to have a higher mass concerning any forces acting along its motion path.

Conversely, perpendicular to its motion, the scalar wave flux rate remains unchanged compared to when the object is stationary. Hence, the perceived mass of the moving object, regarding forces acting at right angles to its trajectory, remains constant to the external Lorentz observer.

This phenomenon elucidates two critical aspects of special relativity's enigmatic observations: (1) the increase in an object's mass relative to its velocity, and (2) the specificity of this mass increase to the direction of motion rather than being uniform in all orientations.

Scalar waves, when emitted from a resonating source, form a patterned ensemble characteristic of that resonance, effectively creating a scalar resonance "current" emanating from the mass-accumulating object. Conversely, scalar waves absorbed by the object contribute to its internal resonance, akin to a scalar resonance current flowing into it. This conceptualization allows for the understanding of scalar resonance as a dynamic, flowing entity.

Increasing an object's mass can be achieved by directing scalar electromagnetic (EM) waves towards it, encouraging the object to absorb more waves than it emits. This process, where absorption exceeds emission, effectively charges the object with inertial energy, transforming it into an inertial accumulator. This effect is attained by setting the transmitting source's reference potential higher than that of the target object, ensuring a net influx of scalar waves.

Similarly, reducing an object's mass involves the opposite approach: transmitting scalar EM waves such that the object emits more waves than it absorbs. In this scenario, the object behaves as though it were discharging its accumulated inertial energy. Achieving this requires the scalar wave transmitter's reference potential to be set lower than the target object's, facilitating a net outflow of scalar waves from the object.

The scalar wave transmitter functions analogously to a heat pump in that it can serve as either an energy distributor or an energy siphon, depending on the potential differential between the transmitter and the receiver.

Moreover, scalar resonance exhibits distinct characteristics, including specific frequency patterns, spatial curvature, and variations in the rate of time flow. Each object possesses a unique "scalar pattern," akin to a spatiotemporal fingerprint, reflecting its entire historical trajectory. Consequently, no two objects are scalar-wise identical due to their unique spatiotemporal imprints.

This understanding opens the door to a remarkable possibility: by targeting an object with scalar waves that resonate with its precise scalar pattern, energy can be introduced into or drawn from that object remotely, similar to how one tuning fork can induce vibrations in another through sympathetic resonance. The implications of this principle for phenomena such as clairvoyance, radionics, and remote viewing are left for the reader to explore and interpret.

As we pointed out, we can often greatly simplify matters by considering currents of scalar resonance. These currents flow from higher potential to lower potential, regardless of whether we are considering "transmission" or "reception."

Indeed, to "transmit at lower potential" is to receive, and to "receive at higher potential" is to transmit.

Thus the "transmitter-receiver" is a special system where simply biasing the two nodes differently determines which way the scalar resonance current will flow.

We may increase or decrease an object's inertia and mass, simply by properly biasing the transmitter-receiver system's two nodes.

TRANSVERSE WAVE INTERFERENCE.
On this slide we show the orthodox representation of EM wave interference.

The chart is stylized since we assume two single-frequency EM waves which intersect and interfere in the indicated region.

In the interference zone, in-phase wave amplitudes add (constructive interference) while out-of-phase wave amplitudes subtract (destructive interference). In our stylized mode, we show the zero-summed locations as lines.

Conventionally, these interfering waves are considered to be transverse waves in vacuum.

The point is, in this scheme we think of "putting in the waves of finite amplitude, and creating the zero-amplitude regions by destructive interference." We create additional waves of increased-amplitude regions by constructive interference.