Forwarded from Recent Case Law India
Mutation entry does not confer any right, title or interest in favour of any person: Supreme Court
Case: Jitendra Singh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh ; SLP(C) 13146/2021
Citation: LL 2021 SC 430
Coram: Justice MR Shah and Aniruddha Bose
Counsel: Adv Rajesh Inamdar for petitioner, Adv G.V. Chandrasekar for respondent
Wednesday 08 September, 2021
The Supreme Court observed that mutation entry in the revenue record is only for fiscal purposes and does not confer any right, title or interest in favour of a person.
"If there is any dispute with respect to the title and more particularly when the mutation entry is sought to be made on the basis of the will, the party who is claiming title/right on the basis of the will has to approach the appropriate civil court/court and get his rights crystalised and only thereafter on the basis of the decision before the civil court necessary mutation entry can be made, the bench of Justices MR Shah and Aniruddha Bose observed.
In this case, the Additional Commissioner, Rewa Division, Rewa, directed to mutate the name of the petitioner in the revenue records, on the basis of the a will produced by him. The Madhya Pradesh High Court, in a petition filed by some parties, set aside the order and directed the petitioner to approach the appropriate court to crystalise his rights on the basis of the alleged will dated 20.05.1998. The petitioner therefore filed Special Leave Petition before the Apex Court
'5..Be that as it may, as per the settled proposition of law, mutation entry does not confer any right, title or interest in favour of the person and the mutation entry in the revenue record is only for the fiscal purpose. As per the settled proposition of law, if there is any dispute with respect to the title and more particularly when the mutation entry is sought to be made on the basis of the will, the party who is claiming title/right on the basis of the will has to approach the appropriate civil court/court and get his rights crystalised and only thereafter on the basis of the decision before the civil court necessary mutation entry can be made", the bench observed.
The court referred to the judgment in Balwant Singh v. Daulat Singh (D) (1997) 7 SCC 137.
"Right from 1997, the law is very clear. In the case of Balwant Singh v. Daulat Singh (D) By Lrs., reported in (1997) 7 SCC 137, this Court had an occasion to consider the effect of mutation and it is observed and held that mutation of property in revenue records neither creates nor extinguishes title to the property nor has it any presumptive value on title. Such entries are relevant only for the purpose of collecting land revenue. Similar view has been expressed in the series of decisions thereafter.", the Court said.
The bench further noted that in Suraj Bhan v. Financial Commissioner, (2007) 6 SCC 186, it was held that an entry in revenue records does not confer title on a person whose name appears in record-of-rights.
"Entries in the revenue records or jamabandi have only "fiscal purpose", i.e., payment of land revenue, and no ownership is conferred on the basis of such entries. It is further observed that so far as the title of the property is concerned, it can only be decided by a competent civil court.", it noted.
The court noticed that similar view has been expressed in the cases of Suman Verma v. Union of India, (2004) 12 SCC 58; Faqruddin v. Tajuddin (2008) 8 SCC 12; Rajinder Singh v. State of J&K, (2008) 9 SCC 368; Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad v. State of Maharashtra, (2015) 16 SCC 689; T. Ravi v. B. Chinna Narasimha, (2017) 7 SCC 342; Bhimabai Mahadeo Kambekar v. Arthur Import & Export Co., (2019) 3 SCC 191; Prahlad Pradhan v. Sonu Kumhar, (2019) 10 SCC 259; and Ajit Kaur v. Darshan Singh, (2019) 13 SCC 70.
Join & Share @Case_Law_India
Case: Jitendra Singh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh ; SLP(C) 13146/2021
Citation: LL 2021 SC 430
Coram: Justice MR Shah and Aniruddha Bose
Counsel: Adv Rajesh Inamdar for petitioner, Adv G.V. Chandrasekar for respondent
Wednesday 08 September, 2021
The Supreme Court observed that mutation entry in the revenue record is only for fiscal purposes and does not confer any right, title or interest in favour of a person.
"If there is any dispute with respect to the title and more particularly when the mutation entry is sought to be made on the basis of the will, the party who is claiming title/right on the basis of the will has to approach the appropriate civil court/court and get his rights crystalised and only thereafter on the basis of the decision before the civil court necessary mutation entry can be made, the bench of Justices MR Shah and Aniruddha Bose observed.
In this case, the Additional Commissioner, Rewa Division, Rewa, directed to mutate the name of the petitioner in the revenue records, on the basis of the a will produced by him. The Madhya Pradesh High Court, in a petition filed by some parties, set aside the order and directed the petitioner to approach the appropriate court to crystalise his rights on the basis of the alleged will dated 20.05.1998. The petitioner therefore filed Special Leave Petition before the Apex Court
'5..Be that as it may, as per the settled proposition of law, mutation entry does not confer any right, title or interest in favour of the person and the mutation entry in the revenue record is only for the fiscal purpose. As per the settled proposition of law, if there is any dispute with respect to the title and more particularly when the mutation entry is sought to be made on the basis of the will, the party who is claiming title/right on the basis of the will has to approach the appropriate civil court/court and get his rights crystalised and only thereafter on the basis of the decision before the civil court necessary mutation entry can be made", the bench observed.
The court referred to the judgment in Balwant Singh v. Daulat Singh (D) (1997) 7 SCC 137.
"Right from 1997, the law is very clear. In the case of Balwant Singh v. Daulat Singh (D) By Lrs., reported in (1997) 7 SCC 137, this Court had an occasion to consider the effect of mutation and it is observed and held that mutation of property in revenue records neither creates nor extinguishes title to the property nor has it any presumptive value on title. Such entries are relevant only for the purpose of collecting land revenue. Similar view has been expressed in the series of decisions thereafter.", the Court said.
The bench further noted that in Suraj Bhan v. Financial Commissioner, (2007) 6 SCC 186, it was held that an entry in revenue records does not confer title on a person whose name appears in record-of-rights.
"Entries in the revenue records or jamabandi have only "fiscal purpose", i.e., payment of land revenue, and no ownership is conferred on the basis of such entries. It is further observed that so far as the title of the property is concerned, it can only be decided by a competent civil court.", it noted.
The court noticed that similar view has been expressed in the cases of Suman Verma v. Union of India, (2004) 12 SCC 58; Faqruddin v. Tajuddin (2008) 8 SCC 12; Rajinder Singh v. State of J&K, (2008) 9 SCC 368; Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad v. State of Maharashtra, (2015) 16 SCC 689; T. Ravi v. B. Chinna Narasimha, (2017) 7 SCC 342; Bhimabai Mahadeo Kambekar v. Arthur Import & Export Co., (2019) 3 SCC 191; Prahlad Pradhan v. Sonu Kumhar, (2019) 10 SCC 259; and Ajit Kaur v. Darshan Singh, (2019) 13 SCC 70.
Join & Share @Case_Law_India
👍23🥰2
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
5_6244750932190432567.pdf
1.1 MB
Haryana ADA Result
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
The_Bharatiya_Nyaya_Sanhita__2023_230811_134238.pdf
437.2 KB
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023
The IPC 1860 will replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
The IPC 1860 will replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
👍4
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
The_Bharatiya_Nagarik_Suraksha_Sanhita_2023_230811_134308.pdf
1 MB
THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023
The Crpc of 1973 will be replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
The Crpc of 1973 will be replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
👍3
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
The_Bharatiya_Sakshya_Bill_2023_230811_134334.pdf
267.1 KB
THE BHARATIYA SAKSHYA BILL, 2023
The Indian Evidence act of 1872 will be replaced by the Bharatiya Sakshya Bill 2023
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
The Indian Evidence act of 1872 will be replaced by the Bharatiya Sakshya Bill 2023
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
👍2
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
Advertisement_22_23_dated_14_08_2023.pdf
529.5 KB
🛡Jharkhand Civil Judge Exam Official Notification 2023.
🛡 Vacancies: 138
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
🛡 Vacancies: 138
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
❤1
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
Adv HJS Bar Exam-2023.pdf
2.4 MB
MPHJS _ District Judge (Entry Level) Recruitment Direct From Bar Exam Official Notification 2023.
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
👍2
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
Open_PDF.pdf
2.2 MB
UPPCS J 2022 Final Result
U.P. JUDICIAL SERVICES (CIVIL JUDGE) (JR.DIV.) EXAM. 2022
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
U.P. JUDICIAL SERVICES (CIVIL JUDGE) (JR.DIV.) EXAM. 2022
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
👍3❤1
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
🛡केन्द्र-राज्य प्रशासनिक सम्बन्धों से जुड़े अनुच्छेद
🔲 अनुच्छेद 256 — राज्यों की और संघ की बाध्यता
🔲 अनुच्छेद 257 — कुछ दशाओं में राज्यों पर संघ का नियंत्रण
🔲 अनुच्छेद 257 क — राज्यों को सशस्त्र बलों अथवा संघ के अन्य बलों की तैनाती में सहयोग (निरस्त)
🔲 अनुच्छेद 258 — कुछ दशाओं में राज्यों को शक्ति प्रदान करने आदि की संघ की शक्ति
🔲 अनुच्छेद 258क — संघ को कृत्य सौंपने की राज्यों की शक्ति
🔲 अनुच्छेद 259 — पहली अनुसूची के भाग-बी में राज्यों में सशस्त्र बल (निरस्त)
🔲 अनुच्छेद 260 — भारत के बाहर के राज्य क्षेत्रों के संबंध में संघ की अधिकारिता
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
🔲 अनुच्छेद 256 — राज्यों की और संघ की बाध्यता
🔲 अनुच्छेद 257 — कुछ दशाओं में राज्यों पर संघ का नियंत्रण
🔲 अनुच्छेद 257 क — राज्यों को सशस्त्र बलों अथवा संघ के अन्य बलों की तैनाती में सहयोग (निरस्त)
🔲 अनुच्छेद 258 — कुछ दशाओं में राज्यों को शक्ति प्रदान करने आदि की संघ की शक्ति
🔲 अनुच्छेद 258क — संघ को कृत्य सौंपने की राज्यों की शक्ति
🔲 अनुच्छेद 259 — पहली अनुसूची के भाग-बी में राज्यों में सशस्त्र बल (निरस्त)
🔲 अनुच्छेद 260 — भारत के बाहर के राज्य क्षेत्रों के संबंध में संघ की अधिकारिता
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
👍10❤1🤔1
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
🛡 CENTRE-STATE ADMINISTRATIVE RELATIONS
🔲 Article 256 — Obligation of states and the Union
🔲 Article 257 — Control of the Union over states in certain cases
🔲 Article 257A — Assistance to States by deployment of armed forces or other forces of the Union (Repealed)
🔲 Article 258 — Power of the Union to confer powers, etc., on states in certain cases
🔲 Article 258A — Power of the states to entrust functions to the union.
🔲 Article 259 — Armed Forces in States in Part B of the First Schedule (Repealed)
🔲 Article 260 — Jurisdiction of the Union in relation to territories outside India
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
🔲 Article 256 — Obligation of states and the Union
🔲 Article 257 — Control of the Union over states in certain cases
🔲 Article 257A — Assistance to States by deployment of armed forces or other forces of the Union (Repealed)
🔲 Article 258 — Power of the Union to confer powers, etc., on states in certain cases
🔲 Article 258A — Power of the states to entrust functions to the union.
🔲 Article 259 — Armed Forces in States in Part B of the First Schedule (Repealed)
🔲 Article 260 — Jurisdiction of the Union in relation to territories outside India
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
👍7😁1
Forwarded from Law Books Store / Legal books pdf
(Polity) Quasi Judicial Bodies in India.pdf
144 KB
Quasi Judicial Bodies in India
👍2
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
🟢 Committees Of The Constituent Assembly
Major Committees
◾️ Union Powers Committee - Jawaharlal Nehru
◾️ Union Constitution Committee -Jawaharlal Nehru
◾️ Provincial Constitution Committee -Sardar Patel
◾️ Drafting Committee - Dr. B.R. Ambedkar
◾️ Advisory Committee on Fundamental Rights, Minorities and Tribal and Excluded Areas - Sardar Patel.
This committee had the following five sub- committees :-
◾️ Fundamental Rights Sub-Committee - J.B. Kripalani
◾️ Minorities Sub-Committee - H.C. Mukherjee
◾️ North-East Frontier Tribal Areas and Assam Excluded & Partially Excluded Areas Sub-Committee - Gopinath Bardoloi
◾️ Excluded and Partially Excluded Areas (other than those in Assam) Sub-Committee - A.V. Thakkar
◾️ North-West Frontier Tribal Areas Sub-Committee.
◾️ Rules of Procedure Committee - Dr. Rajendra Prasad
◾️ States Committee (Committee for Negotiating with States) - Jawaharlal Nehru
◾️ Steering Committee - Dr. Rajendra Prasad
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
Major Committees
◾️ Union Powers Committee - Jawaharlal Nehru
◾️ Union Constitution Committee -Jawaharlal Nehru
◾️ Provincial Constitution Committee -Sardar Patel
◾️ Drafting Committee - Dr. B.R. Ambedkar
◾️ Advisory Committee on Fundamental Rights, Minorities and Tribal and Excluded Areas - Sardar Patel.
This committee had the following five sub- committees :-
◾️ Fundamental Rights Sub-Committee - J.B. Kripalani
◾️ Minorities Sub-Committee - H.C. Mukherjee
◾️ North-East Frontier Tribal Areas and Assam Excluded & Partially Excluded Areas Sub-Committee - Gopinath Bardoloi
◾️ Excluded and Partially Excluded Areas (other than those in Assam) Sub-Committee - A.V. Thakkar
◾️ North-West Frontier Tribal Areas Sub-Committee.
◾️ Rules of Procedure Committee - Dr. Rajendra Prasad
◾️ States Committee (Committee for Negotiating with States) - Jawaharlal Nehru
◾️ Steering Committee - Dr. Rajendra Prasad
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
👍9🥰1
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
🔷भारत परिषद अधिनियम 1909:
🔶इसे मार्ले-मिंटो सुधारों के रूप में भी जाना जाता है
🔶केंद्र और प्रांतों में विधान परिषदों के आकार में उल्लेखनीय वृद्धि हुई। केंद्रीय परिषद में सदस्यों की संख्या 16 से बढ़कर 60 हो गई
साम्प्रदायिक प्रतिनिधित्व की शुरुआत, मुसलमानों के लिए पृथक निर्वाचक मंडल। लार्ड मिंटो साम्प्रदायिक निर्वाचन के जनक माने जाते हैं
🔶वायसराय और गवर्नर की कार्यकारी परिषदों में भारतीयों को अनुमति दी गई थी
परिषदों को किसी भी मामले पर चर्चा करने, बजट पर प्रस्ताव पेश करना और पूरक प्रश्न पूछने का अधिकार दिया गया
🔷भारत शासन अधिनियम 1919:
🔶इसे मोंटेग्यू-चेम्सफोर्ड सुधारों के रूप में भी जाना जाता है
🔶केंद्रीय विषयों तथा प्रांतीय विषयों का सीमांकन किया गया
🔶प्रांतीय स्तर पर "द्वैध शासन" शुरू किया गया
🔶द्वैध शासन व्यवस्था के तहत, प्रांतीय विषयों को हस्तांतरित और आरक्षित विषयों में विभाजित किया गया था- गवर्नर आरक्षित विषयों पर विधान परिषद के प्रति उत्तरदायी नहीं था
पहली बार, केंद्र में द्विसदनीय व्यवस्था की शुरुआत की गई थी
🔶प्रत्यक्ष चुनाव
🔶अधिनियम के अनुसार ,वायसराय की कार्यकारी परिषद के 6 सदस्यों (कमांडर-इन-चीफ के अलावा) में से 3 भारतीय होने थे
🔶केंद्रीय लोक सेवा आयोग की स्थापना का प्रावधान किया गया
🔷भारत सरकार अधिनियम 1935
🔶एक अखिल भारतीय संघ की स्थापना के लिए प्रस्तावित अधिनियम, जिसमें प्रांतों और रियासतों को इकाइयों के रूप में शामिल किया गया था, हालांकि संघ कभी अस्तित्व में नहीं आया
🔶अधिनियम ने केंद्र और इकाइयों के बीच शक्तियों को संघीय सूची, प्रांतीय सूची और समवर्ती सूची में विभाजित किया
🔶अवशिष्ट शक्तियाँ वायसराय में निहित थीं
केंद्र में द्वैध शासन को अपनाने का प्रावधान
6 प्रांतों अर्थात बंगाल, बॉम्बे, मद्रास, बिहार, असम और संयुक्त प्रांतों में द्विसदनीय विधान परिषद् एवं विधान सभा की शुरुआत की
🔶भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक की स्थापना
संघीय न्यायालय की स्थापना1947 का भारतीय
🔷 स्वतंत्रता अधिनियमः
🔶इसने भारत में ब्रिटिश शासन को समाप्त कर
🔶 दिया और भारत को एक स्वतंत्र राष्ट्र घोषित कर दिया
🔶भारत का विभाजन किया गया
भारत सचिव के कार्यालय को भंग किया गया
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
🔶इसे मार्ले-मिंटो सुधारों के रूप में भी जाना जाता है
🔶केंद्र और प्रांतों में विधान परिषदों के आकार में उल्लेखनीय वृद्धि हुई। केंद्रीय परिषद में सदस्यों की संख्या 16 से बढ़कर 60 हो गई
साम्प्रदायिक प्रतिनिधित्व की शुरुआत, मुसलमानों के लिए पृथक निर्वाचक मंडल। लार्ड मिंटो साम्प्रदायिक निर्वाचन के जनक माने जाते हैं
🔶वायसराय और गवर्नर की कार्यकारी परिषदों में भारतीयों को अनुमति दी गई थी
परिषदों को किसी भी मामले पर चर्चा करने, बजट पर प्रस्ताव पेश करना और पूरक प्रश्न पूछने का अधिकार दिया गया
🔷भारत शासन अधिनियम 1919:
🔶इसे मोंटेग्यू-चेम्सफोर्ड सुधारों के रूप में भी जाना जाता है
🔶केंद्रीय विषयों तथा प्रांतीय विषयों का सीमांकन किया गया
🔶प्रांतीय स्तर पर "द्वैध शासन" शुरू किया गया
🔶द्वैध शासन व्यवस्था के तहत, प्रांतीय विषयों को हस्तांतरित और आरक्षित विषयों में विभाजित किया गया था- गवर्नर आरक्षित विषयों पर विधान परिषद के प्रति उत्तरदायी नहीं था
पहली बार, केंद्र में द्विसदनीय व्यवस्था की शुरुआत की गई थी
🔶प्रत्यक्ष चुनाव
🔶अधिनियम के अनुसार ,वायसराय की कार्यकारी परिषद के 6 सदस्यों (कमांडर-इन-चीफ के अलावा) में से 3 भारतीय होने थे
🔶केंद्रीय लोक सेवा आयोग की स्थापना का प्रावधान किया गया
🔷भारत सरकार अधिनियम 1935
🔶एक अखिल भारतीय संघ की स्थापना के लिए प्रस्तावित अधिनियम, जिसमें प्रांतों और रियासतों को इकाइयों के रूप में शामिल किया गया था, हालांकि संघ कभी अस्तित्व में नहीं आया
🔶अधिनियम ने केंद्र और इकाइयों के बीच शक्तियों को संघीय सूची, प्रांतीय सूची और समवर्ती सूची में विभाजित किया
🔶अवशिष्ट शक्तियाँ वायसराय में निहित थीं
केंद्र में द्वैध शासन को अपनाने का प्रावधान
6 प्रांतों अर्थात बंगाल, बॉम्बे, मद्रास, बिहार, असम और संयुक्त प्रांतों में द्विसदनीय विधान परिषद् एवं विधान सभा की शुरुआत की
🔶भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक की स्थापना
संघीय न्यायालय की स्थापना1947 का भारतीय
🔷 स्वतंत्रता अधिनियमः
🔶इसने भारत में ब्रिटिश शासन को समाप्त कर
🔶 दिया और भारत को एक स्वतंत्र राष्ट्र घोषित कर दिया
🔶भारत का विभाजन किया गया
भारत सचिव के कार्यालय को भंग किया गया
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
👍7
Forwarded from UPSC Prelims Notes MCQs Quiz
Who has the right to cast a casting vote on a bill in a joint session of Parliament?
संसद के संयुक्त अधिवेशन में किसी विधेयक पर निर्णायक मत देने का अधिकार किसे है ?
संसद के संयुक्त अधिवेशन में किसी विधेयक पर निर्णायक मत देने का अधिकार किसे है ?
Anonymous Quiz
19%
Speaker of Rajya Sabha / राज्य सभा अध्यक्ष
19%
Deputy Speaker of Lok Sabha / लोक सभा का उपाध्यक्ष
52%
Speaker of Lok Sabha / लोक सभा का अध्यक्ष
10%
Prime Minister / प्रधानमंत्री
👍3
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
🛑 What is Judicial Review? 🛑
▪️ Judicial review is the power of the judiciary to examine the constitutionality of legislative enactments and executive orders of both the Central and State governments.
▪️ The doctrine of judicial review originated and developed in the USA.
▪️ It was propounded for the first time in the famous case of Marbury V. Madison (1803) by John Marshall, the then chief justice of the American Supreme Court.
▪️ The Judicial Review has been classified into three categories:
▪️ Judicial review of constitutional amendments.
▪️ Judicial review of legislation of the Parliament and State Legislatures and subordinate legislations.
▪️ Judicial review of administrative action of the Union and State and authorities under the state.
Join US @Law4CivilServices
▪️ Judicial review is the power of the judiciary to examine the constitutionality of legislative enactments and executive orders of both the Central and State governments.
▪️ The doctrine of judicial review originated and developed in the USA.
▪️ It was propounded for the first time in the famous case of Marbury V. Madison (1803) by John Marshall, the then chief justice of the American Supreme Court.
▪️ The Judicial Review has been classified into three categories:
▪️ Judicial review of constitutional amendments.
▪️ Judicial review of legislation of the Parliament and State Legislatures and subordinate legislations.
▪️ Judicial review of administrative action of the Union and State and authorities under the state.
Join US @Law4CivilServices
👍6❤1🥰1
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
ADMISSION :
Section 17 defines the term “admission.” According to the definition an admission: (i) is a statement, oral or documentary or contained in electronic form, (ii) which suggests any inference as to any fact in issue or relevant fact, and (iii) which is made by any person under the circumstances hereinafter mentioned. Such circumstances as “hereinafter mentioned” have been mentioned in Sections 18 to 30.
Join @Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
Section 17 defines the term “admission.” According to the definition an admission: (i) is a statement, oral or documentary or contained in electronic form, (ii) which suggests any inference as to any fact in issue or relevant fact, and (iii) which is made by any person under the circumstances hereinafter mentioned. Such circumstances as “hereinafter mentioned” have been mentioned in Sections 18 to 30.
Join @Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
👍5
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION :
Special Leave Petition Special Leave Petitions in India holds a prime place in the Judiciary of India, and has been provided as a "residual power" in the hands of Supreme Court of India to be exercised only in cases when any substantial question of law is involved, or gross injustice has been done.
SLP can be filed against any judgment of High Court within 90 days from the date of judgement.
Or
SLP can be filed within 60 days against the order of the High Court refusing to grant the certificate of fitness for appeal to Supreme Court.
Join @Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
Special Leave Petition Special Leave Petitions in India holds a prime place in the Judiciary of India, and has been provided as a "residual power" in the hands of Supreme Court of India to be exercised only in cases when any substantial question of law is involved, or gross injustice has been done.
SLP can be filed against any judgment of High Court within 90 days from the date of judgement.
Or
SLP can be filed within 60 days against the order of the High Court refusing to grant the certificate of fitness for appeal to Supreme Court.
Join @Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
👍5
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
🔆Directive Principles Of State policy DPSP
✅ The constitution of India aims to establish not only political democracy but
also socioeconomic justice to the people to establish a welfare state.
✅These provisions are given in Part IV of Indian Constitution.
✅ Directive Principles of state policy are in the form of instructions to the governments at the centre as well as states.
✅Though these principles are non justiciable, they are fundamental in the governance of the country.
✅ The idea of the Directive Principles of State Policy has been taken from the
Irish Republic .
✅The Directive Principles of State policy were incorporated in our constitution in order to provide economic justice and to avoid concentration of wealth in the hands of few people.
✅ The constitution covers from Article 36 to 51 as Directive Principles of State
Policy.
✅They are unique blend of socialistic, liberal, democratic and Gandhian Principles.
✅ They describe as the ‘conscience of the constitution’.
✅ In the “State of Tamil Nadu etc. Vs L.Abu Kavur Bai” case in 1984 , the Supreme court held that although directive principles of State Policy are not enforceable, yet the court should not avoid them
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
✅ The constitution of India aims to establish not only political democracy but
also socioeconomic justice to the people to establish a welfare state.
✅These provisions are given in Part IV of Indian Constitution.
✅ Directive Principles of state policy are in the form of instructions to the governments at the centre as well as states.
✅Though these principles are non justiciable, they are fundamental in the governance of the country.
✅ The idea of the Directive Principles of State Policy has been taken from the
Irish Republic .
✅The Directive Principles of State policy were incorporated in our constitution in order to provide economic justice and to avoid concentration of wealth in the hands of few people.
✅ The constitution covers from Article 36 to 51 as Directive Principles of State
Policy.
✅They are unique blend of socialistic, liberal, democratic and Gandhian Principles.
✅ They describe as the ‘conscience of the constitution’.
✅ In the “State of Tamil Nadu etc. Vs L.Abu Kavur Bai” case in 1984 , the Supreme court held that although directive principles of State Policy are not enforceable, yet the court should not avoid them
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
👍4
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
🔰A Special Provisions for Some States🔰
🌸Articles 371 to 371-J in Part XXI of the constitution contain special provisions for 12 states viz., Maharashtra, Gujarat, Nagaland, Assam, Manipur, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Sikkim, Mizoram, Arunachal Pradesh, Goa and Karnataka.
371. Maharashtra and Gujarat.
371A. Nagaland
371B. Assam
371C. Manipur
371D. Andhra Pradesh or Telangana
371E. Establishment of Central University in Andhra Pradesh
371F. Sikkim
371G. Mizoram
371H. Arunachal Pradesh
371-I. Goa
371J. Karnataka
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
🌸Articles 371 to 371-J in Part XXI of the constitution contain special provisions for 12 states viz., Maharashtra, Gujarat, Nagaland, Assam, Manipur, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Sikkim, Mizoram, Arunachal Pradesh, Goa and Karnataka.
371. Maharashtra and Gujarat.
371A. Nagaland
371B. Assam
371C. Manipur
371D. Andhra Pradesh or Telangana
371E. Establishment of Central University in Andhra Pradesh
371F. Sikkim
371G. Mizoram
371H. Arunachal Pradesh
371-I. Goa
371J. Karnataka
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
👍2😁2
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
Issues_to_Consider_Womens_Reservation_Bill_2023.pdf
373.1 KB
The Constitution (128th
Amendment) Bill, 2023 (Women’s Reservation Bill)
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
Amendment) Bill, 2023 (Women’s Reservation Bill)
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
👍2