Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
Bihar Civil Judge Preliminary Exam Paper 2023
👉 Admit Card Link-
https://onlinebpsc.bihar.gov.in/Main/logout
Join @Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
Join @Delhi_Judiciary_Preparation
Join us @UP_Judiciary_Preparation
👉 Admit Card Link-
https://onlinebpsc.bihar.gov.in/Main/logout
Join @Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
Join @Delhi_Judiciary_Preparation
Join us @UP_Judiciary_Preparation
👍2
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
5_6314290056190233342.pdf
87.4 KB
Uttarakhand Judiciary Prelims 2023
Cut Off marks
Join @Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
Join @Delhi_Judiciary_Preparation
Join us @UP_Judiciary_Preparation
Cut Off marks
Join @Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
Join @Delhi_Judiciary_Preparation
Join us @UP_Judiciary_Preparation
👍1
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
5_6314290056190233343.pdf
91.9 KB
Uttarakhand Judiciary Prelims 2023 Result out
Join @Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
Join @Delhi_Judiciary_Preparation
Join us @UP_Judiciary_Preparation
Join @Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
Join @Delhi_Judiciary_Preparation
Join us @UP_Judiciary_Preparation
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
UP APO 2022 Interview Schedule
Date 12-6-2022 to 16-6-2023
Join @Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
Join @Delhi_Judiciary_Preparation
Join us @UP_Judiciary_Preparation
Date 12-6-2022 to 16-6-2023
Join @Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
Join @Delhi_Judiciary_Preparation
Join us @UP_Judiciary_Preparation
👍4
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
👁🗨Article 239AA
🔲Article 239AA of the Constitution of India granted Special Status to Delhi among Union Territories (UTs) in the year 1991 through 69th constitutional amendment by the Parliament, thereby providing Legislative Assembly and a Council of Ministers responsible to such Assembly with appropriate powers to deal with matters of concerns to common man. That’s when Delhi was named as National Capital Region (NCT) of Delhi.
🔲As per Article 239AA – Public Order, Police & Land in NCT of Delhi fall within the domain and control of Central Government which shall have the power to make laws on these matters. For remaining matters of State List or Concurrent List, in so far as any such matter is applicable to UTs, the Legislative Assembly shall have power to make laws for NCT of Delhi.
🔲Further, for Offences against laws, Jurisdiction & powers of Courts (except SC) and Fees (except court fees) so far as they relate to Public Order, Police & Land in NCT of Delhi; Central Government would have power to make laws.
🔲Further, the Council of Ministers (i.e. CM and his Ministers) are elected to aid and advise the LG in the exercise of his functions in relation to matters with respect to which the Legislative assembly has power to make law. Therefore, in respect of Public Order, Police & Land – LG would not need aid and advise from the Council of Ministers. For other matters enumerated in the State List, this arrangement would work.
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
🔲Article 239AA of the Constitution of India granted Special Status to Delhi among Union Territories (UTs) in the year 1991 through 69th constitutional amendment by the Parliament, thereby providing Legislative Assembly and a Council of Ministers responsible to such Assembly with appropriate powers to deal with matters of concerns to common man. That’s when Delhi was named as National Capital Region (NCT) of Delhi.
🔲As per Article 239AA – Public Order, Police & Land in NCT of Delhi fall within the domain and control of Central Government which shall have the power to make laws on these matters. For remaining matters of State List or Concurrent List, in so far as any such matter is applicable to UTs, the Legislative Assembly shall have power to make laws for NCT of Delhi.
🔲Further, for Offences against laws, Jurisdiction & powers of Courts (except SC) and Fees (except court fees) so far as they relate to Public Order, Police & Land in NCT of Delhi; Central Government would have power to make laws.
🔲Further, the Council of Ministers (i.e. CM and his Ministers) are elected to aid and advise the LG in the exercise of his functions in relation to matters with respect to which the Legislative assembly has power to make law. Therefore, in respect of Public Order, Police & Land – LG would not need aid and advise from the Council of Ministers. For other matters enumerated in the State List, this arrangement would work.
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
👍5
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
👁🗨Article 239 AB
🔲Article 239 AB is a special provision that applies to the National Capital Territory of Delhi (NCT), and is analogous to Article 356, which applies generally to all States.
🔲Article 356 of the Constitution allows the President to assume the executive powers of a State and transfer the Assembly’s legislative powers to Parliament where the State government cannot be ‘carried on in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution.’ This power to impose ‘President’s Rule’ has mostly been exercised in two limited circumstances — where there is no clear majority in the Assembly, and where a State government acts contrary to constitutional provisions.
🔲Article 239 AB (a) says “if the administration of the NCT cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of Article 239 AA,” the president can dismiss the council of ministers.
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
🔲Article 239 AB is a special provision that applies to the National Capital Territory of Delhi (NCT), and is analogous to Article 356, which applies generally to all States.
🔲Article 356 of the Constitution allows the President to assume the executive powers of a State and transfer the Assembly’s legislative powers to Parliament where the State government cannot be ‘carried on in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution.’ This power to impose ‘President’s Rule’ has mostly been exercised in two limited circumstances — where there is no clear majority in the Assembly, and where a State government acts contrary to constitutional provisions.
🔲Article 239 AB (a) says “if the administration of the NCT cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of Article 239 AA,” the president can dismiss the council of ministers.
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
👍7❤1
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
💠9th, 10th, 11th and 12th Schedule
🛡️Ninth Schedule was added by 1st Amendment Act 1951 to protect the laws included in it from judicial scrutiny on the ground of violation of fundamental rights.
🛡️However, in 2007, the Supreme Court ruled that the laws included in this schedule after April 24, 1973, are now open to judicial review.
🛡️10th Schedule was added by the 52nd Amendment Act of 1985, also known as Anti-defection Law.
🛡️11th schedule was added by the 73rd Amendment Act of 1992. It contains the provisions that specify the powers, authority and responsibilities of Panchayats. It has 29 matters.
🛡️12th schedule was added by the 74th Amendment Act of 1992. It deals with the provisions that specify the powers, authority and responsibilities of Municipalities. It has 18 matters.
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
🛡️Ninth Schedule was added by 1st Amendment Act 1951 to protect the laws included in it from judicial scrutiny on the ground of violation of fundamental rights.
🛡️However, in 2007, the Supreme Court ruled that the laws included in this schedule after April 24, 1973, are now open to judicial review.
🛡️10th Schedule was added by the 52nd Amendment Act of 1985, also known as Anti-defection Law.
🛡️11th schedule was added by the 73rd Amendment Act of 1992. It contains the provisions that specify the powers, authority and responsibilities of Panchayats. It has 29 matters.
🛡️12th schedule was added by the 74th Amendment Act of 1992. It deals with the provisions that specify the powers, authority and responsibilities of Municipalities. It has 18 matters.
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
👍8
Forwarded from Recent Case Law India
Mutation entry does not confer any right, title or interest in favour of any person: Supreme Court
Case: Jitendra Singh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh ; SLP(C) 13146/2021
Citation: LL 2021 SC 430
Coram: Justice MR Shah and Aniruddha Bose
Counsel: Adv Rajesh Inamdar for petitioner, Adv G.V. Chandrasekar for respondent
Wednesday 08 September, 2021
The Supreme Court observed that mutation entry in the revenue record is only for fiscal purposes and does not confer any right, title or interest in favour of a person.
"If there is any dispute with respect to the title and more particularly when the mutation entry is sought to be made on the basis of the will, the party who is claiming title/right on the basis of the will has to approach the appropriate civil court/court and get his rights crystalised and only thereafter on the basis of the decision before the civil court necessary mutation entry can be made, the bench of Justices MR Shah and Aniruddha Bose observed.
In this case, the Additional Commissioner, Rewa Division, Rewa, directed to mutate the name of the petitioner in the revenue records, on the basis of the a will produced by him. The Madhya Pradesh High Court, in a petition filed by some parties, set aside the order and directed the petitioner to approach the appropriate court to crystalise his rights on the basis of the alleged will dated 20.05.1998. The petitioner therefore filed Special Leave Petition before the Apex Court
'5..Be that as it may, as per the settled proposition of law, mutation entry does not confer any right, title or interest in favour of the person and the mutation entry in the revenue record is only for the fiscal purpose. As per the settled proposition of law, if there is any dispute with respect to the title and more particularly when the mutation entry is sought to be made on the basis of the will, the party who is claiming title/right on the basis of the will has to approach the appropriate civil court/court and get his rights crystalised and only thereafter on the basis of the decision before the civil court necessary mutation entry can be made", the bench observed.
The court referred to the judgment in Balwant Singh v. Daulat Singh (D) (1997) 7 SCC 137.
"Right from 1997, the law is very clear. In the case of Balwant Singh v. Daulat Singh (D) By Lrs., reported in (1997) 7 SCC 137, this Court had an occasion to consider the effect of mutation and it is observed and held that mutation of property in revenue records neither creates nor extinguishes title to the property nor has it any presumptive value on title. Such entries are relevant only for the purpose of collecting land revenue. Similar view has been expressed in the series of decisions thereafter.", the Court said.
The bench further noted that in Suraj Bhan v. Financial Commissioner, (2007) 6 SCC 186, it was held that an entry in revenue records does not confer title on a person whose name appears in record-of-rights.
"Entries in the revenue records or jamabandi have only "fiscal purpose", i.e., payment of land revenue, and no ownership is conferred on the basis of such entries. It is further observed that so far as the title of the property is concerned, it can only be decided by a competent civil court.", it noted.
The court noticed that similar view has been expressed in the cases of Suman Verma v. Union of India, (2004) 12 SCC 58; Faqruddin v. Tajuddin (2008) 8 SCC 12; Rajinder Singh v. State of J&K, (2008) 9 SCC 368; Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad v. State of Maharashtra, (2015) 16 SCC 689; T. Ravi v. B. Chinna Narasimha, (2017) 7 SCC 342; Bhimabai Mahadeo Kambekar v. Arthur Import & Export Co., (2019) 3 SCC 191; Prahlad Pradhan v. Sonu Kumhar, (2019) 10 SCC 259; and Ajit Kaur v. Darshan Singh, (2019) 13 SCC 70.
Join & Share @Case_Law_India
Case: Jitendra Singh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh ; SLP(C) 13146/2021
Citation: LL 2021 SC 430
Coram: Justice MR Shah and Aniruddha Bose
Counsel: Adv Rajesh Inamdar for petitioner, Adv G.V. Chandrasekar for respondent
Wednesday 08 September, 2021
The Supreme Court observed that mutation entry in the revenue record is only for fiscal purposes and does not confer any right, title or interest in favour of a person.
"If there is any dispute with respect to the title and more particularly when the mutation entry is sought to be made on the basis of the will, the party who is claiming title/right on the basis of the will has to approach the appropriate civil court/court and get his rights crystalised and only thereafter on the basis of the decision before the civil court necessary mutation entry can be made, the bench of Justices MR Shah and Aniruddha Bose observed.
In this case, the Additional Commissioner, Rewa Division, Rewa, directed to mutate the name of the petitioner in the revenue records, on the basis of the a will produced by him. The Madhya Pradesh High Court, in a petition filed by some parties, set aside the order and directed the petitioner to approach the appropriate court to crystalise his rights on the basis of the alleged will dated 20.05.1998. The petitioner therefore filed Special Leave Petition before the Apex Court
'5..Be that as it may, as per the settled proposition of law, mutation entry does not confer any right, title or interest in favour of the person and the mutation entry in the revenue record is only for the fiscal purpose. As per the settled proposition of law, if there is any dispute with respect to the title and more particularly when the mutation entry is sought to be made on the basis of the will, the party who is claiming title/right on the basis of the will has to approach the appropriate civil court/court and get his rights crystalised and only thereafter on the basis of the decision before the civil court necessary mutation entry can be made", the bench observed.
The court referred to the judgment in Balwant Singh v. Daulat Singh (D) (1997) 7 SCC 137.
"Right from 1997, the law is very clear. In the case of Balwant Singh v. Daulat Singh (D) By Lrs., reported in (1997) 7 SCC 137, this Court had an occasion to consider the effect of mutation and it is observed and held that mutation of property in revenue records neither creates nor extinguishes title to the property nor has it any presumptive value on title. Such entries are relevant only for the purpose of collecting land revenue. Similar view has been expressed in the series of decisions thereafter.", the Court said.
The bench further noted that in Suraj Bhan v. Financial Commissioner, (2007) 6 SCC 186, it was held that an entry in revenue records does not confer title on a person whose name appears in record-of-rights.
"Entries in the revenue records or jamabandi have only "fiscal purpose", i.e., payment of land revenue, and no ownership is conferred on the basis of such entries. It is further observed that so far as the title of the property is concerned, it can only be decided by a competent civil court.", it noted.
The court noticed that similar view has been expressed in the cases of Suman Verma v. Union of India, (2004) 12 SCC 58; Faqruddin v. Tajuddin (2008) 8 SCC 12; Rajinder Singh v. State of J&K, (2008) 9 SCC 368; Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad v. State of Maharashtra, (2015) 16 SCC 689; T. Ravi v. B. Chinna Narasimha, (2017) 7 SCC 342; Bhimabai Mahadeo Kambekar v. Arthur Import & Export Co., (2019) 3 SCC 191; Prahlad Pradhan v. Sonu Kumhar, (2019) 10 SCC 259; and Ajit Kaur v. Darshan Singh, (2019) 13 SCC 70.
Join & Share @Case_Law_India
👍23🥰2
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
5_6244750932190432567.pdf
1.1 MB
Haryana ADA Result
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
The_Bharatiya_Nyaya_Sanhita__2023_230811_134238.pdf
437.2 KB
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023
The IPC 1860 will replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
The IPC 1860 will replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
👍4
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
The_Bharatiya_Nagarik_Suraksha_Sanhita_2023_230811_134308.pdf
1 MB
THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023
The Crpc of 1973 will be replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
The Crpc of 1973 will be replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
👍3
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
The_Bharatiya_Sakshya_Bill_2023_230811_134334.pdf
267.1 KB
THE BHARATIYA SAKSHYA BILL, 2023
The Indian Evidence act of 1872 will be replaced by the Bharatiya Sakshya Bill 2023
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
The Indian Evidence act of 1872 will be replaced by the Bharatiya Sakshya Bill 2023
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
👍2
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
Advertisement_22_23_dated_14_08_2023.pdf
529.5 KB
🛡Jharkhand Civil Judge Exam Official Notification 2023.
🛡 Vacancies: 138
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
🛡 Vacancies: 138
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
❤1
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
Adv HJS Bar Exam-2023.pdf
2.4 MB
MPHJS _ District Judge (Entry Level) Recruitment Direct From Bar Exam Official Notification 2023.
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
👍2
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
Open_PDF.pdf
2.2 MB
UPPCS J 2022 Final Result
U.P. JUDICIAL SERVICES (CIVIL JUDGE) (JR.DIV.) EXAM. 2022
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
U.P. JUDICIAL SERVICES (CIVIL JUDGE) (JR.DIV.) EXAM. 2022
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
👍3❤1
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
🛡केन्द्र-राज्य प्रशासनिक सम्बन्धों से जुड़े अनुच्छेद
🔲 अनुच्छेद 256 — राज्यों की और संघ की बाध्यता
🔲 अनुच्छेद 257 — कुछ दशाओं में राज्यों पर संघ का नियंत्रण
🔲 अनुच्छेद 257 क — राज्यों को सशस्त्र बलों अथवा संघ के अन्य बलों की तैनाती में सहयोग (निरस्त)
🔲 अनुच्छेद 258 — कुछ दशाओं में राज्यों को शक्ति प्रदान करने आदि की संघ की शक्ति
🔲 अनुच्छेद 258क — संघ को कृत्य सौंपने की राज्यों की शक्ति
🔲 अनुच्छेद 259 — पहली अनुसूची के भाग-बी में राज्यों में सशस्त्र बल (निरस्त)
🔲 अनुच्छेद 260 — भारत के बाहर के राज्य क्षेत्रों के संबंध में संघ की अधिकारिता
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
🔲 अनुच्छेद 256 — राज्यों की और संघ की बाध्यता
🔲 अनुच्छेद 257 — कुछ दशाओं में राज्यों पर संघ का नियंत्रण
🔲 अनुच्छेद 257 क — राज्यों को सशस्त्र बलों अथवा संघ के अन्य बलों की तैनाती में सहयोग (निरस्त)
🔲 अनुच्छेद 258 — कुछ दशाओं में राज्यों को शक्ति प्रदान करने आदि की संघ की शक्ति
🔲 अनुच्छेद 258क — संघ को कृत्य सौंपने की राज्यों की शक्ति
🔲 अनुच्छेद 259 — पहली अनुसूची के भाग-बी में राज्यों में सशस्त्र बल (निरस्त)
🔲 अनुच्छेद 260 — भारत के बाहर के राज्य क्षेत्रों के संबंध में संघ की अधिकारिता
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
👍10❤1🤔1
Forwarded from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
🛡 CENTRE-STATE ADMINISTRATIVE RELATIONS
🔲 Article 256 — Obligation of states and the Union
🔲 Article 257 — Control of the Union over states in certain cases
🔲 Article 257A — Assistance to States by deployment of armed forces or other forces of the Union (Repealed)
🔲 Article 258 — Power of the Union to confer powers, etc., on states in certain cases
🔲 Article 258A — Power of the states to entrust functions to the union.
🔲 Article 259 — Armed Forces in States in Part B of the First Schedule (Repealed)
🔲 Article 260 — Jurisdiction of the Union in relation to territories outside India
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
🔲 Article 256 — Obligation of states and the Union
🔲 Article 257 — Control of the Union over states in certain cases
🔲 Article 257A — Assistance to States by deployment of armed forces or other forces of the Union (Repealed)
🔲 Article 258 — Power of the Union to confer powers, etc., on states in certain cases
🔲 Article 258A — Power of the states to entrust functions to the union.
🔲 Article 259 — Armed Forces in States in Part B of the First Schedule (Repealed)
🔲 Article 260 — Jurisdiction of the Union in relation to territories outside India
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation
@Indian_Judicial_Services_IJS
Join us @Law4CivilServices
Join us @Law_Books_Store
👍7😁1