Over 12,700 Doctors and Scientists Have Signed the "Rome Declaration" Accusing COVID Policy Makers of 'Crimes Against Humanity' for Blocking Early Multidrug Treatment of Covid-19
https://doctorsandscientistsdeclaration.org/
https://doctorsandscientistsdeclaration.org/
"a disinformation campaign was initiated by the FDA and others to deter the use of off-label treatment"
https://trialsitenews.com/fdas-smoking-gun-disinformation-campaign-targeting-ivermectin/
Unconscionable. Meanwhile we happily embrace announcements of manipulated study results (standard Pharma practice) of novel costly compounds. Sad stuff
https://trialsitenews.com/fdas-smoking-gun-disinformation-campaign-targeting-ivermectin/
Unconscionable. Meanwhile we happily embrace announcements of manipulated study results (standard Pharma practice) of novel costly compounds. Sad stuff
Trialsitenews
FDA’s Smoking Gun: Disinformation Campaign Targeting Ivermectin
Note that views expressed in this opinion article are the writer’s personal views and not necessarily those of TrialSite.
FLCCC has had fluvox on our protocols for 7 months. Fauci has sat on TOGETHER trial results for 2 months. He now assigns the cowering IDSA docs to give him cover with an insane "not recommended outside clinical trial" on Nov. 1. The U.S-led war on repurposed drugs steamrolls on
Campbell: one of IVM's MANY mechanisms is to bind same enzyme targeted by Pfizer's new drug.
Are outcomes same?
Morgenstern et al, 6/20, IVM:
2706 patients 0.77% hospitalized, one died
Pfizer, 2021
1219 patients, 0.8% hospitalized, none died
Hmm...
https://youtu.be/ufy2AweXRkc
Are outcomes same?
Morgenstern et al, 6/20, IVM:
2706 patients 0.77% hospitalized, one died
Pfizer, 2021
1219 patients, 0.8% hospitalized, none died
Hmm...
https://youtu.be/ufy2AweXRkc
YouTube
New Pfizer drug and ivermectin
New Pfizer antiviral and ivermectin, a pharmacodynamic analysis
New Pfizer antiviral, PF-07321332, C₂₃H₃₂F₃N₅O₄
PF-07321332 is designed to block the activity of the SARS-CoV-2-3CL protease,
https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizers…
New Pfizer antiviral, PF-07321332, C₂₃H₃₂F₃N₅O₄
PF-07321332 is designed to block the activity of the SARS-CoV-2-3CL protease,
https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizers…
Thread re: retraction of the FLCCC paper from the Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
It is unfortunate that JICM retracted an entire paper based on their refusal to accept an update to 1 section of data that had little relevance to the focus or conclusions of the paper
This was a comprehensive paper - 13 sections, nearly 200 scientific references detailing the science behind each MATH+ element of the 2020 protocol. The data in question was in 1 section and WAS ACCURATE when we originally submitted- i.e. a 6% COVID mortality at Sentara
After peer-review & publication, a very unusual request came to us from JICM. Sentara Hospital asked the journal that the paper be updated with longer-term follow up data calculated differently (they never said our original data was inaccurate).
Using Sentara's method, they came up with a 10% mortality - STILL FAR LESS than the 23% U.S hospital mortality average average we were loosely comparing it to.
Best part: Sentara, in their ignorance, tried to call out the 28% mortality of patients who got all components of MATH+ as if it was a bad thing - without realizing those were ICU patients at a time when U.S institutions were reporting UP TO AN 88% MORTALITY in the ICU
We then provided the only follow-up data we had - JICM refused to accept. We then offered to retract the entire section with the old Sentara data - JICM refused. The conclusion of the paper (it was a RATIONALE paper) still stands without the Sentara data even being included.
This action by the journal puts the FLCCC again on the growing list of scientists whose peer reviewed manuscripts on repurposed drugs have been retracted by editors throughout the pandemic (after passing peer review!).
If medical research is there just to serve in supporting mainstream collective thinking and censor those who might have alternative approaches or differing interpretations, the future of medicine will be very dark.
It is unfortunate that JICM retracted an entire paper based on their refusal to accept an update to 1 section of data that had little relevance to the focus or conclusions of the paper
This was a comprehensive paper - 13 sections, nearly 200 scientific references detailing the science behind each MATH+ element of the 2020 protocol. The data in question was in 1 section and WAS ACCURATE when we originally submitted- i.e. a 6% COVID mortality at Sentara
After peer-review & publication, a very unusual request came to us from JICM. Sentara Hospital asked the journal that the paper be updated with longer-term follow up data calculated differently (they never said our original data was inaccurate).
Using Sentara's method, they came up with a 10% mortality - STILL FAR LESS than the 23% U.S hospital mortality average average we were loosely comparing it to.
Best part: Sentara, in their ignorance, tried to call out the 28% mortality of patients who got all components of MATH+ as if it was a bad thing - without realizing those were ICU patients at a time when U.S institutions were reporting UP TO AN 88% MORTALITY in the ICU
We then provided the only follow-up data we had - JICM refused to accept. We then offered to retract the entire section with the old Sentara data - JICM refused. The conclusion of the paper (it was a RATIONALE paper) still stands without the Sentara data even being included.
This action by the journal puts the FLCCC again on the growing list of scientists whose peer reviewed manuscripts on repurposed drugs have been retracted by editors throughout the pandemic (after passing peer review!).
If medical research is there just to serve in supporting mainstream collective thinking and censor those who might have alternative approaches or differing interpretations, the future of medicine will be very dark.
“Dr. Marik has been fighting this battle alone. We cannot let him walk into that courtroom feeling he has no support.” —Dr. Sheila Furey. Read the full article here: https://rescue.substack.com/p/a-virginia-doctor-calls-for-a-protest
“Dr. Marik is an extraordinary clinician, possessed of stellar medical and academic credentials and an exceptional breadth and depth of experience as a physician.” -Dr. Pierre Kory
Read article: https://rescue.substack.com/p/dr-pierre-kory-barring-dr-marik-from
Read article: https://rescue.substack.com/p/dr-pierre-kory-barring-dr-marik-from
“It’s time ‘to let the judge know the doctor-patient relationship is sacred.’” -Dr. Sheila Furey
Stand up for Dr. Marik and share your story in this post or in the comments here: https://rescue.substack.com/p/add-your-voice-to-support-dr-paul/comments
Stand up for Dr. Marik and share your story in this post or in the comments here: https://rescue.substack.com/p/add-your-voice-to-support-dr-paul/comments
Don't miss this Wednesday's weekly update! Dr. Pierre Kory and Dr. Joseph Varon will join Dr. Paul Marik to discuss his case to fight for a doctor's right to treat. Register here: https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_2CY5VGh7Rk6NeDPZOpzKyQ
Zoom
Welcome! You are invited to join a webinar: IMA Weekly Webinar (Formerly FLCCC). After registering, you will receive a confirmation…
Registering once opts you in to the entire series.
Reminder: Use the same link each week.
Reminder: Use the same link each week.
Hearing Set in ICU Doctor’s Lawsuit: Do Doctors or Administrators Determine Treatment for Critical COVID Patients?
https://www.einpresswire.com/article/556542177/hearing-set-in-icu-doctor-s-lawsuit-do-doctors-or-administrators-determine-treatment-for-critical-covid-patients
https://www.einpresswire.com/article/556542177/hearing-set-in-icu-doctor-s-lawsuit-do-doctors-or-administrators-determine-treatment-for-critical-covid-patients
EIN Presswire
Hearing Set in ICU Doctor’s Lawsuit: Do Doctors or Administrators Determine Treatment for Critical COVID Patients?
The case brought by Dr. Paul Marik to restore the use of safe & effective COVID treatments to be heard in a Norfolk VA. Court on Thurs., Nov. 18 at 1pm ET
The fight for the return of physician autonomy in clinical decision making led by Professor Paul Marik is starting to pick up broader international support. Thank you Africa! #westandwithmarik #letdoctorsbedoctors
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Quite the crowd outside Norfolk’s courthouse in support of Dr. Paul Marik. WTKR3 was the first to report last week that he’s suing Sentara Healthcare for banning the use of #Ivermectin
He’s expected in court at 1pm
https://www.wtkr.com/news/investigations/norfolk-doctor-files-lawsuit-against-sentara-on-ban-of-ivermectin-use-to-treat-covid-19?_amp=true
He’s expected in court at 1pm
https://www.wtkr.com/news/investigations/norfolk-doctor-files-lawsuit-against-sentara-on-ban-of-ivermectin-use-to-treat-covid-19?_amp=true
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Dr. Paul Marik arrives at the courthouse with tears in his eyes. He says it’s about saving lives: https://www.wtkr.com/news/investigations/norfolk-doctor-files-lawsuit-against-sentara-on-ban-of-ivermectin-use-to-treat-covid-19?_amp=true