Forwarded from Алина
🇬🇧 Хватит захламлять ленту! Твой идеальный English Hub здесь.
Мы перерыли весь Telegram и упаковали только топовый контент по английскому языку в одну папку. Больше никакого спама — только польза🔥
В этой подборке:
— Сленг, который реально используют в 2026 году.
— Удобные шпаргалки по грамматике и лексике.
— Погружение в менталитет англоязычных стран.
— Твой «билет» в мир карьеры без границ.
Забирай коллекцию, пока ссылка активна👇
СОХРАНИТЬ ПОДБОРКУ
Мы перерыли весь Telegram и упаковали только топовый контент по английскому языку в одну папку. Больше никакого спама — только польза🔥
В этой подборке:
— Сленг, который реально используют в 2026 году.
— Удобные шпаргалки по грамматике и лексике.
— Погружение в менталитет англоязычных стран.
— Твой «билет» в мир карьеры без границ.
Забирай коллекцию, пока ссылка активна👇
СОХРАНИТЬ ПОДБОРКУ
Forwarded from Production écrite (DELF,DALF, TCF)
Sujets de productions écrites: la boite à merveilles
1️⃣Sujet:
2️⃣ Sujet:
3️⃣ Sujet:
4️⃣ Sujet:
5️⃣ Sujet
6️⃣ Sujet:
7️⃣ Sujet:
8️⃣ Sujet:
9️⃣ Sujet :
1️⃣ 0️⃣ . Sujet
1️⃣ 1️⃣ Sujet:
1️⃣ 2️⃣ Sujet:
1️⃣ 3️⃣ Sujet
1️⃣ 4️⃣ Sujet:
Pour vous :
➡️Pour écrire essai
➡️Essai argumenté explication
➡️Structure de l'examen
🤩 @production_ecrite
1️⃣Sujet:
Certaines personnes aiment rester seules; d'autres, au contraire, aiment avoir de la compagnie (des ami(e)s...)
Et vous, que préférez-vous? Rédigez un texte dans lequel vous développez votre avis à l'aide d'arguments précis
Ayant vu à la télévision le chagrin et la détresse (le malheur) d'une mère d'origine étrangère, dont la fille a trouvé la mort à la suite de l'attentat terroriste qui avait frappé, le 28 avril 2011, le café Argana situé à Jama El Fna à Marrakech, vous avez décidé de réagir.
Rédigez un texte bien construit dans lequel vous défendez l'image de notre pays.
Il est temps que les parents arrêtent de décider à la place de leurs jeunes enfants», déclare un
éducateur. Partagez-vous cette idée ?
Dans un texte d'une vingtaine de lignes, vous présenterez votre point de vue sur ce que devrait être le rapport parents/jeunes,
en l'appuyant au moyen d'arguments pertinents et d'exemples précis.
Vous avez certainement vu dans votre entourage des enfants trembler de peur devant leur parent. A-t-on vraiment besoin de faire peur aux enfants pour les éduquer?
Rédigez un texte argumentatif pour développer votre point de vue.
«Les jeunes d'aujourd'hui manquent de respect aux adultes et pensent avoir toujours
raison. Partagez-vous cette opinion?
Développez votre point de vue en le justifiant à l'aide des arguments.
On dit que les voisins, aujourd'hui, ne sont plus ce qu'ils étaient autrefois ils aidaient les vieux, les veuves et se comportaient bien avec les enfants. Aujourd'hui, chacun ne pense qu'à ses propres intérêts.
Partagez-vous ce point de vue?
Développez votre réflexion en vous appuyant sur des arguments et des exemples précis.
Certains parents font des travaux à la place de leurs enfants (devoirs/exercices/chambre/ lit...) Rédigez un texte argumentatif dans lequel vous donnerez votre point de vue sur
ce sujet.
De nos jours, les jeunes préfèrent quitter leur maison familiale après leur mariage, pour aller habiter ailleurs. Qu'en pensez- vous? Rédiger un texte dans lequel vous exprimez votre point de vue en l'illustrant par des exemples précis.
Il arrive que certains parents se disputent devant leurs enfants sans trop se soucier des conséquences de leurs actes. A partir de votre expérience personnelle, rédigez un texte argumentatif où vous montrerez les effets de ces scènes de ménage sur l'éducation des enfants et les relations familiales.
Certains lecteurs de la Boîte à Merveilles» affirment que Lalla Zoubida, la mère du narrateur, a quelques défauts mais elle a beaucoup de qualités. Approuvez-vous cette affirmation?
Rédigez un texte dans lequel vous expliquerez comment doit être une bonne mère.
Dans la Boîte à merveilles d'Ahmed SEFRIOUI, Sidi Mohammed n'a pas d'amis. En ce qui te conceme, es-tu de ces jeunes qui pensent qu'il est important d'avoir des amis, au contraire, de ceux qui pensent qu'avoir des amis, est une source de problèmes?
Donne ton point de vue en le justifiant par des arguments de ton choix.
De nos jours, certains hommes continuent à se marier avec plusieurs femmes. Partagez-vous ce comportement? Rédigez un texte dans lequel vous exposerez votre point de vue justifié par des
arguments précis.
On dit que les parents doivent laisser plus de liberté à leurs enfants. Ainsi, ces enfants pourront faire tout ce qu'ils
veulent. Partagez-vous ce point de vue? Développez votre réflexio votre réflexion en vous appuyant sur des arguments et des exemples précis.
Sidi Mohammed a usé de la violence pour régler ses problèmes avec Zineb. Pensez-vous que le recours à la violence soit le
moyen le plus efficace pour résoudre les problèmes de la vie quotidienne Répondez à cette question dans un écrit argumenté illustré d'exemples précis.
Pour vous :
➡️Pour écrire essai
➡️Essai argumenté explication
➡️Structure de l'examen
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
What’s in it for me? An eye-opening account of the impacts of smartphone use in childhood.
As the first generation to grow up in the era of ubiquitous digital connectivity, Gen Z has faced a surge in mental health challenges that demand our urgent attention.
This Blink dives into the impact that smartphones and social media have had on the well-being of today’s youth. By understanding the four key ways in which these technologies have eroded the traditional foundations of a healthy childhood – through social deprivation, sleep deprivation, attention fragmentation, and addiction – you’ll gain insights into addressing this mental health crisis.
Importantly, this Blink also provides actionable steps that you, as a parent, caregiver, or concerned citizen, can take to mitigate these harms and foster environments that nurture the essential elements of child development. Whether you’re raising a family or are simply worried about the future of our young people, get ready to equip yourself with the knowledge to support the next generation.
Smartphones are behind a worrying rise in childhood and adolescent mental health issues
In the early 2000s, the mental health landscape among preteens and adolescents appeared relatively stable, with no clear indications of an impending crisis. But the next decade brought about a dramatic shift: mental health issues among Generation Z children and teenagers began to surge at an alarming rate.
To put this phenomenon into perspective, consider the findings of a US National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The data reveals a staggering 145 percent increase in reported cases of depressive episodes among girls since 2012. For boys, the rise is even more pronounced, with a 161 percent increase in reported cases of depressive episodes over the same period. The impact extends beyond self-reported symptoms, with college students receiving a 134 percent increase in anxiety, a 106 percent increase in depression, a 72 percent increase in ADHD, and a 57 percent increase in bipolar disorder diagnoses since 2012. This surge in mental health challenges is, with the exception of some young millennials, largely confined to the Gen Z demographic.
The statistics only begin to scratch the surface. Among girls, there has been a 188 percent increase in emergency room visits for self-harm since 2010, and a 167 percent rise in suicide rates. For boys, the numbers are also alarming, with a 48 percent increase in self-harm-related ER visits and a 91 percent surge in suicide rates.
What accounts for this dramatic shift in the mental health landscape of Gen Z? The answer may lie, in part, with the widespread adoption of smartphones and the corresponding changes in the social fabric of adolescence. Smartphones, first introduced in 2007 and widely adopted by the 2010s, have profoundly influenced the way young people interact, communicate, and engage with the world around them.
Studies have shown that tweens and teens who accessed the internet in the 1990s and early 2000s were, on average, slightly happier during their adolescence than their Gen X predecessors. However, this trend reversed dramatically with the widespread adoption of smartphones, which enabled adolescents to be connected and online constantly, wherever they were. By 2016, 79 percent of teens owned a smartphone, as did 28 percent of children aged 8 to 12. Alarmingly, a 2022 Pew report indicates that 46 percent of teens describe themselves as being online “almost constantly.”
🔴 @keep_learning_english
As the first generation to grow up in the era of ubiquitous digital connectivity, Gen Z has faced a surge in mental health challenges that demand our urgent attention.
This Blink dives into the impact that smartphones and social media have had on the well-being of today’s youth. By understanding the four key ways in which these technologies have eroded the traditional foundations of a healthy childhood – through social deprivation, sleep deprivation, attention fragmentation, and addiction – you’ll gain insights into addressing this mental health crisis.
Importantly, this Blink also provides actionable steps that you, as a parent, caregiver, or concerned citizen, can take to mitigate these harms and foster environments that nurture the essential elements of child development. Whether you’re raising a family or are simply worried about the future of our young people, get ready to equip yourself with the knowledge to support the next generation.
Smartphones are behind a worrying rise in childhood and adolescent mental health issues
In the early 2000s, the mental health landscape among preteens and adolescents appeared relatively stable, with no clear indications of an impending crisis. But the next decade brought about a dramatic shift: mental health issues among Generation Z children and teenagers began to surge at an alarming rate.
To put this phenomenon into perspective, consider the findings of a US National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The data reveals a staggering 145 percent increase in reported cases of depressive episodes among girls since 2012. For boys, the rise is even more pronounced, with a 161 percent increase in reported cases of depressive episodes over the same period. The impact extends beyond self-reported symptoms, with college students receiving a 134 percent increase in anxiety, a 106 percent increase in depression, a 72 percent increase in ADHD, and a 57 percent increase in bipolar disorder diagnoses since 2012. This surge in mental health challenges is, with the exception of some young millennials, largely confined to the Gen Z demographic.
The statistics only begin to scratch the surface. Among girls, there has been a 188 percent increase in emergency room visits for self-harm since 2010, and a 167 percent rise in suicide rates. For boys, the numbers are also alarming, with a 48 percent increase in self-harm-related ER visits and a 91 percent surge in suicide rates.
What accounts for this dramatic shift in the mental health landscape of Gen Z? The answer may lie, in part, with the widespread adoption of smartphones and the corresponding changes in the social fabric of adolescence. Smartphones, first introduced in 2007 and widely adopted by the 2010s, have profoundly influenced the way young people interact, communicate, and engage with the world around them.
Studies have shown that tweens and teens who accessed the internet in the 1990s and early 2000s were, on average, slightly happier during their adolescence than their Gen X predecessors. However, this trend reversed dramatically with the widespread adoption of smartphones, which enabled adolescents to be connected and online constantly, wherever they were. By 2016, 79 percent of teens owned a smartphone, as did 28 percent of children aged 8 to 12. Alarmingly, a 2022 Pew report indicates that 46 percent of teens describe themselves as being online “almost constantly.”
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Keep Learning English
What’s in it for me? An eye-opening account of the impacts of smartphone use in childhood. As the first generation to grow up in the era of ubiquitous digital connectivity, Gen Z has faced a surge in mental health challenges that demand our urgent attention. …
This shift in the social landscape of childhood and adolescence, often referred to as the “Great Rewiring of Childhood,” has had a significant impact on the mental health of Gen Z. As their social lives have increasingly moved online through the constant access to social media, video gaming, and other internet activities, the first generation of teens in the United States to go through adolescence with this level of connectivity has become more anxious, depressed, and suicidal than any generation recorded before them. This troubling trend is not limited to the US; studies across Canada, the UK, and the Nordic states have reported similar findings, suggesting that this is a global phenomenon.
While other factors, such as anxiety surrounding global issues like climate change, may also contribute to the mental health outcomes of Gen Z, the ubiquity of smartphone usage and the corresponding changes in social dynamics appear to be the primary drivers behind this tidal wave of mental illness. As we grapple with the implications of this crisis, it’s clear that a deeper understanding of the complex interplay between technology, social interaction, and adolescent development is needed to develop effective strategies for supporting the mental health of our youth.
Play-based childhoods, not phone-based childhoods, promote healthy development
Why has the introduction of the smartphone been so detrimental to children’s and adolescents’ mental health? The answer may lie not just in what the smartphone gives them access to – social media, photo filters, addictive games, and more – but in what time spent on a smartphone takes away from them. Specifically, the introduction of the smartphone has eroded the traditional play-based childhood, with far-reaching consequences for the mental well-being of Generation Z.
Humans have a longer childhood than any other mammal, and there’s a good reason for this. The slower pace of human development allows the brain to undergo a critical process of synaptic pruning, where the connections that are used frequently are strengthened while those that are used rarely fade away. This process of pattern and habit formation is evolutionarily designed to occur through three key areas: free play, attunement, and social learning. Smartphones have enticed children into a virtual world, where it’s challenging to fully explore these three critical functionalities.
Through unstructured, undirected play, children learn to cooperate with each other, assess risks, form friendships, and exercise their imagination. A phone-based childhood, in contrast, is necessarily structured – the content and interactions have been designed by teams of experts. This structured virtual environment can’t offer the same developmental opportunities as the physical world of free play.
Attunement, or the art of connecting with others, is another crucial aspect of child development. From a young age, children learn to read emotional cues, take turns, and build social bonds through synchronous interactions with their caregivers and peers. These interactions are vital for developing emotional self-regulation and social skills. By 2014, a third of preteen girls reported spending roughly 20 hours a week on social media, potentially losing valuable opportunities for attunement.
Social learning, the process by which children emulate effective behaviors and social strategies from role models, is also impacted by the rise of smartphones and social media. While social media doesn’t take away children’s and teens’ opportunities for social learning, it turbocharges them. Children can now identify behaviors to emulate through metric systems, such as the number of likes and engagement on posts. But the role models they choose to emulate may display behaviors or embody values that are inappropriate, or that set impossible standards for children to live up to rather than organically identifying good role models in their communities.
While other factors, such as anxiety surrounding global issues like climate change, may also contribute to the mental health outcomes of Gen Z, the ubiquity of smartphone usage and the corresponding changes in social dynamics appear to be the primary drivers behind this tidal wave of mental illness. As we grapple with the implications of this crisis, it’s clear that a deeper understanding of the complex interplay between technology, social interaction, and adolescent development is needed to develop effective strategies for supporting the mental health of our youth.
Play-based childhoods, not phone-based childhoods, promote healthy development
Why has the introduction of the smartphone been so detrimental to children’s and adolescents’ mental health? The answer may lie not just in what the smartphone gives them access to – social media, photo filters, addictive games, and more – but in what time spent on a smartphone takes away from them. Specifically, the introduction of the smartphone has eroded the traditional play-based childhood, with far-reaching consequences for the mental well-being of Generation Z.
Humans have a longer childhood than any other mammal, and there’s a good reason for this. The slower pace of human development allows the brain to undergo a critical process of synaptic pruning, where the connections that are used frequently are strengthened while those that are used rarely fade away. This process of pattern and habit formation is evolutionarily designed to occur through three key areas: free play, attunement, and social learning. Smartphones have enticed children into a virtual world, where it’s challenging to fully explore these three critical functionalities.
Through unstructured, undirected play, children learn to cooperate with each other, assess risks, form friendships, and exercise their imagination. A phone-based childhood, in contrast, is necessarily structured – the content and interactions have been designed by teams of experts. This structured virtual environment can’t offer the same developmental opportunities as the physical world of free play.
Attunement, or the art of connecting with others, is another crucial aspect of child development. From a young age, children learn to read emotional cues, take turns, and build social bonds through synchronous interactions with their caregivers and peers. These interactions are vital for developing emotional self-regulation and social skills. By 2014, a third of preteen girls reported spending roughly 20 hours a week on social media, potentially losing valuable opportunities for attunement.
Social learning, the process by which children emulate effective behaviors and social strategies from role models, is also impacted by the rise of smartphones and social media. While social media doesn’t take away children’s and teens’ opportunities for social learning, it turbocharges them. Children can now identify behaviors to emulate through metric systems, such as the number of likes and engagement on posts. But the role models they choose to emulate may display behaviors or embody values that are inappropriate, or that set impossible standards for children to live up to rather than organically identifying good role models in their communities.
Keep Learning English
What’s in it for me? An eye-opening account of the impacts of smartphone use in childhood. As the first generation to grow up in the era of ubiquitous digital connectivity, Gen Z has faced a surge in mental health challenges that demand our urgent attention. …
In recent decades, parents have focused on protecting children from perceived physical risks such as cars or sex offenders. But what about protecting them from smartphones and social media?
Setting up guardrails for children in the physical world can be counterproductive, leading to a decrease in resilience, independence, and unsupervised play time. Risky play is necessary for children to learn problem-solving and build confidence and self-efficacy. Dealing with boredom and frustration regularly is also key for becoming an emotionally healthy adult. In light of this, placing a child in a bubble of satisfaction and safety isn’t good for their development. At the same time, we’ve failed to adequately protect children from the risks posed by the constant access to social media, photo filters, and addictive games.
The introduction of the smartphone has fundamentally altered the nature of childhood, depriving children of the critical experiences of free play, attunement, and organic social learning. And this shift has had negative consequences for the mental health of Generation Z, as evidenced by the alarming surge in reported cases of depression, anxiety, and self-harm.
Addressing this crisis requires a deeper understanding of the connection between technology, social dynamics, and child development – which is what we’ll look at next.
From sleep deprivation to attention fragmentation, smartphone use dangerously impacts children’s health
There’s no doubt that the rapid shift from flip phones to smartphones at the end of the 2000s and the start of the 2010s has dramatically transformed the nature of childhood. In this section, we’ll outline the four major ways in which smartphones have adversely impacted the mental well-being of young people.
First up? Social deprivation. As we know, in-person, play-based social interactions are fundamental to a child’s healthy social development. But from 2009 onward, the time children spend interacting with friends face-to-face has dropped markedly. Even when children and teens do spend time together, they increasingly do so with their phones in hand, diminishing the quality of their interactions. This trend extends to family life as well, as parents too have become distracted by their smartphones. In a study of children aged 6–12, 62 percent reported that their parents were “distracted” when they tried to talk with them, with the primary reason being smartphone use.
The second adverse effect of smartphones is sleep deprivation. Biological rhythms shift during adolescence; for generations, parents have struggled to wake their teen or preteen in time for school. Smartphones have exacerbated this issue, as late-night phone use is known to be disruptive to sleep. A review of 36 studies concludes that there’s a clear correlational relationship between smartphone use and sleep deprivation among adolescents. This sleep deprivation is associated with higher levels of depression, anxiety, aggression, and impeded impulse control.
🔴 @keep_learning_english
Setting up guardrails for children in the physical world can be counterproductive, leading to a decrease in resilience, independence, and unsupervised play time. Risky play is necessary for children to learn problem-solving and build confidence and self-efficacy. Dealing with boredom and frustration regularly is also key for becoming an emotionally healthy adult. In light of this, placing a child in a bubble of satisfaction and safety isn’t good for their development. At the same time, we’ve failed to adequately protect children from the risks posed by the constant access to social media, photo filters, and addictive games.
The introduction of the smartphone has fundamentally altered the nature of childhood, depriving children of the critical experiences of free play, attunement, and organic social learning. And this shift has had negative consequences for the mental health of Generation Z, as evidenced by the alarming surge in reported cases of depression, anxiety, and self-harm.
Addressing this crisis requires a deeper understanding of the connection between technology, social dynamics, and child development – which is what we’ll look at next.
From sleep deprivation to attention fragmentation, smartphone use dangerously impacts children’s health
There’s no doubt that the rapid shift from flip phones to smartphones at the end of the 2000s and the start of the 2010s has dramatically transformed the nature of childhood. In this section, we’ll outline the four major ways in which smartphones have adversely impacted the mental well-being of young people.
First up? Social deprivation. As we know, in-person, play-based social interactions are fundamental to a child’s healthy social development. But from 2009 onward, the time children spend interacting with friends face-to-face has dropped markedly. Even when children and teens do spend time together, they increasingly do so with their phones in hand, diminishing the quality of their interactions. This trend extends to family life as well, as parents too have become distracted by their smartphones. In a study of children aged 6–12, 62 percent reported that their parents were “distracted” when they tried to talk with them, with the primary reason being smartphone use.
The second adverse effect of smartphones is sleep deprivation. Biological rhythms shift during adolescence; for generations, parents have struggled to wake their teen or preteen in time for school. Smartphones have exacerbated this issue, as late-night phone use is known to be disruptive to sleep. A review of 36 studies concludes that there’s a clear correlational relationship between smartphone use and sleep deprivation among adolescents. This sleep deprivation is associated with higher levels of depression, anxiety, aggression, and impeded impulse control.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Keep Learning English
What’s in it for me? An eye-opening account of the impacts of smartphone use in childhood. As the first generation to grow up in the era of ubiquitous digital connectivity, Gen Z has faced a surge in mental health challenges that demand our urgent attention. …
Third, there’s attention fragmentation. The average teen receives eleven notifications per waking hour on their smartphone, with heavy users potentially experiencing one notification per minute of every waking hour. Smartphones and social media are designed to pull the user’s attention away from whatever they are doing, providing a constant stream of notifications and the accompanying dopamine hits. This fragmentation of attention can compromise an individual’s ability to focus deeply on a task or engage in slower, more reflective modes of thinking. Even the mere presence of a phone in the room has been shown to impede a teen’s ability to focus on a task! This continual access to smartphones during a crucial period of brain development can mean that some users’ capacity for focus and attention never fully matures, as evidenced by the upward trend in ADHD diagnoses. Not surprisingly, studies show that individuals with ADHD often spend above-average amounts of time online and on their smartphones.
Finally, let’s discuss addiction. Smartphones and the apps that live on them are deliberately designed to be habit-forming and addictive. Preteens and teens, with their more plastic brains, are particularly vulnerable to developing these addictions. Smartphones and social media employ advanced behavioral techniques to create compulsive habits in users – the activation of external triggers, like notifications, is paired with the promise of variable rewards, such as likes or comments. This variability actually makes the experience more addictive, as users find themselves unable to resist the urge to seek out these rewards, even in the absence of the initial trigger. The dopamine rush that users experience when indulging their addiction is countered by the symptoms of withdrawal, including dysphoria, irritability, insomnia, and anxiety, that occur when the addiction can’t be satisfied.
Taken together, these four core harms inflicted by smartphones – social deprivation, sleep deprivation, attention fragmentation, and addiction – have set the stage for the surge in mental disorders we’re seeing among children and adolescents.
The negative impacts of smartphones and social media can be curbed
Many adults who care for children and teens in some capacity are already well aware of the deleterious impact that smartphone use is having on this group’s mental and social well-being. The question then becomes, What can be done to address this pressing issue and support the healthy development of young people in the digital age?
To achieve a lasting, positive transformation, structural changes need to occur at the societal level. In the United States, governments have taken a paradoxical approach to protecting children – zealously enforcing vague “child neglect” laws to overprotect them in the physical world while underprotecting them in the virtual realm. Governments should take proactive steps to address this imbalance, such as passing laws that compel online companies, including social media and gaming platforms, to treat underage users with an extra duty of care. The age of “internet adulthood” should be raised to 16, recognizing the unique vulnerabilities of adolescents. At the same time, governments should institute more opportunities for free play and recess in the school system, and narrow neglect laws so parents can legally allow their children to engage in unsupervised play.
Tech companies, which have demonstrated remarkable ingenuity in creating habit-forming products, should now turn that same level of innovation toward ensuring the safety and well-being of children online. This could involve developing better age verification methods and far stricter options for parental control over digital content and device usage.
While structural change is necessary, it may be slow in coming. In the meantime, there are steps that parents and caregivers can take to protect children and promote healthy development.
Finally, let’s discuss addiction. Smartphones and the apps that live on them are deliberately designed to be habit-forming and addictive. Preteens and teens, with their more plastic brains, are particularly vulnerable to developing these addictions. Smartphones and social media employ advanced behavioral techniques to create compulsive habits in users – the activation of external triggers, like notifications, is paired with the promise of variable rewards, such as likes or comments. This variability actually makes the experience more addictive, as users find themselves unable to resist the urge to seek out these rewards, even in the absence of the initial trigger. The dopamine rush that users experience when indulging their addiction is countered by the symptoms of withdrawal, including dysphoria, irritability, insomnia, and anxiety, that occur when the addiction can’t be satisfied.
Taken together, these four core harms inflicted by smartphones – social deprivation, sleep deprivation, attention fragmentation, and addiction – have set the stage for the surge in mental disorders we’re seeing among children and adolescents.
The negative impacts of smartphones and social media can be curbed
Many adults who care for children and teens in some capacity are already well aware of the deleterious impact that smartphone use is having on this group’s mental and social well-being. The question then becomes, What can be done to address this pressing issue and support the healthy development of young people in the digital age?
To achieve a lasting, positive transformation, structural changes need to occur at the societal level. In the United States, governments have taken a paradoxical approach to protecting children – zealously enforcing vague “child neglect” laws to overprotect them in the physical world while underprotecting them in the virtual realm. Governments should take proactive steps to address this imbalance, such as passing laws that compel online companies, including social media and gaming platforms, to treat underage users with an extra duty of care. The age of “internet adulthood” should be raised to 16, recognizing the unique vulnerabilities of adolescents. At the same time, governments should institute more opportunities for free play and recess in the school system, and narrow neglect laws so parents can legally allow their children to engage in unsupervised play.
Tech companies, which have demonstrated remarkable ingenuity in creating habit-forming products, should now turn that same level of innovation toward ensuring the safety and well-being of children online. This could involve developing better age verification methods and far stricter options for parental control over digital content and device usage.
While structural change is necessary, it may be slow in coming. In the meantime, there are steps that parents and caregivers can take to protect children and promote healthy development.
Keep Learning English
What’s in it for me? An eye-opening account of the impacts of smartphone use in childhood. As the first generation to grow up in the era of ubiquitous digital connectivity, Gen Z has faced a surge in mental health challenges that demand our urgent attention. …
Essentially, children of all ages need less, and better, experience with screens – and more, and better, experience in the real world. So from the ages of zero to five, parents can limit screen time and maximize opportunities for free, unstructured play. While parent-child play is a wonderful connecting experience and provides educational development, children also need to engage in play with other children, ideally of a wide range of ages, to develop essential social and problem-solving skills.
As children enter elementary school, parents can encourage independence, such as walking to school or the local shops on their own. After-school time should be left mostly free for unstructured play, with limited structured activities. Families in the area can collaborate to create safe spaces for children to engage in free play while adhering to strict limits on screen time – for instance, no more than two hours per day – and utilizing rigorous parental controls and content filters on all devices in the home.
For preteens and teens, the focus should be on developing competence and self-efficacy through mastering modes of transportation, such as cycling or public transit; taking on more responsibilities at home, like cooking meals; and engaging with the real world through part-time jobs, camping trips with friends, and other independent experiences. Around the age of 16, parents can consider transitioning their child to a smartphone and active social media accounts – but they should maintain family rules about screen use and monitor for signs of addiction and mental or emotional distress.
At a minimum, the independence and competence that children are encouraged to develop in the real world should match – if not surpass – the autonomy they’re given in the virtual world. By striking this balance, parents and caregivers can mitigate the harmful impacts of excessive smartphone use and help their kids become healthier, happier individuals.
Final summary
The widespread adoption of smartphones has been the primary driver behind the dramatic surge in mental health challenges facing Gen Z. This is due to the ways in which smartphones have eroded the traditional play-based childhood and deprived young people of the essential experiences that foster healthy development. By limiting screen time, maximizing opportunities for unstructured play, and encouraging independence in the real world, parents and caregivers can help nurture the healthy development of young people in the digital age.
As children enter elementary school, parents can encourage independence, such as walking to school or the local shops on their own. After-school time should be left mostly free for unstructured play, with limited structured activities. Families in the area can collaborate to create safe spaces for children to engage in free play while adhering to strict limits on screen time – for instance, no more than two hours per day – and utilizing rigorous parental controls and content filters on all devices in the home.
For preteens and teens, the focus should be on developing competence and self-efficacy through mastering modes of transportation, such as cycling or public transit; taking on more responsibilities at home, like cooking meals; and engaging with the real world through part-time jobs, camping trips with friends, and other independent experiences. Around the age of 16, parents can consider transitioning their child to a smartphone and active social media accounts – but they should maintain family rules about screen use and monitor for signs of addiction and mental or emotional distress.
At a minimum, the independence and competence that children are encouraged to develop in the real world should match – if not surpass – the autonomy they’re given in the virtual world. By striking this balance, parents and caregivers can mitigate the harmful impacts of excessive smartphone use and help their kids become healthier, happier individuals.
Final summary
The widespread adoption of smartphones has been the primary driver behind the dramatic surge in mental health challenges facing Gen Z. This is due to the ways in which smartphones have eroded the traditional play-based childhood and deprived young people of the essential experiences that foster healthy development. By limiting screen time, maximizing opportunities for unstructured play, and encouraging independence in the real world, parents and caregivers can help nurture the healthy development of young people in the digital age.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
What’s in it for me? Learn how to ease generational friction at work
You've probably been in this meeting. Someone's checking their phone. Someone else looks annoyed. One person wants to talk it through. Another just wants the follow-up email. Everyone leaves irritated.
This kind of friction shows up everywhere at work: it’s present in debates about remote work, feedback styles, meeting length, dress codes, loyalty, and technology. It can feel personal, even when it’s not. But this isn't a case of the devil being in the details. The real driver is something much bigger—and much newer.
For the first time, workplaces include people who grew up before television, people shaped by email, people raised on social media, and people who have never known life without a smartphone. They all want to do good work. They all want respect, clarity, and purpose. They just go about it in different ways.
That gap creates daily frustrations that add up. Younger employees feel dismissed or slowed down while their older counterparts feel ignored or pushed aside. Managers are stuck in the middle, trying to keep everyone productive without picking sides.
The first bit of good news? These problems are predictable. They show up in the same places, time and again. Once you start spotting them, they become easier to manage. That's the second bit of good news.
This Blink digs into generational tension and shows how small shifts in flexibility, understanding, and leadership can ease the friction and get people working together. Most importantly, it offers a way out of the generational blame game and a template for organizations that want to accommodate and nurture everyone who works there.
Waiting your turn makes little sense when five generations share workplace
For most of human history, families and workplaces (which were often one and the same thing) ran on a simple rule: you waited your turn. Authority and assets moved slowly from old to young, usually when someone stepped aside or died. That rhythm made sense in a world of farms, land, and livestock, where change crawled and roles stayed stable for decades.
That world, though, is gone. We now live in societies and work in organizations in which up to five generations rub shoulders. That’s new. So is the friction that comes with it.
Longer lives are the first pressure point. A century ago, careers ended around fifty. Today, people often hit their stride at that age. Leadership seats stay occupied longer, which means younger colleagues are often asked to wait until midlife before gaining real influence. Ambition, in short, now frequently collides with longevity. Many younger people worry that good things don't necessarily come to those who wait.
The second pressure point is speed. Information moves at a pace that compresses generations and new tools and ideas reshape work every few years. It’s not unusual for someone in their twenties to master systems that didn’t exist when their manager was trained. A junior analyst can pull data on a phone that used to be restricted to executive briefings. Access invites challenge from every direction. The diffusion of knowledge undermines old hierarchies where age and authority once coincided.
The third shift is cultural. The youngest four generations were raised as consumers: they were taught to question, compare, and expect choice. Many grew up with parents who prized independent thinking over obedience. That mindset walks straight into the workplace. People want a voice early, feedback often, and work that feels engaging rather than dutiful.
Faced with this reality, organizations tend to stumble into two unhelpful responses. The first is trying to ignore differences. The second is trying to force one generation to behave like another – a surefire way of wasting energy and fuelling resentment. People rarely enjoy being improved against their will.
What actually works is leadership, not correction.
🔴 @keep_learning_english
You've probably been in this meeting. Someone's checking their phone. Someone else looks annoyed. One person wants to talk it through. Another just wants the follow-up email. Everyone leaves irritated.
This kind of friction shows up everywhere at work: it’s present in debates about remote work, feedback styles, meeting length, dress codes, loyalty, and technology. It can feel personal, even when it’s not. But this isn't a case of the devil being in the details. The real driver is something much bigger—and much newer.
For the first time, workplaces include people who grew up before television, people shaped by email, people raised on social media, and people who have never known life without a smartphone. They all want to do good work. They all want respect, clarity, and purpose. They just go about it in different ways.
That gap creates daily frustrations that add up. Younger employees feel dismissed or slowed down while their older counterparts feel ignored or pushed aside. Managers are stuck in the middle, trying to keep everyone productive without picking sides.
The first bit of good news? These problems are predictable. They show up in the same places, time and again. Once you start spotting them, they become easier to manage. That's the second bit of good news.
This Blink digs into generational tension and shows how small shifts in flexibility, understanding, and leadership can ease the friction and get people working together. Most importantly, it offers a way out of the generational blame game and a template for organizations that want to accommodate and nurture everyone who works there.
Waiting your turn makes little sense when five generations share workplace
For most of human history, families and workplaces (which were often one and the same thing) ran on a simple rule: you waited your turn. Authority and assets moved slowly from old to young, usually when someone stepped aside or died. That rhythm made sense in a world of farms, land, and livestock, where change crawled and roles stayed stable for decades.
That world, though, is gone. We now live in societies and work in organizations in which up to five generations rub shoulders. That’s new. So is the friction that comes with it.
Longer lives are the first pressure point. A century ago, careers ended around fifty. Today, people often hit their stride at that age. Leadership seats stay occupied longer, which means younger colleagues are often asked to wait until midlife before gaining real influence. Ambition, in short, now frequently collides with longevity. Many younger people worry that good things don't necessarily come to those who wait.
The second pressure point is speed. Information moves at a pace that compresses generations and new tools and ideas reshape work every few years. It’s not unusual for someone in their twenties to master systems that didn’t exist when their manager was trained. A junior analyst can pull data on a phone that used to be restricted to executive briefings. Access invites challenge from every direction. The diffusion of knowledge undermines old hierarchies where age and authority once coincided.
The third shift is cultural. The youngest four generations were raised as consumers: they were taught to question, compare, and expect choice. Many grew up with parents who prized independent thinking over obedience. That mindset walks straight into the workplace. People want a voice early, feedback often, and work that feels engaging rather than dutiful.
Faced with this reality, organizations tend to stumble into two unhelpful responses. The first is trying to ignore differences. The second is trying to force one generation to behave like another – a surefire way of wasting energy and fuelling resentment. People rarely enjoy being improved against their will.
What actually works is leadership, not correction.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Keep Learning English
What’s in it for me? Learn how to ease generational friction at work You've probably been in this meeting. Someone's checking their phone. Someone else looks annoyed. One person wants to talk it through. Another just wants the follow-up email. Everyone leaves…
Communication clicks when teams learn each other’s native language
Few things cause more friction across generations than how messages are sent, received, and judged. Every age group shares the same need: people want enough information to do their job well and to feel included and respected. But each generation has its own communication style that feels natural. Those preferences are shaped by the tools people grew up with, often long before they entered the workforce.
Older generations built trust through letters, memos, meetings, and phone calls. Information came from experts, and conversation rewarded patience and focus. Many still value eye contact and uninterrupted discussion. The next wave – Gen X – grew up with television, where stories mattered more than credentials and messages came in short bursts. When it arrived in everyday life, email became their workhorse, with phone or video reserved for sensitive conversations.
Then came millennials and Gen Z – two generations raised on the internet, feeds, and constant interaction. They expect conversation, not broadcast. They want to comment, respond, and be part of the exchange. Social tools feel normal, but only when there’s real engagement. Posting without interaction feels pointless. The youngest of these employees grew up mobile first. Images, speed, and clean design feel essential. They text constantly yet often prefer email at work because it feels clear and documented. They know their comfort zones and also recognize where they need practice, especially with in person conversations.
Flexibility matters here, but it has limits. The test stays the same. If communication choices affect customers, safety, or revenue, they’re business decisions. Customer preferences always win. If clients expect a call, you call. If they expect a quick message or a video chat, you adapt. The same logic applies to recruiting and retention. Convenience can be the difference between engagement and opt out.
Good teams flex both ways. Older colleagues experiment with new tools while younger ones slow down, listen, and learn the unwritten history that never shows up in a message thread. Those stories carry context, warnings, and hard-earned insight.
The takeaway here is that every communication style has built-in strengths and blind spots. New tools boost speed and access, but they also distract. Experienced voices often spot risks early, especially around focus and overload. The goal isn’t to pick a winner but to learn each other’s language and choose the right one for the conversation you’re in at that particular moment.
🔴 @keep_learning_english
Few things cause more friction across generations than how messages are sent, received, and judged. Every age group shares the same need: people want enough information to do their job well and to feel included and respected. But each generation has its own communication style that feels natural. Those preferences are shaped by the tools people grew up with, often long before they entered the workforce.
Older generations built trust through letters, memos, meetings, and phone calls. Information came from experts, and conversation rewarded patience and focus. Many still value eye contact and uninterrupted discussion. The next wave – Gen X – grew up with television, where stories mattered more than credentials and messages came in short bursts. When it arrived in everyday life, email became their workhorse, with phone or video reserved for sensitive conversations.
Then came millennials and Gen Z – two generations raised on the internet, feeds, and constant interaction. They expect conversation, not broadcast. They want to comment, respond, and be part of the exchange. Social tools feel normal, but only when there’s real engagement. Posting without interaction feels pointless. The youngest of these employees grew up mobile first. Images, speed, and clean design feel essential. They text constantly yet often prefer email at work because it feels clear and documented. They know their comfort zones and also recognize where they need practice, especially with in person conversations.
Flexibility matters here, but it has limits. The test stays the same. If communication choices affect customers, safety, or revenue, they’re business decisions. Customer preferences always win. If clients expect a call, you call. If they expect a quick message or a video chat, you adapt. The same logic applies to recruiting and retention. Convenience can be the difference between engagement and opt out.
Good teams flex both ways. Older colleagues experiment with new tools while younger ones slow down, listen, and learn the unwritten history that never shows up in a message thread. Those stories carry context, warnings, and hard-earned insight.
The takeaway here is that every communication style has built-in strengths and blind spots. New tools boost speed and access, but they also distract. Experienced voices often spot risks early, especially around focus and overload. The goal isn’t to pick a winner but to learn each other’s language and choose the right one for the conversation you’re in at that particular moment.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from 🇫🇷Objectif : DELF • DALF • TCF
Forwarded from 🇫🇷Objectif : DELF • DALF • TCF
Votre expression orale en français n'est pas encore au niveau que vous souhaitez ? Vous cherchez un groupe pour pratiquer et échanger en français ?
[https://t.me/delfdalfmilliysertifikat]
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Telegram
Objectif B2👉C1-C2
🗣️Dans ce groupe, vous pouvez travailler en équipe et progresser ensemble.
📈Nous avancerons ensemble du niveau B2 vers le C1 puis le C2.
🇫🇷Pour toute question concernant la langue française, contactez : @Linguist_77
📈Nous avancerons ensemble du niveau B2 vers le C1 puis le C2.
🇫🇷Pour toute question concernant la langue française, contactez : @Linguist_77
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Le Perroquet Parleur (+shadowing_fr)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Une femme mystérieuse détruit le destin des hommes | Thriller | Film Complet en FrançaisOn you tube
#5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from 🇫🇷Objectif : DELF • DALF • TCF
Nous vous avons préparé un test en ligne dans un format pratique, moderne et agréable à utiliser.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from 🇫🇷FARKHOD’S POSTS | FRANÇAIS
reading_fr_2.html
84.8 KB
🖨️Version PDF disponible
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM