Get this: looks like Kamala is using Biden’s FEC candidate number so she can steal his campaign war chest, which appears to be highly illegal but won’t be stopped cuz the establishment decides what’s legal & illegal and it will choose to ignore her law breaking just like it did with Hillary using a private server for classified documents & Biden using his garage for boxes of classified documents, but then choosing to not ignore it with Trump.

The game is rigged, the tables are tilted, and there’s no adversarial media to hold anyone to account.

We’re not much, if any, different from China or North Korea, or the old Soviet Union. It all works the same way with all the decisions coming from a central authority for the sake of the one (uni) party.

UPDATE: Last night, Kamala Harris personally filed an updated Statement of Candidacy (aka Form 2) to designate Tim Walz as her running mate.

Since she used Biden’s personal candidate ID number (P80000722) instead of her own (P00009423), the FEC records are convoluted. Her newly filed Form 2 shows up on Biden's personal FEC page. But if you look at the 2024 election cycle, Biden is erased and replaced with Harris, as if he was never never running for President.

Looking at Biden’s campaign committee’s FEC record, it’s now associated with both Biden’s and Harris’s candidacies for President for the period of 2020-2022. But that makes no sense, because Harris’s Presidential run in 2020 was never linked to Biden’s, and she ceased her campaign for President in 2020 and did not run again until 2024. Now Harris’s personal FEC candidate ID number (P00009423)—which is supposed to follow her for all Presidential campaigns for life—is somehow linked to Biden’s Presidential campaign in 2020. Only her Vice-Presidential campaign was ever linked to Biden’s, but that is separate from any Presidential campaigns.

The current 2023-2024 FEC record for “Biden for President” (aka “Harris for President,” ID number C00703975) is linked to two Presidential candidates. Both are both named “Kamala Harris.” One of these candidates is associated with Harris’s candidate ID number (P00009423), and the other “Kamala Harris” is associated with Biden’s candidate ID number (P80000722).

The Statement of Candidacy that Kamala Harris filed on July 29, using Biden’s personal candidate ID number (P80000722), now shows up under Harris’s ID number. But last night’s filing for that same candidate—number P80000722—shows up for the other “Kamala Harris” who is running for President. (Based on what happened previously, I suspect the FEC will shift these records in the future, to make it seem like there aren’t so many discrepancies between the names and the ID numbers.)

Confused? That’s because these filings from Harris are irregular. If Kamala Harris had used her own candidate ID number, like every other candidate in modern history, this wouldn’t have been so complicated, but then it would have been difficult to make the case that she’s entitled to Biden’s war chest. Undoubtedly, these filings are trying to circumvent those pesky campaign finance laws.

By the way, since Walz has never run for President, he doesn’t have his own FEC candidate ID for a Presidential run. According the the logic of Harris’s supporters, Walz is equally entitled to any funds from the campaign committee associated with ID number C00703975. And, just as Harris felt entitled to file an amended Statement of Candidacy using Biden’s personal candidate ID number because she was the Vice Presidential candidate, Walz could do the same, using Biden’s personal candidate ID number to run for President if he wanted to. The Democrats could pass this campaign down in perpetuity, without even obtaining the formal agreement of the prior candidate.

This reminds me of a system of government that isn’t considered anything like a democracy.
Quote
Laura Powell
@LauraPowellEsq

https://x.com/jimmy_dore/status/1821566940227547379

"[The 'vaccine' schedule] has been a one-hundred-year bluff...The head of the Nigerian vaccine program says, 'I need to know if I put this cocktail of vaccines in one little body...the cocktail is safe and effective.' [But they had] nothing. The whole thing is an empty hand."

Investment banker, former HUD official, and founder of the Solari Report (
@solari_the
) Catherine Austin Fitts describes on a recent episode of the
@ChildrensHD

series Financial Rebellion how the entire "vaccine" schedule is based on a "one-hundred-year bluff."

Fitts notes in the clip that when Heidi Larson, an anthropologist from London, was tasked with figuring out what was behind so-called "vaccine hesitancy," she found that "the families and the family physicians want[ed] scientific proof that vaccines are safe and effective, and there [was] none."

Furthermore, Fitts notes that there are no studies supporting the safety and efficacy of giving multiple "vaccines" to a child simultaneously, at one time.

Partial transcription of clip:

"Heidi Larson is an anthropologist from London, and she had been funded by the Gates Foundation to study what
the problem was with vaccine hesitancy. And the WHO had gathered in [Geneva], so remember, this is just four
months before the pandemic takes off. They had gathered in the leaders of the vaccine program for every country who's a member of the WHO. And she gives her presentation and says that the problem is the families and the family physicians want scientific proof that vaccines are safe and effective, and there is none.
And everybody is sort of sitting around staring at each other like, well, oh, no. And that's when I realized, oh, my
God, this has been a one-hundred-year bluff.

"You know, this whole thing is a bluff. But then it gets worse. The head of the Nigerian vaccine program says, 'Well, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute. I don't just need studies that say one vaccine and each vaccine is safe and effective; I need to know if I put this whole cocktail of vaccines together in one little body, that, in combination, the cocktail is safe and effective.' And that's when I realized they have nothing. They have nothing. The whole thing is an empty hand.
It's a bluff."

https://t.me/TheTruthAboutVaccines/1726