“Hate speech” is obviously an intentionally vague term that was purpose-built as a weapon by the left and for the left.
The doctrine on ‘fighting words’ established by the US Supreme Court in Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942), and further elucidated in the body of case law that followed, should be the guiding light for Twitter’s moderation policies.
https://www.mtsu.edu:8443/first-amendment/article/293/chaplinsky-v-new-hampshire
The doctrine on ‘fighting words’ established by the US Supreme Court in Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942), and further elucidated in the body of case law that followed, should be the guiding light for Twitter’s moderation policies.
https://www.mtsu.edu:8443/first-amendment/article/293/chaplinsky-v-new-hampshire
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This is just hilarious.
Forwarded from Australia’s Sons
This Jew thing is really blowing up. They should have said, “Yes, we’re disproportionately represented in media, banking, and Hollywood but we’re also disproportionately represented in medicine. It’s because we’re smart.” Boom. The end.
Instead, the raging intolerance of ANY criticism has led the Low IQ community to believe the worst possible interpretation of what Ye was saying.
Instead, the raging intolerance of ANY criticism has led the Low IQ community to believe the worst possible interpretation of what Ye was saying.
The latest version of the official story on the Pelosi break-in is the first one I have seen that is plausible.
How is the media’s appropriation of the term “The Big Lie” to describe denial of the 2020 election results not antisemitic? I always thought that term was specifically reserved to describe the rhetoric used by Nazi Germany to justify the Holocaust.