Forwarded from Disclosure Library Group
How safe are biometric data?
Biometric data seems more secure than a password, but that is not always the case. They are stored digitally and are therefore as vulnerable to data breaches as other data. And when leaking that data, the damage is much greater. You replace a hacked password with a new one, but you will never lose a hacked fingerprint.
Biometrics can be abused. Ethical hacker Inti de Ceuckelaire has already shown that they can mimic facial and voice recognition with 3 D printed fingerprints or deepfake. The safety so it depends on how they are stored and processed digitally. [google answer] Yes, fingerprint scanners on computers are generally very reliable and safer than many traditional passwords, because they are fast, easy to use and your fingerprint is unique, but they are not 100% infallible; they are vulnerable to circumvention with, for example, 3D prints, can cause problems with damaged fingers, and the data is secure as long as it is stored encrypted locally and does not leak. Advantages:
Convenience and Speed: Much faster and easier than typing a password.
Unique: Your fingerprint is unique, which makes it difficult for others to imitate. Is it!?
Safe: Modern scanners store data encrypted and locally (in a 'Secure Enclave' at Apple) and not on servers, making it difficult to steal.
Disadvantages and Risks:
Vulnerable to Spoofing: Ethical hackers have shown that 3 D printed fingerprints can bypass scanners, especially older optical scanners.
Wear & Damage: Dry skin, cuts, or worn-out fingertips can make scanning difficult.
Biometric data is permanent: If your fingerprint data leaks, you cannot change it like a password, which increases the damage.
Conclusion:
For everyday use, they offer an excellent balance between safety and ease of use. However, it is advisable to always have a strong password or PIN code as a backup if the FINGERPRNT does NOT Work. Reliability depends greatly on the quality of the scanner and how the data is stored and secured on your device. If your fingerprint on your computer almost never works, it is often due to a dirty sensor, dry/dirty fingers, outdated drivers, or software problems; you can solve this by cleaning the sensor, moisturizing your fingers, re-registering the fingerprint, and updating drivers and Windows. If your fingerprint on your computer doesn't work then start with cleaning and reset (via Settings > Accounts > Login Options), check Windows Updates and new drivers via Device Manager, and restart your PC; often it also helps to re-register the fingerprint from different angles. O boy.... https://t.me/DisclosureLibraryGroup/305797 https://t.me/DisclosureLibraryGroup/305796 Fingerprint is unique [Is it!?], but they are NOT 100% infallible! - After research, I've come to the conclusion that absolutely everything is being implemented, but it's certainly not [working] adequate. It simply doesn't work reliably, Yet it's used and put in place/implemented worldwide so that people think and 'believe' it works 100%. When you enter a country like the US or New York, for example, you have to give a fingerprint. It's a state of mind that makes people believe it works. The power of the mind. As long as people believe it. How many people have been falsely accused because their fingerprints were faulty, didn't work, or were fake, yet were still used to imprison someone? Perhaps even receiving life sentences or the death penalty? How many people are now falsely imprisoned...
Biometric data seems more secure than a password, but that is not always the case. They are stored digitally and are therefore as vulnerable to data breaches as other data. And when leaking that data, the damage is much greater. You replace a hacked password with a new one, but you will never lose a hacked fingerprint.
Biometrics can be abused. Ethical hacker Inti de Ceuckelaire has already shown that they can mimic facial and voice recognition with 3 D printed fingerprints or deepfake. The safety so it depends on how they are stored and processed digitally. [google answer] Yes, fingerprint scanners on computers are generally very reliable and safer than many traditional passwords, because they are fast, easy to use and your fingerprint is unique, but they are not 100% infallible; they are vulnerable to circumvention with, for example, 3D prints, can cause problems with damaged fingers, and the data is secure as long as it is stored encrypted locally and does not leak. Advantages:
Convenience and Speed: Much faster and easier than typing a password.
Unique: Your fingerprint is unique, which makes it difficult for others to imitate. Is it!?
Safe: Modern scanners store data encrypted and locally (in a 'Secure Enclave' at Apple) and not on servers, making it difficult to steal.
Disadvantages and Risks:
Vulnerable to Spoofing: Ethical hackers have shown that 3 D printed fingerprints can bypass scanners, especially older optical scanners.
Wear & Damage: Dry skin, cuts, or worn-out fingertips can make scanning difficult.
Biometric data is permanent: If your fingerprint data leaks, you cannot change it like a password, which increases the damage.
Conclusion:
For everyday use, they offer an excellent balance between safety and ease of use. However, it is advisable to always have a strong password or PIN code as a backup if the FINGERPRNT does NOT Work. Reliability depends greatly on the quality of the scanner and how the data is stored and secured on your device. If your fingerprint on your computer almost never works, it is often due to a dirty sensor, dry/dirty fingers, outdated drivers, or software problems; you can solve this by cleaning the sensor, moisturizing your fingers, re-registering the fingerprint, and updating drivers and Windows. If your fingerprint on your computer doesn't work then start with cleaning and reset (via Settings > Accounts > Login Options), check Windows Updates and new drivers via Device Manager, and restart your PC; often it also helps to re-register the fingerprint from different angles. O boy.... https://t.me/DisclosureLibraryGroup/305797 https://t.me/DisclosureLibraryGroup/305796 Fingerprint is unique [Is it!?], but they are NOT 100% infallible! - After research, I've come to the conclusion that absolutely everything is being implemented, but it's certainly not [working] adequate. It simply doesn't work reliably, Yet it's used and put in place/implemented worldwide so that people think and 'believe' it works 100%. When you enter a country like the US or New York, for example, you have to give a fingerprint. It's a state of mind that makes people believe it works. The power of the mind. As long as people believe it. How many people have been falsely accused because their fingerprints were faulty, didn't work, or were fake, yet were still used to imprison someone? Perhaps even receiving life sentences or the death penalty? How many people are now falsely imprisoned...
Telegram
Disclosure Library Group
https://t.me/DisclosureLibraryGroup/305796
Forwarded from Disclosure Library (Disclosure Library Group)
Another Tranny Lie!
Rob Reiner, Director and Actress, and Man Wife Found Dead in Apparent Homicide
Rob Reiner
FTM abomination deceiver ➡️ a biological Female pretending to be a Male
Michele Singer 🍎🦒
MTF abomination deceiver ➡️ a biological Male pretending to be a Female
Penny Marshall 🍎🦒
MTF abomination deceiver ➡️ a biological Male pretending to be a Female
Rob Reiner, Director and Actress, and Man Wife Found Dead in Apparent Homicide
Rob Reiner
FTM abomination deceiver ➡️ a biological Female pretending to be a Male
Michele Singer 🍎🦒
MTF abomination deceiver ➡️ a biological Male pretending to be a Female
Penny Marshall 🍎🦒
MTF abomination deceiver ➡️ a biological Male pretending to be a Female
Forwarded from TRANSVEST7770 (Tlc7770)
All in the Family
Sally Struthers
Rob Reiner
Sally Struthers
Rob Reiner
All in the Family
They all have inverted skulls.
They are all farmed bred inverted entities in a family.
They all have inverted skulls.
They are all farmed bred inverted entities in a family.