In green, the lands conquered by Sunni Muslims at any one point in history (with some small inaccuracies - but still comparatively one of the most complete maps).

In red, the lands conquered by Shiahs.

(Yes, exactly, there is no red in the map, that's the point).

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westphalian_system

Even a simple Wikipedia entry like this should be enough to understand how many concepts that most contemporary Muslims take for granted, natural, objective and neutral and even appeal to (international law, Westphalian Nation-State, national sovereignty...) are not only in opposition to the principles of our Din and Shari'ah; they are nothing but the product of specific social, political, religious and historical happenings peculiar to specific situations of European history; European solutions to peculiar European problems.

Man, you live in Jakarta/Peshawar/Tashkent/Mogadishu/Kazan/Jeddah - what relevance should internal developments of Europe after the Protestant reform have a bearing on how you conceive politics and religion??

It's like South Africa or Poland organising its social structure according to some internal Buddhist debates between Theravada and Mahayana schools; does it make any sense?

No.

Same is applying the cursed genocidal Nation-state model to Islamic lands, which have a totally different history and deserve a totally different method of organising its various people, on the basis of Islamic (not Euro-Protestant) principles.

On the UAE kafir rulers.

So once again (and as we had said) it all goes back to sending children to study in the west plus raising them with awe and admiration for the west from the smallest things

How is this not going to foster apostasy and self-hatred?

All those rulers and royal families sending their pupils at western academies to be used by their western masters and coming back to Muslim lands with disastrous "development" plans.

Once again, the two foremost causes of our slavery are:

1. Ideological awe for the west (rooted in materialism)
2. Secularization of the educational system.

See this sudden global push for free-mixing, now also with this other clown who claims to be "Ash'ari" (true Asharism is free of him)

Once again it's clear that it's not an isolated case of Zeeshan or bin Adam or tariq jameel being individually mistaken or deviant.

ONCE AGAIN we assist to global PLANNED developments being pushed by certain structure, agencies etc etc.

Same as with interfaith, or the idea of being a loyal citizen to his nation-state, or female education, etc.

That's why it's essential to have a wide approach and connect the dots of the various singular local developments into wider global trends, to be able to recognise the wider patterns, instead of assuming they're just genuine individual mistakes depending on "wrong ijtihad" or a mistake in understanding of the related proofs or fiqhi stances etc - which instead is the standard assumption of those who try to refute them, who thus miss the wider point and the actual crux of the issues: planned concerned global efforts to push deviancy.

Caring about harbi kuffar's health instead of helping and strengthening Muslim lands.
They should be ashamed.

Then people complain about the bad status of health departments in Muslim countries.

"Thank" the brain-drain of illicit Muslim migration to diyarul harb.

https://x.com/clashreport/status/1879211896957751769?t=WIMdtbaubve7IoD34CglCg&s=19

That's why we unironically fully support forceful deportation of Muslims to Muslim lands.

Those who deny actual fiqh and abuse Islam by picking single episodes from the sirah and or ayat/ahadith without context and true understanding will just quote when the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم refused to have the people of Ta'if punished and extend this as a general rule.

Or when he صلى الله عليه وسلم didn't punish some of the blasphemous mushrikin after the fath of Makkah.

This is the sort of abuse of religion with extrapolated twisted references and a paint of Islamic-sounding slogans that is in reality a denial of the correct understanding of the texts as held by 14 centuries of Muslims from one corner to another of the Islamic world.

This deformist "salafi" methodology is the backbone of all modernists and all istikhbarati-academia twisting: they all adopt the classical-fiqh-bypassing "going back directly to the Qur'an and Sunnah" and "authentic original pristine actual Izlaam over culture and man-made fiqh" deception slogans to twist nusus through a modern liberal filter.

All modernism passes through the destruction of classical traditional fiqh.

Mufti Taqi Usmani: from Shaykh al-Islam to Malala-ally?

It come as a shock (but not totally as a surprise) to see Mufti Taqi Usmani joining sellout palace scholars at the payroll of Na-PAK government and Malala (the kafirah feminist daughter of pashtun communist feminist activist parents) at a "Muslim world league" conference organised in Pakistan and focusing on the idol of 'female education". 

Imagine, instead of having Muslim scholars organising (at least) a conference about Gaza, organisation of qi.tal, unifying and stopping the balkanisation of Muslim countries, acquiring quwwah, rebuilding Syria etc, they are busy sitting and talking about female education, as the Nth attempt to put pressure on the Afghan government. 

Also, the fact that it's taking place in Pakistan out of all places (since these days there are many heavy skirmishes with the IEA) is a further clear signal about who the objective of such sham conference are. 

Honestly how does he not realise that this whole female EdUcAsHiOn and this whole conference is used as a tool against the IEA? 

Mufti Taqi was intellectually one of the most aware of modernist ideologies. 
Many of his works - such as Islahi Khutbat, Discourses on the Islamic Way of Life and Islam and Modernism - are filled with very good refutations of modernist ideologies including UN, NGOs, human rights, equal rights, feminism etc. 

So he definitely can't be unaware of what this all about; we're not talking about the average pro-female-education Afghan scholar who thinks the issue of female education is merely a technical fiqh issue of teaching girls how to read and write (their mistake is excusable and they have to be informed about the wider objectives, the social outcomes and results etc.). 

But Mufti Taqi Usmani, who has been refuting NGOs feminism human rights etc for decades, now he finds himself: 
-sharing platforms with MALALA the kafirah daughter of filthy communists 
-in a conference organised by the government of a country at the brink of war with the IEA and 
-talking about the BIGGEST EXCUSE that is being used against the IEA. 
 
And we're supposed to believe he hasn't done his math about what's going on?

This is all it is about with those "ulama conferences" sponsored by taghuti states - they only open their mouth to abuse and twist religious discourse for their interests.

Similar to the Azhar declaration they made when the IEA were winning and suddenly those neo-Azhari munafiqin came out and talked about the "need for pacification and sitting around a table and representativity" etc etc.. After having been silent for 20 years about the kafir occupation they suddenly have some Islamic-sounding slogans about "peace" and "brotherhood" once the Taliban were taking over.

THIS is exactly what the role of official government ulama is: giving a stamp of supposed "Islamic legitimacy" and voice out some slogans in Islamic-sounding language (as has been coined by istikhbarat and academia), and then those turbaned jubbah-ed sellout munafiqin will just put their faces and "qualifications" to fool the common Muslims - "oh but the palace GRAND MUFTI said xyz".

And if you dare voicing some concerns:

"Who are you to disagree? Where did you study? What did you do for Islam as compared to big conference government scholar xyz who everyone around the world praises" (don't forget the "I Sîdî you, you Sîdî me" dialectics) - without realising their being "big" (I.e. popular) in the first place is because government and agencies nominated them and made them popular.

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1BEaUEsTzk/

I forgot the delicate suffused piano 🎹 background delighting the guests and the gala-like table settings, so they can thing they're PRIVILEGED to be in some XIX century Paris of SUPERIOR WESTERN CIVILISATION...

Imagine deluding oneself that being invited to these piano-playing piano 🎹 conferences to make pressures against IEA according to the agendas of feminists, communists and kafir NGOs and istikhbarat in a country at the brink of war with it, is a sign of ACCEPTANCE IN THE EYES OF ALLAH..

Oh, and how can the NA-PAK regime responsible for the arrest and kidnapping and rendition to the USA of the DOCTOR, RESEARCHER AND SCIENTIST, Afia Siddiqi, keep a straight face to talk about FEMALE EDUCASHION and WOMEN RIGHTS?

A few more points from a dear friend:

This is why mufti taqi when he sent that letter to the Afghan government about female education I don’t know what he was thinking. It was proper Khuruj. If he had concerns why not send it privately to them?

See mufti taqi did emphasise in his talk that female education should be subservient to the shariah and not follow the west. It was relatively strong. But in conference full of deviants his messsgae will have no impact. Rather his presence is used to justify all sorts. More importantly it is clear khuruj against the rulers of Afghanistan.

Also Pakistan is involved in major clashes with Afghanistan so does it make sense to increase the tension with the Afghan government? He is basically assisting the Pakistani government and by extension the whole kafir world who has spread kufr education against the afghan movement.

The taliban who genuinely do have an excuse for being naive and simple saw through this scam but shaykh ul islam a master of modern ideas and rebutting them could not? Can someone explain?

It's always like this, nobody listens to thw actual talk, they just go around saying "but Mufti Taqi was there too - are you calling him a fasiq sellout tool???"

Same was for.
Amman conference - he wrote a paper correcting them, but still participated in it and his name is always taken.
UAE peace conference against Islamism - he spoke about implementation of Shariah, but again same issue
Other conferences - he spoke about jihad
Pakistan conference - he spoke about subservience to Shariah, but people will use his participation to place him on the same page with the feminist apostate Malala.

How many people have heard the respective talks versus how many will just repeat "but Mufti Taqi was there too?"

"Mufti taqi was going to these conferences free-mixing".
That’s the message that is being spread by his own students, that’s what these idiots have deduced like ibn Adam.

Next step:

"What's wrong with Malala, brother? She was at the same conference with Shaykh al-Islam Mufti Taqi - surely she can't be that bad! How dare you takfir her. She was sitting with mufti taqi don’t you know and mufti taqi was freemixing with her".

Malala, daughter of a family of communist murtaddin.
Like imagine being a FEMINIST MARXIST COMMUNIST in pakhtunkhwa. Somehow his daughter's priority and activism is all about FEMALE EDUCASHION....

"Oh it's just totally a merely technical issue of girls reading how to read and write, it's totally not about subverting social and family roles, "empowering" women etc etc, zeroing female fertility, mining family institution and patriarchy, destroying the job market, declaring war on modesty, overfilling the job market, skyrocketing rent prices..."

Kafir governments, kafir NGOs, feminists, secularists, communists.. Their priority is FEMALE EDUCASHION and yet "oh girls should know how to read and write".

"How are they going to HAVE AN EQUAL FOOT AND EQUAL SAY IN FAMILY AND SOCIETY OTHERWISE"..