Shaykh Muhammad Awwamah blasting those using his name and supposed actions as a proof to claim the permissibility of ikhtilat.

This is going to burn the UK-USA neobandis' mafia which has been trying to legitimize free-mixing between males and females by using the Shaykh's name.

English translation:

بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيمِ

الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ رَبِّ الْعَالَمِينَ، وَالصَّلَاةُ وَالسَّلَامُ عَلَىٰ سَيِّدِ الْأَنْبِيَاءِ وَالْمُرْسَلِينَ، وَآلِهِمْ وَأَصْحَابِهِمْ، وَالْمُتَّبِعِينَ هَدْيَهُمْ وَسُنَّتَهُمْ إِلَىٰ يَوْمِ الدِّينِ، وَلَا عُدْوَانَ إِلَّا عَلَى الظَّالِمِينَ.

It has reached me with certainty that there are individuals who fish in murky waters to serve their corrupt desires by exploiting certain incidents involving people of virtue and ʿIlm, as well as some students of ʿIlm who are treading the path of guidance. They use these incidents—over which the individuals in question have no control—to discredit their noble journey.

While these individuals themselves are plagued by their misguided conduct, they possess enough intellect to discern between clear evidence and deceptive ambiguities. Yet, they choose to act against sound reasoning to fulfil their flawed objectives.

Having said this, I must clarify:

Some individuals, whose hearts are diseased, have extracted certain images of me from public gatherings—gatherings in which women were present without my knowledge or awareness—and have misused these images to falsely claim that I endorse the mixing of men and women in the same gathering or in study circles. They have further alleged that I permit such intermingling in educational settings!

I completely and categorically absolve myself of such false claims. My stance is in total alignment with the Sharīʿah of Allāh Taʿālā, the Sunnah of His Nabi (ﷺ), and the path of our pious predecessors and esteemed Imāms (radhiyallāhu ʿanhum).

I seek the forgiveness of Allāh, the Most Great, for anything that does not conform to His Sacred Law. And the reckoning of those who level such baseless accusations is with Allāh on the Day of Judgement.

All praise belongs to Allāh, the Lord of all the worlds.

Istanbul

9th Rajab, 1446 AH (9th January, 2025)

(Shaykh) Muḥammad ʿAwwāmah

Among the deviance-promoters who endorsed the misuse of Shaykh Awwamah's name in the pathetic "research" paper ('Guidelines For Gender Interaction In Islam' ) by Zeeshan Chaudri and Muntasir Zaman, and who should be publicly shamed:

List of those who endorsed the misuse of Shaykh Muḥammad ‘Awwāmah’s name:

Muhammad Yasir Al-Ḥanafī, Imam at Masjid Tawheed Ul Islam (Aylesbury)

Zahir Mahmood (As-Suffa Institute)

Sulaiman Moola

Muhammad ibn Adam al-Kawthari, Darul Iftaa, Leicester, UK

Ahmad Afnan

Mahmoud Shabieb

Dr. Shadee Elmasry

Haitham al-Haddad London

Dr Shahrul Hussain — Ibn Rushd Centre of Excellence for Islamic Research

Mujahid Ali (Ebrahim College)

Liaquat Zaman (As-Suffa)

Salman Nasir

I.e. A combo of neobandis, awnists, pseudo-traditionalists and ikhwanis.

قبل أكثر من عقدين، وقع في يدي بالصدفة عدد قديم من مجلة دينية يتضمن حوارا مع قارئ للقرآن في بداية صعوده لسلّم الشهرة، وقال فيه بوضوح إنه يرفض ظاهرة أناشيد الفيديوكليب التي كانت آنذاك في بدايتها، مؤكدا أنه سيحافظ على سمت حملة كتاب الله، فلن يُنشد إلا الأناشيد الملتزمة مثل الأراجيز والمنظومات العلمية، ولن يشوّه صورة طالب العلم الشرعي بعالم الفن.
بعد فترة قصيرة أطلق هذا القارئ قناة فضائية، ومنحها اسمه الشخصي، فكانت أول قناة تحمل اسم شخص في العالم العربي، وجعل شعارها "قناة الذاكرين والذاكرات"، وسرعان ما اقتحم عالم الفيديوكليب، وكانت أول تجربة له بكاميرات سينمائية احترافية، ولم يكتفِ فيها بالإنشاد بل أدى دورًا تمثيليًا كما يفعل المطربون. وبما أنه مدخليّ-جاميّ الهوى فقد فُتحت له أبواب السلاطين، وعُيّن إمامًا في مساجدهم الفخرية، وفُتحت له أبواب النجومية والثروة على مصاريعها، وعندما بدأت الثورات المضادة وزُجّ بمئات المشايخ في السجون لم يتردد في أداء الدور القذر، ليس فقط بترسيخ حُكم الطغاة كما يفعل العبيد، ولا بإضفاء الشرعية الدينية على الظلم كما يفعل مشايخ البلاط، بل أيضًا بمهاجمة خصوم السلاطين من المشايخ مستخدما نفس الدعاية التحريضية للذباب ولجان المخابرات.
مَن كانت هذه سيرته فلن يجد ضيرًا في التباهي بالترف الذي يكسبه من الطغاة والظلمة، ولن يخطر على باله الاستحياء من الظهور بمواكب وأزياء نجوم الفن، ولن يعدم الحُجة الشرعية ليبرر لنفسه ما كان يصرّح برفضه في بداية مشواره، وسيواصل ملايين المعجبين من الشباب والبسطاء تشجيعه والتصفيق له، كما سيواصل الطغاة دعمه ليقودوا به تلك الملايين.

اقرؤوا كتاب "ما رواه الأساطين في عدم المجيء إلى السلاطين" للسيوطي، واستعيذوا بالله من الفتن.
#دنيا_فانية

أحمد الدعدوش

In green, the lands conquered by Sunni Muslims at any one point in history (with some small inaccuracies - but still comparatively one of the most complete maps).

In red, the lands conquered by Shiahs.

(Yes, exactly, there is no red in the map, that's the point).

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westphalian_system

Even a simple Wikipedia entry like this should be enough to understand how many concepts that most contemporary Muslims take for granted, natural, objective and neutral and even appeal to (international law, Westphalian Nation-State, national sovereignty...) are not only in opposition to the principles of our Din and Shari'ah; they are nothing but the product of specific social, political, religious and historical happenings peculiar to specific situations of European history; European solutions to peculiar European problems.

Man, you live in Jakarta/Peshawar/Tashkent/Mogadishu/Kazan/Jeddah - what relevance should internal developments of Europe after the Protestant reform have a bearing on how you conceive politics and religion??

It's like South Africa or Poland organising its social structure according to some internal Buddhist debates between Theravada and Mahayana schools; does it make any sense?

No.

Same is applying the cursed genocidal Nation-state model to Islamic lands, which have a totally different history and deserve a totally different method of organising its various people, on the basis of Islamic (not Euro-Protestant) principles.

On the UAE kafir rulers.

So once again (and as we had said) it all goes back to sending children to study in the west plus raising them with awe and admiration for the west from the smallest things

How is this not going to foster apostasy and self-hatred?

All those rulers and royal families sending their pupils at western academies to be used by their western masters and coming back to Muslim lands with disastrous "development" plans.

Once again, the two foremost causes of our slavery are:

1. Ideological awe for the west (rooted in materialism)
2. Secularization of the educational system.

See this sudden global push for free-mixing, now also with this other clown who claims to be "Ash'ari" (true Asharism is free of him)

Once again it's clear that it's not an isolated case of Zeeshan or bin Adam or tariq jameel being individually mistaken or deviant.

ONCE AGAIN we assist to global PLANNED developments being pushed by certain structure, agencies etc etc.

Same as with interfaith, or the idea of being a loyal citizen to his nation-state, or female education, etc.

That's why it's essential to have a wide approach and connect the dots of the various singular local developments into wider global trends, to be able to recognise the wider patterns, instead of assuming they're just genuine individual mistakes depending on "wrong ijtihad" or a mistake in understanding of the related proofs or fiqhi stances etc - which instead is the standard assumption of those who try to refute them, who thus miss the wider point and the actual crux of the issues: planned concerned global efforts to push deviancy.

Caring about harbi kuffar's health instead of helping and strengthening Muslim lands.
They should be ashamed.

Then people complain about the bad status of health departments in Muslim countries.

"Thank" the brain-drain of illicit Muslim migration to diyarul harb.

https://x.com/clashreport/status/1879211896957751769?t=WIMdtbaubve7IoD34CglCg&s=19

That's why we unironically fully support forceful deportation of Muslims to Muslim lands.

Those who deny actual fiqh and abuse Islam by picking single episodes from the sirah and or ayat/ahadith without context and true understanding will just quote when the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم refused to have the people of Ta'if punished and extend this as a general rule.

Or when he صلى الله عليه وسلم didn't punish some of the blasphemous mushrikin after the fath of Makkah.

This is the sort of abuse of religion with extrapolated twisted references and a paint of Islamic-sounding slogans that is in reality a denial of the correct understanding of the texts as held by 14 centuries of Muslims from one corner to another of the Islamic world.

This deformist "salafi" methodology is the backbone of all modernists and all istikhbarati-academia twisting: they all adopt the classical-fiqh-bypassing "going back directly to the Qur'an and Sunnah" and "authentic original pristine actual Izlaam over culture and man-made fiqh" deception slogans to twist nusus through a modern liberal filter.

All modernism passes through the destruction of classical traditional fiqh.

Mufti Taqi Usmani: from Shaykh al-Islam to Malala-ally?

It come as a shock (but not totally as a surprise) to see Mufti Taqi Usmani joining sellout palace scholars at the payroll of Na-PAK government and Malala (the kafirah feminist daughter of pashtun communist feminist activist parents) at a "Muslim world league" conference organised in Pakistan and focusing on the idol of 'female education". 

Imagine, instead of having Muslim scholars organising (at least) a conference about Gaza, organisation of qi.tal, unifying and stopping the balkanisation of Muslim countries, acquiring quwwah, rebuilding Syria etc, they are busy sitting and talking about female education, as the Nth attempt to put pressure on the Afghan government. 

Also, the fact that it's taking place in Pakistan out of all places (since these days there are many heavy skirmishes with the IEA) is a further clear signal about who the objective of such sham conference are. 

Honestly how does he not realise that this whole female EdUcAsHiOn and this whole conference is used as a tool against the IEA? 

Mufti Taqi was intellectually one of the most aware of modernist ideologies. 
Many of his works - such as Islahi Khutbat, Discourses on the Islamic Way of Life and Islam and Modernism - are filled with very good refutations of modernist ideologies including UN, NGOs, human rights, equal rights, feminism etc. 

So he definitely can't be unaware of what this all about; we're not talking about the average pro-female-education Afghan scholar who thinks the issue of female education is merely a technical fiqh issue of teaching girls how to read and write (their mistake is excusable and they have to be informed about the wider objectives, the social outcomes and results etc.). 

But Mufti Taqi Usmani, who has been refuting NGOs feminism human rights etc for decades, now he finds himself: 
-sharing platforms with MALALA the kafirah daughter of filthy communists 
-in a conference organised by the government of a country at the brink of war with the IEA and 
-talking about the BIGGEST EXCUSE that is being used against the IEA. 
 
And we're supposed to believe he hasn't done his math about what's going on?

This is all it is about with those "ulama conferences" sponsored by taghuti states - they only open their mouth to abuse and twist religious discourse for their interests.

Similar to the Azhar declaration they made when the IEA were winning and suddenly those neo-Azhari munafiqin came out and talked about the "need for pacification and sitting around a table and representativity" etc etc.. After having been silent for 20 years about the kafir occupation they suddenly have some Islamic-sounding slogans about "peace" and "brotherhood" once the Taliban were taking over.

THIS is exactly what the role of official government ulama is: giving a stamp of supposed "Islamic legitimacy" and voice out some slogans in Islamic-sounding language (as has been coined by istikhbarat and academia), and then those turbaned jubbah-ed sellout munafiqin will just put their faces and "qualifications" to fool the common Muslims - "oh but the palace GRAND MUFTI said xyz".