πŸ”Š @IntuitiveUnknown β€’ IURadio β€’ Self, Other, & This Intuitive Unknown β€’ IPR β€’β€’β€’
13 subscribers
1.7K photos
337 videos
29 files
2K links
Download Telegram
Sources: Omar Jordan "All things you never learned about SmallPox". @kattie.su "The Truth about SmallPox " Tom Cowan "Contagion Myth" and Dawn Lester/David Parker "What really makes you, The Bailey's "What killed the Native Populations", Aldhissla Substack "Dispelling the Myth of Smallpox Contagion" and ofcourse my own SmallPox Post.

t.me/theundercovervirologist/758?single

t.me/BlessTheVacuum/5510?single
β€œThe hardship of the exercises is intended less to strengthen the back than to toughen the mind.”

β€” Steven Pressfield, Gates of Fire
Forwarded from Humanley
In the 1920's, the U.S Department of Agriculture conducted several studies investigating the issue of pleomorphism. One of the experiments discovered that a pure strain of bacteria would change into more than a dozen different forms when the culture medium it was growing in was modified.

These shocking results led the researchers to conclude that "the whole system of bacteria needs complete revision".

This experiment, and many others like it, conclusively demonstrate that bacteria are not monomorphic, but pleomorphic. This means that bacteria are not fixed, and can modify their form and function in response to changes in environmental conditions.

These findings not only turn the entire field of microbiology on its head, but shatter the very foundations that germ theory is built upon.

All of this information and more is discussed in my book, Can You Catch A Cold?

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Forwarded from Dani Katz
some gratitude-ings from the new and improved YES, I AM coloring book from my heart to yours, superstar!
Forwarded from Humanley
In 1933, the Microbial Institute of Moscow published research on the issue of pleomorphism. The authors, Professor Kritschewski and Ponamarewa, observed many different forms of bacteria growing in a pure culture of B. paratyhphi over a twenty day period under controlled settings.

They were clear about the importance of their results, stating that the pleomorphism of bacteria should be considered a proven fact. They went on to say that "the doctrine of monomorphism contradicts reality, and should be substituted by the statement that bacterial species are pleomorphic".

Unsurprisingly, these findings, and those of many others from institutions around the world, were dismissed and relegated to the waste paper basket. Why were such important discoveries suppressed? Because if pleomorphism was ever accepted as fact, the entire field of microbiology and infectious disease would fall over night.

Find out more in my book, Can You Catch A Cold?

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley