04-15-21 Correcting the record with inclusion and accuracy

4/15/21 by Native Voice One - NV1

https://soundcloud.com/native-america-calling/04-15-21-correcting-the-record-with-inclusion-and-accuracy

Web player: https://podcastaddict.com/episode/121837364
Episode: http://feeds.soundcloud.com/stream/1030266166-native-america-calling-04-15-21-correcting-the-record-with-inclusion-and-accuracy.mp3

There are plenty of warnings about the accuracy of information on publicly-edited online sources like Wikipedia, but those are one of the first places people go to research a topic. The National Museum of the American Indian is hosting a Wikipedia Edit-a-thon. They want to add entries to the public online encyclopedia, specifically on Native women. Organizers maintain entries are often inaccurate, one-sided or missing. We’ll talk about the state of accurate representation and inclusion in online educational and research resources.

Avsnitt 20. Lantbrukslogik

4/14/21 by SLU Future Foods podcast

https://soundcloud.com/slu-future-food/avsnitt-20-lantbrukslogik

Episode: http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/feeds.soundcloud.com/stream/1029243529-slu-future-food-avsnitt-20-lantbrukslogik.mp3

Det svenska lantbruket är fullt av utmaningar. Lantbruket ska ge oss hållbar, närproducerad mat - och helst mer mat också, och utan alltför mycket miljö- och klimatpåverkan. Lantbruket ska försöka vara en del av lösningen istället för problemet när man pratar om hot mot biologisk mångfald och klimatförändringarna. Vem vill, vågar och orkar satsa på en bransch som är i händerna på klimatförändringar, politiska beslut och konsumenternas val? SLU-forskarna Kristina Marquardt och Brian Kuns och Camilla Eriksson från FOI har frågat bönderna själva, i en studie om lantbrukets logik. De fann att lantbrukarna ofta ligger steget före i framtidstänket, med en stark känsla och passion för lantbruket oavsett produktionsinriktning.

Episode 33: Ramadan's Feast

4/20/21

https://nasmaofny.libsyn.com/episode-33-ramadans-feast

Episode: https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/nasmaofny/Ramadans_Feast_.mp3?dest-id=2123117

In this episode I will introduce you to my family’s Ramadan feast. What my mother cooks and I will share with you my favourite family recipes. Great way to learn food in a fun way. Most of the words I will be sharing, can be found in Book 3- Nawartona- Lesson 5- Section A. Make sure to check out our Top 20 Vocabulary picks from this episode below. Join our Conversational Classes: https://nasmaofny.com/adult-group-conversation-class/ Join our Levantine Masterclass: https://nasmaofny.com/online-course-membership/ Get the eBook: https://nasmaofny.com/adult-textbooks/ Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/levantinearabic_bynasmaofny/ Subscribe to our Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZ3xodgJWwMeRCE59ZNNCTQ?view_as=subscriber Music by: Stay Young by Nick Petrov Vocabulary: 1. Rbeat/ ربيت: Grew up 2. Mawaheba/ موهبا: Her talents 3. 3adas/ عدس: Lentils 4. Wish-aro/ يشقرو: Become brown or gold 5. Minbalesh/ منبلش: We start 6. Debis remen/ دمس رمان: Pomegranate molasses 7. Me2li/ مقلي: Fried 8. Me7shiyeh/ محشية: Stuffed 9. Taba2 el-ra2ese/ طبق الرئسي: Main course 10. Tabkhah/ طبخة: Cooked meal 11. Kusa/ كوسة: Zucchini 12. Fasolyah/ فصولية: Kidney beans 13. Yakhneh/ يخنة: Stew 14. Bamyeh/ بامية: Okra 15. Khaline/ خليني: Let me/ allow me 16. Toum/ توم: Garlic 17. La7meh mafromeh/ لحمة مفرومة: Ground beef 18. Domeh/ دومة: Bunch 19. Sh3ayriyeh/ شعيرية: Vermicelli 20. Sofrah/ صفرة: Feast

HPR3317: Reading a manifesto: Towards A Cooperative Technology Movement

4/19/21 by hpr.nospam@nospam.clacke.user.lysator.liu.se (clacke)

http://hackerpublicradio.org/eps.php?id=3317

Web player: https://podcastaddict.com/episode/122004637
Episode: http://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr3317.mp3

Three good decades ago, Richard Stallman founded the free software movement and gave it a name. Two good decades ago there was a fork and Eric S. Raymond, Bruce Perens and others founded the open source software movement, and neglected to tell us who gave it a name. (it was Christine Peterson[0]) Ever since then, the free software side of the two movements has been careful to guard the boundary between the two, see Richard Stallman's essay "Open Source Misses the Point".[1] But lately a lot of people have increasingly been feeling that free software misses the point. Ironically a lot of this has been coming from the open source side of things, as the official free software philosophy has been firmly anchored with Stallman, and he hasn't been interested in moving his philosophy in more inclusive directions. For sure, there are a lot of people in free software who have been wanting to go in this direction as well. I've been thinking of it as a "free software plus", as it builds on the free software philosophy, but adds aspects of social responsibility. The fact that Stallman was forced to resign from being Free Software Foundation president two years ago was a sign that people inside free software cared about more than just the code and what freedoms it gives the recipient. A month ago, if you are listening to this on April the 20th 2021, a manifesto was published called "Towards A Communal Software Movement", and I'll get to that in a minute. I mentioned the names of the drivers of the previous movements, but this author has said "I intentionally left authors' names out of it"[2], and I think that makes sense. Part of the problems with previous movements has been this Great Man of History fallacy, which may have kept them focused and on track, but it has also held them back. The movement is young and has already changed names once as I was writing about it. The manifesto is now "Towards A Cooperative Technology Movement", and I have updated the shownotes and my commentary to reflect that. https://misskey.de/notes/8k0igd5tcd I see the difference between free software and cooperative technology similarly as the difference between open source and free software. There are certainly people within open source and on the Open Source Initiative board that look further than just the license, and treat open source like just another brand name for free software. But at its core, the Open Source Definition is all about the licensing and that document is the shared common ground for all open source. People write code for different reasons and there's a license and contribution model that allow them to come together without those differences of purpose getting too much in the way. So if the software and the license is "what" we're building, the philosophical documents of free software provide the guidance on "why" we are building it: We want to get away from proprietary software, we want to control our own computing, we want the freedoms to use, learn, modify and share, etc. Free software is about our freedoms. So just like "free" is right there in the name, maybe the "community" in "communal software" or the "cooperative" in "cooperative technology" is all about the "who": Who gets the freedom, who has the influence, who is affected. And again, lots of people in free software do care about community principles beyond code, care about social responsibility, but the shared baseline is the care for formal, technical and individual user freedom: If you receive the code, you are allowed the technical rights to update the code, the code or license should not restrict your freedoms, you, the recipient of the software, the hacker, the code contributor. It says nothing about practical user freedom and it says nothing about the community beyond the immediate user. That was my commentary. Now let's read the manifesto.

http://hackerpublicradio.org/eps.php?id=3317

https://cooperativetechnology.codeberg.page/ Before I saw the manifesto, I had written a draft list of aspects beyond licensing and contribution that determine the social good of your project: https://libranet.de/display/0b6b25a8-3060-61f6-28df-cae554943983 The conversations that led directly to the creation of the manifesto: https://social.polymerwitch.com/@polymerwitch/105934078911643041 https://fosstodon.org/@be/105952735879246194 [0] https://opensource.com/article/18/2/coining-term-open-source-software [1] https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.en.html [2] https://fosstodon.org/@be/105952960559032774 Towards A Cooperative Technology Movement In response to the surprise, undemocratic reinstatement of Richard Stallman to the board of directors of the Free Software Foundation after his resignation in September 2019, the Free and Open Source Software movement is in the midst of a reckoning. The authors of this document recognize and honor the contributions Richard Stallman has made to this movement while unequivocally condemning his harmful behavior which has pushed many capable, dedicated people away from the movement. Regardless of what happens in the Free Software Foundation, we believe it is time to reflect on the shortcomings of our advocacy so we can grow into a more effective and inclusive movement for justice. Towards this end, we believe the movement will benefit from new terminology to describe what we do and what we aim for. Richard Stallman authored the free software definition in 1986. This term has always created difficulties communicating the ideas behind it because of the different meanings of the word "free" in English. Moreover, it is not the freedom of machines we are concerned with, but the freedom of humans. In response to this and other issues, in 1998, the term open source was promoted using an adapted version of the Debian Free Software Guidelines. The history of computing in the past 23 years have validated critiques that the term "open source" is insufficient for communicating the values behind it. The term "open source" and the ecosystem of Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) is today used by powerful companies, governments, and other institutions to harm people on enormous scales through surveillance and violence. These institutions use FOSS to minimize economic costs by benefitting from decades of work done by others, much of which was done by unpaid volunteers motivated by curiosity, passion, and the ideals of the FOSS movement. We believe a significant reason for the failures of both "free software" and "open source" to prevent this cooptation is that the men who coined and initially promoted these terms did not and do not critique capitalism. Richard Stallman has generally dodged the question of whether free software is opposed to capitalism. In the historical context of the United States in the 1980s, that may have been a wise decision. But that was then, and now it is 2021. The promoters of "open source" emphasize its compatibility with capitalism and go out of their way to distance "open source" from critiques of capitalism. We believe we need to build on the FOSS movement with an explicitly anticapitalist political movement which proactively collaborates with other movements for justice. We propose the term "cooperative technology" for this movement. By "cooperative technology", we mean technology that is constructed by and for the people whose lives are affected by its use. While this builds on the Free and Open Source Software movement, we aim to apply the same principles to hardware as well, although the criteria by which we evaluate hardware and software will of course not be identical. It is not sufficient to narrowly focus on the people who directly interact with computers. Cooperative software which is run on a server should not be controlled solely by the administrator of the server, but also by the people who interact with the server over a network.

http://hackerpublicradio.org/eps.php?id=3317

Similarly, the data generated by the technology and the data which it requires to function should be in the control of the people who are affected by the technology. Cooperative software that uses cameras should not be controlled solely by the people who own the cameras, but also the people who are observed by the cameras. Cooperative electronic medical record systems should not be designed for the interests of insurance companies or hospital administrators, but for the interests of patients and the clinicians who directly use it. We aim for a world in which all technology is cooperative technology and recognize that any amount of proprietary technology is in conflict with this goal. As an anticapitalist movement, we recognize that any institution which motivates people to put money, power, or self-interest above the welfare of humans is in conflict with our goals. Corporations are beholden to their shareholders who can hold the corporation legally liable for spending money in a way that is not intended to further enrich the shareholders. Other capitalist forms of enterprise have similar problems, incentivizing the profit of an elite few over the impact their activities have on others. We are not opposed to exchanges of money being involved in the creation or distribution of software or hardware. However, we should carefully consider the motivational structures of the institutions which fund technology development. Who benefits from the technology and who determines the priorities of its development and design? These are questions we ask about technology whether money is involved or not. It is in our interest to use safeguards to ensure that technology always remains controlled by the community which develops and uses it. Copyleft is one such safeguard, but it is insufficient on its own to prevent cooptation of our movement. Any cooperative technology project that receives funding from a for-profit enterprise must institute governance structures which prioritize community interests over profit in case there is a conflict between the two. We oppose business models which are in conflict with community interests such as "open core"/proprietary relicensing. Similarly, we are opposed to authoritarian and hierarchical governance structures of technology projects such as "benevolent dictators for life". Cooperative technology is developed democratically; no single individual should have ultimate authority in cooperative projects. While we recognize the need for leadership and private communication, discussions regarding cooperative technology should take place in public unless there is a specific reason for communications to be private. Organizations which advocate for cooperative technology should likewise operate democratically and transparently. We recognize that creating high quality technology requires much more than engineering skills. Cooperative technology is not only for people who have the skills of writing code (unless the software is for writing code such as a compiler) nor the skills to design hardware. Cooperative technology strives to be easy to use, including for people with disabilities, and acknowledges that this is best accomplished by continual dialog between engineers and users. Providing such feedback is a valuable way to contribute to the construction of cooperative technology without needing engineering skills. Ideally, the engineers of the technology should also be using it themselves. Moreover, there are many ways to contribute to cooperative technology without programming skills such as imagining ideas for new features, reporting bugs, writing documentation, graphic design, translation, promotion, and financial support. The free software movement has failed to create a world in which humans in technological societies can live without using proprietary software unless one chooses to live the ascetic lifestyle of Richard Stallman.

http://hackerpublicradio.org/eps.php?id=3317

Expecting people to not use any proprietary technology and judging people for not meeting this standard pushes people away from our movement. People who are coerced into using proprietary technology deserve our empathy and invitation into our movement, not condescension. Let us criticize institutions which pressure people into using proprietary technology, not the people who choose to use it. To that end, we strive to use cooperative technology tools as much as possible in our efforts to build cooperative technology. The purpose of this document is not to proclaim a legalistic set of criteria for determining what technology is cooperative and what technology is not. History has demonstrated that this is not an effective political tactic for the reasons explained above. The free software definition and the open source definition are useful criteria for evaluating copyright licenses for code, but an effective political movement cannot be so narrowly focused on legalistic and binary judgements of copyright licenses to judge whether certain technology aligns with our goals. We believe the focus of the cooperative technology movement should be on the practical impacts that the use of technology has on humans and the universe we inhabit. The scope of this extends beyond humans and must consider the environment around us. Moreover, we believe it is counterproductive to have a small self-appointed group of privileged men determine what our movement's terminology, goals, and tactics are. We encourage anyone interested in building a better world through technology to engage in discussions with your own communities about what you want "cooperative technology" to mean. While we agree with the Ethical Software Movement that we must resist when our efforts are coopted for unjust purposes, we reject putting restrictions on the ways people may use software through copyright licenses as a wise tactic for achieving our goals.

http://hackerpublicradio.org/eps.php?id=3317

The history of the Free and Open Source Software movement has shown that the proliferation of incompatible copyright licenses which prohibit software from being legally combined creates more obstacles than opportunities for our movement. Any new copyright licenses for use with cooperative software must be written with this consideration in mind to intentionally avoid fracturing the software ecosystem. Adopting incompatible copyright licenses for different software would make it easy for our adversaries to divide and suppress the movement. Language is constructed collectively and is always evolving. It is counterproductive to our movement to refuse to collaborate with people because they use the words "open source" or "free software" to describe their work. They may even disagree with the entire premise of this document. That does not mean we should not work together towards shared goals, but we should be conscious that our goals may not perfectly align and this may cause tension in our communities from time to time.

We invite anyone to collaborate with us who is interested in building a better world and treats us and others in our communities with dignity and respect. This document is licensed under the CC0 license. Contributions are welcome on Codeberg. If you disagree with parts of this, feel free to fork it and say what you want to say.

http://hackerpublicradio.org/eps.php?id=3317

The messages transmitted by @IntuitivePublicRadio and our Intuitive network are single-link reference notes or forwarded items where severely disabled, multiply marginalized colleagues request support for specific community conversations.

Our community admins assist trafficking victims and other Intuitive Invisibles to post the links they would like to share in order to initiate lifesaving public and private conversations, anonymously when needed for safety.

Because of severe disabilities and circumstances of violence, our community members often can only post a small part of what they would like to talk about safely with others.

Many survivors of violence can only be safe to initiate a particular discussion in caring, supportive, inclusive community settings --- spaces we are building and sharing.

Our public links and notes are part of extended private @IntuitiveCommunity knowledgebase materials and collaborative groups where all are invited to participate.

We learn together how to support one another so that courageous conversations and fully inclusive communications regenerate strength and healing in our communities.

Our friends and families today are being victimized by sex trafficking and ritual abuse --- many women, children, elders, and others.

Please hear us and respond with kindness each time a conversation is initiated —- each time a message is broadcast.

Our lives depend on this.

https://t.me/s/RedIntuitiva/13 • https://t.me/s/DisabilityAid/388 • https://t.me/s/IntuitiveCommunity/1496 • https://t.me/s/IntuitivePublicRadio/7629 • https://t.me/s/RadioPublicaIntuitiva/1124 ••

Los mensajes transmitidos por @IntuitivePublicRadio y @RadioPublicaIntuitiva y nuestra @RedIntuitiva son notas de referencia de un solo enlace o elementos reenviados donde los colegas gravemente discapacitados y múltiples marginados solicitan apoyo para conversaciones comunitarias específicas.

Los administradores de nuestra comunidad ayudan a las víctimas de la trata y otros invisibles intuitivos a publicar los enlaces que les gustaría compartir para iniciar conversaciones públicas y privadas que salvan vidas, de forma anónima cuando sea necesario por motivos de seguridad.

Debido a discapacidades graves y circunstancias de violencia, los miembros de nuestra comunidad a menudo solo pueden publicar una pequeña parte de lo que les gustaría hablar de manera segura con los demás.

Muchos sobrevivientes de violencia solo pueden estar seguros si inician una discusión particular en entornos comunitarios comprensivos, solidarios e inclusivos, espacios que estamos construyendo y compartiendo.

Nuestros enlaces y notas públicos son parte de los materiales de la base de conocimientos y de los grupos de colaboración privados extendidos de @IntuitiveCommunity, donde todos están invitados a participar.

Aprendemos juntos cómo apoyarnos unos a otros para que las conversaciones valientes y las comunicaciones totalmente inclusivas regeneren la fuerza y ​​la sanación en nuestras comunidades.

Hoy en día, nuestros amigos y familias están siendo víctimas de la trata sexual y el abuso ritual: muchas mujeres, niños, ancianos y otros.

Escúchenos y responda con amabilidad cada vez que se inicie una conversación, cada vez que se transmita un mensaje.

Nuestras vidas dependen de esto.

https://t.me/s/RedIntuitiva/13 • https://t.me/s/DisabilityAid/388 • https://t.me/s/IntuitiveCommunity/1496 • https://t.me/s/IntuitivePublicRadio/7629 • https://t.me/s/RadioPublicaIntuitiva/1124 ••

حديث حول الاتصال الدولي

4/14/21 by Mics | مايكس

https://omny.fm/shows/pittsburgh-coffee/13

Web player: https://podcastaddict.com/episode/122107090
Episode: https://traffic.omny.fm/d/clips/2b465d4a-14ee-4fbe-a3c2-ac46009a2d5a/506e2940-7b84-440c-867c-ac70007ff058/581797cd-3642-4e1c-8834-ad0a00b8bdc0/audio.mp3?utm_source=Podcast&in_playlist=99de34a7-5604-4f51-9687-ac70007ff083

منذ أن خطى الإنسان على هذه البسيطة قبل آلاف السنين وهو يبحث عن أجوبة لأسئلته الوجودية. ومع تنقله في دروب الأرض شرقا وغربا، بدأ بتكوين الجماعات التي أصبحت مع مرور الوقت شعوبا وقبائل ودول مترامية الأطراف. هذا التحول في المسيرة الإنسانية خلق ضرورة حتمية لنشوء علم الإتصال الدولي، والذي يعنى بدراسة الأفكار والسياسة والاقتصاد والإعلام والتعليم والتقنية وغيرها من العلوم بهدف فهم طبيعة السلوكيات الإنسانية ومن ثم توظيفها أو إستغلالها خيرا أو شرا. نستضيف في هذا اللقاء أ. يحيى القبعة -مرشح درجة الدكتوراه في الإتصال الدولي- للحديث عن نشأة هذا العلم، علاقته بالعلوم الأخرى، دور الدول في التأثير على المزاج الاتصالي العالمي، والعديد من القصص والتجارب الدولية في الجهود الاتصالية والإعلامية. •ضيف اللقاء
أ. يحيى القبعة
@yahyaalquba •معد ومقدم اللقاء
د. محمد العدساني
@AladsaniMS •إنتاج
‎شبكة مايكس للبودكاست
@MicsPod ‎هذا اللقاء برعاية الملحقية الثقافية السعودية في أمريكا See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Ep 97 | IBM's Role in Killing Jews & High-Tech Lessons from the Holocaust | Edwin Black | The Glenn Beck Podcast

2/13/21 by Blaze Podcast Network

https://www.glennbeck.com/st/the_glenn_beck_podcast

Web player: https://podcastaddict.com/episode/119094373
Episode: https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/pdst.fm/e/chtbl.com/track/384GD8/traffic.megaphone.fm/BMDC2585706430.mp3

Edwin Black is the son of Holocaust survivors and an investigative journalist with awards and best-selling books translated into 20 languages in nearly 200 countries. His book "IBM and the Holocaust" examines high tech's role in killing Jews during the Holocaust and what it can teach us about the dangers of Big Tech today. Edwin has spent enough time in the media to see all of its warts (there are a lot). And he’s speaking out about it and its role in ignoring history at our nation's peril. He also discusses Disney actress Gina Carano, fired for comparing conservative persecution to the Nazi treatment of the Jews. Our culture is being erased. Our ideals and values are being censored and mocked. Our history is being erased. With another human extermination on the horizon in China, Edwin challenges this with bravery. This Week’s Sponsors:
Raycon makes great sound accessible to everyone, with wireless earbuds starting at half the price of other premium audio brands. Whether you’re catching up on your favorite news podcast, binging an audiobook, or powering through your workout with a pumped-up playlist, a pair of Raycons in your ears can make all the difference. Go to BUYRAYCON.com/Glenn and get 15% off. Built Bar Protein Bars are high protein, low calorie, high fiber, and low carb, and they’ve just added six new flavors, including caramel brownie and lemon-almond cheesecake. Go to Builtbar.com and use the promo code “BECK” to get $10 off your first order. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Les Reines D'Egypte Antique

4/22/21 by Storiavoce

https://soundcloud.com/user-93445498/les-reines-degypte-antique

Episode: http://feeds.soundcloud.com/stream/1034905870-user-93445498-les-reines-degypte-antique.mp3

L’un des mythes les plus populaires et les plus célèbres de la mythologie égyptienne raconte l’histoire d’une femme Isis, épouse et sœur heureuse du roi Osiris. Assassiné par le maléfique Seth, son propre frère, Osiris est protégé et défendu par son épouse. Isis organise sa protection, s’unit à lui pour assurer sa descendance et conçoit Horus. Maitresse dans l’art de la métamorphose, défenseur de sa dynastie, divinité bienveillante, elle est le modèle de la reine, et de la souveraine égyptienne. Si l’histoire les a cachées derrière la figure des pharaons, elles ont eu un rôle non négligeable dans la civilisation égyptienne. Elles se nomment Hatchepsout, Néfertiti, Tiyi et la plus connue : Cléopâtre. Florence Quentin fait le point sur l’histoire de ces souveraines loin des clichés hollywoodiens.

- La reine d’Égypte avait-elle un rôle qui dépassait celui du symbolique et du religieux ?
- Était-elle définie uniquement dans sa relation au roi ?
- Comment la souveraine était-elle représentée ?
- A-t-on des traces d’une action politique menée par une femme de la famille royale ?

Dans les sarcophages royaux, l’histoire se confond avec le mythe et l’archéologie s’aide de la légende. Florence Quentin est interrogée par Mari-Gwenn Carichon.

Notre invitée: Florence Quentin est égyptologue et spécialiste d’histoire de l’Égypte ancienne. Elle a publié de nombreux ouvrages sur la civilisation et le religion égyptienne : Isis l’éternelle, biographie d’un mythe féminin, Le Livre des Égypte, savoirs et imaginaires. Son dernier livre paru chez Perrin (mars 2021, 416 pages, 24.00 €)/ Les grandes souveraines d'Egypte propose une galerie de portraits des souveraines les plus marquantes de l'antique civilisation égyptienne.

HPR3300: YouTube Channels for Learning Spanish, Part 1

3/25/21 by zwilnik.nospam@nospam.zwilnik.com (Ahuka)

http://hackerpublicradio.org/eps.php?id=3300

Web player: https://podcastaddict.com/episode/120922871
Episode: http://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr3300.mp3

As I have been learning Spanish I have been making use of a variety of tools and aids. One of the best is YouTube, where there is a wealth of free stuff. Of course, Spanish is not the only language with good resources here, but it is the one I am studying right now. But if you are interested in learning another language, or improving your knowledge of one, you should take a look. Links: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_GFwrcNlXh92xA8iKFT2WA http://thelanguagetutor.co/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyLl_0d0EBw&list=PLTpetkN815Qyuc2RbC1kxxMQvxjQ3RnYG https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8hFdZEPqdM https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_European_Framework_of_Reference_for_Languages https://www.youtube.com/c/Professorjason/featured https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC67BDv__7er_ZaYKqhOSOFQ https://www.youtube.com/user/culturealley https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9yudInUYzMh9H4gJs4DrHg https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCozZrWPuoNRLl5ArOyJ57sQ https://www.palain.com/spanish/youtube-channels-for-learning-spanish/

HPR3320: YouTube Channels for Learning Spanish, Part 2

4/22/21 by zwilnik.nospam@nospam.zwilnik.com (Ahuka)

http://hackerpublicradio.org/eps.php?id=3320

Web player: https://podcastaddict.com/episode/122159049
Episode: http://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr3320.mp3

As I have been learning Spanish I have been making use of a variety of tools and aids. One of the best is YouTube, where there is a wealth of free stuff. Of course, Spanish is not the only language with good resources here, but it is the one I am studying right now. But if you are interested in learning another language, or improving your knowledge of one, you should take a look. This is the second part covering some additional channels Links: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmSElpplqOqmAHi1N0z42AQ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCydVvh3Wg4VPvllLHFoe5_A https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCouyFdE9-Lrjo3M_2idKq1A https://algworld.com/ https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/comprehensible-input https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIdFcLCIJQ_YMrormG_nU8w https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfG2VhlQgy5bHGmkpeKcjVA https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrMqdq1osi5ECCBkia2jsNw https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAg2CRWxgDZPFricsDv6EOA https://www.palain.com/spanish/youtube-channels-for-learning-spanish-part-2/

🔊 Visioning • Material • Space • @IntuitiveVision • Intuitive Vision • IPR •• https://t.me/joinchat/Pgu4k0qkRlBmNTQ5 • 20210415-081919 • https://t.me/s/IntuitiveVision/5 ••

¿Cómo vemos?

Jackson Whalan and KRS-One, From the Woods • https://liveforlivemusic.com/news/premiere-jackson-whalan-krs-one-from-the-woods-remix-listen • https://open.spotify.com/track/6vtxIUWhBEFe3hHs8f1Wqg?si=b-jpsVVnS4e-Fw6cc5_0WA&utm_source=copy-link • https://t.me/s/IntuitivePublicMusic/1732 ••