Cathy Bernatt shared, ' This... '

' There is a brokenness out of which comes the unbroken,
a shatteredness out of which blooms the unshatterable.

There is a sorrow
beyond all grief which leads to joy
and a fragility
out of whose depths emerges strength.

There is a hollow space
too vast for words
through which we pass with each loss,
out of whose darkness we are sanctioned into being.

There is a cry deeper than all sound
whose serrated edges cut the heart
as we break open
to the place inside which is unbreakable
and whole,
while learning to sing.

Rashani '

facebook.com/share/p/hEknnbwoqpTF7pm9

t.me/IntuitiveEmergent/2747

Will Hall writes,

' Britney Spears = human trafficking by psychiatry '

prospect.org/culture/2024-07-31-domination-tour-britney-spears-music-industry

facebook.com/share/p/4pADVdNZNnGEuD9d

t.me/IntuitiveDeep/126
t.me/IntuitiveEmergent/2750

The comments on this public Facebook post are particularly revealing.

' This is an article about Edina Slayter-Engelsman, the woman pictured: bbc.com/news/articles/c51y7zq4pgno '

t.me/IntuitiveDeep/127

' Apollo's Principles of Discourse

(ἡ ἀλήθεια ἐλευθερώσει ὑμᾶς)

Asking questions is not presenting a theory. Presenting a theory is not asserting a claim.

Asserting a claim is not a personal attack. Disputing an idea is not attacking an individual who holds that idea.

Making an observation is neither condoning nor condemning what is observed.

Referencing a person's work is not agreeing with it. Agreeing with one thing a person has said or done is not agreeing with everything that person has said or done. None of these things condone or condemn the character or behavior of that person.

Emotional responses to questions, theories, and claims have no explanatory or persuasive value.

Ad hominem attacks have no explanatory or persuasive value.

No idea, individual, or organization is immune to inquiry.

The highest goal in discourse shall always be truth, regardless of how unexpected, unbelievable, or unwelcome that truth may be. Truth above all. '

https://substack.com/@apolloslyre/note/c-63929944

https://t.me/IntuitiveDeep/128

' As applied by the Stasi, Zersetzung is a technique to subvert and undermine an opponent. The aim was to disrupt the target's private or family life so they are unable to continue their "hostile-negative" activities towards the state. Typically, the Stasi would use collaborators to garner details from a victim's private life. They would then devise a strategy to "disintegrate" the target's personal circumstances—their career, their relationship with their spouse, their reputation in the community. They would even seek to alienate them from their children. [...] The security service's goal was to use Zersetzung to "switch off" regime opponents. After months and even years of Zersetzung a victim's domestic problems grew so large, so debilitating, and so psychologically burdensome that they would lose the will to struggle against the East German state. Best of all, the Stasi's role in the victim's personal misfortunes remained tantalisingly hidden. The Stasi operations were carried out in complete operational secrecy. The service acted like an unseen and malevolent god, manipulating the destinies of its victims.

It was in the mid-1970 that Honecker's secret police began to employ these perfidious methods. At that moment the GDR was finally achieving international respectability. [...] Honecker's predecessor, Walter Ulbricht, was an old-fashioned Stalinist thug. He used open terror methods to subdue his post-war population: show trials, mass arrests, camps, torture and the secret police.

But two decades after east Germany had become a communist paradise of workers and peasants, most citizens were acquiescent. When a new group of dissidents began to protest against the regime, Honecker came to the conclusion that different tactics were needed. Mass terror was no longer appropriate and might damage the GDR's international reputation. A cleverer strategy was called for. [...] The most insidious aspect of Zersetzung is that its victims are almost invariably not believed. '

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zersetzung

' The Stasi used Zersetzung essentially as a means of psychological oppression and persecution.[22] Findings of operational psychology[23] were formulated into method at the Stasi's College of Law (Juristische Hochschule der Staatssicherheit, or JHS), and applied to political opponents in an effort to undermine their self-confidence and self-esteem. Operations were designed to intimidate and destabilise them by subjecting them to repeated disappointment, and to socially alienate them by interfering with and disrupting their relationships with others as in social undermining. The aim was to induce personal crises in victims, leaving them too unnerved and psychologically distressed to have the time and energy for anti-government activism.[24] The Stasi intentionally concealed their role as mastermind of the operations.[25][26] Author Jürgen Fuchs was a victim of Zersetzung and wrote about his experience, describing the Stasi's actions as "psychosocial crime", and "an assault on the human soul". '

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zersetzung

Principles on Forced Treatment Abolition - Tina Minkowitz • madnessradio.net/files/PrinciplesonForcedPsychiatryAbolitionTinaMinkowitz.pdf

Posted by Will Hall • facebook.com/share/oJmw35kiTt32TyWQ

t.me/IntuitiveEmergent/2760

A macro photo of a poppy flower. • facebook.com/share/p/PTXEJsJXUC7fvJSS • t.me/RealityWalking/262