Max Mo writes,
Intuitive Public research has shown repeatedly how human trafficking organizations use disablement and invisibilization of #disability to continue perpetrating violence while most members of the community think that someone is addressing it.
twitter.com/MoFromTheGut/status/1608822956691709952
t.me/IntuitiveTraffic/2386
Intuitive Public research has shown repeatedly how human trafficking organizations use disablement and invisibilization of #disability to continue perpetrating violence while most members of the community think that someone is addressing it.
twitter.com/MoFromTheGut/status/1608822956691709952
t.me/IntuitiveTraffic/2386
Max Mo writes,
This gap in awareness results in severely disabled children, elders, mothers, & families not being taken seriously when they say they are being targeted by #sextraffickers. Often, violence against them is escalated.
Let's expand our dialogue about this radically, please.
twitter.com/MoFromTheGut/status/1608823135121608706
t.me/IntuitiveTraffic/2387
This gap in awareness results in severely disabled children, elders, mothers, & families not being taken seriously when they say they are being targeted by #sextraffickers. Often, violence against them is escalated.
Let's expand our dialogue about this radically, please.
twitter.com/MoFromTheGut/status/1608823135121608706
t.me/IntuitiveTraffic/2387
Max Mo writes,
We have spent many years documenting these invisible #sextrafficking intersections and the prolific retaliation from unaddressed trafficking-aligned systems that silence these disabled people, mischaracterize them, and continue to funnel them into unconscionable brutality.
twitter.com/MoFromTheGut/status/1608824587323846657
t.me/IntuitiveTraffic/2388
We have spent many years documenting these invisible #sextrafficking intersections and the prolific retaliation from unaddressed trafficking-aligned systems that silence these disabled people, mischaracterize them, and continue to funnel them into unconscionable brutality.
twitter.com/MoFromTheGut/status/1608824587323846657
t.me/IntuitiveTraffic/2388
Max Mo writes,
We make public media by-&-for severely disabled sex trafficking survivors.
We'd like to see this conversation rapidly amplified.
twitter.com/IntuitivePublic
t.me/IntuitivePublicRadio/11228
t.me/IntuitiveTraffic/2389 πΊπ₯°ποΈ
We make public media by-&-for severely disabled sex trafficking survivors.
We'd like to see this conversation rapidly amplified.
twitter.com/IntuitivePublic
t.me/IntuitivePublicRadio/11228
t.me/IntuitiveTraffic/2389 πΊπ₯°ποΈ
Are-Viruses-Real_-25Dec22.pdf
691 KB
Max Mo writes,
This paper released by Michael McKay Christmas day is especially excellent. (Thank you for the gift, Mr. McKay.) Great footnotes. Lots of plain languaging.
It's a wonderful adjunct to Dr. Mark Bailey's "Farewell to Virology (Expert Edition)."
twitter.com/MoFromTheGut/status/1609904711771258882
With thanks to t.me/TheWayForwardForMankind/6261 β’ t.me/MaxMoRadio/5666, t.me/BlessTheVacuum/4721
This paper released by Michael McKay Christmas day is especially excellent. (Thank you for the gift, Mr. McKay.) Great footnotes. Lots of plain languaging.
It's a wonderful adjunct to Dr. Mark Bailey's "Farewell to Virology (Expert Edition)."
twitter.com/MoFromTheGut/status/1609904711771258882
With thanks to t.me/TheWayForwardForMankind/6261 β’ t.me/MaxMoRadio/5666, t.me/BlessTheVacuum/4721
A-FAREWELL-TO-VIROLOGY-Expert-Edition.pdf
17 MB
Max Mo writes,
Here is Dr. Mark Bailey's "A Farewell to Virology (Expert Edition)." Its comprehensive discussion points are especially useful to consider in-depth. It's dense, and excellent.
If you feel it's challenging to get through -- not uncommon, and certainly understandable -- I'll read it out loud to you.
With love π
twitter.com/MoFromTheGut/status/1609907213715243010, twitter.com/MoFromTheGut/status/1609907612564295680
t.me/MaxMoRadio/5667, t.me/BlessTheVacuum/4722
Here is Dr. Mark Bailey's "A Farewell to Virology (Expert Edition)." Its comprehensive discussion points are especially useful to consider in-depth. It's dense, and excellent.
If you feel it's challenging to get through -- not uncommon, and certainly understandable -- I'll read it out loud to you.
With love π
twitter.com/MoFromTheGut/status/1609907213715243010, twitter.com/MoFromTheGut/status/1609907612564295680
t.me/MaxMoRadio/5667, t.me/BlessTheVacuum/4722
Jason Breshears of Archaix: There Is A Wizard Within You β’ youtube.com/watch?v=_-Jjh880ZiI β’ t.me/IntuitiveUnknown/2449, t.me/Esomancy/72, t.me/EsoExp/575
YouTube
There is a Wizard Within You
Our imagination is entirely nonlocal, a quantum phenomenon that is independent of, and can influence, the physical, Newtonian world around us.
MAIL
Archaix/ Jason at: PO Box 493 Willis, TX 77378
Email: archaix138@gmail.com
ALWAYS taking donations of oldβ¦
Archaix/ Jason at: PO Box 493 Willis, TX 77378
Email: archaix138@gmail.com
ALWAYS taking donations of oldβ¦
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Jason Breshears of Archaix: There Is A Wizard Within You β’ youtube.com/watch?v=_-Jjh880ZiI β’ t.me/IntuitiveUnknown/2450, t.me/Esomancy/73, t.me/EsoExp/576
Now hiring for $100 recurring work position(s)
Max Megan Elizabeth Morris presents this useful 5-part text to be propagated far and wide in order to solve a pressing set of interesting problems:
intuitivepublicradio.substack.com/p/now-hiring-for-100-recurring-work
t.me/IntuitiveEditorial/128
Max Megan Elizabeth Morris presents this useful 5-part text to be propagated far and wide in order to solve a pressing set of interesting problems:
intuitivepublicradio.substack.com/p/now-hiring-for-100-recurring-work
t.me/IntuitiveEditorial/128
Forwarded from Humanley
This is kryptonite for germ theory.
We are told that bacteria have basic life cycles, when in fact they have complex life cycles.
We are told that bacteria are monomorphic, when in fact they are pleomorphic (can morph into different kinds of bacteria).
Bacteria arise from base units called somatids or microzyma. The microzyma can develop into any kind of bacteria depending on the environmental conditions they are growing in.
βAnyone who will patiently study with the microscope his own cultures which he knows to be pure can quickly confirm the general observation that rod forms may appear in cultures of cocci, spherical forms in cultures of bacilli, lateral buds and branches and internal globular bodies" Arthur Henrici, MD - 1895
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/30990#page/7/mode/1up
Countless papers have been published showing that bacteria have complex life cycles and are not monomorphic.
The United States Dept. of Agriculture demonstrated that bacteria could change into other bacteria back in 1916 and 1923, as did the United States Health Dept. in 1932.
1916 - https://naldc.nal.usda.gov/catalog/IND43965684
1923 - https://naldc.nal.usda.gov/catalog/IND43966525
1932 - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1996182
Quote from the US Health Dept (1932) - "They found that one type of bacteria could present itself in over a dozen different forms, so different from each other that they have to be accepted as separate species belonging to half a dozen different genera."
There are countless papers published in the scientific literature documenting extreme pleomorphism and the complex bacterial life cycle.
Everything we think we know about bacteria is probably wrong.
Germs don't cause disease.
Disease causes germs.
Follow me on Telegram: t.me/humanley
1. Enderlein E. Bacteria Cyclogeny. Prescott: Enderlein Enterprises Inc; 1925.
2. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30082257
3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2167589/
4. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3859916
5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC379023/
6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC533658/
7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16560237/
8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC440979/
9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16560823/
10. https://www.bmj.com/content/1/2940/571
11. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC375132/
12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC374850/
13. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4130434
14. https://www.nature.com/articles/2221285a0
15. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5522357
16. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7250327/
17. https://www.nature.com/articles/215936a0
18. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2084495
19. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16559356/
20. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.75.1935.121
We are told that bacteria have basic life cycles, when in fact they have complex life cycles.
We are told that bacteria are monomorphic, when in fact they are pleomorphic (can morph into different kinds of bacteria).
Bacteria arise from base units called somatids or microzyma. The microzyma can develop into any kind of bacteria depending on the environmental conditions they are growing in.
βAnyone who will patiently study with the microscope his own cultures which he knows to be pure can quickly confirm the general observation that rod forms may appear in cultures of cocci, spherical forms in cultures of bacilli, lateral buds and branches and internal globular bodies" Arthur Henrici, MD - 1895
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/30990#page/7/mode/1up
Countless papers have been published showing that bacteria have complex life cycles and are not monomorphic.
The United States Dept. of Agriculture demonstrated that bacteria could change into other bacteria back in 1916 and 1923, as did the United States Health Dept. in 1932.
1916 - https://naldc.nal.usda.gov/catalog/IND43965684
1923 - https://naldc.nal.usda.gov/catalog/IND43966525
1932 - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1996182
Quote from the US Health Dept (1932) - "They found that one type of bacteria could present itself in over a dozen different forms, so different from each other that they have to be accepted as separate species belonging to half a dozen different genera."
There are countless papers published in the scientific literature documenting extreme pleomorphism and the complex bacterial life cycle.
Everything we think we know about bacteria is probably wrong.
Germs don't cause disease.
Disease causes germs.
Follow me on Telegram: t.me/humanley
1. Enderlein E. Bacteria Cyclogeny. Prescott: Enderlein Enterprises Inc; 1925.
2. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30082257
3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2167589/
4. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3859916
5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC379023/
6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC533658/
7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16560237/
8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC440979/
9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16560823/
10. https://www.bmj.com/content/1/2940/571
11. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC375132/
12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC374850/
13. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4130434
14. https://www.nature.com/articles/2221285a0
15. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5522357
16. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7250327/
17. https://www.nature.com/articles/215936a0
18. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2084495
19. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16559356/
20. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.75.1935.121
"What do we want to believe so badly that we donβt actually require evidence to believe it is true?" --Michael Hobbes
sophiestrand.substack.com/p/no-more-divine-vessels
t.me/IntuitiveFlow/2601
sophiestrand.substack.com/p/no-more-divine-vessels
t.me/IntuitiveFlow/2601
Make Me Good Soil
No More Divine Vessels
Some Research Behind My Novel The Madonna Secret
Hola, Intuitiva Intensiva!
We are in search of professionals interested to ensure the safety of vulnerable individuals experiencing severe physical abuse through toxemia.
When someone is physically abused using toxemia, there is nowhere for them to go for help because the usual establishment resources have been influenced to disbelieve reports of toxemia.
Virology or contagion narratives, for instance, the false covid narrative, are used to force inappropriate or harmful interventions on people who report toxemia.
This violently silences and often permanently kills the most sensitive individuals, including those who have been actively forced into sex trafficking.
Many sex trafficking survivors across the worldwide Intuitive network are being directly killed using toxemia -- then harvested for sex trafficking when the local human trafficking organizations wish to take advantage of this commodity.
So that we may build together the most honorable community bodies, it's important for us to ensure that survivors in our midst are not continually submitted to these violent conditions.
Where should a survivor go for help to get away from their physical abusers?
Where should a survivor go for help to get away from sex traffickers?
Please help us answer this question by tuning closely to this conversation, and participating in every way you find you can.
t.me/IntuitiveIntensive/234
We are in search of professionals interested to ensure the safety of vulnerable individuals experiencing severe physical abuse through toxemia.
When someone is physically abused using toxemia, there is nowhere for them to go for help because the usual establishment resources have been influenced to disbelieve reports of toxemia.
Virology or contagion narratives, for instance, the false covid narrative, are used to force inappropriate or harmful interventions on people who report toxemia.
This violently silences and often permanently kills the most sensitive individuals, including those who have been actively forced into sex trafficking.
Many sex trafficking survivors across the worldwide Intuitive network are being directly killed using toxemia -- then harvested for sex trafficking when the local human trafficking organizations wish to take advantage of this commodity.
So that we may build together the most honorable community bodies, it's important for us to ensure that survivors in our midst are not continually submitted to these violent conditions.
Where should a survivor go for help to get away from their physical abusers?
Where should a survivor go for help to get away from sex traffickers?
Please help us answer this question by tuning closely to this conversation, and participating in every way you find you can.
t.me/IntuitiveIntensive/234
Toward Solving the Impossible Problems by Asta Raami, PhD:
"The more unexplainable the personal experiences are, the greater stigma they tend to carry.
Highly personal or extraordinary experiences are not shared.
The experiences may be consciously ignored or explained away due to a couple of reasons.
Firstly, no-one wants to be laughed at or ostracised.
For example, Nobel laureate McClintock was a highly respected scientist by peers until around 1950βs when her thoughts started to significantly differ from the mainstream.
In scientific conferences, her lectures were marked by silence since nobody understood what she was talking about.
Colleagues started to laugh at her behind her back and βmcclintocknismβ became a synonym for an unscientific approach.
In 1953 she quit all academic publishing due to severe criticism. It was only in the 1980βs when she was rewarded with a Nobel Prize that it was evident she was far ahead of her own time.
Historically, she has been the only woman awarded an undivided Nobel Prize in medicine (Keller, 1983).
Secondly, the human consciousness can bend, shrink or even split, but it cannot tolerate a break in coherence (Hayles, 2014).
This leads to a situation where consciousness easily edits and modifies reality to fit personal expectations, at the cost of a more accurate rendering of reality, by misinterpreting anomalous or strange situations (Hayles, 2014).
This may result in ignoring or shutting out anomalies even before they reach the conscious.
In other words, if our mental compartments are not open enough, we cannot escape our current thinking models.
We perceive only those perceptions that fit our current mental models and filter out others."
academia.edu/38596829/Towards_Solving_the_Impossible_Problems
π Engage β’ @IntuitiveIntensive β’ Intensive, Immersive β’ Intuitive Public Radio β’ IPR β’β’ Join public chat: t.me/+bH1HP47VEKE3OWFh
Visit Brendan's original message: t.me/c/1431273236/590
t.me/IntuitiveIntensive/246
"The more unexplainable the personal experiences are, the greater stigma they tend to carry.
Highly personal or extraordinary experiences are not shared.
The experiences may be consciously ignored or explained away due to a couple of reasons.
Firstly, no-one wants to be laughed at or ostracised.
For example, Nobel laureate McClintock was a highly respected scientist by peers until around 1950βs when her thoughts started to significantly differ from the mainstream.
In scientific conferences, her lectures were marked by silence since nobody understood what she was talking about.
Colleagues started to laugh at her behind her back and βmcclintocknismβ became a synonym for an unscientific approach.
In 1953 she quit all academic publishing due to severe criticism. It was only in the 1980βs when she was rewarded with a Nobel Prize that it was evident she was far ahead of her own time.
Historically, she has been the only woman awarded an undivided Nobel Prize in medicine (Keller, 1983).
Secondly, the human consciousness can bend, shrink or even split, but it cannot tolerate a break in coherence (Hayles, 2014).
This leads to a situation where consciousness easily edits and modifies reality to fit personal expectations, at the cost of a more accurate rendering of reality, by misinterpreting anomalous or strange situations (Hayles, 2014).
This may result in ignoring or shutting out anomalies even before they reach the conscious.
In other words, if our mental compartments are not open enough, we cannot escape our current thinking models.
We perceive only those perceptions that fit our current mental models and filter out others."
academia.edu/38596829/Towards_Solving_the_Impossible_Problems
π Engage β’ @IntuitiveIntensive β’ Intensive, Immersive β’ Intuitive Public Radio β’ IPR β’β’ Join public chat: t.me/+bH1HP47VEKE3OWFh
Visit Brendan's original message: t.me/c/1431273236/590
t.me/IntuitiveIntensive/246
www.academia.edu
Towards Solving the Impossible Problems
How can we make better decisions to solve complex problems? How can we reach for unseen ideas and inventions? A sustainable and coherent future is embedded in coherent decision making, successful problem solving and radical innovating. Solving the
π Engage β’ @IntuitiveIntensive β’ Intensive, Immersive β’ Intuitive Public Radio β’ IPR β’β’ Join public chat: t.me/+bH1HP47VEKE3OWFh
Visit Brendan's original message: t.me/c/1431273236/593
t.me/IntuitiveIntensive/247
Visit Brendan's original message: t.me/c/1431273236/593
t.me/IntuitiveIntensive/247
π Engage β’ @IntuitiveIntensive β’ Intensive, Immersive β’ Intuitive Public Radio β’ IPR β’β’ Join public chat: t.me/+bH1HP47VEKE3OWFh
Visit Brendan's original message at Intuitive Intensive: t.me/c/1431273236/595
t.me/IntuitiveAnalysis/122
Visit Brendan's original message at Intuitive Intensive: t.me/c/1431273236/595
t.me/IntuitiveAnalysis/122
"Even in media and fiction, it's usually only villains who do long-term strategic planning..." - Brendan Heidenreich
π Engage β’ @IntuitiveIntensive β’ Intensive, Immersive β’ Intuitive Public Radio β’ IPR β’β’ Join public chat: t.me/+bH1HP47VEKE3OWFh
Visit Brendan's original message in Intuitive Intensive: t.me/c/1431273236/771
Original painting in traditional acrylic media by Megan Elizabeth Morris / Shakti Mer with private editorial collaborators circa 2010-2015, Austin Texas. Image design, same artist. Find more at t.me/MaxMoRadio/5959.
t.me/IntuitiveIntensive/256
π Engage β’ @IntuitiveIntensive β’ Intensive, Immersive β’ Intuitive Public Radio β’ IPR β’β’ Join public chat: t.me/+bH1HP47VEKE3OWFh
Visit Brendan's original message in Intuitive Intensive: t.me/c/1431273236/771
Original painting in traditional acrylic media by Megan Elizabeth Morris / Shakti Mer with private editorial collaborators circa 2010-2015, Austin Texas. Image design, same artist. Find more at t.me/MaxMoRadio/5959.
t.me/IntuitiveIntensive/256
π Engage β’ @IntuitiveIntensive β’ Intensive, Immersive β’ Intuitive Public Radio β’ IPR β’β’ Join public chat: t.me/+bH1HP47VEKE3OWFh
Visit Brendan's original message: t.me/c/1431273236/782
t.me/IntuitiveIntensive/257
Visit Brendan's original message: t.me/c/1431273236/782
t.me/IntuitiveIntensive/257
Forwarded from Humanley
Our entire lives we have been told that there are germs floating through the air that are out to get us, yet no one has ever observed such a thing with their own two eyes.
If there are no germs in the air, then disease cannot be caught. This also means that germs are a direct consequence of the environment (ie terrain) and their presence is not random.
Many people are probably aware of the debate between Pasteur and Bèchamp, but may not be aware of other controversies taking place around the same time. During the late 1800's Felix Pouchet was locked in a heated debate with Pasteur about the origin of microorganisms. Pasteur argued they came 'from the air' or whereas Pouchet argued germs arose spontaneously from the environment. Pouchet believed that there were basic units existing in nature that could give rise to any microorganism, depending on the environmental conditions - just like a stem cell can morph into any cell in the human body.
Pouchet conducted many experiments demonstrating spontaneous generation, as did other scientists like Henry Bastian, and at least a dozen others.
The theory of spontaneous generation was all but relegated to the waste paper basket following the release of Pasteur's germ theory. It's interesting that Pasteur was so adamant germs could not be generated spontaneously, considering he was a proponent of the theory himself, just a few years prior. Germ theory could never possibly be accepted as long as spontaneous generation stood in the way. Pasteur had to disprove spontaneous generation in order for the germ theory to be accepted.
Many modern day scientists, I philosophers and historians have reviewed Pasteurs work on spontaneous generation and have concluded that his experiments do not disprove the theory at all.
The germ is nothing; the terrain is everything.
Mother nature is not out to get us.
The environment determines the germ; the germ does not determine the environment.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
If there are no germs in the air, then disease cannot be caught. This also means that germs are a direct consequence of the environment (ie terrain) and their presence is not random.
Many people are probably aware of the debate between Pasteur and Bèchamp, but may not be aware of other controversies taking place around the same time. During the late 1800's Felix Pouchet was locked in a heated debate with Pasteur about the origin of microorganisms. Pasteur argued they came 'from the air' or whereas Pouchet argued germs arose spontaneously from the environment. Pouchet believed that there were basic units existing in nature that could give rise to any microorganism, depending on the environmental conditions - just like a stem cell can morph into any cell in the human body.
Pouchet conducted many experiments demonstrating spontaneous generation, as did other scientists like Henry Bastian, and at least a dozen others.
The theory of spontaneous generation was all but relegated to the waste paper basket following the release of Pasteur's germ theory. It's interesting that Pasteur was so adamant germs could not be generated spontaneously, considering he was a proponent of the theory himself, just a few years prior. Germ theory could never possibly be accepted as long as spontaneous generation stood in the way. Pasteur had to disprove spontaneous generation in order for the germ theory to be accepted.
Many modern day scientists, I philosophers and historians have reviewed Pasteurs work on spontaneous generation and have concluded that his experiments do not disprove the theory at all.
The germ is nothing; the terrain is everything.
Mother nature is not out to get us.
The environment determines the germ; the germ does not determine the environment.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Intuitive Signal Seminar Series: Brendan Heidenreich reviews Intuitive Intensive published articles of recent years and discusses the intersections survivors' groups are analyzing to meet day-to-day challenges with successful solutions.
On 23 April, we published a crucial piece describing the context of our anti-traffic action items. 14 May, Brendan Heidenreich has brought us additional important pieces of this discussion, engaged now in the public discussion group at t.me/IntuitiveIntensive. Read on to learn how to participate in this seminar session.
Join our π Engage public chat at Intuitive Intensive: t.me/+bH1HP47VEKE3OWFh
Find the initial Action Items article at this link: t.me/c/1431273236/863
Then, find the beginning of these 14-15 May 2023 Signal Seminar materials and Brendan's commentary by scrolling downward or by clicking this message link: t.me/c/1431273236/864
Series art credit, author links, & prints purchases: t.me/IntuitiveGallery/281
t.me/IntuitiveSignal/122
On 23 April, we published a crucial piece describing the context of our anti-traffic action items. 14 May, Brendan Heidenreich has brought us additional important pieces of this discussion, engaged now in the public discussion group at t.me/IntuitiveIntensive. Read on to learn how to participate in this seminar session.
Join our π Engage public chat at Intuitive Intensive: t.me/+bH1HP47VEKE3OWFh
Find the initial Action Items article at this link: t.me/c/1431273236/863
Then, find the beginning of these 14-15 May 2023 Signal Seminar materials and Brendan's commentary by scrolling downward or by clicking this message link: t.me/c/1431273236/864
Series art credit, author links, & prints purchases: t.me/IntuitiveGallery/281
t.me/IntuitiveSignal/122
Forwarded from The Solari Report
"The Federal Reserve System is much less federal than the name would have you believe. There is a fair bit of government guidance from the Board of Governors, as well as from the directors the Board of Governors gets to choose. However, the actual system itself is primarily made up of private banks with a majority of privately appointed directors running the show at individual member banks and offering advice on monetary policy changes. While the upper levels of the organization are a government agency, this leaves much of the daily goings-on of the Federal Reserve in individual banks inaccessible to the public.
The goal of President Wilson and Congress in creating the Federal Reserve System was to promote economic stability through the uniformity and certainty of a central banking system which would promote and handle much of the monetary policy of the U.S. More recently, Congress expanded this aim, β[promoting] effectively the goals of maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates.β The idea behind a centralized banking system is that it protects consumers from individual banks taking advantage of them as well as providing stability to the banking system.
However, the banking system in recent years has not really been known for its stability. As it stands, the Federal Reserve Act and associated law puts a lot of power to fulfill ostensibly government functions in entirely or partially private elements of the Federal Reserve. For example, the New York Fedβa private bank with government guidanceβhas a tremendous amount of power and influence over the financial state and policy of the U.S. The FOMC likewise has an enormous amount of power for a committee that is nearly half composed of what are, at the end of the day, private banking interests.
This state of affairs, coupled with the rocky trajectory of the banking industry over the last several decades, has led to quite a bit of criticism directed at the Federal Reserve. Critics have targeted everything from the structure of the Federal Reserve System, to its very efficacy in achieving its stated goals. This is an extremely complicated discussion. Look to future articles which will look more at the powers granted by the Federal Reserve Act, the loaning practices of the Federal Reserve, and some of these criticisms.
There is certainly a very credible argument that placing substantial control over monetary policy in the hands of private organizations which could profit from those policies is not ideal to say the least. This being said, the power split between public and private within the Federal Reserve System is complicated to unpack. However, it is plain to see that while the function and goals of the Federal Reserve are simple to recite, they are much more difficult to achieve in practice. The question of whether the current structure of the Federal Reserve is the best means of achieving those goals is similarly difficult to parse."
missingmoney.solari.com/the-history-and-organization-of-the-federal-reserve-the-what-and-why-of-the-united-states-most-powerful-banking-organization
t.me/IntuitiveAnalysis/128
The goal of President Wilson and Congress in creating the Federal Reserve System was to promote economic stability through the uniformity and certainty of a central banking system which would promote and handle much of the monetary policy of the U.S. More recently, Congress expanded this aim, β[promoting] effectively the goals of maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates.β The idea behind a centralized banking system is that it protects consumers from individual banks taking advantage of them as well as providing stability to the banking system.
However, the banking system in recent years has not really been known for its stability. As it stands, the Federal Reserve Act and associated law puts a lot of power to fulfill ostensibly government functions in entirely or partially private elements of the Federal Reserve. For example, the New York Fedβa private bank with government guidanceβhas a tremendous amount of power and influence over the financial state and policy of the U.S. The FOMC likewise has an enormous amount of power for a committee that is nearly half composed of what are, at the end of the day, private banking interests.
This state of affairs, coupled with the rocky trajectory of the banking industry over the last several decades, has led to quite a bit of criticism directed at the Federal Reserve. Critics have targeted everything from the structure of the Federal Reserve System, to its very efficacy in achieving its stated goals. This is an extremely complicated discussion. Look to future articles which will look more at the powers granted by the Federal Reserve Act, the loaning practices of the Federal Reserve, and some of these criticisms.
There is certainly a very credible argument that placing substantial control over monetary policy in the hands of private organizations which could profit from those policies is not ideal to say the least. This being said, the power split between public and private within the Federal Reserve System is complicated to unpack. However, it is plain to see that while the function and goals of the Federal Reserve are simple to recite, they are much more difficult to achieve in practice. The question of whether the current structure of the Federal Reserve is the best means of achieving those goals is similarly difficult to parse."
missingmoney.solari.com/the-history-and-organization-of-the-federal-reserve-the-what-and-why-of-the-united-states-most-powerful-banking-organization
t.me/IntuitiveAnalysis/128