This account @RealWahidaAFG is also run by a urine drinker.
He pretends to be an Afghan Muslim, but he is actually Indian—I’m certain of it.
This account has never criticized Israel or spoken against the genocide. They have never posted in support of Gaza.
It must be mass-reported.
He pretends to be an Afghan Muslim, but he is actually Indian—I’m certain of it.
This account has never criticized Israel or spoken against the genocide. They have never posted in support of Gaza.
It must be mass-reported.
Islam is not like Hinduism, which welcomes a rapist who rapes a Muslim girl.
Islam does not teach like Brahma, who had sex with his daughter and later became her husband.
Islam does not allow prostitution like the Pandavas and Draupadi, but Hinduism allows everything.
In Islam, anyone involved in rape will be punished with the death penalty, but in Hinduism, they will welcome the rapist with flowers.
Look here:
Hinduism allows rape, and there is no punishment in Hinduism for rapists. Then why do Hindus welcome the rapist who raped Bilkis Bano?
Why did Brahma have sex with his daughter and later become her husband?
Rape, sex, scam, abuse, prostitution everything is allowed in Hinduism.
Yudhishthira lost his wife in a game of dice, and yet he was considered a Hindu god and a cult rapist.
Islam does not teach like Brahma, who had sex with his daughter and later became her husband.
Islam does not allow prostitution like the Pandavas and Draupadi, but Hinduism allows everything.
In Islam, anyone involved in rape will be punished with the death penalty, but in Hinduism, they will welcome the rapist with flowers.
Look here:
Hinduism allows rape, and there is no punishment in Hinduism for rapists. Then why do Hindus welcome the rapist who raped Bilkis Bano?
Why did Brahma have sex with his daughter and later become her husband?
Rape, sex, scam, abuse, prostitution everything is allowed in Hinduism.
Yudhishthira lost his wife in a game of dice, and yet he was considered a Hindu god and a cult rapist.
Many of the cases against Muslims labeled as terrorism have been mostly false and fabricated. The NIA has proven in several instances that the cases were false.
I think this case will also be proven false.
By the way, sir, according to your logic, if Muslims are radical, then what about the murders committed in the name of the cow?
NIA declared Pragya Thakur a terrorist and sentenced her to death for her role in the Hyderabad and Malegaon bomb blasts, which were terrorist attacks. So why is the BJP government protecting her? Is it only because she is a hardline Hindu terrorist?
What was the religion of those who welcomed Bilkis Bano's rapists, garlanding them and cutting cakes?
A man involved in the Nirbhaya case was named Ram Singh. Does that mean you will label everyone with "Ram" in their name a rapist?
If India has a first terrorist, it is Nathuram Godse, whom the Sangh has now made their idol.
Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam was an educated man, yet Yati Narsinghanand called him a terrorist.
I think this case will also be proven false.
By the way, sir, according to your logic, if Muslims are radical, then what about the murders committed in the name of the cow?
NIA declared Pragya Thakur a terrorist and sentenced her to death for her role in the Hyderabad and Malegaon bomb blasts, which were terrorist attacks. So why is the BJP government protecting her? Is it only because she is a hardline Hindu terrorist?
What was the religion of those who welcomed Bilkis Bano's rapists, garlanding them and cutting cakes?
A man involved in the Nirbhaya case was named Ram Singh. Does that mean you will label everyone with "Ram" in their name a rapist?
If India has a first terrorist, it is Nathuram Godse, whom the Sangh has now made their idol.
Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam was an educated man, yet Yati Narsinghanand called him a terrorist.
Minority Rights
Many of the cases against Muslims labeled as terrorism have been mostly false and fabricated. The NIA has proven in several instances that the cases were false. I think this case will also be proven false. By the way, sir, according to your logic…
Stop your hypocrisy and answer me straight: People who claimed during the Pahalgam terrorist attack that it couldn’t have happened without local collaborators are those same people now going to say that the Delhi attack also required local collaborators? I’m unequivocally opposed to terrorism and will remain so, but I’m also opposed to anyone who uses the fight against terrorism as a pretext to target Muslims. If a terrorist’s religion is relevant, then shouldn’t the religion of the rapist Ram Singh also be taken into account?
Ashok Singhal, Assam’s cabinet minister and a Radical Hindutva supporter, posted a picture of cauliflower with the caption “Bihar approves gobi farming.” He’s using this as a grim nod to the 1989 Bhagalpur massacre, where over 1,000 Muslims were reportedly killed and buried in cauliflower fields to hide the crime. He shared the post right after the elections.
Wake-up call for Bihari Muslims: Stay alert and be ready to protect yourselves.