#sample #essay #writing
In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. Discuss the advantages and disadvantage of young people who decide to do this.
In some parts of the world, youngsters are advised that either work or travel for a year after college before furthering their education in the university. Nevertheless, this discourse looks into the boons and pitfalls associated with this trend, accordingly.
According to a school of thought, the major plus point of taking a break after high school to either get a job or migrate to a different location is probably to earn money in order to take care of their financial needs when they start studies in the high institution. Put differently, students work and save money to help life some financial burden off their parents. In addition to this, another reason could likely be to acquire soft skills. In this respect, scholars volunteer to work in organizations where they learn important life skills such as interpersonal skills, which sets them apart and increase their chances of getting admitted into the school of their choice. To illustrate this, out of the myriad of students that apply each year at the Cambridge university, about 10% are chosen based on their extracurricular qualities, according to Vanguard newspaper,2012.
On the flip side, could there be a downside related to this scenario? Certainly, it follows that one of the main drawback to this trend is probably that students lose interest in their academic pursuit during this period. Students tend to concentrate on their newly found interest when they are out of school for a long time especially when it gives them financial freedom. For instance, according to a survey carried out at the institute of information, university of London (2013), about 60% of students who took a break to either work or travel, never returned to school.
In conclusion, despite the plus points of earning a living and developing skills, working or traveling after secondary education before beginning university studies has a negative effect of students losing focus in their academic ambition.
#Assessment
... youngsters are advised that [to] either...
[Always endeavour to re-read your work as many times as possible in order to be able to fix lapses/slips of this kind.]
...in the high [higher] institution
...to help life some financial burden off their parents. [Construction not quite clear... A bit awkward.]
TA = 8
CC = 7
LR = 8
GRA = 6.5
BS = 7.5
Fantastic job! Keep it up!
Meanwhile, diligently effect the corrections, and further explore some other correlative conjunctions (such as "both/and, not only/but also, as [well] as, neither/nor, etc.,) in order to boost your grammar range.
Join and share⬇️
@IELTSmates
In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. Discuss the advantages and disadvantage of young people who decide to do this.
In some parts of the world, youngsters are advised that either work or travel for a year after college before furthering their education in the university. Nevertheless, this discourse looks into the boons and pitfalls associated with this trend, accordingly.
According to a school of thought, the major plus point of taking a break after high school to either get a job or migrate to a different location is probably to earn money in order to take care of their financial needs when they start studies in the high institution. Put differently, students work and save money to help life some financial burden off their parents. In addition to this, another reason could likely be to acquire soft skills. In this respect, scholars volunteer to work in organizations where they learn important life skills such as interpersonal skills, which sets them apart and increase their chances of getting admitted into the school of their choice. To illustrate this, out of the myriad of students that apply each year at the Cambridge university, about 10% are chosen based on their extracurricular qualities, according to Vanguard newspaper,2012.
On the flip side, could there be a downside related to this scenario? Certainly, it follows that one of the main drawback to this trend is probably that students lose interest in their academic pursuit during this period. Students tend to concentrate on their newly found interest when they are out of school for a long time especially when it gives them financial freedom. For instance, according to a survey carried out at the institute of information, university of London (2013), about 60% of students who took a break to either work or travel, never returned to school.
In conclusion, despite the plus points of earning a living and developing skills, working or traveling after secondary education before beginning university studies has a negative effect of students losing focus in their academic ambition.
#Assessment
... youngsters are advised that [to] either...
[Always endeavour to re-read your work as many times as possible in order to be able to fix lapses/slips of this kind.]
...in the high [higher] institution
...to help life some financial burden off their parents. [Construction not quite clear... A bit awkward.]
TA = 8
CC = 7
LR = 8
GRA = 6.5
BS = 7.5
Fantastic job! Keep it up!
Meanwhile, diligently effect the corrections, and further explore some other correlative conjunctions (such as "both/and, not only/but also, as [well] as, neither/nor, etc.,) in order to boost your grammar range.
Join and share⬇️
@IELTSmates
#Health #essay #sample
"Prevention is better than cure." Out of a country's health budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measures.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? .
The prophylactic initiatives have been playing a superior role to protect people against diseases rather than finding remedies for them since the ancient time. The argument whether a nation's financial blueprint should be deflected towards the protective steps from medicaments – has become a moot point. Notwithstanding, this disquisition delves into these both standpoints, and subsequently will explore my own perspective, accordingly.
Apparently, the exponents that postulate that pre-emptive operations must get a substantial part of the forecast, and should be carried out by the authorities to abbreviate the ailment – have their justification. The rationalization behind their argument might due to the fact that public edification by arranging awareness campaigns can proliferate the importance of hygienic practice in communities; hence, the chances of outbreaks of the deadliest illnesses can be diminished to a great degree. Additionally, researching methods for therapy may take years of practice and experiments to find its positive effects; nonetheless, it may not able to find medical care at all. To epitomize, human science has been investigating a perfect therapeutics for malignant illnesses, such as cancer, and autoimmune disorders, from past many decades, but still there are no successful drugs available in the market that can cure the disease completely. Thus, the vindication for precautionary measures.
Conversely, could the contenders that opine that ministrations only the best option to make the world healthy, be absolutely right? Certainly, it follows that some fatal ailments like heart disorder and stroke need spontaneous treatment than allocating on protection. Moreover, if a large share of the budget will be designated to find a cure than in a short period of time, a country would have the best control on these kinds of diseases. According to one survey by the Chronicle Journal, in 2009, 5% of indigenous people in the rural part of Canada died due to lack of emergency facilities in a hospital, where the government could not provide it.
To conclude, having explored both vantage points, I am in perfect alignment with the school of thought that maintains that obstructive actions ought to be given priority to enlighten civilians, for the sake of lessening outspread of disease, and to improve the quality of healthy environment; however, enough statement should be devoted to pivotal treatments for emergency situations as well.
#Assessment
...has [no doubt/unarguably] become a moot point.
[Or ...has metamorphosised/transmuted into a moot point.]
[Note that it makes sense to incorporate these 'filters' in order to avoid the tendency to over-generalize.]
... might [be] due to... [Always re-read your work.]
Conversely, ...ministrations [of what?] ... [is?] only the best option...[Again, another vague construction... Kindly further simplify to clarify things.]
...by Chronicle Journal in 2019, ...[take note of where the comma is placed]
obstructive actions [precautionary, preemptive, preventative, inhibitory actions]
See PRECISION in vocabulary.
TA = 7.5
CC = 6.5
LR = 7 [Although the lexical resources explored mostly sound quite unnatural and/or not way too skilfully managed, it follows that they are largely less common (rare) constructions.]
GRA = 6.5
BS = 7
Quite impressed that this actually achieved 7 this time.
Credits: IELTSGrammarPoint
Join and share⬇️
@IELTSmates
"Prevention is better than cure." Out of a country's health budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measures.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? .
The prophylactic initiatives have been playing a superior role to protect people against diseases rather than finding remedies for them since the ancient time. The argument whether a nation's financial blueprint should be deflected towards the protective steps from medicaments – has become a moot point. Notwithstanding, this disquisition delves into these both standpoints, and subsequently will explore my own perspective, accordingly.
Apparently, the exponents that postulate that pre-emptive operations must get a substantial part of the forecast, and should be carried out by the authorities to abbreviate the ailment – have their justification. The rationalization behind their argument might due to the fact that public edification by arranging awareness campaigns can proliferate the importance of hygienic practice in communities; hence, the chances of outbreaks of the deadliest illnesses can be diminished to a great degree. Additionally, researching methods for therapy may take years of practice and experiments to find its positive effects; nonetheless, it may not able to find medical care at all. To epitomize, human science has been investigating a perfect therapeutics for malignant illnesses, such as cancer, and autoimmune disorders, from past many decades, but still there are no successful drugs available in the market that can cure the disease completely. Thus, the vindication for precautionary measures.
Conversely, could the contenders that opine that ministrations only the best option to make the world healthy, be absolutely right? Certainly, it follows that some fatal ailments like heart disorder and stroke need spontaneous treatment than allocating on protection. Moreover, if a large share of the budget will be designated to find a cure than in a short period of time, a country would have the best control on these kinds of diseases. According to one survey by the Chronicle Journal, in 2009, 5% of indigenous people in the rural part of Canada died due to lack of emergency facilities in a hospital, where the government could not provide it.
To conclude, having explored both vantage points, I am in perfect alignment with the school of thought that maintains that obstructive actions ought to be given priority to enlighten civilians, for the sake of lessening outspread of disease, and to improve the quality of healthy environment; however, enough statement should be devoted to pivotal treatments for emergency situations as well.
#Assessment
...has [no doubt/unarguably] become a moot point.
[Or ...has metamorphosised/transmuted into a moot point.]
[Note that it makes sense to incorporate these 'filters' in order to avoid the tendency to over-generalize.]
... might [be] due to... [Always re-read your work.]
Conversely, ...ministrations [of what?] ... [is?] only the best option...[Again, another vague construction... Kindly further simplify to clarify things.]
...by Chronicle Journal in 2019, ...[take note of where the comma is placed]
obstructive actions [precautionary, preemptive, preventative, inhibitory actions]
See PRECISION in vocabulary.
TA = 7.5
CC = 6.5
LR = 7 [Although the lexical resources explored mostly sound quite unnatural and/or not way too skilfully managed, it follows that they are largely less common (rare) constructions.]
GRA = 6.5
BS = 7
Quite impressed that this actually achieved 7 this time.
Credits: IELTSGrammarPoint
Join and share⬇️
@IELTSmates
#writing #task2 #sample
Sample Band 7+ Essay
Writing Task 2
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
In many countries, young people are finding it harder and harder to find permanent jobs. Why is this happening? What can be done to improve the situation?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
In this fast-moving age, with the development of education and modern technologies, people strive to have a secure job after graduating from colleges and universities. Despite their efforts, so many young adults in different parts of the world have a negative experience of finding a long-term job.
It so happens that most colleges and universities focus on students’ academic performance much more than their practical skills. Unfortunately, many companies reserve permanent job opportunities for experienced applicants because there is no need to invest much in their training. Lack of practical experience in new graduates puts them at a disadvantage as far as companies are concerned. The situation is made worse by the abundance of advanced technologies that can easily replace human labor. Robots and computers work more efficiently and with higher precision than humans. That shrinks the pool of available job placements even more, as companies only need to hire highly educated and experienced staff.
Fortunately, there is a number of solutions that can help inexperienced workers gain permanent employment. An obvious one is that universities could offer internships to their students, or arrange workshops in addition to classwork. This would help students to get training and experience in their respective fields. Also, the government could examine the demands of changing labor market and steer young people towards professions that will be popular in the coming years. Together with colleges and universities the government could create special awareness programs for graduates, providing them with an overview of various job offers and their benefits. This way students would be able to choose the right jobs for themselves.
To sum up, lack of demand in the labour market and insufficient experience are two major reasons why many young people have trouble finding a permanent position. Helping them gain hands-on experience as part of their studies and educating them about career options early on is key to improving the employment outcome for them.
Join ans share ↙
@IELTSmates
Sample Band 7+ Essay
Writing Task 2
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
In many countries, young people are finding it harder and harder to find permanent jobs. Why is this happening? What can be done to improve the situation?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
In this fast-moving age, with the development of education and modern technologies, people strive to have a secure job after graduating from colleges and universities. Despite their efforts, so many young adults in different parts of the world have a negative experience of finding a long-term job.
It so happens that most colleges and universities focus on students’ academic performance much more than their practical skills. Unfortunately, many companies reserve permanent job opportunities for experienced applicants because there is no need to invest much in their training. Lack of practical experience in new graduates puts them at a disadvantage as far as companies are concerned. The situation is made worse by the abundance of advanced technologies that can easily replace human labor. Robots and computers work more efficiently and with higher precision than humans. That shrinks the pool of available job placements even more, as companies only need to hire highly educated and experienced staff.
Fortunately, there is a number of solutions that can help inexperienced workers gain permanent employment. An obvious one is that universities could offer internships to their students, or arrange workshops in addition to classwork. This would help students to get training and experience in their respective fields. Also, the government could examine the demands of changing labor market and steer young people towards professions that will be popular in the coming years. Together with colleges and universities the government could create special awareness programs for graduates, providing them with an overview of various job offers and their benefits. This way students would be able to choose the right jobs for themselves.
To sum up, lack of demand in the labour market and insufficient experience are two major reasons why many young people have trouble finding a permanent position. Helping them gain hands-on experience as part of their studies and educating them about career options early on is key to improving the employment outcome for them.
Join ans share ↙
@IELTSmates
Part 1 Memorizing things - @IELTSmates.pdf
221 KB
#Part1 #Speaking #Vocab #Sample
Memorizing Things
Make best use of this guys. Try to learn ideas and topic related words first and prepare your own sample.
Join and share ↙️
@IELTSmates
Memorizing Things
Make best use of this guys. Try to learn ideas and topic related words first and prepare your own sample.
Join and share ↙️
@IELTSmates
Nodirjon's IELTSmates
Photo
#writing #sample
The graph compares the percentage of households in England and Wales living in either a rental property or their own home in 1918, 1939, and 1953, and at ten-year intervals between 1961 and 2011.
Overall, the two sectors followed opposite trends, with renting generally declining as home ownership increased. However, towards the end of the period, there is evidence of this trend reversing and home ownership did not reach renting's highest level.
Renting was its peak in 1918, accounting for just under 80% of all households. Despite declining almost continually from this point, it remained the dominant category until 1971, when it reached parity with homeownership. Apart from 1939 and 1953, the figures dropped in almost every decade until 1991, when the decline slowed and renting increased slightly in 2011. Nevertheless, in the final 40 years, significantly fewer people (40% or lower) were living in rented accommodation.
This contrasts starkly with the data for home ownership, which climbed steadily throughout, again with the exception of 1939 and 1953. Notably, the increases in owning a home corresponded with the falls in renting, and from 1981 onwards, it was increasingly more common than renting. However, the figure peaked at below 70% in 2001, almost 10% less than the rental peak, and by 2011 had fallen to approximately 65%
Join and share ↙
@IELTSmates
The graph compares the percentage of households in England and Wales living in either a rental property or their own home in 1918, 1939, and 1953, and at ten-year intervals between 1961 and 2011.
Overall, the two sectors followed opposite trends, with renting generally declining as home ownership increased. However, towards the end of the period, there is evidence of this trend reversing and home ownership did not reach renting's highest level.
Renting was its peak in 1918, accounting for just under 80% of all households. Despite declining almost continually from this point, it remained the dominant category until 1971, when it reached parity with homeownership. Apart from 1939 and 1953, the figures dropped in almost every decade until 1991, when the decline slowed and renting increased slightly in 2011. Nevertheless, in the final 40 years, significantly fewer people (40% or lower) were living in rented accommodation.
This contrasts starkly with the data for home ownership, which climbed steadily throughout, again with the exception of 1939 and 1953. Notably, the increases in owning a home corresponded with the falls in renting, and from 1981 onwards, it was increasingly more common than renting. However, the figure peaked at below 70% in 2001, almost 10% less than the rental peak, and by 2011 had fallen to approximately 65%
Join and share ↙
@IELTSmates
Nodirjon's IELTSmates
Photo
#task1 #writing #sample
The charts compare the amount of water used for agriculture, industry and homes around the world, and water use in Brazil and the Democratic Republic of Congo.
It is clear that global water needs rose significantly between 1900 and 2000, and that agriculture accounted for the largest proportion of water used. We can also see that water consumption was considerably higher in Brazil than in the Congo.
In 1900, around 500km³ of water was used by the agriculture sector worldwide. The figures for industrial and domestic water consumption stood at around one fifth of that amount. By 2000, global water use for agriculture had increased to around 3000km³, industrial water use had risen to just under half that amount, and domestic consumption had reached approximately 500km³.
In the year 2000, the populations of Brazil and the Congo were 176 million and 5.2 million respectively. Water consumption per person in Brazil, at 359m³, was much higher than that in the Congo, at only 8m³, and this could be explained by the fact that Brazil had 265 times more irrigated land.
(184 words, band 7+)
Join and share ↙️
@IELTSmates
The charts compare the amount of water used for agriculture, industry and homes around the world, and water use in Brazil and the Democratic Republic of Congo.
It is clear that global water needs rose significantly between 1900 and 2000, and that agriculture accounted for the largest proportion of water used. We can also see that water consumption was considerably higher in Brazil than in the Congo.
In 1900, around 500km³ of water was used by the agriculture sector worldwide. The figures for industrial and domestic water consumption stood at around one fifth of that amount. By 2000, global water use for agriculture had increased to around 3000km³, industrial water use had risen to just under half that amount, and domestic consumption had reached approximately 500km³.
In the year 2000, the populations of Brazil and the Congo were 176 million and 5.2 million respectively. Water consumption per person in Brazil, at 359m³, was much higher than that in the Congo, at only 8m³, and this could be explained by the fact that Brazil had 265 times more irrigated land.
(184 words, band 7+)
Join and share ↙️
@IELTSmates
Part 1 - Chocolate.pdf
216.9 KB
#useful #speaking #sample
January - April Speaking samples
Part 1 - Chocolate
1. Useful vocabulary
2. Set 1 - IELTS Simon.com
3. Set 2 - Rewind.com
4. Set 3 - IELTS Material.com
5. Set 4 - IELTS Liz.com
P.S. Watch the video below to understand how to use this handout.
Join and share⬇️
@IELTSmates_Uz
January - April Speaking samples
Part 1 - Chocolate
1. Useful vocabulary
2. Set 1 - IELTS Simon.com
3. Set 2 - Rewind.com
4. Set 3 - IELTS Material.com
5. Set 4 - IELTS Liz.com
P.S. Watch the video below to understand how to use this handout.
Join and share
@IELTSmates_Uz
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
#video_explanation
How to work with Speaking Samples?
P.S. You can find another copy of this in a smaller size in the comments section below.
Join and share🔽
@IELTSmates_Uz
How to work with Speaking Samples?
P.S. You can find another copy of this in a smaller size in the comments section below.
Join and share
@IELTSmates_Uz
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Part 1 - Staying Up Late.pdf
63.6 KB
#useful #speaking #sample
January - April Speaking samples
Part 1 - Staying Up Late
1. Useful vocabulary
2. Set 1 - Paramount IELTS.com
3. Set 2 - SuccessWithIELTS.com
4. Set 3 - GoldEagledu.com
5. Set 4 - IELTS Quang Binh.com
P.S. Watch the video to understand how to use this handout.
Join and share⬇️
@IELTSmates_Uz
January - April Speaking samples
Part 1 - Staying Up Late
1. Useful vocabulary
2. Set 1 - Paramount IELTS.com
3. Set 2 - SuccessWithIELTS.com
4. Set 3 - GoldEagledu.com
5. Set 4 - IELTS Quang Binh.com
P.S. Watch the video to understand how to use this handout.
Join and share
@IELTSmates_Uz
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
#essay #task2 #sample
Since its discovery, nuclear energy has been a controversial technology.
What are some dangers connected with nuclear energy?
In your opinion, is nuclear energy a good or bad technology?
Nuclear energy has always been a much debated technology. This essay will discuss the dangers posed by its use and decide whether it is beneficial or harmful for humanity.
There are several issues associated with nuclear energy. These problems are evidenced in its history of disasters and destruction. Once the power of the atom had been discovered, it was almost immediately weaponised and used to destroy two cities filled with civilians. Even when nuclear technology was used for peaceful means, tragedy has still been connected with its use. The Chernobyl and Fukushima disasters along with many other smaller ones show that this technology is never truly safe even in supposedly technologically advanced countries.
However, nuclear technology is the best choice in many situations. The only current realistic affordable alternative to nuclear energy is the burning of fossil fuels. Studies show that fossil fuel emissions have claimed many more lives than nuclear disasters because air pollution slowly poisons people’s throats, lungs and respiratory systems. In addition, even though some may argue that solar, wind, wave or hydroelectricity are better alternatives, some cold landlocked nations such as Switzerland do not have consistent access to sunlight, wind or flowing rivers year-round. For these countries it would appear that nuclear energy, despite its dangers, is the best option.
In conclusion, although nuclear technology is undoubtedly dangerous due to radioactivity and its proven history, I believe in some contexts it is actually the best alternative to other more harmful or unreliable energy sources.
©️Beyden Dingle (Overall 9.0, W: 8.5)
Join and share🔽
@IELTSmates_Uz
Since its discovery, nuclear energy has been a controversial technology.
What are some dangers connected with nuclear energy?
In your opinion, is nuclear energy a good or bad technology?
Nuclear energy has always been a much debated technology. This essay will discuss the dangers posed by its use and decide whether it is beneficial or harmful for humanity.
There are several issues associated with nuclear energy. These problems are evidenced in its history of disasters and destruction. Once the power of the atom had been discovered, it was almost immediately weaponised and used to destroy two cities filled with civilians. Even when nuclear technology was used for peaceful means, tragedy has still been connected with its use. The Chernobyl and Fukushima disasters along with many other smaller ones show that this technology is never truly safe even in supposedly technologically advanced countries.
However, nuclear technology is the best choice in many situations. The only current realistic affordable alternative to nuclear energy is the burning of fossil fuels. Studies show that fossil fuel emissions have claimed many more lives than nuclear disasters because air pollution slowly poisons people’s throats, lungs and respiratory systems. In addition, even though some may argue that solar, wind, wave or hydroelectricity are better alternatives, some cold landlocked nations such as Switzerland do not have consistent access to sunlight, wind or flowing rivers year-round. For these countries it would appear that nuclear energy, despite its dangers, is the best option.
In conclusion, although nuclear technology is undoubtedly dangerous due to radioactivity and its proven history, I believe in some contexts it is actually the best alternative to other more harmful or unreliable energy sources.
©️Beyden Dingle (Overall 9.0, W: 8.5)
Join and share
@IELTSmates_Uz
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
#essay #task2 #sample
Some people argue that space exploration has had more to do with national pride than international effort.
To what extent do you agree with this?
How do you think space exploration will change in the future?
It has been argued that the history of space exploration has been motivated more by nationalism than a desire to further humanity’s accomplishments. This essay will discuss this point of view and explore the new ways humanity will approach space exploration.
Although nationalism has been a factor in space exploration in the past, there are two clear reasons why humanity’s explorations of space should be considered as generally an international endeavor. Firstly, modern collaboration between countries with the international space station shows that outside the earth’s atmosphere, nations can come together to further humanity’s understanding and exploration of the universe. If space exploration were still grounded in nationalism, the very existence of the space station would be impossible. Secondly, the advent of private enterprise attempting to make humans a multiplanetary species shows that nationalism is becoming irrelevant. When companies like SpaceX finally reach Mars, it is more likely that the banner of a private company will be planted than the flag of a country.
The future holds many exciting possibilities in the exploration of our universe. It seems that the new ambition driving space technology innovation is the desire to go to Mars and live permanently beyond earth. Thus, the future of space exploration is likely to be based around planet colonization and living in harsh environments. In the more distant future, another possible change will be the desire for humans to achieve interstellar travel. Even though for now this seems impossible, with the discovery of new technology and new understandings of the nature of the universe, it is likely a matter of time before humanity will find a way to leave our solar system.
In conclusion, I believe that as a whole, humanity’s exploration of space has been driven more by shared sense of humanity than national pride, and it is no doubt true that the future of space exploration will go far beyond humanity’s current achievements.
©️Beyden Dingle (Overall 9.0, W: 8.5)
Join and share🔽
@IELTSmates_Uz
Some people argue that space exploration has had more to do with national pride than international effort.
To what extent do you agree with this?
How do you think space exploration will change in the future?
It has been argued that the history of space exploration has been motivated more by nationalism than a desire to further humanity’s accomplishments. This essay will discuss this point of view and explore the new ways humanity will approach space exploration.
Although nationalism has been a factor in space exploration in the past, there are two clear reasons why humanity’s explorations of space should be considered as generally an international endeavor. Firstly, modern collaboration between countries with the international space station shows that outside the earth’s atmosphere, nations can come together to further humanity’s understanding and exploration of the universe. If space exploration were still grounded in nationalism, the very existence of the space station would be impossible. Secondly, the advent of private enterprise attempting to make humans a multiplanetary species shows that nationalism is becoming irrelevant. When companies like SpaceX finally reach Mars, it is more likely that the banner of a private company will be planted than the flag of a country.
The future holds many exciting possibilities in the exploration of our universe. It seems that the new ambition driving space technology innovation is the desire to go to Mars and live permanently beyond earth. Thus, the future of space exploration is likely to be based around planet colonization and living in harsh environments. In the more distant future, another possible change will be the desire for humans to achieve interstellar travel. Even though for now this seems impossible, with the discovery of new technology and new understandings of the nature of the universe, it is likely a matter of time before humanity will find a way to leave our solar system.
In conclusion, I believe that as a whole, humanity’s exploration of space has been driven more by shared sense of humanity than national pride, and it is no doubt true that the future of space exploration will go far beyond humanity’s current achievements.
©️Beyden Dingle (Overall 9.0, W: 8.5)
Join and share
@IELTSmates_Uz
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
#essay #task2 #sample #opinion #balanced
Some educationalists argue that non-exam, arts-based subjects, such as music, drama, art and craft, should be compulsory in the secondary-school curriculum. They believe that activities such as these can improve overall academic performance.
To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Some education experts believe that arts subjects should be mandatory in high school due to the benefits they provide to academic outcomes. Although this approach may not be ideal every case, I am of the opinion that arts subjects should generally be a required part of the school program.
There are a number of issues associated with making arts subjects mandatory. First of all, not all schools have the resources to provide this kind of an education. In the case of schools in poor countries or on tight budgets, attention must be given to subjects that the students will need for a financially successful future as a priority. Furthermore, it is true that certain arts subjects are not a perfect match for every student. Many students are introverted and shy, so to force them to take classes like drama and performance may be counterproductive.
However, in most cases, requiring students to have at least a certain amount of exposure to arts-based subjects is the right decision. Research has shown that learning a range of skills has a positive impact on cognitive ability and intelligence. For example, when Finland began to focus their education on exposing their students to a wider variety of subjects, the academic performance of their children rose to the best in the world. In addition, arts subjects have obvious benefits beyond academics. Arts subjects have the potential to introduce young people to activities, such as playing an instrument, that they may enjoy for the rest of their lives.
In conclusion, providing extensive arts programs is not realistic for every school, and not all students should not be forced to do every kind of art class. However, I do believe that whenever realistically possible, it should be mandatory for students to have some involvement in the arts.
©️ Beyden Dingle(Overall 9.0, W:8.5)
Join and share🔽
@IELTSmates_Uz
Some educationalists argue that non-exam, arts-based subjects, such as music, drama, art and craft, should be compulsory in the secondary-school curriculum. They believe that activities such as these can improve overall academic performance.
To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Some education experts believe that arts subjects should be mandatory in high school due to the benefits they provide to academic outcomes. Although this approach may not be ideal every case, I am of the opinion that arts subjects should generally be a required part of the school program.
There are a number of issues associated with making arts subjects mandatory. First of all, not all schools have the resources to provide this kind of an education. In the case of schools in poor countries or on tight budgets, attention must be given to subjects that the students will need for a financially successful future as a priority. Furthermore, it is true that certain arts subjects are not a perfect match for every student. Many students are introverted and shy, so to force them to take classes like drama and performance may be counterproductive.
However, in most cases, requiring students to have at least a certain amount of exposure to arts-based subjects is the right decision. Research has shown that learning a range of skills has a positive impact on cognitive ability and intelligence. For example, when Finland began to focus their education on exposing their students to a wider variety of subjects, the academic performance of their children rose to the best in the world. In addition, arts subjects have obvious benefits beyond academics. Arts subjects have the potential to introduce young people to activities, such as playing an instrument, that they may enjoy for the rest of their lives.
In conclusion, providing extensive arts programs is not realistic for every school, and not all students should not be forced to do every kind of art class. However, I do believe that whenever realistically possible, it should be mandatory for students to have some involvement in the arts.
©️ Beyden Dingle(Overall 9.0, W:8.5)
Join and share
@IELTSmates_Uz
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Nodirjon's IELTSmates
#task1 #map #FreshOutOfOven Join and share 🔽 @IELTSmates_Uz
#sample #model
The map illustrates the development of the town of Bellingham between 1980 and 2019. Overall, there was a substantial increase in the size of Bellingham. Included in this were the development of the town's residential areas and the establishment of a range of public services and infrastructure.
The first major phase of development began in 1990 with the establishment of a train line. Over the next decade, the town of Bellingham grew alongside the major road and around this train station. A school was built in this area in 1993 and a hospital close by in 2001.
Between 2010 and 2019, the second and largest phase of development occurred. This began with the building of a freeway in 2010. After this, Bellingham grew dramatically due to government assisted housing development alongside the freeway, railway line and major roads. Another addition to the town in this period was the construction of a sports stadium in 2012 nearby where the railway line intersects with the freeway.
©️IELTS Online(by Macquarie University)
Join and share🔽
@IELTSmates_Uz
The map illustrates the development of the town of Bellingham between 1980 and 2019. Overall, there was a substantial increase in the size of Bellingham. Included in this were the development of the town's residential areas and the establishment of a range of public services and infrastructure.
The first major phase of development began in 1990 with the establishment of a train line. Over the next decade, the town of Bellingham grew alongside the major road and around this train station. A school was built in this area in 1993 and a hospital close by in 2001.
Between 2010 and 2019, the second and largest phase of development occurred. This began with the building of a freeway in 2010. After this, Bellingham grew dramatically due to government assisted housing development alongside the freeway, railway line and major roads. Another addition to the town in this period was the construction of a sports stadium in 2012 nearby where the railway line intersects with the freeway.
©️IELTS Online(by Macquarie University)
Join and share
@IELTSmates_Uz
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Nodirjon's IELTSmates
#task2 #ClassPractice Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to poorer countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
#sample #NotModel
Giving financial support to impoverished countries is not a solution to their poverty. Therefore, other types of help are proposed to be given to poor countries instead of giving money directly. I completely agree with this view.
There are two main reasons why the funds given may not help poor countries. Firstly, this may put even more stress in the economy of the country if the financial aid is not used wisely. This is because the poor countries will eventually need to give the money back. Unless they can do so, a possible case scenario can be giving out their land or natural resources to affluent countries, which can be even more costly in the long run. More importantly, there is a risk of not using the money for the original purpose. This usually happens when the officials of the poor country are corrupt. They tend to put their own personal needs ahead of their fellow citizens and only a small proportion of the population, usually a handful of people, can benefit from this type of help. Thus, supporting poor countries in this way does not always help them grow financially as a whole.
Nevertheless, there are other ways of supporting poor countries. Instead of giving money directly, rich countries can consider spending these funds on the education of the young generation in poor countries. This can be in forms of scholarships, bursaries, and grants in developed countries with specific terms and conditions. These can include working for a fixed period of time (3-5 years) in the country where they get knowledge and experience, and then going back to their own home countries to contribute to the development of their own field of work and study. Similarly, rich countries can send their experts for some time to share their expertise in this or that area of the development. They can pay higher amounts of salaries and then get the money back from poor countries. The experienced teachers, doctors, builders, and of course finance experts of the developed countries may educate their less experienced counterparts in the third world countries, resulting in improvements of these areas and overall well-being of the financially-struggled countries.
In conclusion, there are two main disadvantages of giving direct financial support to poor countries: handing in their precious resources and mismanagement of the funds. However, rich countries can help more by investing in the education and human resources of the poor countries. Therefore, I support the latter view.
411 words
45 mins...
Join and share🔽
@IELTSmates_Uz
Giving financial support to impoverished countries is not a solution to their poverty. Therefore, other types of help are proposed to be given to poor countries instead of giving money directly. I completely agree with this view.
There are two main reasons why the funds given may not help poor countries. Firstly, this may put even more stress in the economy of the country if the financial aid is not used wisely. This is because the poor countries will eventually need to give the money back. Unless they can do so, a possible case scenario can be giving out their land or natural resources to affluent countries, which can be even more costly in the long run. More importantly, there is a risk of not using the money for the original purpose. This usually happens when the officials of the poor country are corrupt. They tend to put their own personal needs ahead of their fellow citizens and only a small proportion of the population, usually a handful of people, can benefit from this type of help. Thus, supporting poor countries in this way does not always help them grow financially as a whole.
Nevertheless, there are other ways of supporting poor countries. Instead of giving money directly, rich countries can consider spending these funds on the education of the young generation in poor countries. This can be in forms of scholarships, bursaries, and grants in developed countries with specific terms and conditions. These can include working for a fixed period of time (3-5 years) in the country where they get knowledge and experience, and then going back to their own home countries to contribute to the development of their own field of work and study. Similarly, rich countries can send their experts for some time to share their expertise in this or that area of the development. They can pay higher amounts of salaries and then get the money back from poor countries. The experienced teachers, doctors, builders, and of course finance experts of the developed countries may educate their less experienced counterparts in the third world countries, resulting in improvements of these areas and overall well-being of the financially-struggled countries.
In conclusion, there are two main disadvantages of giving direct financial support to poor countries: handing in their precious resources and mismanagement of the funds. However, rich countries can help more by investing in the education and human resources of the poor countries. Therefore, I support the latter view.
411 words
45 mins...
Join and share
@IELTSmates_Uz
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
#band6 #sample
The bar chart shows the percentages of men and women with illiteracy in different parts of the world last year. Overall, we can see that women are higher levels of illiteracy than men.
Develop countries have the lowest levels of illiteracy on the chart. Only one percent of men and two percent of women are illiteracy. However, in Latin American and Caribbean countries the percent is higher with ten percent of men and little more women. Moreover, In East Asia and Oceania less men are illiterate than in Latin America and Caribbean countries but the figure for women is much more higher at 20%. In Sub Saharan Africa rates are more than twice in East Asia and Oceania. More than thirty percent of men and a little lesser than fifty percent of women. On the other hand in Arab states this gap is even more with less than thirty percentage of men and more than fifty percent of women can’t read or write. South Asia has the highest illiteracy rates on the chart for both men and women.
Join and share🔽
@IELTSmates_Uz
The bar chart shows the percentages of men and women with illiteracy in different parts of the world last year. Overall, we can see that women are higher levels of illiteracy than men.
Develop countries have the lowest levels of illiteracy on the chart. Only one percent of men and two percent of women are illiteracy. However, in Latin American and Caribbean countries the percent is higher with ten percent of men and little more women. Moreover, In East Asia and Oceania less men are illiterate than in Latin America and Caribbean countries but the figure for women is much more higher at 20%. In Sub Saharan Africa rates are more than twice in East Asia and Oceania. More than thirty percent of men and a little lesser than fifty percent of women. On the other hand in Arab states this gap is even more with less than thirty percentage of men and more than fifty percent of women can’t read or write. South Asia has the highest illiteracy rates on the chart for both men and women.
Join and share
@IELTSmates_Uz
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
#band7 #sample
The bar chart shows the rate of illiteracy in different parts of the world, broken down into men and women last year. Overall, we can see that there is big difference in different parts of the world but that woman are much less likely to be able to be literate.
We can see that people living in Sub Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Arab States are much more likely to be illiterate. Approximately half women in these countries is unable to read or write with the figure as high as 56% in South Asia. However, the figure for men is lower, at around 30%. However, this is still high.
In contrast, in other countries the vast majority of people read and write. In developped countries nearly everybody is literate. However, there are slight more women with illiteracy than men. In East Asia and Oceania it is clear that there is big difference between men and women. Less than ten percent of men are illiterate but for women the figure is more than double at 20%.
The bar chart shows the rate of illiteracy in different parts of the world, broken down into men and women last year. Overall, we can see that there is big difference in different parts of the world but that woman are much less likely to be able to be literate.
We can see that people living in Sub Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Arab States are much more likely to be illiterate. Approximately half women in these countries is unable to read or write with the figure as high as 56% in South Asia. However, the figure for men is lower, at around 30%. However, this is still high.
In contrast, in other countries the vast majority of people read and write. In developped countries nearly everybody is literate. However, there are slight more women with illiteracy than men. In East Asia and Oceania it is clear that there is big difference between men and women. Less than ten percent of men are illiterate but for women the figure is more than double at 20%.