This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
#IELTStips #TASKTWO #Writing
INTRODUCTION: no framework!!!
You should know that band 7.0+ essays hardly ever come thanks to templates. Simply show that you do not have any framed essay in your had. Give your opinion in the essay without any pre-learnt phrases like
"This essay will discuss..."
"There are different opinions about whether or not..."
"Baaa...."🐑🐑🐑
You have only one frame to bear in mind - formal style!
@IELTS_bro
INTRODUCTION: no framework!!!
You should know that band 7.0+ essays hardly ever come thanks to templates. Simply show that you do not have any framed essay in your had. Give your opinion in the essay without any pre-learnt phrases like
"This essay will discuss..."
"There are different opinions about whether or not..."
"Baaa...."🐑🐑🐑
You have only one frame to bear in mind - formal style!
@IELTS_bro
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
#IELTStips #TASKTWO #Writing
BODY PARAGRAPHS: here we have two tips.
Tip 1: do not complicate!!!
All too often, candidates over-complicate their essays, which is vividly noticed in the body paragraphs. It mostly happens when too much emphasis is put on so-called ADVANCED VOCABULARY/ paraphrasing.
Bros, do we use flamboyant vocab in our native language, just not to repeat our words or seem cleverer?)
No!!!
So here we go with the tip. Instead of repeating the words (even in paraphrasing, the meaning is repeated), try to focus on reasoning. Keep answer Wh-questions like "what's next?", "So what?", "What do you mean?".
Tip 2: give at least one, but striking example!!!
Have you ever noticed, in some reading materials, we cannot understand the point of the writer. But as soon as the writer provides an example, every word that we have read becomes meaningful. The same is true with essays. An example can be a real-life case that can prove your point, or even a convincing fake fact.
@IELTS_bro
BODY PARAGRAPHS: here we have two tips.
Tip 1: do not complicate!!!
All too often, candidates over-complicate their essays, which is vividly noticed in the body paragraphs. It mostly happens when too much emphasis is put on so-called ADVANCED VOCABULARY/ paraphrasing.
Bros, do we use flamboyant vocab in our native language, just not to repeat our words or seem cleverer?)
No!!!
So here we go with the tip. Instead of repeating the words (even in paraphrasing, the meaning is repeated), try to focus on reasoning. Keep answer Wh-questions like "what's next?", "So what?", "What do you mean?".
Tip 2: give at least one, but striking example!!!
Have you ever noticed, in some reading materials, we cannot understand the point of the writer. But as soon as the writer provides an example, every word that we have read becomes meaningful. The same is true with essays. An example can be a real-life case that can prove your point, or even a convincing fake fact.
@IELTS_bro
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
#IELTStips #TASKTWO #Writing
CONCLUSION: repeat your standpoint
As its name suggests, it is Conclusion, not a new-idea paragraph. After reading 250+ words in the previous paragraphs, examiners may get confusing in what you mean. So, gather their minds up in your Conclusion, providing the main viewpoint on the topic.
P.S now let's see how it looks in the essay)👇👇👇
@IELTS_bro
CONCLUSION: repeat your standpoint
As its name suggests, it is Conclusion, not a new-idea paragraph. After reading 250+ words in the previous paragraphs, examiners may get confusing in what you mean. So, gather their minds up in your Conclusion, providing the main viewpoint on the topic.
P.S now let's see how it looks in the essay)👇👇👇
@IELTS_bro
#tasktwo #modelessay
Are you ready to read a new essay written by me?)
Then scroll down, analyse and learn
👉 @IELTS_bro 👈
👉 @IELTS_bro 👈
👉 @IETS_bro 👈
Are you ready to read a new essay written by me?)
Then scroll down, analyse and learn
👉 @IELTS_bro 👈
👉 @IELTS_bro 👈
👉 @IETS_bro 👈
#tasktwo
Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is claimed that individuals cannot contribute to the betterment of the environment, and the only bodies sufficiently powerful to do this are government and big companies. However, although governments and companies are indeed more superior to individuals in terms of environmental protection, I disagree that the efforts of individuals are useless.
On the one hand, governments and large organizations have bigger opportunities to protect the environment than individuals. Firstly, governments can introduce laws and regulations that ban throwing away wastes to land and water and cutting down trees, while ordinary citizens cannot create rules and make people obey. Similarly, large companies can apply technology and workers in order to conduct regular massive clean-ups on land and in the water, and deter harm to the environment, which might be too expensive for individuals.
Having said that, individuals are also capable to take care of the environment to a large extent. One way individuals support the environment is by recycling and reusing wastes. Since one of the the major culprits of environmental deterioration is waste coming from domestic use, individuals who recycle and reuse products would significantly contribute to the welfare of the surroundings. Furthermore, individuals can plant more trees and flowers in their yards and gardens to sustain fresh air of the environment. While the flora is being reduced by the intention of governments and companies to widen roads and raise accommodation buildings, the small contributions of all individuals can result in significant benefits to the environment, and make a big difference eventually.
To conclude, governments and companies do possess higher chances to improve the natural settings than individuals. However, I am convinced that the contribution of individuals should not be overlooked either.
By @ielts_bro
Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is claimed that individuals cannot contribute to the betterment of the environment, and the only bodies sufficiently powerful to do this are government and big companies. However, although governments and companies are indeed more superior to individuals in terms of environmental protection, I disagree that the efforts of individuals are useless.
On the one hand, governments and large organizations have bigger opportunities to protect the environment than individuals. Firstly, governments can introduce laws and regulations that ban throwing away wastes to land and water and cutting down trees, while ordinary citizens cannot create rules and make people obey. Similarly, large companies can apply technology and workers in order to conduct regular massive clean-ups on land and in the water, and deter harm to the environment, which might be too expensive for individuals.
Having said that, individuals are also capable to take care of the environment to a large extent. One way individuals support the environment is by recycling and reusing wastes. Since one of the the major culprits of environmental deterioration is waste coming from domestic use, individuals who recycle and reuse products would significantly contribute to the welfare of the surroundings. Furthermore, individuals can plant more trees and flowers in their yards and gardens to sustain fresh air of the environment. While the flora is being reduced by the intention of governments and companies to widen roads and raise accommodation buildings, the small contributions of all individuals can result in significant benefits to the environment, and make a big difference eventually.
To conclude, governments and companies do possess higher chances to improve the natural settings than individuals. However, I am convinced that the contribution of individuals should not be overlooked either.
By @ielts_bro
It is thought that governments should invest more money in building highrise buildings to attract more tourists.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
#Dubai#travel#tasktwo#ielts#essay
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
#Dubai#travel#tasktwo#ielts#essay
#tasktwo
Nowadays more and more people want to get things done instantly (services, information, tasks).
Why is this?
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
In today's society, there is an increasing desire among individuals to have tasks completed, and access services and information immediately. In this essay, I will discuss why this issue exists, and give my opinion on whether it is a positive or negative development.
There are several reasons why people expect to have everything accomplished instantaneously. One of them is hectic lifestyle of contemporary individuals. Most modern people tend to rush to accomplish tasks as they have other duties to proceed to. As a short delay in one task or service may consequently cause delays in accomplishing the next plans, people want everything to finish quickly. Another reason for such a high expectation is the availability of modern technology. The majority of technological advancements have indeed enabled people to finish any task within a shorter time span. For example, modern AI programmes generate ideas to solve problems within seconds, high speed vehicles provide fast delivery and companies prioritize quick services to achieve customer satisfaction. As a result, people have become used to having everything done instantly.
As for my verdict on this development, I am convinced that while there are clear benefits associated with the increasing demand for instant results, there are also negative implications. On the positive note, this leaves more time to spend with family, friends and colleagues, fostering connectivity and collaboration. However, this desire can lead to impatience and a lack of perseverance. When individuals become accustomed to immediate outcomes, they may struggle when faced with situations that require time and effort. This can hinder personal growth and resilience in the face of challenges. Moreover, the pursuit of instant results can lead to impulsive decision-making, overspending, and a lack of commitment to long-term goals. For instance, individuals may opt for quick fixes, such as crash diets or fad exercise routines, instead of adopting sustainable lifestyle changes for better health.
In conclusion, the desire for instant results in today's society is fueled by a busy lifestyle and modern technology. While there are benefits like more time for personal connections, it also leads to impatience and a lack of perseverance. Striking a balance between instant gratification and patience is crucial for personal growth and resilience.
By @IELTS_bro
Nowadays more and more people want to get things done instantly (services, information, tasks).
Why is this?
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
In today's society, there is an increasing desire among individuals to have tasks completed, and access services and information immediately. In this essay, I will discuss why this issue exists, and give my opinion on whether it is a positive or negative development.
There are several reasons why people expect to have everything accomplished instantaneously. One of them is hectic lifestyle of contemporary individuals. Most modern people tend to rush to accomplish tasks as they have other duties to proceed to. As a short delay in one task or service may consequently cause delays in accomplishing the next plans, people want everything to finish quickly. Another reason for such a high expectation is the availability of modern technology. The majority of technological advancements have indeed enabled people to finish any task within a shorter time span. For example, modern AI programmes generate ideas to solve problems within seconds, high speed vehicles provide fast delivery and companies prioritize quick services to achieve customer satisfaction. As a result, people have become used to having everything done instantly.
As for my verdict on this development, I am convinced that while there are clear benefits associated with the increasing demand for instant results, there are also negative implications. On the positive note, this leaves more time to spend with family, friends and colleagues, fostering connectivity and collaboration. However, this desire can lead to impatience and a lack of perseverance. When individuals become accustomed to immediate outcomes, they may struggle when faced with situations that require time and effort. This can hinder personal growth and resilience in the face of challenges. Moreover, the pursuit of instant results can lead to impulsive decision-making, overspending, and a lack of commitment to long-term goals. For instance, individuals may opt for quick fixes, such as crash diets or fad exercise routines, instead of adopting sustainable lifestyle changes for better health.
In conclusion, the desire for instant results in today's society is fueled by a busy lifestyle and modern technology. While there are benefits like more time for personal connections, it also leads to impatience and a lack of perseverance. Striking a balance between instant gratification and patience is crucial for personal growth and resilience.
By @IELTS_bro
#tasktwo
Some people encourage young children to leave their parents’ house as soon as they become adults while others say children should stay at their parents’ house as long as possible.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In recent years, there has been a heated debate over people’s staying in their parents’ home. While some consider that children should continue to stay with their parents after reaching adulthood, others, myself included, believe that they should leave the house for an increased independence and better social life.
On the one hand, there are a number of benefits of children living with their parents. First and foremost, children benefit from the availability of caretakers when they share home with parents. Parents tend to look after children’s nutrition, clothes as well as waking hours, thereby helping the young to have an effective lifestyle. Additionally, children can spare more time for study or job, and entrust household chores to their parents, which helps them focus on better productivity at school or at work. As for parents, the presence of children in vicinity may instill the sense of tenderness and warmness, which is beneficial for parents’ emotional state. Seeing their children having an easier life with them, parents avoid worrying about children’s welfare.
Nonetheless, I am convinced that children should be encouraged to live alone once they enter adulthood. Living separately from parents, albeit difficult initially, eventually makes children more independent. This is because they learn to run errands and cope with daily chores on their own, which indubitably enhances their problem solving skills. Moreover, departing from the family home often exposes individuals to diverse social environments. Whether through shared accommodations, new neighborhoods, or different cities, this exposure broadens their perspectives and encourages the establishment of new social connections. As a result, such experiences contribute to the enrichment of their social and cultural awareness.
In conclusion, although there are clear benefits to staying with parents, such as care from parents and lack of worrying in the family, I am in favor of encouraging children towards an independent life, as they can benefit from increased self-reliance and enhanced social connections.
+/- 30minutes
By kamina @IELTS_bro
Some people encourage young children to leave their parents’ house as soon as they become adults while others say children should stay at their parents’ house as long as possible.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In recent years, there has been a heated debate over people’s staying in their parents’ home. While some consider that children should continue to stay with their parents after reaching adulthood, others, myself included, believe that they should leave the house for an increased independence and better social life.
On the one hand, there are a number of benefits of children living with their parents. First and foremost, children benefit from the availability of caretakers when they share home with parents. Parents tend to look after children’s nutrition, clothes as well as waking hours, thereby helping the young to have an effective lifestyle. Additionally, children can spare more time for study or job, and entrust household chores to their parents, which helps them focus on better productivity at school or at work. As for parents, the presence of children in vicinity may instill the sense of tenderness and warmness, which is beneficial for parents’ emotional state. Seeing their children having an easier life with them, parents avoid worrying about children’s welfare.
Nonetheless, I am convinced that children should be encouraged to live alone once they enter adulthood. Living separately from parents, albeit difficult initially, eventually makes children more independent. This is because they learn to run errands and cope with daily chores on their own, which indubitably enhances their problem solving skills. Moreover, departing from the family home often exposes individuals to diverse social environments. Whether through shared accommodations, new neighborhoods, or different cities, this exposure broadens their perspectives and encourages the establishment of new social connections. As a result, such experiences contribute to the enrichment of their social and cultural awareness.
In conclusion, although there are clear benefits to staying with parents, such as care from parents and lack of worrying in the family, I am in favor of encouraging children towards an independent life, as they can benefit from increased self-reliance and enhanced social connections.
+/- 30minutes
By kamina @IELTS_bro