What I have noticed is, whenever you ask these LLMs a question with the phrase "Is x ... y?", their answer is almost always "no", even if you are right. It seems they always want to go against you, to prove you are wrong :(

This is mostly due to 2 cases I assume.

Pedantic tendencies (models are trained on textbooks and technical explanations, which often focus on correcting misconceptions. This makes them prone to nitpicking phrasing or minor inaccuracies.)

And

Lack of contextual clues (unlike humans, LLMs struggle to infer why you’re asking. If your question sounds like a student checking their understanding, the model might assume you’re wrong and "teach" you instead of affirming.)

So, dont rely too much on the answer given to you when you ask for a yes or no response.

We begged for this chapter, but now we are too numb to read it. How pathetic.

One of the worst thing you could ever do is "just existing for the sake of existing".

Life = existence + enjoyment. No matter the situation, no matter how big or small your problem may seem.

Accept that you are gonna die one day and the weight, the burden you are carrying will somehow feel a little bit easy. A little bit more interesting.

And worry not about the things that are beyond your control.

Things that are beyond your control are not yours to bear.

Writing this casually, because I have to wake up at 5AM and study 4 chapters of inclusiveness module in just 3 hours and take my final exam😌

Something to think about.

Can we reconcile science and religion? Do they really conflict?

Proof by intimidation :)

Literally😕

1st year of campus concluded today.

All I can say is: Surviving is winning

Number of posts by the days of the week. Monday, hmm

Facts💯

Navier-Stoke's equation in 3D. A nightmare to engineering students (Electrical engineering and Aerodynamics engineering to be specific).