Do you mind if I post Maxwell's equations 2nd part in a PDF form? Because I can't type the mathematical equations in telegram.
Final Results
86%
Sure, no problem
14%
No, we don't need PDF
It's hard to get it logically, but you can get same range of projectile on two angles!
But the condition is that the angles should be complementary.
ββββββββββββ
Physical Reason :
Range of a projectile depends on two factors, its horizontal speed and time of flight. Let's take two complementary angles 30Β° and 60Β°, in 30Β° projection, the time of flight is less because vertical component of velocity is less and hence horizontal velocity is larger. In 60Β° projection, the time of flight is larger since vertical component of velocity is larger and hence horizontal component in less.
These two factors kind of balance each other and produce same ranges on both 30Β° and 60Β°
ββββββββββββ
Mathematical Reason :
The mathematical way of understanding it is simple, expression for range is :
R = uΒ²sin(2ΞΈ)
g
Since angle is twiced, the angles now become supplementary, i.e. from 30Β° and 60Β° to 60Β° and 120Β°. And sine of angles of ΞΈ and 180-ΞΈ is same, so the value of range will be same.
But the condition is that the angles should be complementary.
ββββββββββββ
Physical Reason :
Range of a projectile depends on two factors, its horizontal speed and time of flight. Let's take two complementary angles 30Β° and 60Β°, in 30Β° projection, the time of flight is less because vertical component of velocity is less and hence horizontal velocity is larger. In 60Β° projection, the time of flight is larger since vertical component of velocity is larger and hence horizontal component in less.
These two factors kind of balance each other and produce same ranges on both 30Β° and 60Β°
ββββββββββββ
Mathematical Reason :
The mathematical way of understanding it is simple, expression for range is :
R = uΒ²sin(2ΞΈ)
g
Since angle is twiced, the angles now become supplementary, i.e. from 30Β° and 60Β° to 60Β° and 120Β°. And sine of angles of ΞΈ and 180-ΞΈ is same, so the value of range will be same.
π5
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Animation showing the working of second hand in a clock
π±9π2π₯2π€2
@sci_tech0_ Maxwell's_Equations.pdf
364.2 KB
Maxwell's equations:
Their derivation
Proof
Uses
Books and videos suggestions are included in this short pdf. I hope you guys will enjoy itπ
Their derivation
Proof
Uses
Books and videos suggestions are included in this short pdf. I hope you guys will enjoy itπ
β€12π3π1
For those who has voted for 'Physics Book Recommendation', check out this link ππ I will also add another recommendation by myself.
https://noobphysics.com/the-best-books-to-learn-physics-from/
https://noobphysics.com/the-best-books-to-learn-physics-from/
noobphysics.com - Just another WordPress site
The Best Books to Learn Physics From (ver 0.1) - noobphysics.com
Confused about what books to start learning physics from? Here's a starters kit for anyone wanting to learn the subject.
β€6
π9
Beginner + High School level physics book recommendations
It is important to get the right background in mathematics, especially calculus, and in the foundations of physics.
Calculus:
βοΈCalculus the early transcendentals by Anton, Bivens and Davis
- It is an introductory book for calculus.
- it has tons of examples and practice problems.
- tons of figures.
- so long explanations.
βοΈCalculus for dummies by Mark Ryan.
- it is an outstanding book for precalculus, differentiation and integration.
- it has a moderate amount of examples.
- the explanations are so understandable.
- it is like its name any person with a basic algebra knowledge can go through it.
Physics
βοΈUniversity physics with modern physics by Young and Freedman
- it is an introductory physics textbook.
- it has long explanations.
- it has tons of examples and practice problems.
- it also consist of a little bit modern physics like relativity, quantum mechanics, particle physics, condensed matter physics and nuclear physics.
- it has wonderful explanations for especially concepts.
βοΈFundamentals of physics by Resnick and Haliday and Walker.
- it is an introductory level.
- it has a lot of figures.
- it has tons of examples and practice problems.
- it is good especially for practicing on numerous problems.
TO BE CONTINUED...π
Coming up, I will post PDF format of these booksβοΈ
Note: These recommendations are collected from different persons, groups, videos and websites. I'm not the one who recommended it utterly but I believe they are good.
It is important to get the right background in mathematics, especially calculus, and in the foundations of physics.
Calculus:
βοΈCalculus the early transcendentals by Anton, Bivens and Davis
- It is an introductory book for calculus.
- it has tons of examples and practice problems.
- tons of figures.
- so long explanations.
βοΈCalculus for dummies by Mark Ryan.
- it is an outstanding book for precalculus, differentiation and integration.
- it has a moderate amount of examples.
- the explanations are so understandable.
- it is like its name any person with a basic algebra knowledge can go through it.
Physics
βοΈUniversity physics with modern physics by Young and Freedman
- it is an introductory physics textbook.
- it has long explanations.
- it has tons of examples and practice problems.
- it also consist of a little bit modern physics like relativity, quantum mechanics, particle physics, condensed matter physics and nuclear physics.
- it has wonderful explanations for especially concepts.
βοΈFundamentals of physics by Resnick and Haliday and Walker.
- it is an introductory level.
- it has a lot of figures.
- it has tons of examples and practice problems.
- it is good especially for practicing on numerous problems.
TO BE CONTINUED...π
Coming up, I will post PDF format of these booksβοΈ
Note: These recommendations are collected from different persons, groups, videos and websites. I'm not the one who recommended it utterly but I believe they are good.
π₯7
Calculus_Early_Transcendentals,_10th_Edition_PDFDrive_1.pdf
24.1 MB
πCalculus the early transcendentals by Anton, Davis and Bivens
π24MB
π24MB
π1
Calculus for Dummies (2nd Edition) ( PDFDrive ).pdf
7.1 MB
πCalculus for dummies by Mark Ryan.
π7MB
π7MB
π1
university physics.pdf
62.6 MB
πUniversity physics with modern physics 15th edition by Young and Freedman.
π63MB
π63MB
π1
All the galaxies are 99.99% empty! This is a wonderful symmetry, as atoms are also 99.99% empty
For now by the word 'empty', I will just mean absence of normal matter, excluding dark matter, quantum fluctuations etc.
ββββββββββββ
But the question is why do we see images of galaxies with so densely packed stars, are they wrong?
No, they are not wrong. This illusion is due to the fact that angular distance between two stars in a far off galaxy is too less, enough less to be perceived both stars as one, by our eyes and cameras.
This huge empty space also a major reason why there would be almost no collisions between solar systems and stars when Milkyway and Andromeda, or any other galaxy will collide.
For now by the word 'empty', I will just mean absence of normal matter, excluding dark matter, quantum fluctuations etc.
ββββββββββββ
But the question is why do we see images of galaxies with so densely packed stars, are they wrong?
No, they are not wrong. This illusion is due to the fact that angular distance between two stars in a far off galaxy is too less, enough less to be perceived both stars as one, by our eyes and cameras.
This huge empty space also a major reason why there would be almost no collisions between solar systems and stars when Milkyway and Andromeda, or any other galaxy will collide.
π8π₯3π1π±1