Are Identity Christians 'Materialists'?

A common retort that floats around whenever an adherent of CI wishes to discuss race with universalist types is that we are 'materialists' because we have a worldview that prioritises the racial covenants God has made with His elect people.

The Scriptures themselves do not hold this erroneous view, however. We only have to look as far as our race's patriarch, Adam, and his creation in Genesis 1 and 2. In Gen. 2:7 we read how Adam was imbued with the God-breathed Spirit, and Adam become a living soul. This is what truly set him apart from the rest of Creation. This very same living soul is the spark that the bastard races lack, for in Jeremiah 2:13 we read about how some have sought after "broken cisterns, that can hold no water". This is indicative of the "wells without water" (2 Pt. 2:17) and "clouds without water" (Jude 12), for if one is not a pure descendent of Adam then they are not a fit vessel for the Breath of Life.

Who is Lucifer?

Commonly presumed to be a name of the Satan figure by many Christians, Lucifer (Lat. light bringer) is a name found only once in older English translations of Isaiah 14:12, "How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning!". Is this really referring to the grand spiritual adversary?

Of course, Lucifer is borrowed from the Latin Vulgate and left untranslated. The Hebrew, helel ben shachar, means shining one, son of the morning (hence, isn't a proper name). The context of Isaiah 14:3-21 as a whole tells us that this is a lamentation of the earthly king of Babylon (v4). He is referred to as a ruler of nations (v6), and his fate is death and decomposition in Sheol (the grave) amongst all the other kings of the earth (vv9-11). His arrogant ambitions of self-deification (vv13-14) are met with the taunt that he has fallen from the heavens (v12). Only through reading Isa. 14:12 out of context can one posit that Lucifer is the devil, and not the King of Babylon.

Our forebears wrote down their lives, histories, thoughts and wisdom in the hopes that there will never come a day in which they are forgotten by their descendants.

We are those descendants, and in an epoch of amnesia and obfuscation, reading our people's history can be a revolutionary act. So much of the history books on shelves nowadays are written by academics with anti-White biases and presupposed notions of our race's shame. The only way to get any clear picture is to begin by going to the most original sources, of which the Christian Scriptures are the most supreme authority (especially as accounting the genesis of our own Adamic origins and destiny).

If one wishes to begin the Western Canon, as it were, then their best course would be to pick up the Homeric epics, the Iliad and the Odyssey, and start there. You won't regret it.

The best way to honor our ancestors is to embrace their wisdom and knowledge they preserved for us. If you wish for a future then you must love our past.

Matthew 1:21
²¹She shall give birth to a son. You shall name him Jesus, for it is he who shall save his people from their sins.

In the first chapter of Matthew's Gospel, the angel Gabriel tells Joseph that his betrothed, Mary, will give birth to a son and that His name will be Jesus (Gk. Ἰησοῦς, Iésous) and that He has come to save His people from their sins.

The beauty of what Matthew was trying to convey can only be ascertained once we understand Christ's name in Hebrew, Yahshua (transliterated Joshua in the English OT), and what meaning this held to an Israelite in Judaea. Yahshua is a theophoric name, as a compound of 'Yah-' (abbreviated form of the Tetragrammaton, YHWH – the name of the God of Israel) and 'shua' (meaning salvation or deliverance). The implied notion being that Yahweh God is our salvation, and was incarnate as an Adamic child to be the promised Saviour of His people (the dispersed White nations of the Abrahamic Covenant, (Jer. 31:31; Mtt. 15:24; etc).

[1] [2] Cont.

We of course know that the Greek Iésous and Hebrew Yahshua/Joshua are the same name in their respective languages, as Joshua of Nun (Israelite leader in the Old Testament) is referred to as Iésous in the Greek NT (Acts 7:45; Heb. 4:8), as well as being called Iésous in the Greek Septuagint translation of the Hebrew Scriptures. Of course, 'Jesus' is our Modern English transliteration of the Latin Iesus, which in itself is a transliteration of the Greek Ἰησοῦς (Iésous, pronounced 'yay-sous'), itself being a transliteration of the Hebrew Yahshua/Yashua (יהושע). Though, a direct anglicised transliteration of the Hebrew has given us the commonly known name, Joshua.

Restart

"If Jesus were a Jew, He would have done stand-up comedy instead of parables." ~ William R. Finck

Christian Identity: What Difference Does it Make? [audio]

Hate Jews? So does God

Not only is Christianity the single most despised creed by the demonic jews, but the Holy Scriptures give the most scathing judgement of the jewish menace of all time (Matt. 23:33-36; Jn. 8:44; Rev 2:9, 3:9 etc). Visit Christogenea.org or the @ChristogeneaArchive to learn more.

Christogenea Bible Basics, presented by William Finck and Sven Longshanks.

Bible Basics is a series of podcasts with Sven Longshanks and William Finck which is meant to describe all of the fundamental aspects of Bible and history from a Christian Identity point of view. This series brings together all basic Christian Identity beliefs into a single narrative which explains them sufficiently to give the seeker of truth a firm foundation in our understanding.

Index:

Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Part 6
Part 7
Part 8
Part 9
Part 10
Part 11

@ChristogeneaArchive

Christogenea: The Spurious Book of Jasher, with Sven Longshanks
Link

Sven Longshanks and William Finck discuss some of the historical errors and anachronisms which expose the so-called "Book of Jasher" as a fraud, along with some of its many conflicts with Scripture. Do not be deceived by another medieval Jewish ploy to distort the Scriptures.

Adolf Hitler, in Volume 2, Chapter 2 of Mein Kampf, criticized the organized churches of Germany which “try to convert the Hottentots and the Zulus and the Kaffirs and to bestow on them the blessings of the Church. While our European people, God be praised and thanked, are left to become the victims of moral depravity, the pious missionary goes out to Central Africa and establishes missionary stations for negroes. Finally, sound and healthy – though primitive and backward – people will be transformed, under the name of our 'higher civilization', into a motley of lazy and brutalized mongrels. It would better accord with noble human aspirations if our two Christian denominations would cease to bother the negroes with their preaching, which the negroes do not want and do not understand.”

Christ Will Return to Wage WAR

Christ was not passive in His earthly life, and shall not be a peace-seeking hippie when He returns. On the contrary, Christ will return to wage war against the powers of this earth.

Today, we dwell under the yoke of Babylon the Great (Rev. 18), which is destined to collapse (vv. 2, 21). We are called to separate from this system and to "come out from her" (v4), lest we are dragged down with it. In that hour we are expected to "repay her double for her deeds" (v6), hitting back twice as hard for all the injustices delivered to our people.

Revelation 19 then proclaims Christ's triumphant return on a white horse, "clothed in a robe dipped in blood", with the armies of heaven, armed with a sword "to strike down the nations" as "He judges and makes war". The armies of the beast gather to make war against the forces of good, and this final conflict ends with the devil and his children cast into the Lake of Fire (Rev. 19:11-21).

In all of the time Heirs of the Promise has been active on Telegram, we haven't heard a single tangible criticism of CI that extends beyond the "we wuz jews" meme. These hecklers have divorced their words from being worthy of any respect.

The simple truth of the matter is that tenets and concepts of Christian Identity are spreading and there is nothing that these racial universalists can do to stop it. The truth, like a lion, needs no man to defend it; let it loose and it will defend itself. Learn what Christian Identity is, and if you are interested in digging deeper then join us at @HeirsofPromise [chat]

New DNA Study Confirms Jews And Arabs Share Up To 50% Canaanite Genetic Ancestry
[1] [2]

Just as the discovery of genetics undermined the theory of evolution, the same can now be said for the Jewish contention that they are “God’s chosen people", the legitimate descendants of the Israelites, as a new DNA study has revealed that both Jews and Arabs share common ancestry with the Canaanites, the ancient enemies of the biblical Israelites.

Catholics have inserted many words into their translation of the Scriptures that do not belong such as "gentile" and "jew". These words should more honestly, and most often, be translated as "nation" and "Judean" respectively.

Likewise Catholics have also inserted the word "godhead" and created a whole doctrine based on this word. The word for godhead in the New Testament does not refer to an entity that encapsulates the Father and the Son and Holy Spirit but rather the Greek only refers to qualities which belong alone to Yahweh God.

These heretics have inserted the word in three places; Acts 17:29, Romans 1:20, Colossians 2:9.

An examination of these words reveals that these verses should be understood differently than catholics see it

The first being θεῖος what comes from God
The latter two being θειότης Divinity, the state of being God

Strong's Concordance and others are known for throwing these words in as definitions at the end of the list to follow the church and it does so here... this is no proof

Salvation Through Marriage.

Christ dying for our salvation is one of the core premises of any group that calls themselves Christian. While just knowing this is sufficient, it is extremely important to understand HOW the death of Yahshua could save His people.

Cont.

To understand how Christ's death could save us, we must understand the nature of the law that condemned us in the first place. While some laws were given before, we can find all the designations for Israel, after Moses' trip to Sinai, in Deuteronomy and Leviticus. To break these laws would be sin (1 John 3:4), the punishment almost always death (Romans 6:23, 1 John 5:17). This law was given to Israel as the terms of our marriage with Yahweh, vows if you will (Exodus 19-24).

Yahweh does not change, His word is immutable. If someone broke the law, they are condemned to second death or total destruction. While Yahweh provisioned ways to atone for sin with the priesthood, the punishment was still death. The law was an agreement between two parties, Israel and Yahweh. This is why Yahweh couldn't just speak the punishment or guilt away. If Yahweh broke the law then He too would surely die.

The Israelites failure to follow these terms of marriage through adultery with false gods and mixing seed caused our divorce from Yahweh (Jeremiah 3:8). We were lead into captivity by our enemies and entered a spiritual dark age. Even through this Yahweh still made promises to save us (Jeremiah 31:31-32, Isaiah 45:17). The punishment of death for breaking our covenant was still looming and immutable, but Yahweh promised to re-marry Israel (Hos 2:19-20) and would fulfill this promise with His own life (Acts 20:28).

For Yahweh to be able to fulfill His promise that He shall save Israel, He would have to be able to release us from the punishment of the law without breaking the law Himself. The law states that if you divorce your wife for adultery, that it is a sin to take her back as the wife has been defiled (Deuteronomy 24:1-4). This would mean Yahweh could not re-marry Israel directly under the law. There is one way to free a wife from the Law of the husband in the bible and Paul mentions this in Romans 6:20-23 and explains this in Romans 7:1-6. If a woman's husband dies she is released from her husbands law and subsequently its punishments.

This is why Israel's relationship with God being a marriage is so important. God, our husband, sacrificed His own life so He could free us from the punishment of death His law demanded. The only way to be able to re-marry Israel without God sinning was to die and release us from our own sin against the Law first.
By the Law either Israel/Adam or Yahweh had to die
(Heb 9:22; Isa 53:4-5; 1Peter 2:23-24)

With that we see Christ's death is not a ritual but an act of a living God who chose to die in place of His people. Christ is Yahweh come in the flesh, the husband of Israel, who died to save us and make us His eternal bride with the Marriage Supper of the Lamb.

Yahweh Bless

Heirs of Yahweh's Covenants

From creation, the message and covenants of Yahweh have been distinctly for one family and their descendants. You will find many groups today who will try and include anybody in these covenants, however this is not scripturally accurate. Any time the scripture mentions Israel or any of God's congregations, it only speaks of those who have inherited the covenants from their fathers. Christ came to keep His promises, not to create a universal covenant for anything on two legs.

Cont.

We can see this in the very first covenant God made with Adam and the result of it being broken (Gen 1:28-29, 2:16-17, 3). Adam/Man would have eternal life lest he eat from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, which Eve was quickly beguiled to do. Adam accepted her in sin allowing Cain to be born and bringing death into the world. We equate the tree as a family tree of the Fallen Angels, and like an adultress Eve "ate" from it (Prov 30:20). And while many claim Cain to be Adam's child, scripture states he was of "That wicked one", a devil doing his father's will (1 John 3:12, John 8:42-44).

The next covenant is with Noah, who was "perfect in his generations/lineage" and the progenitor of all Adamic man after the flood. This covenant echoes many statements made to Adam such as to be fruitful and multiply, while also including a punishment for murder and a promise to not cause mass floods (Gen 9:1-11). Yahweh explains to Noah that he establishes this Covenant with his seed explicitly, after having drowned all other Adamites who were mixing with The Tree of Knowledge (Gen 9:9). [1] [2]

This leads us to Abraham and the covenant his seed would inherit. Abraham's other sons such as Ishmael were not included, it would be through Isaac (Gen 17:20-26, Gal 4:28,31). Isaac's son Esau, mixed with the Tree of Knowledge damning his children and excluding them from Adamic kind altogether (Heb 12:16). This leaves only Jacob's seed as the true heir of God's promise to Abraham (Gen 27:46, Gen 36:2)

The covenant found in Genesis 15 was an unconditional promise Yahweh made to Abraham, this is the basis of every covenant that follows. It is also the reason Israel would never be blotted out of the book of Adam, they would always survive unlike many of the other Adamic nations. Yahweh having passed through the divided animals confirmed his promises to Abraham, without any requirements from Abraham or his seed. According to ancient inscriptions, this ritual was common in covenants where the promiser(s) are swearing on their life (Jer 34:18). This is why Yahshua Christ came to "fulfill the promises to the fathers" (Rom 9:4, Rom 15:8), He died for the promises He made in order to keep them. [Born Under Contract + Presentation]

The covenants after (Jacob) Israel continue with the law/marriage agreement (Exo 19-24), their acquiring of Canaan, and the creation of their kingdoms Israel and Judah (Deu 26:17-18) (Deu 28:1,15) (1Sam 16:13, Psa 89: 34-37, Jer 33:20-21) (2Sam 7:12-16)

Eventually, Yahweh divorces His people (Jer 3:8) and sends them into captivity for their sin[Hos 1:1-11]; but the law cannot break Yahweh's unconditional promises to Abraham (Gal 3:21-22)! Telling them He shall "not make a full end" of Israel and promising to remarry Israel (Jer 30:11, Hos 2:14-23).
The New Covenant continues with those same people, Israel (Jer 31:31). It was not with anyone else and Yahshua Christ never claimed anything but Israel (Mat 15:24). Though all Adam can have a relationship with Yahweh as Paul demonstrated with the Lukaonians (Acts 14:6-1) and Ionians (Acts 17:16-34), it is different to the relationship between God and Israel (Deu 14:2, 1Pet 2:9).

To conclude, nowhere has Yahweh allowed someone who was not an heir of his covenant to believe their way in (Galatians 3:29, Mat 7:21-23). In fact, God has done nothing but exclude children of mixed relationships, who had no choice, from his promises. Look at any modern Christian group and see even the demons believe and tremble; however, sheeps clothing will not save them, include them in Israel, or even make them Adamic.

Are Identity Christians Judaizers?

[1] [2]

There is quite some confusion regarding the laws of God in modern Christianity. Some hold fast and rely on all of them to justify themselves as righteous. They are rare unlike those who follow the laws of men in churches, neither being truly Christian but Judaizers. The antithesis to this belief would be that all of these laws have been done away with and that we have total "freedom" in Christ's sacrifice, which happens to be just as erroneous. Often when these two extremes are mixed and matched, without regards to scripture, a new "faith" arises lulling in thousands. Those wishing to adhere to CI and scriptural doctrine should know that we are required to "establish the law" (Rom 3:31). [Christian Foundations]

That which has gone away are the rituals and ordinances of the Sinaitic covenant, along with the Levitical priesthood designated to facilitate them (Dan 9:27, Heb 9). Many of these rituals and ordinances required man to work for and prove his righteousness, through works like wearing certain clothing to offering sacrifices. When Israel was divorced and lead into captivity their Sinaitic covenant was voided, along with the purpose of following the rituals, as they had given up God Himself (Jer 3:1-10, Zech 11:10-11, Isaiah 1). Later, the Sinaitic rituals and ordinances would be fulfilled through Jesus, and He established a new covenant which continued the moral law of the Mosaic covenant and all prior covenants with Adamic kind (Jer 31:31-38, Luke 22:19-20, Mat 5:17-19). This included cleansing all Israel of sin along with our clean animals prepared profanely (1 John 1:7, Acts 10:9-17).

Since the divorce you will find groups trying to salvage the rituals of a voided and conditional covenant, by vainly sacrificing, and following their "traditions of the elders" (Mark 7:1-9). The Pharisees would be an example of Judaizers in Christ's time, or those who followed the rituals of a dead covenant, or even made up ones, in a vain attempt at man-made righteousness regardless of faith. The biggest culprits of this in today's time would be the Judeo churches who have created their own "traditions of the elders", with each sect being greater or lesser in this evil. Worst of all believing they are the ones removing sin, or providing the gateway to heaven, desecrating Yahweh's sacrifice. Like a physician they prescribe requirements to be saved, from ritual water baptism, confession to a man, believing or saying the "right" things, to even pretending to ritually cannibalize Jesus!

A large misconception in modern theology today is baptism; the requirement for water cleansing was never in reference to salvation in the Law (Exo 40:31-32, Lev 15:2-6). In fact it was a ritual specifically for the priesthood and for the Passover lamb (Exo 12:1-6), Christ being our final lamb and High Priest (John 1:29, Heb 4:14). The later baptism of John was a matter of prophecy (Isa 40). Yahweh has already cleansed us all with His own blood (Acts 20:28, 1 John 1:7). The baptism of John was for a short period and even the apostles did not understand at first (Acts 1:4-5, 10:48, 11:15-16), but learned the true baptism is now in the hearing of the good message (Acts 10:44, 1 Pet 3:21). A man was found preaching and knowing only the baptism of John in (Acts 18:25-28) but two women privately corrected him.

On the other hand many groups will confuse the Sinaitic covenant, and make it synonymous with any covenant and old testament law as a whole. While it was the core of Israel's code, many of the laws found therein existed before. This misunderstanding leads to those who do away with any law found in the old testament. Many being moral laws, summarized in the 10 commandments handed down to Moses, and later summarized (Matt 22:37-40, Luke 18:20) and written in our hearts by the will of Yahweh (Jer 31:33).