Who are the 'gentiles'?
It is very apparent that one of the foremost stumbling blocks to the detoxification of the falsehood of racial universalism is the fantastical idea of the 'jew' and 'gentile' distinction in the New Testament narrative. The idea of 'gentiles' who hadn't been relevant to the story of revelation or prophecy until the 1st Century AD when God decided He'd simply 'graft' some new people into His fold from a different flock.
Of course, such a concept is foreign to Scripture. Gentile in the New Testament is translated from the Greek word ethnos/ἔθνος, which referred to a nation as a collective. Gentile itself comes from the Latin 'gentilis', which means 'of the same tribe or clan'. Over the centuries, gentile adopted connotations of referring to non-jews.
Whenever Judaeans and the nations (gentiles) are contrasted, one should note that the latter refers to the dispersed nations of the Abrahamic Covenant (Gen. 17:4-7, 35:10-11; Jer. 31:31-33; Jas. 1:1; 1 Pet. 1:1-2; etc). [1]
It is very apparent that one of the foremost stumbling blocks to the detoxification of the falsehood of racial universalism is the fantastical idea of the 'jew' and 'gentile' distinction in the New Testament narrative. The idea of 'gentiles' who hadn't been relevant to the story of revelation or prophecy until the 1st Century AD when God decided He'd simply 'graft' some new people into His fold from a different flock.
Of course, such a concept is foreign to Scripture. Gentile in the New Testament is translated from the Greek word ethnos/ἔθνος, which referred to a nation as a collective. Gentile itself comes from the Latin 'gentilis', which means 'of the same tribe or clan'. Over the centuries, gentile adopted connotations of referring to non-jews.
Whenever Judaeans and the nations (gentiles) are contrasted, one should note that the latter refers to the dispersed nations of the Abrahamic Covenant (Gen. 17:4-7, 35:10-11; Jer. 31:31-33; Jas. 1:1; 1 Pet. 1:1-2; etc). [1]
'Christian' Zionism in Prophecy
Malachi 1:4
⁴Even though Edom has said,
“We have been impoverished, but we will return and build the desolate places.”
As we can see in our day and age, it is the jews who have returned and built the desolate places in the region of Palestine, with the aid of their judeo-churchian thralls. If prophecy holds that this would be done by Esau-Edom, then it can only be said that the jews are the offspring of the Edomite bastards of Scripture. It would not be from the 5th Century BC through to the 20th Century AD (with the dawn of 'Christian' Zionism) when the Edomite jews would begin to 'return and build the desolate places'.
Zionists are indeed CORRECT that the jews are prophesied to return to the Levant to rebuild their prized Herodian Temple. They are, however, too foolish to understand exactly who these satanic jews are and only do the bidding of the devil.
[1]
Malachi 1:4
⁴Even though Edom has said,
“We have been impoverished, but we will return and build the desolate places.”
As we can see in our day and age, it is the jews who have returned and built the desolate places in the region of Palestine, with the aid of their judeo-churchian thralls. If prophecy holds that this would be done by Esau-Edom, then it can only be said that the jews are the offspring of the Edomite bastards of Scripture. It would not be from the 5th Century BC through to the 20th Century AD (with the dawn of 'Christian' Zionism) when the Edomite jews would begin to 'return and build the desolate places'.
Zionists are indeed CORRECT that the jews are prophesied to return to the Levant to rebuild their prized Herodian Temple. They are, however, too foolish to understand exactly who these satanic jews are and only do the bidding of the devil.
[1]
Are Identity Christians 'Materialists'?
A common retort that floats around whenever an adherent of CI wishes to discuss race with universalist types is that we are 'materialists' because we have a worldview that prioritises the racial covenants God has made with His elect people.
The Scriptures themselves do not hold this erroneous view, however. We only have to look as far as our race's patriarch, Adam, and his creation in Genesis 1 and 2. In Gen. 2:7 we read how Adam was imbued with the God-breathed Spirit, and Adam become a living soul. This is what truly set him apart from the rest of Creation. This very same living soul is the spark that the bastard races lack, for in Jeremiah 2:13 we read about how some have sought after "broken cisterns, that can hold no water". This is indicative of the "wells without water" (2 Pt. 2:17) and "clouds without water" (Jude 12), for if one is not a pure descendent of Adam then they are not a fit vessel for the Breath of Life.
A common retort that floats around whenever an adherent of CI wishes to discuss race with universalist types is that we are 'materialists' because we have a worldview that prioritises the racial covenants God has made with His elect people.
The Scriptures themselves do not hold this erroneous view, however. We only have to look as far as our race's patriarch, Adam, and his creation in Genesis 1 and 2. In Gen. 2:7 we read how Adam was imbued with the God-breathed Spirit, and Adam become a living soul. This is what truly set him apart from the rest of Creation. This very same living soul is the spark that the bastard races lack, for in Jeremiah 2:13 we read about how some have sought after "broken cisterns, that can hold no water". This is indicative of the "wells without water" (2 Pt. 2:17) and "clouds without water" (Jude 12), for if one is not a pure descendent of Adam then they are not a fit vessel for the Breath of Life.
Who is Lucifer?
Commonly presumed to be a name of the Satan figure by many Christians, Lucifer (Lat. light bringer) is a name found only once in older English translations of Isaiah 14:12, "How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning!". Is this really referring to the grand spiritual adversary?
Of course, Lucifer is borrowed from the Latin Vulgate and left untranslated. The Hebrew, helel ben shachar, means shining one, son of the morning (hence, isn't a proper name). The context of Isaiah 14:3-21 as a whole tells us that this is a lamentation of the earthly king of Babylon (v4). He is referred to as a ruler of nations (v6), and his fate is death and decomposition in Sheol (the grave) amongst all the other kings of the earth (vv9-11). His arrogant ambitions of self-deification (vv13-14) are met with the taunt that he has fallen from the heavens (v12). Only through reading Isa. 14:12 out of context can one posit that Lucifer is the devil, and not the King of Babylon.
Commonly presumed to be a name of the Satan figure by many Christians, Lucifer (Lat. light bringer) is a name found only once in older English translations of Isaiah 14:12, "How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning!". Is this really referring to the grand spiritual adversary?
Of course, Lucifer is borrowed from the Latin Vulgate and left untranslated. The Hebrew, helel ben shachar, means shining one, son of the morning (hence, isn't a proper name). The context of Isaiah 14:3-21 as a whole tells us that this is a lamentation of the earthly king of Babylon (v4). He is referred to as a ruler of nations (v6), and his fate is death and decomposition in Sheol (the grave) amongst all the other kings of the earth (vv9-11). His arrogant ambitions of self-deification (vv13-14) are met with the taunt that he has fallen from the heavens (v12). Only through reading Isa. 14:12 out of context can one posit that Lucifer is the devil, and not the King of Babylon.
Our forebears wrote down their lives, histories, thoughts and wisdom in the hopes that there will never come a day in which they are forgotten by their descendants.
We are those descendants, and in an epoch of amnesia and obfuscation, reading our people's history can be a revolutionary act. So much of the history books on shelves nowadays are written by academics with anti-White biases and presupposed notions of our race's shame. The only way to get any clear picture is to begin by going to the most original sources, of which the Christian Scriptures are the most supreme authority (especially as accounting the genesis of our own Adamic origins and destiny).
If one wishes to begin the Western Canon, as it were, then their best course would be to pick up the Homeric epics, the Iliad and the Odyssey, and start there. You won't regret it.
The best way to honor our ancestors is to embrace their wisdom and knowledge they preserved for us. If you wish for a future then you must love our past.
We are those descendants, and in an epoch of amnesia and obfuscation, reading our people's history can be a revolutionary act. So much of the history books on shelves nowadays are written by academics with anti-White biases and presupposed notions of our race's shame. The only way to get any clear picture is to begin by going to the most original sources, of which the Christian Scriptures are the most supreme authority (especially as accounting the genesis of our own Adamic origins and destiny).
If one wishes to begin the Western Canon, as it were, then their best course would be to pick up the Homeric epics, the Iliad and the Odyssey, and start there. You won't regret it.
The best way to honor our ancestors is to embrace their wisdom and knowledge they preserved for us. If you wish for a future then you must love our past.
Matthew 1:21
²¹She shall give birth to a son. You shall name him Jesus, for it is he who shall save his people from their sins.
In the first chapter of Matthew's Gospel, the angel Gabriel tells Joseph that his betrothed, Mary, will give birth to a son and that His name will be Jesus (Gk. Ἰησοῦς, Iésous) and that He has come to save His people from their sins.
The beauty of what Matthew was trying to convey can only be ascertained once we understand Christ's name in Hebrew, Yahshua (transliterated Joshua in the English OT), and what meaning this held to an Israelite in Judaea. Yahshua is a theophoric name, as a compound of 'Yah-' (abbreviated form of the Tetragrammaton, YHWH – the name of the God of Israel) and 'shua' (meaning salvation or deliverance). The implied notion being that Yahweh God is our salvation, and was incarnate as an Adamic child to be the promised Saviour of His people (the dispersed White nations of the Abrahamic Covenant, (Jer. 31:31; Mtt. 15:24; etc).
[1] [2] Cont.
²¹She shall give birth to a son. You shall name him Jesus, for it is he who shall save his people from their sins.
In the first chapter of Matthew's Gospel, the angel Gabriel tells Joseph that his betrothed, Mary, will give birth to a son and that His name will be Jesus (Gk. Ἰησοῦς, Iésous) and that He has come to save His people from their sins.
The beauty of what Matthew was trying to convey can only be ascertained once we understand Christ's name in Hebrew, Yahshua (transliterated Joshua in the English OT), and what meaning this held to an Israelite in Judaea. Yahshua is a theophoric name, as a compound of 'Yah-' (abbreviated form of the Tetragrammaton, YHWH – the name of the God of Israel) and 'shua' (meaning salvation or deliverance). The implied notion being that Yahweh God is our salvation, and was incarnate as an Adamic child to be the promised Saviour of His people (the dispersed White nations of the Abrahamic Covenant, (Jer. 31:31; Mtt. 15:24; etc).
[1] [2] Cont.
We of course know that the Greek Iésous and Hebrew Yahshua/Joshua are the same name in their respective languages, as Joshua of Nun (Israelite leader in the Old Testament) is referred to as Iésous in the Greek NT (Acts 7:45; Heb. 4:8), as well as being called Iésous in the Greek Septuagint translation of the Hebrew Scriptures. Of course, 'Jesus' is our Modern English transliteration of the Latin Iesus, which in itself is a transliteration of the Greek Ἰησοῦς (Iésous, pronounced 'yay-sous'), itself being a transliteration of the Hebrew Yahshua/Yashua (יהושע). Though, a direct anglicised transliteration of the Hebrew has given us the commonly known name, Joshua.
Restart
Restart
Matthew 26:26-29
²⁶While they were eating, Jesus took a loaf of bread, and after blessing it he broke it, gave it to the disciples, and said, “Take, eat; this is my body.” ²⁷Then he took a cup, and after giving thanks he gave it to them, saying, “Drink from it, all of you; ²⁸for this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins. ²⁹I tell you, I will never again drink of this fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father’s Kingdom.”
²⁶While they were eating, Jesus took a loaf of bread, and after blessing it he broke it, gave it to the disciples, and said, “Take, eat; this is my body.” ²⁷Then he took a cup, and after giving thanks he gave it to them, saying, “Drink from it, all of you; ²⁸for this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins. ²⁹I tell you, I will never again drink of this fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father’s Kingdom.”
"If Jesus were a Jew, He would have done stand-up comedy instead of parables." ~ William R. Finck
Christian Identity: What Difference Does it Make? [audio]
Christian Identity: What Difference Does it Make? [audio]
Hate Jews? So does God
Not only is Christianity the single most despised creed by the demonic jews, but the Holy Scriptures give the most scathing judgement of the jewish menace of all time (Matt. 23:33-36; Jn. 8:44; Rev 2:9, 3:9 etc). Visit Christogenea.org or the @ChristogeneaArchive to learn more.
Not only is Christianity the single most despised creed by the demonic jews, but the Holy Scriptures give the most scathing judgement of the jewish menace of all time (Matt. 23:33-36; Jn. 8:44; Rev 2:9, 3:9 etc). Visit Christogenea.org or the @ChristogeneaArchive to learn more.
Forwarded from Christogenea Archive
Christogenea Bible Basics, presented by William Finck and Sven Longshanks.
Bible Basics is a series of podcasts with Sven Longshanks and William Finck which is meant to describe all of the fundamental aspects of Bible and history from a Christian Identity point of view. This series brings together all basic Christian Identity beliefs into a single narrative which explains them sufficiently to give the seeker of truth a firm foundation in our understanding.
Index:
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Part 6
Part 7
Part 8
Part 9
Part 10
Part 11
@ChristogeneaArchive
Bible Basics is a series of podcasts with Sven Longshanks and William Finck which is meant to describe all of the fundamental aspects of Bible and history from a Christian Identity point of view. This series brings together all basic Christian Identity beliefs into a single narrative which explains them sufficiently to give the seeker of truth a firm foundation in our understanding.
Index:
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Part 6
Part 7
Part 8
Part 9
Part 10
Part 11
@ChristogeneaArchive
Christogenea: The Spurious Book of Jasher, with Sven Longshanks
Link
Sven Longshanks and William Finck discuss some of the historical errors and anachronisms which expose the so-called "Book of Jasher" as a fraud, along with some of its many conflicts with Scripture. Do not be deceived by another medieval Jewish ploy to distort the Scriptures.
Link
Sven Longshanks and William Finck discuss some of the historical errors and anachronisms which expose the so-called "Book of Jasher" as a fraud, along with some of its many conflicts with Scripture. Do not be deceived by another medieval Jewish ploy to distort the Scriptures.
Adolf Hitler, in Volume 2, Chapter 2 of Mein Kampf, criticized the organized churches of Germany which “try to convert the Hottentots and the Zulus and the Kaffirs and to bestow on them the blessings of the Church. While our European people, God be praised and thanked, are left to become the victims of moral depravity, the pious missionary goes out to Central Africa and establishes missionary stations for negroes. Finally, sound and healthy – though primitive and backward – people will be transformed, under the name of our 'higher civilization', into a motley of lazy and brutalized mongrels. It would better accord with noble human aspirations if our two Christian denominations would cease to bother the negroes with their preaching, which the negroes do not want and do not understand.”
Christ Will Return to Wage WAR
Christ was not passive in His earthly life, and shall not be a peace-seeking hippie when He returns. On the contrary, Christ will return to wage war against the powers of this earth.
Today, we dwell under the yoke of Babylon the Great (Rev. 18), which is destined to collapse (vv. 2, 21). We are called to separate from this system and to "come out from her" (v4), lest we are dragged down with it. In that hour we are expected to "repay her double for her deeds" (v6), hitting back twice as hard for all the injustices delivered to our people.
Revelation 19 then proclaims Christ's triumphant return on a white horse, "clothed in a robe dipped in blood", with the armies of heaven, armed with a sword "to strike down the nations" as "He judges and makes war". The armies of the beast gather to make war against the forces of good, and this final conflict ends with the devil and his children cast into the Lake of Fire (Rev. 19:11-21).
Christ was not passive in His earthly life, and shall not be a peace-seeking hippie when He returns. On the contrary, Christ will return to wage war against the powers of this earth.
Today, we dwell under the yoke of Babylon the Great (Rev. 18), which is destined to collapse (vv. 2, 21). We are called to separate from this system and to "come out from her" (v4), lest we are dragged down with it. In that hour we are expected to "repay her double for her deeds" (v6), hitting back twice as hard for all the injustices delivered to our people.
Revelation 19 then proclaims Christ's triumphant return on a white horse, "clothed in a robe dipped in blood", with the armies of heaven, armed with a sword "to strike down the nations" as "He judges and makes war". The armies of the beast gather to make war against the forces of good, and this final conflict ends with the devil and his children cast into the Lake of Fire (Rev. 19:11-21).
In all of the time Heirs of the Promise has been active on Telegram, we haven't heard a single tangible criticism of CI that extends beyond the "we wuz jews" meme. These hecklers have divorced their words from being worthy of any respect.
The simple truth of the matter is that tenets and concepts of Christian Identity are spreading and there is nothing that these racial universalists can do to stop it. The truth, like a lion, needs no man to defend it; let it loose and it will defend itself. Learn what Christian Identity is, and if you are interested in digging deeper then join us at @HeirsofPromise [chat]
The simple truth of the matter is that tenets and concepts of Christian Identity are spreading and there is nothing that these racial universalists can do to stop it. The truth, like a lion, needs no man to defend it; let it loose and it will defend itself. Learn what Christian Identity is, and if you are interested in digging deeper then join us at @HeirsofPromise [chat]
New DNA Study Confirms Jews And Arabs Share Up To 50% Canaanite Genetic Ancestry
[1] [2]
Just as the discovery of genetics undermined the theory of evolution, the same can now be said for the Jewish contention that they are “God’s chosen people", the legitimate descendants of the Israelites, as a new DNA study has revealed that both Jews and Arabs share common ancestry with the Canaanites, the ancient enemies of the biblical Israelites.
[1] [2]
Just as the discovery of genetics undermined the theory of evolution, the same can now be said for the Jewish contention that they are “God’s chosen people", the legitimate descendants of the Israelites, as a new DNA study has revealed that both Jews and Arabs share common ancestry with the Canaanites, the ancient enemies of the biblical Israelites.
Catholics have inserted many words into their translation of the Scriptures that do not belong such as "gentile" and "jew". These words should more honestly, and most often, be translated as "nation" and "Judean" respectively.
Likewise Catholics have also inserted the word "godhead" and created a whole doctrine based on this word. The word for godhead in the New Testament does not refer to an entity that encapsulates the Father and the Son and Holy Spirit but rather the Greek only refers to qualities which belong alone to Yahweh God.
These heretics have inserted the word in three places; Acts 17:29, Romans 1:20, Colossians 2:9.
An examination of these words reveals that these verses should be understood differently than catholics see it
The first being θεῖος what comes from God
The latter two being θειότης Divinity, the state of being God
Strong's Concordance and others are known for throwing these words in as definitions at the end of the list to follow the church and it does so here... this is no proof
Likewise Catholics have also inserted the word "godhead" and created a whole doctrine based on this word. The word for godhead in the New Testament does not refer to an entity that encapsulates the Father and the Son and Holy Spirit but rather the Greek only refers to qualities which belong alone to Yahweh God.
These heretics have inserted the word in three places; Acts 17:29, Romans 1:20, Colossians 2:9.
An examination of these words reveals that these verses should be understood differently than catholics see it
The first being θεῖος what comes from God
The latter two being θειότης Divinity, the state of being God
Strong's Concordance and others are known for throwing these words in as definitions at the end of the list to follow the church and it does so here... this is no proof
Salvation Through Marriage.
Christ dying for our salvation is one of the core premises of any group that calls themselves Christian. While just knowing this is sufficient, it is extremely important to understand HOW the death of Yahshua could save His people.
Cont.
Christ dying for our salvation is one of the core premises of any group that calls themselves Christian. While just knowing this is sufficient, it is extremely important to understand HOW the death of Yahshua could save His people.
Cont.