The Civilizations of Noah
Following the Great Flood, all that remained of the elect Adamic bloodline was to be found within Noah and his family of eight aboard the Ark.
Noah, a purebred descendent of Adam, had three sons: Ham, Shem and Japheth. If Noah was White, then surely these three would have been White. The judeo-churches will still remain adamant that these three men represent the patriarchs of three races (usually Japheth as the Caucasians, Ham as the Negroid and Shem as the Asiatic), however as we will show, the progeny of the three sons would go on to become the founding patriarchs of the great ancient Aryan civilizations.
Cont.
Following the Great Flood, all that remained of the elect Adamic bloodline was to be found within Noah and his family of eight aboard the Ark.
Noah, a purebred descendent of Adam, had three sons: Ham, Shem and Japheth. If Noah was White, then surely these three would have been White. The judeo-churches will still remain adamant that these three men represent the patriarchs of three races (usually Japheth as the Caucasians, Ham as the Negroid and Shem as the Asiatic), however as we will show, the progeny of the three sons would go on to become the founding patriarchs of the great ancient Aryan civilizations.
Cont.
In fact, even anthropologists of old understood that Japhetite, Hamite and Semite/Shemite were just three divisions of the Caucasian race (see images). We will of course contend that not all Caucasoids in this day and age are pure Whites, however that it is an indication of Adamic admixture to varying degrees (those outside of the European oikoumene being mostly bastardized).
It should also be noted that the Afro-Asiatic language family, of which very few of the Sub-Saharan tribes speak, was formerly known as the Hamito-Semitic (this would contain the Semitic languages of the Near East, and the languages of North Africa). We can digress into linguistic theories at a later date.
From the biblical record, we can infer that the Urheimat of the Noahite Aryans lies in the land spanning from the Armenian Highlands (mountains of Ararat where Noah's Ark landed, Gen. 9), Mesopotamia (where languages were confounded in Babel, Gen. 11) and the Iranian Plateau. From this region began the Adamic diffusion of migration, civilization, culture, language and technology across the known world.
Now, as for Noah's progeny, we can accurately pinpoint the whereabouts of many. For the purposes of this post, we shall handpick a couple from each of the three sons, but for a longer essay I would recommend reading William Finck's The Race of Genesis 10, as can be found on Christogenea.
Japheth is generally to be associated with the early Indo-European cultures of Eurasia (Yamnaya, Andronovo, Corded Ware, etc). In Gen. 9:27 it reads "God will enlarge Japheth...", as was found following the IE domestication of the horse. Of course, due to the fact that many of these Japhethite cultures dispersed north of the Caucasus, we cannot find them mentioned within texts of the Ancient Near East. However, we can determine several of them that did in fact settle on the Mediterranean. Javan/Yawan is to be identified as the Ionian Greeks of the Aegean, as Persian and Sanskrit will also bear the cognate names of Yona or Yavana for the Greeks. Javan's sons Rodanim can be identified with Rhodes, Kittim with Cyprus, Tarshish with Tartessus in southern Iberia. Japheth's other son Madai can also be identified with the Indo-Aryan Medes of the Iron Age.
Shem's major identifiable progeny are of course Aram with Aramea/Syria; Asshur with Assyria; Elam with the pre-Iranic Elamites; and Lud who was the forefather of the Indo-Anatolian Lydians. Not of course forgetting the Ancient Hebrews and their seed, more on this in the future.
Ham is commonly confused as the patriarch of the negroid races, however even an iota of study shatters this myth irreparably. Ham's progeny include Mizraim as patriarch of the Ancient Egyptians; Kush as patriarch of Ancient Aithiops (Greek for 'burnt/shining face'), the Sumerian royal dynasty with Nimrod (a son of Kush), the Mesopotamian city of Kish, and of course the Hindu Kush mountains of the east; Casluhim from whom came the Indo-European Philistines (Gen 10:14); and Caphtorim which would be Crete.
There exists no room for negroids or mongoloids in the Genesis 10 Table of [Adamic] Nations.
[Read More]
It should also be noted that the Afro-Asiatic language family, of which very few of the Sub-Saharan tribes speak, was formerly known as the Hamito-Semitic (this would contain the Semitic languages of the Near East, and the languages of North Africa). We can digress into linguistic theories at a later date.
From the biblical record, we can infer that the Urheimat of the Noahite Aryans lies in the land spanning from the Armenian Highlands (mountains of Ararat where Noah's Ark landed, Gen. 9), Mesopotamia (where languages were confounded in Babel, Gen. 11) and the Iranian Plateau. From this region began the Adamic diffusion of migration, civilization, culture, language and technology across the known world.
Now, as for Noah's progeny, we can accurately pinpoint the whereabouts of many. For the purposes of this post, we shall handpick a couple from each of the three sons, but for a longer essay I would recommend reading William Finck's The Race of Genesis 10, as can be found on Christogenea.
Japheth is generally to be associated with the early Indo-European cultures of Eurasia (Yamnaya, Andronovo, Corded Ware, etc). In Gen. 9:27 it reads "God will enlarge Japheth...", as was found following the IE domestication of the horse. Of course, due to the fact that many of these Japhethite cultures dispersed north of the Caucasus, we cannot find them mentioned within texts of the Ancient Near East. However, we can determine several of them that did in fact settle on the Mediterranean. Javan/Yawan is to be identified as the Ionian Greeks of the Aegean, as Persian and Sanskrit will also bear the cognate names of Yona or Yavana for the Greeks. Javan's sons Rodanim can be identified with Rhodes, Kittim with Cyprus, Tarshish with Tartessus in southern Iberia. Japheth's other son Madai can also be identified with the Indo-Aryan Medes of the Iron Age.
Shem's major identifiable progeny are of course Aram with Aramea/Syria; Asshur with Assyria; Elam with the pre-Iranic Elamites; and Lud who was the forefather of the Indo-Anatolian Lydians. Not of course forgetting the Ancient Hebrews and their seed, more on this in the future.
Ham is commonly confused as the patriarch of the negroid races, however even an iota of study shatters this myth irreparably. Ham's progeny include Mizraim as patriarch of the Ancient Egyptians; Kush as patriarch of Ancient Aithiops (Greek for 'burnt/shining face'), the Sumerian royal dynasty with Nimrod (a son of Kush), the Mesopotamian city of Kish, and of course the Hindu Kush mountains of the east; Casluhim from whom came the Indo-European Philistines (Gen 10:14); and Caphtorim which would be Crete.
There exists no room for negroids or mongoloids in the Genesis 10 Table of [Adamic] Nations.
[Read More]
The Biblical Philistines were Adamic Aryans
The Philistines, the neighbours to the south of the Israelite Kingdom in the biblical era, owe their origins to the Aegean Sea (east of the Greek mainland) according to DNA and archaeology. [1] This is in complete corroboration of the scriptural narrative which speaks of the Philistines, as the descendents of Mizraim, who migrated from Capthor (Crete) to the Southern Levantine Coast.
Genesis 10:13-14
¹³Mizraim [Egypt] fathered Ludim, Anamim, Lehabim, Naphtuhim, ¹⁴Pathrusim, Casluhim (from whom the Philistines came), and Caphtorim.
Amos 9:7
⁷“Are you not like the Cushites to me, O people of Israel?” declares the Lord. “Did I not bring up Israel from the land of Egypt, and the Philistines from Caphtor [Crete] and the Syrians from Kir?
The Philistines, the neighbours to the south of the Israelite Kingdom in the biblical era, owe their origins to the Aegean Sea (east of the Greek mainland) according to DNA and archaeology. [1] This is in complete corroboration of the scriptural narrative which speaks of the Philistines, as the descendents of Mizraim, who migrated from Capthor (Crete) to the Southern Levantine Coast.
Genesis 10:13-14
¹³Mizraim [Egypt] fathered Ludim, Anamim, Lehabim, Naphtuhim, ¹⁴Pathrusim, Casluhim (from whom the Philistines came), and Caphtorim.
Amos 9:7
⁷“Are you not like the Cushites to me, O people of Israel?” declares the Lord. “Did I not bring up Israel from the land of Egypt, and the Philistines from Caphtor [Crete] and the Syrians from Kir?
"And after some days my son Methuselah took a wife for his son Lamech, and she became pregnant by him and bore a son. And his body was white as snow and red as the blooming of a rose, and the hair of his head and his long locks were white as wool, and his eyes beautiful. And when he opened his eyes, he lighted up the whole house like the sun, and the whole house was very bright.... his eyes are as the rays of the sun, and his countenance is glorious...and the colour of his body is whiter than snow and redder than the bloom of a rose, and the hair of his head is whiter than white wool, and his eyes are like the rays of the sun, and he opened his eyes and thereupon lighted up the whole house....make known to thy son Lamech that he who has been born is in truth his son, and call his name Noah."
Book of Enoch 106 (Fragment of the Book of Noah)
Book of Enoch 106 (Fragment of the Book of Noah)
On the "Curse of Ham"
One of the most common means by which people have tried to fit the black race into the seed of Adam is by imagining a 'curse of Ham' in Genesis 9 by which one of Noah's three sons, Ham, was cursed for 'seeing the nakedness of his father' and was turned into a negroid (and his progeny followed suit). Is this biblical?
A basic reading of the text would reveal that it was in fact Canaan who was cursed for the sins of Ham (Gen. 9:25) and that there is no curse on Ham to speak of (the earliest mentions of a Curse of Ham coming from the Talmud). Canaan's offspring, though accursed, would come to inhabit the southern Levant (Gen. 15:18-21) and were not a Sub-Saharan populace like the negroid.
Even if we are to roll with the erroneous conventional idea that Ham produced the black race, then we would have to concede that of the Genesis 10 nations, Egypt (Mizraim), the Philistines, and the earliest Sumerian dynasty (Gen. 10:8-12) are all of negro origin.
One of the most common means by which people have tried to fit the black race into the seed of Adam is by imagining a 'curse of Ham' in Genesis 9 by which one of Noah's three sons, Ham, was cursed for 'seeing the nakedness of his father' and was turned into a negroid (and his progeny followed suit). Is this biblical?
A basic reading of the text would reveal that it was in fact Canaan who was cursed for the sins of Ham (Gen. 9:25) and that there is no curse on Ham to speak of (the earliest mentions of a Curse of Ham coming from the Talmud). Canaan's offspring, though accursed, would come to inhabit the southern Levant (Gen. 15:18-21) and were not a Sub-Saharan populace like the negroid.
Even if we are to roll with the erroneous conventional idea that Ham produced the black race, then we would have to concede that of the Genesis 10 nations, Egypt (Mizraim), the Philistines, and the earliest Sumerian dynasty (Gen. 10:8-12) are all of negro origin.
Genesis 1:24-25
²⁴And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so. ²⁵And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
²⁴And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so. ²⁵And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
Deuteronomy 23:2
²A bastard* shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the Lord.
*Strong's Hebrew #4464 –מַמְזֵר mamzêr, mam-zare'; from an unused root meaning to alienate; a mongrel, i.e. born of [an Israelite] father and a heathen mother:—bastard.
²A bastard* shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the Lord.
*Strong's Hebrew #4464 –מַמְזֵר mamzêr, mam-zare'; from an unused root meaning to alienate; a mongrel, i.e. born of [an Israelite] father and a heathen mother:—bastard.
In this world, God created only one Adam which became one race of man that would spawn from his loins. To this race alone were the many covenants, laws and promises of eternal life made. From the days before our fall from Eden, through to the gathering of the wheat at the end of the age, our race has always been met in opposition by the children of the wicked one. There are only two categorize in Scripture. One is either:
• A son or a bastard (Heb. 12:7-8)
• A sheep or a goat (Mtt. 25:31-46).
• A good fish or bad fish (Mtt. 13:47-50).
• Wheat or a tare (Mtt. 13:24-30, 34-42).
• Of the good tree or the bad tree (Gen. 2:9; Mtt. 7:17-18).
Your destiny is to either inherit the Kingdom of Heaven, or to be burned up in the Lake of Fire following the Gathering. There is NO middle ground.
Hail Christ, our Kinsman Redeemer and Saviour.
• A son or a bastard (Heb. 12:7-8)
• A sheep or a goat (Mtt. 25:31-46).
• A good fish or bad fish (Mtt. 13:47-50).
• Wheat or a tare (Mtt. 13:24-30, 34-42).
• Of the good tree or the bad tree (Gen. 2:9; Mtt. 7:17-18).
Your destiny is to either inherit the Kingdom of Heaven, or to be burned up in the Lake of Fire following the Gathering. There is NO middle ground.
Hail Christ, our Kinsman Redeemer and Saviour.
Sons or Bastards
Hebrews 12:7-8
⁷If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not? ⁸But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons.
☩
As it says in Proverbs 13: “24 He that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes.” And again, in Amos 3:2, speaking to the children of Israel collectively: “2 You only have I known of all the families of the earth: therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities."
The Greek word for bastard here is νόθος (Strong’s # 3541). Liddell & Scott define the word to mean “bastard, baseborn, i.e. born of a slave or concubine... opposed to γνήσιος… 2. at Athens, child of a citizen father and an alien mother… of animals, cross-bred… generally, spurious, counterfeit, supposititious [substituted for the real thing; not genuine], of persons and things...”
Since the antonym of νόθος is γνήσιος, which appears in Paul’s writings on four occasions, it will serve us to see the definition of that word as well, from Liddell & Scott: “belonging to the race, i. e. lawfully begotten, born in wedlock…” For Christians, lawful wedlock is described in Genesis chapter 2, where a wife must be flesh of one’s flesh, and bone of one’s bone. Anything else is fornication and produces bastards, not sons or daughters. The word γνήσιος is derived from the word γένος, which according to that same source is “race, stock, family”. So a person who is γνήσιος is an authentic member of a particular race, and one who is νόθος is spurious, and does not actually belong to the race. A νόθος is therefore a bastard, or someone not belonging to the same Adamic race as the children of Israel.
Paul’s Epistle to the Hebrews, Part 15: Sons or Bastards
Hebrews 12:7-8
⁷If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not? ⁸But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons.
☩
As it says in Proverbs 13: “24 He that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes.” And again, in Amos 3:2, speaking to the children of Israel collectively: “2 You only have I known of all the families of the earth: therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities."
The Greek word for bastard here is νόθος (Strong’s # 3541). Liddell & Scott define the word to mean “bastard, baseborn, i.e. born of a slave or concubine... opposed to γνήσιος… 2. at Athens, child of a citizen father and an alien mother… of animals, cross-bred… generally, spurious, counterfeit, supposititious [substituted for the real thing; not genuine], of persons and things...”
Since the antonym of νόθος is γνήσιος, which appears in Paul’s writings on four occasions, it will serve us to see the definition of that word as well, from Liddell & Scott: “belonging to the race, i. e. lawfully begotten, born in wedlock…” For Christians, lawful wedlock is described in Genesis chapter 2, where a wife must be flesh of one’s flesh, and bone of one’s bone. Anything else is fornication and produces bastards, not sons or daughters. The word γνήσιος is derived from the word γένος, which according to that same source is “race, stock, family”. So a person who is γνήσιος is an authentic member of a particular race, and one who is νόθος is spurious, and does not actually belong to the race. A νόθος is therefore a bastard, or someone not belonging to the same Adamic race as the children of Israel.
Paul’s Epistle to the Hebrews, Part 15: Sons or Bastards
Isaiah 43:3-4
³For I am Yahweh your God,
the Holy One of Israel,
your Savior.
I have given Egypt as your ransom,
Kush and Seba in your place.
⁴Since you have been precious and honored in my sight,
and I have loved you,
therefore I will give people in your place,
and nations instead of your life.
In Egyptian record, we read from The Admonitions of Ipu-Wer (believed to date to the period between the Old and Middle Kingdoms, or perhaps from 2300 to 2050 BC), from page 441 of Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament, by James B. Pritchard, in part: “A man regards his son as his enemy… A man of character goes in mourning because of what has happened in the land... Foreigners have become people everywhere.[1]” The translator, John Wilson, made a footnote at the word for people here which says: “The term ‘men, humans, people,’ was used by the Egyptians to designate themselves, in contrast to their foreign neighbors, who were not conceded to be real people.”
³For I am Yahweh your God,
the Holy One of Israel,
your Savior.
I have given Egypt as your ransom,
Kush and Seba in your place.
⁴Since you have been precious and honored in my sight,
and I have loved you,
therefore I will give people in your place,
and nations instead of your life.
In Egyptian record, we read from The Admonitions of Ipu-Wer (believed to date to the period between the Old and Middle Kingdoms, or perhaps from 2300 to 2050 BC), from page 441 of Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament, by James B. Pritchard, in part: “A man regards his son as his enemy… A man of character goes in mourning because of what has happened in the land... Foreigners have become people everywhere.[1]” The translator, John Wilson, made a footnote at the word for people here which says: “The term ‘men, humans, people,’ was used by the Egyptians to designate themselves, in contrast to their foreign neighbors, who were not conceded to be real people.”
Moses' Negro Wife?
Detractors of Christianity usually point to Numbers 12 as evidence that God has no qualms with the mixture of races as Moses takes a Kushite wife and Miriam is punished for opposing his choice of wife. Is this really an instance of God permitting miscegenation?
Moses' wife, Zipporah, is from the land of Midian (Exo. 2), and these Midianites are descendants of Abraham through Keturah (Gen. 25:1-2). We won't digress into whether Zipporah is the Kushite wife. Miriam's opposition to Moses is due to him choosing a non-Israelite wife, before she questions his status as prophet (by proxy questioning God). The Kushites are descendants of Ham (Gen. 10:6), hence Adamic [1]. The land of Kush originally was in Mesopotamia (Gen. 2:13, 10:8-12), though they expanded their oikouménē to the Horn of Africa [2] [3] [4]. Given that Moses was wandering in the Levant by this time, he couldn't have found a wife from amongst the 'Ethiopians' in Africa but from those of Kush in the East.
Detractors of Christianity usually point to Numbers 12 as evidence that God has no qualms with the mixture of races as Moses takes a Kushite wife and Miriam is punished for opposing his choice of wife. Is this really an instance of God permitting miscegenation?
Moses' wife, Zipporah, is from the land of Midian (Exo. 2), and these Midianites are descendants of Abraham through Keturah (Gen. 25:1-2). We won't digress into whether Zipporah is the Kushite wife. Miriam's opposition to Moses is due to him choosing a non-Israelite wife, before she questions his status as prophet (by proxy questioning God). The Kushites are descendants of Ham (Gen. 10:6), hence Adamic [1]. The land of Kush originally was in Mesopotamia (Gen. 2:13, 10:8-12), though they expanded their oikouménē to the Horn of Africa [2] [3] [4]. Given that Moses was wandering in the Levant by this time, he couldn't have found a wife from amongst the 'Ethiopians' in Africa but from those of Kush in the East.
Was the Eunuch of Ethiopia a Negro?
Proponents of racial universalism will commonly direct your attention to the Ethiopian Eunuch who Philip baptized on the road from Gaza to Jerusalem (Acts 8:26-40) as evidence that all of the races can partake in the New Covenant. Of course this all hinges on the assumption that this Eunuch was a negroid, this claim is wrong.
The nuance that is not typically noticed is the fact that the Eunuch was both in possession of a scroll of Isaiah (v30) and was making pilgrimage to Jerusalem for worship (v27). The most obvious inference was that this was a Judaean in the Ethiopian court, and this was indeed a view held by Early Church writers such as Irenaeus (Against Heresies, 4.23.2) and Pontius (Life of Cyprian, 3). This view continues to make sense when you consider the Jerusalem Temple Warning forbidding entrance to aliens as well as the existence of an Israelite temple as far down the Nile as the Elephantine in the 5th Century BC [2].
Proponents of racial universalism will commonly direct your attention to the Ethiopian Eunuch who Philip baptized on the road from Gaza to Jerusalem (Acts 8:26-40) as evidence that all of the races can partake in the New Covenant. Of course this all hinges on the assumption that this Eunuch was a negroid, this claim is wrong.
The nuance that is not typically noticed is the fact that the Eunuch was both in possession of a scroll of Isaiah (v30) and was making pilgrimage to Jerusalem for worship (v27). The most obvious inference was that this was a Judaean in the Ethiopian court, and this was indeed a view held by Early Church writers such as Irenaeus (Against Heresies, 4.23.2) and Pontius (Life of Cyprian, 3). This view continues to make sense when you consider the Jerusalem Temple Warning forbidding entrance to aliens as well as the existence of an Israelite temple as far down the Nile as the Elephantine in the 5th Century BC [2].
Genesis 2:7
⁷Yahweh God formed man (adam, H120) from the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
John 3:3
Yahshua replied and said to him: “Truly, truly I say to you, unless a man should be born from above, he is not able to see the Kingdom of Yahweh.”
John 3:5-7
⁵Yahshua replied: “Truly, truly I say to you, if one should not be born from water and Spirit, he is not able to enter into the Kingdom of Yahweh! ⁶That which is born from of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born from of the Spirit is Spirit. ⁷You should not wonder that I said to you that it is necessary for you to be born from above.
⁷Yahweh God formed man (adam, H120) from the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
John 3:3
Yahshua replied and said to him: “Truly, truly I say to you, unless a man should be born from above, he is not able to see the Kingdom of Yahweh.”
John 3:5-7
⁵Yahshua replied: “Truly, truly I say to you, if one should not be born from water and Spirit, he is not able to enter into the Kingdom of Yahweh! ⁶That which is born from of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born from of the Spirit is Spirit. ⁷You should not wonder that I said to you that it is necessary for you to be born from above.
The Abrahamic Covenant
Following Noah, and the disinheritance of the Adamic nations at the Tower of Babel after the confusion of tongues, the next time God would interact with mankind would be with Abram, a Hebrew (descendent of Eber, the great-grandson of Shem) from the city of Ur in the land of Aram Naharayim (Gen. 12, 24:4,10, 28:5-7). Abram was called out by God to undergo a series of trials and challenges, travelling to Canaan, Egypt, and Canaan again. Eventually, God had revealed His racial covenant He would make to Abraham.
Cont.
Following Noah, and the disinheritance of the Adamic nations at the Tower of Babel after the confusion of tongues, the next time God would interact with mankind would be with Abram, a Hebrew (descendent of Eber, the great-grandson of Shem) from the city of Ur in the land of Aram Naharayim (Gen. 12, 24:4,10, 28:5-7). Abram was called out by God to undergo a series of trials and challenges, travelling to Canaan, Egypt, and Canaan again. Eventually, God had revealed His racial covenant He would make to Abraham.
Cont.
Genesis 17:4-7
⁴“As for Me, behold, My covenant is with you, and you shall be a father of many nations. ⁵No longer shall your name be called Abram, but your name shall be Abraham; for I have made you a father of many nations. ⁶I will make you exceedingly fruitful; and I will make nations of you, and kings shall come from you. ⁷And I will establish My covenant between Me and you and your descendants after you in their generations, for an everlasting covenant, to be God to you and your descendants after you."
Abram became Abraham, and the unconditional Abrahamic Covenant declared that from his loins would spawn a multitude of nations and kings. With any shred of intellectual honesty, one can easily understand that only one race of people have truthfully fulfilled such a promise, the White race. The Abrahamic Covenant is the beginning of the covenant faith of Israel, and the backbone of the promises of Christianity.
Epistle to the Galatians 3:15-17
¹⁵Brethren, (I speak as befits a man,) even a validated covenant of man no one sets aside, or makes additions to for himself. ¹⁶Now to Abraham the promises have been spoken, and to his seed. It does not say “and to seeds”, as of many; but as of one: “and to your seed,” which is anointed. ¹⁷Now this I say, a covenant validated beforehand by God, the law which arrived after four hundred and thirty years does not invalidate, by which the promise is left idle.
⁴“As for Me, behold, My covenant is with you, and you shall be a father of many nations. ⁵No longer shall your name be called Abram, but your name shall be Abraham; for I have made you a father of many nations. ⁶I will make you exceedingly fruitful; and I will make nations of you, and kings shall come from you. ⁷And I will establish My covenant between Me and you and your descendants after you in their generations, for an everlasting covenant, to be God to you and your descendants after you."
Abram became Abraham, and the unconditional Abrahamic Covenant declared that from his loins would spawn a multitude of nations and kings. With any shred of intellectual honesty, one can easily understand that only one race of people have truthfully fulfilled such a promise, the White race. The Abrahamic Covenant is the beginning of the covenant faith of Israel, and the backbone of the promises of Christianity.
Epistle to the Galatians 3:15-17
¹⁵Brethren, (I speak as befits a man,) even a validated covenant of man no one sets aside, or makes additions to for himself. ¹⁶Now to Abraham the promises have been spoken, and to his seed. It does not say “and to seeds”, as of many; but as of one: “and to your seed,” which is anointed. ¹⁷Now this I say, a covenant validated beforehand by God, the law which arrived after four hundred and thirty years does not invalidate, by which the promise is left idle.
From Abraham to Israel
Abraham would have many nations and kings spawn from him. However, it can be noted that Abraham had eight children in total. Ishmael was the first, born of Sarai's (Abram's wife) handmaiden Hagar. Followed of course by Isaac when God made the barren Sarah fertile. Following the death of Sarah, Abraham had six children with the concubine Keturah, including Midian, Zimran and Medan, among others.
Despite all of these children, the heirs of the promise would only be called through one (Rom. 9:7). The children of Hagar and Keturah were sent away (Gen. 21:12-13, 25:1-6) and only in Isaac was Abraham's seed called (Gen. 21:12).
Cont.
Abraham would have many nations and kings spawn from him. However, it can be noted that Abraham had eight children in total. Ishmael was the first, born of Sarai's (Abram's wife) handmaiden Hagar. Followed of course by Isaac when God made the barren Sarah fertile. Following the death of Sarah, Abraham had six children with the concubine Keturah, including Midian, Zimran and Medan, among others.
Despite all of these children, the heirs of the promise would only be called through one (Rom. 9:7). The children of Hagar and Keturah were sent away (Gen. 21:12-13, 25:1-6) and only in Isaac was Abraham's seed called (Gen. 21:12).
Cont.
Isaac would proceed to take a wife of the Arameans, Rebecca, sister of Laban (whose name coincidentally means 'white'). In her womb would be two children, both interlocked in a struggle, an enmity which would last the generations. The first child came out "red and hairy all over", named Esau (Gen. 25:25). And after him followed Jacob. Later on in their lives, Esau would forsake his birthright and sell it for a bowl of pottage to Jacob (Gen. 25:29-34) and would take wives of the Canaanitic daughters of Heth (Gen. 36), hence bastardizing his birthright into oblivion. For this reason he had not the inheritance of the promise and was a vain fornicator (Heb. 12:16)
It was left up to Jacob as the sole inheritor of the elect seed. His mother implored that if he follows Esau's example and breeds with the daughters of Heth, "what good shall my life do me?" (Gen. 27:46)
Should Jacob adulterate the bloodline like Esau, she'd have no reason to live. In response, Jacob was sent to Aram to find a daughter of Laban to marry. He'd take Rachel and Leah both as his wives, and with them he would bare twelve children. Later on, Jacob would wrestle with an angel who'd spare his life. In honor he'd be renamed as Israel — "And God said to him, “Though your name is Jacob, you will no longer be called Jacob. Instead, your name will be Israel.” So God named him Israel. And God told him, “I am God Almighty. Be fruitful and multiply. A nation—even a company of nations—shall come from you, and kings shall descend from you. The land that I gave to Abraham and Isaac I will give to you, and I will give this land to your descendants after you.” (Gen. 35:10-12). Isra'El meaning 'he struggles with god'.
Jacob is Israel, and his 12 children would be the patriarchs of the 12 tribes of Israel. Now, not only was Israel to become a nation, but afterwards a company of nations (Heb. goyim). If the jews really are of Israel, then how come the only nation they have been able to 'build' is a parasitic crime-ring in the Middle East? Beyond that, they have spent the past two millennia skulking around in the ghettos of Europe as usurers, murderers, and as thorns in our side. Will your church, pastors or priests ever tell you where these nations of Israel are today?
If not, will the true nations of Israel please stand up?
It was left up to Jacob as the sole inheritor of the elect seed. His mother implored that if he follows Esau's example and breeds with the daughters of Heth, "what good shall my life do me?" (Gen. 27:46)
Should Jacob adulterate the bloodline like Esau, she'd have no reason to live. In response, Jacob was sent to Aram to find a daughter of Laban to marry. He'd take Rachel and Leah both as his wives, and with them he would bare twelve children. Later on, Jacob would wrestle with an angel who'd spare his life. In honor he'd be renamed as Israel — "And God said to him, “Though your name is Jacob, you will no longer be called Jacob. Instead, your name will be Israel.” So God named him Israel. And God told him, “I am God Almighty. Be fruitful and multiply. A nation—even a company of nations—shall come from you, and kings shall descend from you. The land that I gave to Abraham and Isaac I will give to you, and I will give this land to your descendants after you.” (Gen. 35:10-12). Isra'El meaning 'he struggles with god'.
Jacob is Israel, and his 12 children would be the patriarchs of the 12 tribes of Israel. Now, not only was Israel to become a nation, but afterwards a company of nations (Heb. goyim). If the jews really are of Israel, then how come the only nation they have been able to 'build' is a parasitic crime-ring in the Middle East? Beyond that, they have spent the past two millennia skulking around in the ghettos of Europe as usurers, murderers, and as thorns in our side. Will your church, pastors or priests ever tell you where these nations of Israel are today?
If not, will the true nations of Israel please stand up?
The Dardanite Sons of Troy
The first major migration of Israel, outside of the Exodus from Egypt, is that of the sons of Zarah-Judah across the Mediterranean.
Firstly, who is Zarah-Judah? His father, Judah, fornicated with a daughter of Canaan, producing three bastard offspring, of which two died leaving Shelah. Tamar's daring actions saw that she would be married to the widowed Judah through the Law of Levirate marriage. She was with two children of his own and when giving birth to these twins, one of their bloody hands exited the womb and the midwife put a scarlet cord on his exposed wrist. His hand went back in, and his brother was birthed first, was named Pharez, and then his brother followed, named Zarah. The promise made to Judah's posterity is that the royal sceptre would never depart from their feet (Gen. 49:10). As the firstborn, Pharez's progeny would go on to bear fruits such as David and his dynasty, Solomon and eventually Christ Himself. However, what would become of Zarah?
Cont.
The first major migration of Israel, outside of the Exodus from Egypt, is that of the sons of Zarah-Judah across the Mediterranean.
Firstly, who is Zarah-Judah? His father, Judah, fornicated with a daughter of Canaan, producing three bastard offspring, of which two died leaving Shelah. Tamar's daring actions saw that she would be married to the widowed Judah through the Law of Levirate marriage. She was with two children of his own and when giving birth to these twins, one of their bloody hands exited the womb and the midwife put a scarlet cord on his exposed wrist. His hand went back in, and his brother was birthed first, was named Pharez, and then his brother followed, named Zarah. The promise made to Judah's posterity is that the royal sceptre would never depart from their feet (Gen. 49:10). As the firstborn, Pharez's progeny would go on to bear fruits such as David and his dynasty, Solomon and eventually Christ Himself. However, what would become of Zarah?
Cont.
1 Kings 4:30-31
³⁰The wisdom of Solomon was greater than the wisdom of all the people of the east and more than all the wisdom of Egypt. ³¹He was wiser than all the men: Ethan the Ezrahite; Heman, Calcol, and Darda the children of Mahol; and he was very well known.
We later read in 1 Chronicles 2:5-6 that these were all children of Zarah-Judah. When Moses comes to take the census following the Exodus from Egypt, we see that no individual sons of Zarah are named, whereas the children of Pharez are (Num. 26:20-21). If these people are used as a comparison in order to display the Wisdom of Solomon, and if they were neither in the east country, in Egypt nor in the horde migrating with Moses, then where could they have been? Let us take two examples, that of Darda and Chalcol. These men appear nowhere else in scripture besides the verses above in Kings and Chronicles, so to find them we must look to the secular records of history.
We see from the Greek texts that Dardanus is the founder of the Trojan royal dynasty, and a certain royal house of the Trojans are known as the Dardanians, including Aeneas. Of Aeneas, Homer's Iliad says...
"Let us rescue him, and avoid Zeus’s anger were Achilles to kill him, for Aeneas is destined to live on, so that Dardanus’ race itself might survive, Dardanus whom Zeus loved above all his children by mortal women. The Son of Cronos has come to hate Priam’s line, and mighty Aeneas will be the Trojan king, as his descendants will in time to come." ~ Homer, Iliad Book XX
Here we see something reminiscent to the promise made to Judah regarding kingship.
Of course, this would be fulfilled by the legendary Aeneas, when he would flee Troy's destruction to eventually settle in the Italian peninsula, founding a colony of Latinium with a local princess. The inhabitants of this town would go on to be the founding members of Rome, according to Virgil's Aeneid, as well as Strabo's Geographica (3.2.13, 6.1.12, 14; 13.1.52, 53 et al.).
Of course, Paul's epistle to the Romans even makes this very observation when Paul called Abraham their "forefather according to the flesh" (4:1).
Of course, there also exists folklore throughout the early middle ages with regards to European royal dynasties being founded by the children of the Trojan refugees. One such example would by that of Brutus of Britain, according to historians Nennius and Geoffrey of Monmouth, was the great-grandson of Aeneas that killed his own father in a hunting accident and was exiled. He would band up with other colonies of Trojans along the western Mediterranean coast and would eventually lead his kinsmen into the shores of Albion where they'd find a mythical race of giants that they'd slay, and end up establishing a kingdom after his name, Britain. His capital would be named Trinovantum, or Nova Troia (the Trinovantes being a tribe seen in Caesar's Commentaries), later renamed Caer Lud by one of his descendants, King Lud, and eventually renamed by the Romans as Londinium, or London as we know it. Brutus is the legendary ancestor of all of Britain's monarchs.
Considering that from the time of the Babylonian sacking of Jerusalem in the 6th Century BC and the life of Christ there has been no Judahite king, the Christian should expect Judah's sceptre to have existed elsewhere in the meantime.
Genesis 49:10
The scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor the ruler’s staff from between his feet, until tribute comes to him; and to him shall be the obedience of the peoples.
³⁰The wisdom of Solomon was greater than the wisdom of all the people of the east and more than all the wisdom of Egypt. ³¹He was wiser than all the men: Ethan the Ezrahite; Heman, Calcol, and Darda the children of Mahol; and he was very well known.
We later read in 1 Chronicles 2:5-6 that these were all children of Zarah-Judah. When Moses comes to take the census following the Exodus from Egypt, we see that no individual sons of Zarah are named, whereas the children of Pharez are (Num. 26:20-21). If these people are used as a comparison in order to display the Wisdom of Solomon, and if they were neither in the east country, in Egypt nor in the horde migrating with Moses, then where could they have been? Let us take two examples, that of Darda and Chalcol. These men appear nowhere else in scripture besides the verses above in Kings and Chronicles, so to find them we must look to the secular records of history.
We see from the Greek texts that Dardanus is the founder of the Trojan royal dynasty, and a certain royal house of the Trojans are known as the Dardanians, including Aeneas. Of Aeneas, Homer's Iliad says...
"Let us rescue him, and avoid Zeus’s anger were Achilles to kill him, for Aeneas is destined to live on, so that Dardanus’ race itself might survive, Dardanus whom Zeus loved above all his children by mortal women. The Son of Cronos has come to hate Priam’s line, and mighty Aeneas will be the Trojan king, as his descendants will in time to come." ~ Homer, Iliad Book XX
Here we see something reminiscent to the promise made to Judah regarding kingship.
Of course, this would be fulfilled by the legendary Aeneas, when he would flee Troy's destruction to eventually settle in the Italian peninsula, founding a colony of Latinium with a local princess. The inhabitants of this town would go on to be the founding members of Rome, according to Virgil's Aeneid, as well as Strabo's Geographica (3.2.13, 6.1.12, 14; 13.1.52, 53 et al.).
Of course, Paul's epistle to the Romans even makes this very observation when Paul called Abraham their "forefather according to the flesh" (4:1).
Of course, there also exists folklore throughout the early middle ages with regards to European royal dynasties being founded by the children of the Trojan refugees. One such example would by that of Brutus of Britain, according to historians Nennius and Geoffrey of Monmouth, was the great-grandson of Aeneas that killed his own father in a hunting accident and was exiled. He would band up with other colonies of Trojans along the western Mediterranean coast and would eventually lead his kinsmen into the shores of Albion where they'd find a mythical race of giants that they'd slay, and end up establishing a kingdom after his name, Britain. His capital would be named Trinovantum, or Nova Troia (the Trinovantes being a tribe seen in Caesar's Commentaries), later renamed Caer Lud by one of his descendants, King Lud, and eventually renamed by the Romans as Londinium, or London as we know it. Brutus is the legendary ancestor of all of Britain's monarchs.
Considering that from the time of the Babylonian sacking of Jerusalem in the 6th Century BC and the life of Christ there has been no Judahite king, the Christian should expect Judah's sceptre to have existed elsewhere in the meantime.
Genesis 49:10
The scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor the ruler’s staff from between his feet, until tribute comes to him; and to him shall be the obedience of the peoples.