Forwarded from Christogenea Archive
Christogenea Bible Basics, presented by William Finck and Sven Longshanks.
Bible Basics is a series of podcasts with Sven Longshanks and William Finck which is meant to describe all of the fundamental aspects of Bible and history from a Christian Identity point of view. This series brings together all basic Christian Identity beliefs into a single narrative which explains them sufficiently to give the seeker of truth a firm foundation in our understanding.
Index:
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Part 6
Part 7
Part 8
Part 9
Part 10
Part 11
@ChristogeneaArchive
Bible Basics is a series of podcasts with Sven Longshanks and William Finck which is meant to describe all of the fundamental aspects of Bible and history from a Christian Identity point of view. This series brings together all basic Christian Identity beliefs into a single narrative which explains them sufficiently to give the seeker of truth a firm foundation in our understanding.
Index:
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Part 6
Part 7
Part 8
Part 9
Part 10
Part 11
@ChristogeneaArchive
Christogenea: The Spurious Book of Jasher, with Sven Longshanks
Link
Sven Longshanks and William Finck discuss some of the historical errors and anachronisms which expose the so-called "Book of Jasher" as a fraud, along with some of its many conflicts with Scripture. Do not be deceived by another medieval Jewish ploy to distort the Scriptures.
Link
Sven Longshanks and William Finck discuss some of the historical errors and anachronisms which expose the so-called "Book of Jasher" as a fraud, along with some of its many conflicts with Scripture. Do not be deceived by another medieval Jewish ploy to distort the Scriptures.
Adolf Hitler, in Volume 2, Chapter 2 of Mein Kampf, criticized the organized churches of Germany which “try to convert the Hottentots and the Zulus and the Kaffirs and to bestow on them the blessings of the Church. While our European people, God be praised and thanked, are left to become the victims of moral depravity, the pious missionary goes out to Central Africa and establishes missionary stations for negroes. Finally, sound and healthy – though primitive and backward – people will be transformed, under the name of our 'higher civilization', into a motley of lazy and brutalized mongrels. It would better accord with noble human aspirations if our two Christian denominations would cease to bother the negroes with their preaching, which the negroes do not want and do not understand.”
Christ Will Return to Wage WAR
Christ was not passive in His earthly life, and shall not be a peace-seeking hippie when He returns. On the contrary, Christ will return to wage war against the powers of this earth.
Today, we dwell under the yoke of Babylon the Great (Rev. 18), which is destined to collapse (vv. 2, 21). We are called to separate from this system and to "come out from her" (v4), lest we are dragged down with it. In that hour we are expected to "repay her double for her deeds" (v6), hitting back twice as hard for all the injustices delivered to our people.
Revelation 19 then proclaims Christ's triumphant return on a white horse, "clothed in a robe dipped in blood", with the armies of heaven, armed with a sword "to strike down the nations" as "He judges and makes war". The armies of the beast gather to make war against the forces of good, and this final conflict ends with the devil and his children cast into the Lake of Fire (Rev. 19:11-21).
Christ was not passive in His earthly life, and shall not be a peace-seeking hippie when He returns. On the contrary, Christ will return to wage war against the powers of this earth.
Today, we dwell under the yoke of Babylon the Great (Rev. 18), which is destined to collapse (vv. 2, 21). We are called to separate from this system and to "come out from her" (v4), lest we are dragged down with it. In that hour we are expected to "repay her double for her deeds" (v6), hitting back twice as hard for all the injustices delivered to our people.
Revelation 19 then proclaims Christ's triumphant return on a white horse, "clothed in a robe dipped in blood", with the armies of heaven, armed with a sword "to strike down the nations" as "He judges and makes war". The armies of the beast gather to make war against the forces of good, and this final conflict ends with the devil and his children cast into the Lake of Fire (Rev. 19:11-21).
In all of the time Heirs of the Promise has been active on Telegram, we haven't heard a single tangible criticism of CI that extends beyond the "we wuz jews" meme. These hecklers have divorced their words from being worthy of any respect.
The simple truth of the matter is that tenets and concepts of Christian Identity are spreading and there is nothing that these racial universalists can do to stop it. The truth, like a lion, needs no man to defend it; let it loose and it will defend itself. Learn what Christian Identity is, and if you are interested in digging deeper then join us at @HeirsofPromise [chat]
The simple truth of the matter is that tenets and concepts of Christian Identity are spreading and there is nothing that these racial universalists can do to stop it. The truth, like a lion, needs no man to defend it; let it loose and it will defend itself. Learn what Christian Identity is, and if you are interested in digging deeper then join us at @HeirsofPromise [chat]
New DNA Study Confirms Jews And Arabs Share Up To 50% Canaanite Genetic Ancestry
[1] [2]
Just as the discovery of genetics undermined the theory of evolution, the same can now be said for the Jewish contention that they are “God’s chosen people", the legitimate descendants of the Israelites, as a new DNA study has revealed that both Jews and Arabs share common ancestry with the Canaanites, the ancient enemies of the biblical Israelites.
[1] [2]
Just as the discovery of genetics undermined the theory of evolution, the same can now be said for the Jewish contention that they are “God’s chosen people", the legitimate descendants of the Israelites, as a new DNA study has revealed that both Jews and Arabs share common ancestry with the Canaanites, the ancient enemies of the biblical Israelites.
Catholics have inserted many words into their translation of the Scriptures that do not belong such as "gentile" and "jew". These words should more honestly, and most often, be translated as "nation" and "Judean" respectively.
Likewise Catholics have also inserted the word "godhead" and created a whole doctrine based on this word. The word for godhead in the New Testament does not refer to an entity that encapsulates the Father and the Son and Holy Spirit but rather the Greek only refers to qualities which belong alone to Yahweh God.
These heretics have inserted the word in three places; Acts 17:29, Romans 1:20, Colossians 2:9.
An examination of these words reveals that these verses should be understood differently than catholics see it
The first being θεῖος what comes from God
The latter two being θειότης Divinity, the state of being God
Strong's Concordance and others are known for throwing these words in as definitions at the end of the list to follow the church and it does so here... this is no proof
Likewise Catholics have also inserted the word "godhead" and created a whole doctrine based on this word. The word for godhead in the New Testament does not refer to an entity that encapsulates the Father and the Son and Holy Spirit but rather the Greek only refers to qualities which belong alone to Yahweh God.
These heretics have inserted the word in three places; Acts 17:29, Romans 1:20, Colossians 2:9.
An examination of these words reveals that these verses should be understood differently than catholics see it
The first being θεῖος what comes from God
The latter two being θειότης Divinity, the state of being God
Strong's Concordance and others are known for throwing these words in as definitions at the end of the list to follow the church and it does so here... this is no proof
Salvation Through Marriage.
Christ dying for our salvation is one of the core premises of any group that calls themselves Christian. While just knowing this is sufficient, it is extremely important to understand HOW the death of Yahshua could save His people.
Cont.
Christ dying for our salvation is one of the core premises of any group that calls themselves Christian. While just knowing this is sufficient, it is extremely important to understand HOW the death of Yahshua could save His people.
Cont.
To understand how Christ's death could save us, we must understand the nature of the law that condemned us in the first place. While some laws were given before, we can find all the designations for Israel, after Moses' trip to Sinai, in Deuteronomy and Leviticus. To break these laws would be sin (1 John 3:4), the punishment almost always death (Romans 6:23, 1 John 5:17). This law was given to Israel as the terms of our marriage with Yahweh, vows if you will (Exodus 19-24).
Yahweh does not change, His word is immutable. If someone broke the law, they are condemned to second death or total destruction. While Yahweh provisioned ways to atone for sin with the priesthood, the punishment was still death. The law was an agreement between two parties, Israel and Yahweh. This is why Yahweh couldn't just speak the punishment or guilt away. If Yahweh broke the law then He too would surely die.
The Israelites failure to follow these terms of marriage through adultery with false gods and mixing seed caused our divorce from Yahweh (Jeremiah 3:8). We were lead into captivity by our enemies and entered a spiritual dark age. Even through this Yahweh still made promises to save us (Jeremiah 31:31-32, Isaiah 45:17). The punishment of death for breaking our covenant was still looming and immutable, but Yahweh promised to re-marry Israel (Hos 2:19-20) and would fulfill this promise with His own life (Acts 20:28).
For Yahweh to be able to fulfill His promise that He shall save Israel, He would have to be able to release us from the punishment of the law without breaking the law Himself. The law states that if you divorce your wife for adultery, that it is a sin to take her back as the wife has been defiled (Deuteronomy 24:1-4). This would mean Yahweh could not re-marry Israel directly under the law. There is one way to free a wife from the Law of the husband in the bible and Paul mentions this in Romans 6:20-23 and explains this in Romans 7:1-6. If a woman's husband dies she is released from her husbands law and subsequently its punishments.
This is why Israel's relationship with God being a marriage is so important. God, our husband, sacrificed His own life so He could free us from the punishment of death His law demanded. The only way to be able to re-marry Israel without God sinning was to die and release us from our own sin against the Law first.
By the Law either Israel/Adam or Yahweh had to die
(Heb 9:22; Isa 53:4-5; 1Peter 2:23-24)
With that we see Christ's death is not a ritual but an act of a living God who chose to die in place of His people. Christ is Yahweh come in the flesh, the husband of Israel, who died to save us and make us His eternal bride with the Marriage Supper of the Lamb.
Yahweh Bless
Yahweh does not change, His word is immutable. If someone broke the law, they are condemned to second death or total destruction. While Yahweh provisioned ways to atone for sin with the priesthood, the punishment was still death. The law was an agreement between two parties, Israel and Yahweh. This is why Yahweh couldn't just speak the punishment or guilt away. If Yahweh broke the law then He too would surely die.
The Israelites failure to follow these terms of marriage through adultery with false gods and mixing seed caused our divorce from Yahweh (Jeremiah 3:8). We were lead into captivity by our enemies and entered a spiritual dark age. Even through this Yahweh still made promises to save us (Jeremiah 31:31-32, Isaiah 45:17). The punishment of death for breaking our covenant was still looming and immutable, but Yahweh promised to re-marry Israel (Hos 2:19-20) and would fulfill this promise with His own life (Acts 20:28).
For Yahweh to be able to fulfill His promise that He shall save Israel, He would have to be able to release us from the punishment of the law without breaking the law Himself. The law states that if you divorce your wife for adultery, that it is a sin to take her back as the wife has been defiled (Deuteronomy 24:1-4). This would mean Yahweh could not re-marry Israel directly under the law. There is one way to free a wife from the Law of the husband in the bible and Paul mentions this in Romans 6:20-23 and explains this in Romans 7:1-6. If a woman's husband dies she is released from her husbands law and subsequently its punishments.
This is why Israel's relationship with God being a marriage is so important. God, our husband, sacrificed His own life so He could free us from the punishment of death His law demanded. The only way to be able to re-marry Israel without God sinning was to die and release us from our own sin against the Law first.
By the Law either Israel/Adam or Yahweh had to die
(Heb 9:22; Isa 53:4-5; 1Peter 2:23-24)
With that we see Christ's death is not a ritual but an act of a living God who chose to die in place of His people. Christ is Yahweh come in the flesh, the husband of Israel, who died to save us and make us His eternal bride with the Marriage Supper of the Lamb.
Yahweh Bless
Heirs of Yahweh's Covenants
From creation, the message and covenants of Yahweh have been distinctly for one family and their descendants. You will find many groups today who will try and include anybody in these covenants, however this is not scripturally accurate. Any time the scripture mentions Israel or any of God's congregations, it only speaks of those who have inherited the covenants from their fathers. Christ came to keep His promises, not to create a universal covenant for anything on two legs.
Cont.
From creation, the message and covenants of Yahweh have been distinctly for one family and their descendants. You will find many groups today who will try and include anybody in these covenants, however this is not scripturally accurate. Any time the scripture mentions Israel or any of God's congregations, it only speaks of those who have inherited the covenants from their fathers. Christ came to keep His promises, not to create a universal covenant for anything on two legs.
Cont.
We can see this in the very first covenant God made with Adam and the result of it being broken (Gen 1:28-29, 2:16-17, 3). Adam/Man would have eternal life lest he eat from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, which Eve was quickly beguiled to do. Adam accepted her in sin allowing Cain to be born and bringing death into the world. We equate the tree as a family tree of the Fallen Angels, and like an adultress Eve "ate" from it (Prov 30:20). And while many claim Cain to be Adam's child, scripture states he was of "That wicked one", a devil doing his father's will (1 John 3:12, John 8:42-44).
The next covenant is with Noah, who was "perfect in his generations/lineage" and the progenitor of all Adamic man after the flood. This covenant echoes many statements made to Adam such as to be fruitful and multiply, while also including a punishment for murder and a promise to not cause mass floods (Gen 9:1-11). Yahweh explains to Noah that he establishes this Covenant with his seed explicitly, after having drowned all other Adamites who were mixing with The Tree of Knowledge (Gen 9:9). [1] [2]
This leads us to Abraham and the covenant his seed would inherit. Abraham's other sons such as Ishmael were not included, it would be through Isaac (Gen 17:20-26, Gal 4:28,31). Isaac's son Esau, mixed with the Tree of Knowledge damning his children and excluding them from Adamic kind altogether (Heb 12:16). This leaves only Jacob's seed as the true heir of God's promise to Abraham (Gen 27:46, Gen 36:2)
The covenant found in Genesis 15 was an unconditional promise Yahweh made to Abraham, this is the basis of every covenant that follows. It is also the reason Israel would never be blotted out of the book of Adam, they would always survive unlike many of the other Adamic nations. Yahweh having passed through the divided animals confirmed his promises to Abraham, without any requirements from Abraham or his seed. According to ancient inscriptions, this ritual was common in covenants where the promiser(s) are swearing on their life (Jer 34:18). This is why Yahshua Christ came to "fulfill the promises to the fathers" (Rom 9:4, Rom 15:8), He died for the promises He made in order to keep them. [Born Under Contract + Presentation]
The covenants after (Jacob) Israel continue with the law/marriage agreement (Exo 19-24), their acquiring of Canaan, and the creation of their kingdoms Israel and Judah (Deu 26:17-18) (Deu 28:1,15) (1Sam 16:13, Psa 89: 34-37, Jer 33:20-21) (2Sam 7:12-16)
Eventually, Yahweh divorces His people (Jer 3:8) and sends them into captivity for their sin[Hos 1:1-11]; but the law cannot break Yahweh's unconditional promises to Abraham (Gal 3:21-22)! Telling them He shall "not make a full end" of Israel and promising to remarry Israel (Jer 30:11, Hos 2:14-23).
The New Covenant continues with those same people, Israel (Jer 31:31). It was not with anyone else and Yahshua Christ never claimed anything but Israel (Mat 15:24). Though all Adam can have a relationship with Yahweh as Paul demonstrated with the Lukaonians (Acts 14:6-1) and Ionians (Acts 17:16-34), it is different to the relationship between God and Israel (Deu 14:2, 1Pet 2:9).
To conclude, nowhere has Yahweh allowed someone who was not an heir of his covenant to believe their way in (Galatians 3:29, Mat 7:21-23). In fact, God has done nothing but exclude children of mixed relationships, who had no choice, from his promises. Look at any modern Christian group and see even the demons believe and tremble; however, sheeps clothing will not save them, include them in Israel, or even make them Adamic.
The next covenant is with Noah, who was "perfect in his generations/lineage" and the progenitor of all Adamic man after the flood. This covenant echoes many statements made to Adam such as to be fruitful and multiply, while also including a punishment for murder and a promise to not cause mass floods (Gen 9:1-11). Yahweh explains to Noah that he establishes this Covenant with his seed explicitly, after having drowned all other Adamites who were mixing with The Tree of Knowledge (Gen 9:9). [1] [2]
This leads us to Abraham and the covenant his seed would inherit. Abraham's other sons such as Ishmael were not included, it would be through Isaac (Gen 17:20-26, Gal 4:28,31). Isaac's son Esau, mixed with the Tree of Knowledge damning his children and excluding them from Adamic kind altogether (Heb 12:16). This leaves only Jacob's seed as the true heir of God's promise to Abraham (Gen 27:46, Gen 36:2)
The covenant found in Genesis 15 was an unconditional promise Yahweh made to Abraham, this is the basis of every covenant that follows. It is also the reason Israel would never be blotted out of the book of Adam, they would always survive unlike many of the other Adamic nations. Yahweh having passed through the divided animals confirmed his promises to Abraham, without any requirements from Abraham or his seed. According to ancient inscriptions, this ritual was common in covenants where the promiser(s) are swearing on their life (Jer 34:18). This is why Yahshua Christ came to "fulfill the promises to the fathers" (Rom 9:4, Rom 15:8), He died for the promises He made in order to keep them. [Born Under Contract + Presentation]
The covenants after (Jacob) Israel continue with the law/marriage agreement (Exo 19-24), their acquiring of Canaan, and the creation of their kingdoms Israel and Judah (Deu 26:17-18) (Deu 28:1,15) (1Sam 16:13, Psa 89: 34-37, Jer 33:20-21) (2Sam 7:12-16)
Eventually, Yahweh divorces His people (Jer 3:8) and sends them into captivity for their sin[Hos 1:1-11]; but the law cannot break Yahweh's unconditional promises to Abraham (Gal 3:21-22)! Telling them He shall "not make a full end" of Israel and promising to remarry Israel (Jer 30:11, Hos 2:14-23).
The New Covenant continues with those same people, Israel (Jer 31:31). It was not with anyone else and Yahshua Christ never claimed anything but Israel (Mat 15:24). Though all Adam can have a relationship with Yahweh as Paul demonstrated with the Lukaonians (Acts 14:6-1) and Ionians (Acts 17:16-34), it is different to the relationship between God and Israel (Deu 14:2, 1Pet 2:9).
To conclude, nowhere has Yahweh allowed someone who was not an heir of his covenant to believe their way in (Galatians 3:29, Mat 7:21-23). In fact, God has done nothing but exclude children of mixed relationships, who had no choice, from his promises. Look at any modern Christian group and see even the demons believe and tremble; however, sheeps clothing will not save them, include them in Israel, or even make them Adamic.
There is quite some confusion regarding the laws of God in modern Christianity. Some hold fast and rely on all of them to justify themselves as righteous. They are rare unlike those who follow the laws of men in churches, neither being truly Christian but Judaizers. The antithesis to this belief would be that all of these laws have been done away with and that we have total "freedom" in Christ's sacrifice, which happens to be just as erroneous. Often when these two extremes are mixed and matched, without regards to scripture, a new "faith" arises lulling in thousands. Those wishing to adhere to CI and scriptural doctrine should know that we are required to "establish the law" (Rom 3:31). [Christian Foundations]
That which has gone away are the rituals and ordinances of the Sinaitic covenant, along with the Levitical priesthood designated to facilitate them (Dan 9:27, Heb 9). Many of these rituals and ordinances required man to work for and prove his righteousness, through works like wearing certain clothing to offering sacrifices. When Israel was divorced and lead into captivity their Sinaitic covenant was voided, along with the purpose of following the rituals, as they had given up God Himself (Jer 3:1-10, Zech 11:10-11, Isaiah 1). Later, the Sinaitic rituals and ordinances would be fulfilled through Jesus, and He established a new covenant which continued the moral law of the Mosaic covenant and all prior covenants with Adamic kind (Jer 31:31-38, Luke 22:19-20, Mat 5:17-19). This included cleansing all Israel of sin along with our clean animals prepared profanely (1 John 1:7, Acts 10:9-17).
Since the divorce you will find groups trying to salvage the rituals of a voided and conditional covenant, by vainly sacrificing, and following their "traditions of the elders" (Mark 7:1-9). The Pharisees would be an example of Judaizers in Christ's time, or those who followed the rituals of a dead covenant, or even made up ones, in a vain attempt at man-made righteousness regardless of faith. The biggest culprits of this in today's time would be the Judeo churches who have created their own "traditions of the elders", with each sect being greater or lesser in this evil. Worst of all believing they are the ones removing sin, or providing the gateway to heaven, desecrating Yahweh's sacrifice. Like a physician they prescribe requirements to be saved, from ritual water baptism, confession to a man, believing or saying the "right" things, to even pretending to ritually cannibalize Jesus!
A large misconception in modern theology today is baptism; the requirement for water cleansing was never in reference to salvation in the Law (Exo 40:31-32, Lev 15:2-6). In fact it was a ritual specifically for the priesthood and for the Passover lamb (Exo 12:1-6), Christ being our final lamb and High Priest (John 1:29, Heb 4:14). The later baptism of John was a matter of prophecy (Isa 40). Yahweh has already cleansed us all with His own blood (Acts 20:28, 1 John 1:7). The baptism of John was for a short period and even the apostles did not understand at first (Acts 1:4-5, 10:48, 11:15-16), but learned the true baptism is now in the hearing of the good message (Acts 10:44, 1 Pet 3:21). A man was found preaching and knowing only the baptism of John in (Acts 18:25-28) but two women privately corrected him.
On the other hand many groups will confuse the Sinaitic covenant, and make it synonymous with any covenant and old testament law as a whole. While it was the core of Israel's code, many of the laws found therein existed before. This misunderstanding leads to those who do away with any law found in the old testament. Many being moral laws, summarized in the 10 commandments handed down to Moses, and later summarized (Matt 22:37-40, Luke 18:20) and written in our hearts by the will of Yahweh (Jer 31:33).
That which has gone away are the rituals and ordinances of the Sinaitic covenant, along with the Levitical priesthood designated to facilitate them (Dan 9:27, Heb 9). Many of these rituals and ordinances required man to work for and prove his righteousness, through works like wearing certain clothing to offering sacrifices. When Israel was divorced and lead into captivity their Sinaitic covenant was voided, along with the purpose of following the rituals, as they had given up God Himself (Jer 3:1-10, Zech 11:10-11, Isaiah 1). Later, the Sinaitic rituals and ordinances would be fulfilled through Jesus, and He established a new covenant which continued the moral law of the Mosaic covenant and all prior covenants with Adamic kind (Jer 31:31-38, Luke 22:19-20, Mat 5:17-19). This included cleansing all Israel of sin along with our clean animals prepared profanely (1 John 1:7, Acts 10:9-17).
Since the divorce you will find groups trying to salvage the rituals of a voided and conditional covenant, by vainly sacrificing, and following their "traditions of the elders" (Mark 7:1-9). The Pharisees would be an example of Judaizers in Christ's time, or those who followed the rituals of a dead covenant, or even made up ones, in a vain attempt at man-made righteousness regardless of faith. The biggest culprits of this in today's time would be the Judeo churches who have created their own "traditions of the elders", with each sect being greater or lesser in this evil. Worst of all believing they are the ones removing sin, or providing the gateway to heaven, desecrating Yahweh's sacrifice. Like a physician they prescribe requirements to be saved, from ritual water baptism, confession to a man, believing or saying the "right" things, to even pretending to ritually cannibalize Jesus!
A large misconception in modern theology today is baptism; the requirement for water cleansing was never in reference to salvation in the Law (Exo 40:31-32, Lev 15:2-6). In fact it was a ritual specifically for the priesthood and for the Passover lamb (Exo 12:1-6), Christ being our final lamb and High Priest (John 1:29, Heb 4:14). The later baptism of John was a matter of prophecy (Isa 40). Yahweh has already cleansed us all with His own blood (Acts 20:28, 1 John 1:7). The baptism of John was for a short period and even the apostles did not understand at first (Acts 1:4-5, 10:48, 11:15-16), but learned the true baptism is now in the hearing of the good message (Acts 10:44, 1 Pet 3:21). A man was found preaching and knowing only the baptism of John in (Acts 18:25-28) but two women privately corrected him.
On the other hand many groups will confuse the Sinaitic covenant, and make it synonymous with any covenant and old testament law as a whole. While it was the core of Israel's code, many of the laws found therein existed before. This misunderstanding leads to those who do away with any law found in the old testament. Many being moral laws, summarized in the 10 commandments handed down to Moses, and later summarized (Matt 22:37-40, Luke 18:20) and written in our hearts by the will of Yahweh (Jer 31:33).
One example of this confusion is those who do away with what they believe to be "food laws", since they are found being explained in great detail to Moses at Sinai (Deut 14). What God defines as food for man has been in effect since the creation of Adam. Abel had his flock of sheep (Gen 4:2) and Noah was instructed to bring seven pairs of clean animals instead of the one pair of unclean animals onto his ark (Gen 7:2). Yahweh has created every creature for a purpose and many of them do not have a purpose as food. Men should know not to say that what God defines as food has been changed. They would be wise to know Yahweh's creations have not changed in purpose.
Judeos twist the words of Paul in 1 Cor 8 and other places where he is speaking of freedom from profane foods (2 Pet 3:14-16). Along with the KJV mistranslating simple words for their doctrines in Romans 14:14, where the KJV lies about the word "koinos" G2839 meaning common/profane and translate it as if "akathartos" G169 was written, meaning unclean. We do have "exousia" G1849 meaning choice, liberty, permission; that being the ability to live without the rituals and judgements of the Law (Gal 5:1-6). Though we have this freedom, Paul speaks of abstaining from these profane foods, in this case sacrificed to idols; for the sake of those weak in the faith who would be tried by your eating. [Christian Disagreement]
The Apostles followed the food laws as evident in Acts 10:14 and 15:29. You won't find any evidence they ate any unclean animals and they certainly did not teach to do so.
The Laws of sanctification will never change... Levitical priests could cleanse Israelites and clean animals but could not cleanse a bastard or unclean animal into food. The only difference in Christ's High Priesthood is that a clean animal can no longer become profane just as an Israelite cannot.
In conclusion, Yahweh died to free us from the Sinaitic covenant, based on works, the rituals of the priests; so He could remarry us in a new covenant based on faith; however this does not do away with the law, it establishes the law so that we may abound in favor, eternal reward, and trials that do not exceed our spirit. Yahweh will not accept vain attempts at following the "works of the law" or the traditions of robed men as a tally for righteousness, but faith in Christ freeing us from our transgressions.
Judeos twist the words of Paul in 1 Cor 8 and other places where he is speaking of freedom from profane foods (2 Pet 3:14-16). Along with the KJV mistranslating simple words for their doctrines in Romans 14:14, where the KJV lies about the word "koinos" G2839 meaning common/profane and translate it as if "akathartos" G169 was written, meaning unclean. We do have "exousia" G1849 meaning choice, liberty, permission; that being the ability to live without the rituals and judgements of the Law (Gal 5:1-6). Though we have this freedom, Paul speaks of abstaining from these profane foods, in this case sacrificed to idols; for the sake of those weak in the faith who would be tried by your eating. [Christian Disagreement]
The Apostles followed the food laws as evident in Acts 10:14 and 15:29. You won't find any evidence they ate any unclean animals and they certainly did not teach to do so.
The Laws of sanctification will never change... Levitical priests could cleanse Israelites and clean animals but could not cleanse a bastard or unclean animal into food. The only difference in Christ's High Priesthood is that a clean animal can no longer become profane just as an Israelite cannot.
In conclusion, Yahweh died to free us from the Sinaitic covenant, based on works, the rituals of the priests; so He could remarry us in a new covenant based on faith; however this does not do away with the law, it establishes the law so that we may abound in favor, eternal reward, and trials that do not exceed our spirit. Yahweh will not accept vain attempts at following the "works of the law" or the traditions of robed men as a tally for righteousness, but faith in Christ freeing us from our transgressions.
Christian Identity Methodology
Modern day Christianity is a complete mess, full of made up theories and authorities that oppose one another and the scripture itself. Christian Identity has the obligation of moving past their failings and truly holding the Scriptures as authority rather than the ideas of men.
The basic approach to Scripture that CI holds involves Scriptural witnesses (Isaiah 8:20, 1 Thes 5:21), word studies, and defining Biblical concepts with the scripture [2]. Christian Identists hold the Bible as the authority, and not the subjective opinion of a man, as the word of God cannot contradict itself. Scripture must be interpreted holistically, if two verses seem to conflict, then the context, word definitions or your own false premise must be examined.
Cont.
Modern day Christianity is a complete mess, full of made up theories and authorities that oppose one another and the scripture itself. Christian Identity has the obligation of moving past their failings and truly holding the Scriptures as authority rather than the ideas of men.
The basic approach to Scripture that CI holds involves Scriptural witnesses (Isaiah 8:20, 1 Thes 5:21), word studies, and defining Biblical concepts with the scripture [2]. Christian Identists hold the Bible as the authority, and not the subjective opinion of a man, as the word of God cannot contradict itself. Scripture must be interpreted holistically, if two verses seem to conflict, then the context, word definitions or your own false premise must be examined.
Cont.
Christians should not be like judeos, spiritualizing the words of the Bible such as seed, fathers, Israelite, etc. The Bible is not a book that needs a priest with mystical powers to understand it. All it requires is logic and consistency to keep it coherent. Taking a pre-conceived premise such as "all humanoids are mankind/Adam-kind", the judeo can never get anywhere in scriptural understanding without someone proving their non-biblical premise wrong with the plain words of scripture. The same goes for many more ideas including the trinity.
The correct method is using the plain words of Yahweh to understand scripture. We cannot create our views based on verses with multiple valid interpretations. We do not refute the words of Isaiah with other verses, rather they should be interpreted in respect of Isaiah.
Something Paul says to Romans cannot nullify something Christ said in the Gospel of Matthew.
Something Isaiah said in the time of the patriarchs cannot be nullified by the church fathers
♰ Abraham's seed would become many nations, not that many nations would become Abraham's seed (Gen 17)
♰ When we read that there is one YHWH and no other we can't then contend with His words (Isa 45; Joel 2:27)
♰ When Yahweh says "all the seed of Israel shall be justified" we can't then interpret other verses into believing we aren't. (Isa 45)
♰ Christ says "I am sent only to the lost sheep of Israel" and this cannot be changed by any other scripture! (Mat 15:24)
All scripture is good (2 Tim 3:16) but we must know what is scripture in the case of apocrypha and failures by the ancient scribes (Jer 8:8) such as Deut 23:7 being indiscernible in manuscripts between Edomite and Aramite (Syrian). Another example being the problem with Genesis 4:1
Romans 3:4 "Rather, Yahweh will be true, and every man a liar..."
Romans 3:7 "Indeed if the truth of Yahweh were increased by my lie for His honor, why then am I still judged as a wrongdoer?"
YOU CANNOT DISPROVE SCRIPTURE, WITH SCRIPTURE
The correct method is using the plain words of Yahweh to understand scripture. We cannot create our views based on verses with multiple valid interpretations. We do not refute the words of Isaiah with other verses, rather they should be interpreted in respect of Isaiah.
Something Paul says to Romans cannot nullify something Christ said in the Gospel of Matthew.
Something Isaiah said in the time of the patriarchs cannot be nullified by the church fathers
♰ Abraham's seed would become many nations, not that many nations would become Abraham's seed (Gen 17)
♰ When we read that there is one YHWH and no other we can't then contend with His words (Isa 45; Joel 2:27)
♰ When Yahweh says "all the seed of Israel shall be justified" we can't then interpret other verses into believing we aren't. (Isa 45)
♰ Christ says "I am sent only to the lost sheep of Israel" and this cannot be changed by any other scripture! (Mat 15:24)
All scripture is good (2 Tim 3:16) but we must know what is scripture in the case of apocrypha and failures by the ancient scribes (Jer 8:8) such as Deut 23:7 being indiscernible in manuscripts between Edomite and Aramite (Syrian). Another example being the problem with Genesis 4:1
Romans 3:4 "Rather, Yahweh will be true, and every man a liar..."
Romans 3:7 "Indeed if the truth of Yahweh were increased by my lie for His honor, why then am I still judged as a wrongdoer?"
YOU CANNOT DISPROVE SCRIPTURE, WITH SCRIPTURE
It has come to our attention that a website claiming to promote CI called "Christians for Truth", or CFT for short, is really just another
CI-lite dumpster fire. With their recent article "Will All Israel Be Saved or Just A Remnant?" it became crystal clear they are a group of choir boys that want to send their brethren to eternal destruction with the rest of the bastards. This is an unacceptable doctrine and a disgusting curse on all Adam kind.
This awful website does not allow the posting of Christogenea.org links or even the mentioning of the site. Seeing as CFT are unable to correctly dispense the Word of Yahweh and His Good Message, they should be avoided.
Cont.
CI-lite dumpster fire. With their recent article "Will All Israel Be Saved or Just A Remnant?" it became crystal clear they are a group of choir boys that want to send their brethren to eternal destruction with the rest of the bastards. This is an unacceptable doctrine and a disgusting curse on all Adam kind.
This awful website does not allow the posting of Christogenea.org links or even the mentioning of the site. Seeing as CFT are unable to correctly dispense the Word of Yahweh and His Good Message, they should be avoided.
Cont.
CFT seems to believe the gift and fulfillment of the unconditional promises we have inherited are to be earned, or lost, through works. You earn a "wedding garment" if you are good enough on earth (Not through being born into the married family), and this clothing allows you to avoid the punishment of sin, not the death of Yahweh releasing us. You must also remember and confess to every sin you have committed, while on earth, lest you miss out on forgiveness you must earn (Misrepresented 1 John 1:9).
I believe this error stems from their equating forgiveness for sin, with salvation from the punishment of sin. You can forgive a child for drawing on the walls, however the crayon is still there and the spanking still happened. God not only forgives us but saved us from the punishment of death we, under the law, must have faced. While CFT is correct that we should not let having white skin overtake the importance of good deeds. If one uses God's sacrifice as a get out of jail free card, he likely isn't "truly" Christian to begin with, and using those that do as an example of why Israel can only be saved through works is backwards, inaccurate and scripturally unfounded.
True CI writing "The Good Message"
True CI message from our friend in the comments...
A very good case can be made for racial salvation based on the three verses that say ‘all Israel is saved’ (Romans 11:26, Isaiah 45:25, Isaiah 45:17 ) in the Bible. That is three witnesses. And then there are many supporting verses, such as ‘every knee shall bow’ and verses where Paul tells us about the fornicator and the Judgement of the Adamic man (1 Corinthians 3, 1 Corinthians 5). At Romans 11:26 Paul is actually speaking about unbelief, about the hardness of hearts in Judea.
CFT didnt mention Isaiah 45:25; it says “all the seed”.
Israel is a race.
A very strong case. Based on the plain words of Scripture. Certainly a good proof for racial salvation. Later we see Christ judging the nations and He divides by ethnos (the judgement of nations at Matthew 25).
To dismiss these witnesses CFT seems to use verses that have multiple possible interpretations in a vacuum. While Isaiah clearly says ‘all Israel is saved’ the verses CFT cites could be interpreted to be in agreement with racial salvation very easily. I would suggest that it is better to interpret such verses as CFT cites in respect of Isaiah rather than trying to reinterpret Isaiah with verses that have multiple possible meanings. It is a better approach, objectively speaking. We must have an approach that honestly seeks to understand the message of Scripture, to conform ourselves to Scripture with humility. CFT’s case relies on a flawed approach IMO. It isn't a very strong case because of it’s methodology. As I have explained.
I would rather interpret the verses CFT cites in respect of the plain meaning of Isaiah. I accept what the prophet says as true. I believe his report ; racial salvation is the Bible.
I look forward to the day when the traitors of our race receive their reward. They will have everlasting contempt which may be worse than death.
While many white folk will come to Christ so that their good works may be manifest.
When I profess racial salvation, that does not mean that all white folk will have an equal reward or that traitors will be happy since they will have no reward.
☩
Now they have a new theory that Edomites were pure whites and the reason for Esau's failure was marrying pagans. Yet Jacob married pagan daughters of Laban, it is a racial issue and they have no clue what they are talking about. These people are failures...
I believe this error stems from their equating forgiveness for sin, with salvation from the punishment of sin. You can forgive a child for drawing on the walls, however the crayon is still there and the spanking still happened. God not only forgives us but saved us from the punishment of death we, under the law, must have faced. While CFT is correct that we should not let having white skin overtake the importance of good deeds. If one uses God's sacrifice as a get out of jail free card, he likely isn't "truly" Christian to begin with, and using those that do as an example of why Israel can only be saved through works is backwards, inaccurate and scripturally unfounded.
True CI writing "The Good Message"
True CI message from our friend in the comments...
A very good case can be made for racial salvation based on the three verses that say ‘all Israel is saved’ (Romans 11:26, Isaiah 45:25, Isaiah 45:17 ) in the Bible. That is three witnesses. And then there are many supporting verses, such as ‘every knee shall bow’ and verses where Paul tells us about the fornicator and the Judgement of the Adamic man (1 Corinthians 3, 1 Corinthians 5). At Romans 11:26 Paul is actually speaking about unbelief, about the hardness of hearts in Judea.
CFT didnt mention Isaiah 45:25; it says “all the seed”.
Israel is a race.
A very strong case. Based on the plain words of Scripture. Certainly a good proof for racial salvation. Later we see Christ judging the nations and He divides by ethnos (the judgement of nations at Matthew 25).
To dismiss these witnesses CFT seems to use verses that have multiple possible interpretations in a vacuum. While Isaiah clearly says ‘all Israel is saved’ the verses CFT cites could be interpreted to be in agreement with racial salvation very easily. I would suggest that it is better to interpret such verses as CFT cites in respect of Isaiah rather than trying to reinterpret Isaiah with verses that have multiple possible meanings. It is a better approach, objectively speaking. We must have an approach that honestly seeks to understand the message of Scripture, to conform ourselves to Scripture with humility. CFT’s case relies on a flawed approach IMO. It isn't a very strong case because of it’s methodology. As I have explained.
I would rather interpret the verses CFT cites in respect of the plain meaning of Isaiah. I accept what the prophet says as true. I believe his report ; racial salvation is the Bible.
I look forward to the day when the traitors of our race receive their reward. They will have everlasting contempt which may be worse than death.
While many white folk will come to Christ so that their good works may be manifest.
When I profess racial salvation, that does not mean that all white folk will have an equal reward or that traitors will be happy since they will have no reward.
☩
Now they have a new theory that Edomites were pure whites and the reason for Esau's failure was marrying pagans. Yet Jacob married pagan daughters of Laban, it is a racial issue and they have no clue what they are talking about. These people are failures...
The Many Manifestations of Yahweh
Throughout the ages there has been an endless stream of church heresies, and countless refurbished pagan rituals for these so called "Christian" fraternities that spring up; however, none of these traditions and vain dress are based on Christ's word. Many of these heresies originate from pagan beliefs being suited up as Christianity, others from misinterpreted scripture. One in particular that we would like to discuss is the Trinity and the pitfalls that come with it.
There are many renditions of the Trinity just like any biblical subject, however the core premise remains in direct opposition to everything Israel has been taught and handed down by God Himself. This premise being Yahweh is composed of 3 distinct persons, the Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
Cont.
Throughout the ages there has been an endless stream of church heresies, and countless refurbished pagan rituals for these so called "Christian" fraternities that spring up; however, none of these traditions and vain dress are based on Christ's word. Many of these heresies originate from pagan beliefs being suited up as Christianity, others from misinterpreted scripture. One in particular that we would like to discuss is the Trinity and the pitfalls that come with it.
There are many renditions of the Trinity just like any biblical subject, however the core premise remains in direct opposition to everything Israel has been taught and handed down by God Himself. This premise being Yahweh is composed of 3 distinct persons, the Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
Cont.
Yahweh is ONE. Period. (Deut 6:4)
He will manifest Himself as He so pleases and in as many ways simultaneously as He could desire. (Matt 3:16, Exo 3:4 etc.)
Yahweh is The Father. (Isa 64:8)
Christ is the Image of the Person of Yahweh. (1Tim 2:5-6)
The Father came down as one of his own sons. (Heb 2:16)
Yahshua - YHWH SAVES - Christ is His Tabernacle. (Exo 14:30 "Yahweh saved", Eze 37:26-28; Isa 12:6)
Indeed the Son and the Father are one. (John 10:30)
Hence Christ can be the root and offspring of David. (Rev 22:16; Mat 22:41-46)
Through biblical scripture, you can come to the conclusion that Yahweh, which is the name of the Father, (Isa 64:8) who is our God; is required to have come down and lived as one of His own sons (Heb 2:16) and die as a man in order to release Israel from the Marriage Bonds and Remarry Israel (Acts 20:28, Hosea 2:19-20). This could not be accomplished without Yahweh's ability to transcend His creation, keep His Law, and come as His own son. The Husband must die to free the woman from judgement
(Rom 6:20-23; 7:1-6).
1 Cor 8:6 but to us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things, and we for Him; and one Prince (Lord), Yahshua Christ, through whom are all things, and we through Him.
John 20:28-29 Thomas answered and said unto him, My Prince (Lord) and my God.
Yahshua says to him: “Because you have seen Me you believe! Blessed are those not seeing and believing!”
Those against our position will be quick to recycle verses the churches have manipulated into their favor, have outright fabricated, or even truthful verses that have been misunderstood. They don't understand that these verses are of no use to their position. "What about" is not a proof and is besides the point. For example, one of these "silver bullet" verses is John 17:5, but they do not know the whole scriptures and cannot interpret the verse in such a manner without conflicting verses such as Isaiah 42:8, in a prophecy of the Gospel: “I am YHWH: that is my name: and my glory will I not give to another, neither my praise to graven images”.
They need a correct method to scripture. It can't contradict, so we must seek objective verses (Isa 9:6, John 14:8-9) to interpret the rest.
This is not a Catholic, Orthodox, or any other Judeo-Christian group. We are not Trinitarian, and do not subscribe to any of these Church lingo-isms littering the academic scope of Christianity serving to pigeon-hole any belief oppositional to the mainstream churches. We do not need Platonists or other pagan philosophers to understand and dictate what Yahweh has said. Frilly priests and their vain rituals for luring in unsuspecting Christians to save themselves through works and tithe are also to be avoided like a plague. These things are not Christian.
With that said I encourage you to stray from this heresy. As a full fleshed argument would be hard to fit into one post, we have linked plenty of articles, commentaries, and essays that add to and explain what we believe found below. I would recommend "Who is Your Savior" and it's commentary.
Haast "Why I Believe Oneness"
Joe "Christian Identity or Trinitarianism"
Comparet "Who is Your Savior"
Emahiser "Holy One"
Emahiser "Yahweh singular-ELOHIM"
Emahiser "The Day The Word Became Flesh"
Finck Review of "Who is Your Savior"
Finck Review of "The Day The Word Became Flesh"
Finck John Series
He will manifest Himself as He so pleases and in as many ways simultaneously as He could desire. (Matt 3:16, Exo 3:4 etc.)
Yahweh is The Father. (Isa 64:8)
Christ is the Image of the Person of Yahweh. (1Tim 2:5-6)
The Father came down as one of his own sons. (Heb 2:16)
Yahshua - YHWH SAVES - Christ is His Tabernacle. (Exo 14:30 "Yahweh saved", Eze 37:26-28; Isa 12:6)
Indeed the Son and the Father are one. (John 10:30)
Hence Christ can be the root and offspring of David. (Rev 22:16; Mat 22:41-46)
Through biblical scripture, you can come to the conclusion that Yahweh, which is the name of the Father, (Isa 64:8) who is our God; is required to have come down and lived as one of His own sons (Heb 2:16) and die as a man in order to release Israel from the Marriage Bonds and Remarry Israel (Acts 20:28, Hosea 2:19-20). This could not be accomplished without Yahweh's ability to transcend His creation, keep His Law, and come as His own son. The Husband must die to free the woman from judgement
(Rom 6:20-23; 7:1-6).
1 Cor 8:6 but to us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things, and we for Him; and one Prince (Lord), Yahshua Christ, through whom are all things, and we through Him.
John 20:28-29 Thomas answered and said unto him, My Prince (Lord) and my God.
Yahshua says to him: “Because you have seen Me you believe! Blessed are those not seeing and believing!”
Those against our position will be quick to recycle verses the churches have manipulated into their favor, have outright fabricated, or even truthful verses that have been misunderstood. They don't understand that these verses are of no use to their position. "What about" is not a proof and is besides the point. For example, one of these "silver bullet" verses is John 17:5, but they do not know the whole scriptures and cannot interpret the verse in such a manner without conflicting verses such as Isaiah 42:8, in a prophecy of the Gospel: “I am YHWH: that is my name: and my glory will I not give to another, neither my praise to graven images”.
They need a correct method to scripture. It can't contradict, so we must seek objective verses (Isa 9:6, John 14:8-9) to interpret the rest.
This is not a Catholic, Orthodox, or any other Judeo-Christian group. We are not Trinitarian, and do not subscribe to any of these Church lingo-isms littering the academic scope of Christianity serving to pigeon-hole any belief oppositional to the mainstream churches. We do not need Platonists or other pagan philosophers to understand and dictate what Yahweh has said. Frilly priests and their vain rituals for luring in unsuspecting Christians to save themselves through works and tithe are also to be avoided like a plague. These things are not Christian.
With that said I encourage you to stray from this heresy. As a full fleshed argument would be hard to fit into one post, we have linked plenty of articles, commentaries, and essays that add to and explain what we believe found below. I would recommend "Who is Your Savior" and it's commentary.
Haast "Why I Believe Oneness"
Joe "Christian Identity or Trinitarianism"
Comparet "Who is Your Savior"
Emahiser "Holy One"
Emahiser "Yahweh singular-ELOHIM"
Emahiser "The Day The Word Became Flesh"
Finck Review of "Who is Your Savior"
Finck Review of "The Day The Word Became Flesh"
Finck John Series
Forwarded from Christogenea Memes
♰YAHWEH IS ONE♰
His manifestations are not "multiple persons" and there is no such things as a catholic "godhead"
plain version
alternate orientation
Christogenea.org
His manifestations are not "multiple persons" and there is no such things as a catholic "godhead"
plain version
alternate orientation
Christogenea.org