400 Hal Finney - prebitcoin
13 subscribers
96 photos
5 videos
6 files
202 links
Hal Finney
RPOW - Reusable Proofs of Work
2004
https://t.me/Hal_Finney

@Hal_Finney

https://ramonquesada.com/english/telegrams-channels/

Created Jun 2018
Download Telegram
Forwarded from BTC Patent (@RamonQuesada 🌷)
10.1.1.394.3037.pdf
2.6 MB
Darrel Hankerson
Alfred Menezes
Scott Vanstone

Guide to Elliptic
Curve Cryptography
2004.pdf
Forwarded from 2008 - 2010 361 BitCoin History (@RamonQuesada 🌷)
Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper

Hal Finney hal at finney.org
Fri Nov 7 07:40:12 PST 2008

https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks-legacy/2008-November/155312.html
bitcoin

Hal Finney hal.finney at gmail.com
Tue Jan 27 15:29:32 PST 2009

"I've been running it for a couple of weeks now, with about 2000 Bitcoins generated (each successful generation gives 50 Bitcoins). I wrote a somewhat tongue in cheek article on the cryptography list estimating that each Bitcoin could be worth ten million dollars, so this is quite a haul :). (Actually that same reasoning implies that gold should be worth about $10K per ounce, so maybe it's not so many orders of magnitude off.) "

https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks-legacy/2009-January/156150.html
2008 11 07 Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper ES.docx
18.9 KB
Papel de efectivo electrónico P2P de Bitcoin
Hal Finney hal finney.org Vie 7 de noviembre 07:40:12 PST 2008

https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks-legacy/2008-November/155312.html
Forwarded from 2008 361 Ray Dillinger - Bear 400 (@RamonQuesada 🌷)
Copyright (c) 2008 Satoshi Nakamoto

Bitcoin source from November 2008.
December 23, 2013, 07:30:00 PM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=382374.0
Dying Outside
by HalFinney5th Oct 200988 comments
240
MedicineBiologyHuman BodiesLife ExtensionDeathCommunity
Frontpage
A man goes in to see his doctor, and after some tests, the doctor says, "I'm sorry, but you have a fatal disease."

Man: "That's terrible! How long have I got?"

Doctor: "Ten."

Man: "Ten? What kind of answer is that? Ten months? Ten years? Ten what?"

The doctor looks at his watch. "Nine."

Recently I received some bad medical news (although not as bad as in the joke). Unfortunately I have been diagnosed with a fatal disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis or ALS, sometimes called Lou Gehrig's disease. ALS causes nerve damage, progressive muscle weakness and paralysis, and ultimately death. Patients lose the ability to talk, walk, move, eventually even to breathe, which is usually the end of life. This process generally takes about 2 to 5 years.

There are however two bright spots in this picture. The first is that ALS normally does not affect higher brain functions. I will retain my abilities to think and reason as usual. Even as my body is dying outside, I will remain alive inside.

The second relates to survival. Although ALS is generally described as a fatal disease, this is not quite true. It is only mostly fatal. When breathing begins to fail, ALS patients must make a choice. They have the option to either go onto invasive mechanical respiration, which involves a tracheotomy and breathing machine, or they can die in comfort. I was very surprised to learn that over 90% of ALS patients choose to die. And even among those who choose life, for the great majority this is an emergency decision made in the hospital during a medical respiratory crisis. In a few cases the patient will have made his wishes known in advance, but most of the time the procedure is done as part of the medical management of the situation, and then the ALS patient either lives with it or asks to have the machine disconnected so he can die. Probably fewer than 1% of ALS patients arrange to go onto ventilation when they are still in relatively good health, even though this provides the best odds for a successful transition.

With mechanical respiration, survival with ALS can be indefinitely extended. And the great majority of people living on respirators say that their quality of life is good and they are happy with their decision. (There may be a selection effect here.) It seems, then, that calling ALS a fatal disease is an oversimplification. ALS takes away your body, but it does not take away your mind, and if you are determined and fortunate, it does not have to take away your life.

There are a number of practical and financial obstacles to successfully surviving on a ventilator, foremost among them the great load on caregivers. No doubt this contributes to the high rates of choosing death. But it seems that much of the objection is philosophical. People are not happy about being kept alive by machines. And they assume that their quality of life would be poor, without the ability to move and participate in their usual activities. This is despite the fact that most people on respirators describe their quality of life as acceptable to good. As we have seen in other contexts, people are surprisingly poor predictors of how they will react to changed circumstances. This seems to be such a case, contributing to the high death rates for ALS patients.
I hope that when the time comes, I will choose life. ALS kills only motor neurons, which carry signals to the muscles. The senses are intact. And most patients retain at least some vestige of control over a few muscles, which with modern technology can offer a surprisingly effective mode of communication. Stephen Hawking, the world's longest surviving ALS patient at over 40 years since diagnosis, is said to be able to type at ten words per minute by twitching a cheek muscle. I hope to be able to read, browse the net, and even participate in conversations by email and messaging. Voice synthesizers allow local communications, and I am making use of a free service for ALS patients which will create a synthetic model of my own natural voice, for future use. I may even still be able to write code, and my dream is to contribute to open source software projects even from within an immobile body. That will be a life very much worth living. https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/bshZiaLefDejvPKuS/dying-outside
Why I Don't Use PGP...
Hal 74076.1041 at CompuServe.COM
Sat Oct 31 09:42:14 PST 1992
https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks-legacy/1992-October/000628.html
Electronic Banking
Hal Finney ghsvax!hal at uunet.UU.NET
Wed Nov 25 13:04:57 PST 1992
https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks-legacy/1992-November/000876.html
Forwarded from bitcoin
Previously Unpublished Emails of Satoshi Nakamoto Present a New Puzzle
https://www.coindesk.com/satoshi-nakamoto-hal-finney-emails

The emails between Satoshi and Hal Finney come from Bitcoin’s earliest days. They show how closely the cryptocurrency’s creator collaborated with early supporters at the time.
Detecting Double Spending
Hal Finney
October 15, 1993 https://nakamotoinstitute.org/detecting-double-spending/
Hal Finney
Literature
- Detecting Double Spending - October 15, 1993
- Digital Cash & Privacy - August 19, 1993
- Bitcoin and Me - March 19, 2013
- RPOW - Reusable Proofs of Work - August 15, 2004
- PGP Web of Trust Misconceptions - March 30, 1994
- For-Pay Remailers - October 28, 1994
- Politics vs Technology - January 2, 1994 https://nakamotoinstitute.org/authors/hal-finney/
33 – How many people were involved in programming Bitcoin? Bear and Hal reviewed the code

"1. The Original Website - Satoshi Nakamoto
- Dr. Craig S. Wright & Ryan X. Charles."
2021 01 04

https://youtu.be/_E7iuVM4CIA
Me encanta ver como se estrujan el cerebro algunos, jejeje

Minuto 35:40
"Adam Back ha comentado alguna vez, que pareciera que Satoshi era un outsider, al no tener referencias cypherpunks"

"¿Qué sabemos de Satoshi antes de publicar el whitepaper de Bitcoin? - L92" en YouTube
https://youtu.be/mgn6TOW1IHg