Forwarded from Grumpy's Rabbit Hole
_"Suicidal Empathy" is precisely the optimal designation_
https://fixupx.com/aly_el_maghraby/status/2111875615326396838?s=46
https://fixupx.com/aly_el_maghraby/status/2111875615326396838?s=46
From Brivael Le Pogam@X:
Two days ago I wrote about the trap this generation keeps falling into. 1.5M of you read it. The most common reply: "OK, but who builds the trap?"
Fair question. Here's my answer. And let me be clear from the start: there is no secret room. No puppet master. What exists is far more banal and far more durable: a machine of incentives, where every person in the chain is paid to keep the same story alive. Nobody has to coordinate. The money does it for them.
Let's start at the bottom of the machine, with the person nobody ever looks at.
PART ONE: THE MACHINE, LINK BY LINK
A. The NGO bureaucrat.
His salary depends on the problem existing. He isn't paid to solve it. He's paid to document it, denounce it and campaign about it. An NGO that actually solved housing would have to lay itself off. So the incentive is never "fix." It's "mobilize." And nothing mobilizes like a villain.
B. The program officer.
The person who decides which NGO gets funded. He has to show "impact" to his board, and impact means reports, campaigns, reach, people in the street. A group that quietly builds 200 homes produces a boring report. A group that fills a square produces a great one.
C. The fiscal sponsor.
The plumbing. Many activist groups have no legal structure of their own, so their money flows through an umbrella nonprofit that receives and redistributes it. This is legal and common, and it makes the money nearly impossible to trace from donor to banner.
D. The university administrator.
Subsidized tuition didn't buy better teaching. It bought administration: entire offices whose job is to read every interaction between students as a power relation. Remove the lens and the office has no reason to exist.
E. The academic.
Careers run on grants and peer committees. Publish inside the dominant frame and you rise. Publish outside it and you're "problematic." Nobody has to forbid anything, because everyone can read the incentives.
F. The subsidized artist.
Film, theater and festivals are funded by committees that reward the "right" themes. The capitalist villain isn't a creative choice. It's a funding criterion nobody writes down.
G. The public broadcaster.
Paid by the taxpayer, never by the viewer. It never has to win you over. It has to please the people who renew its budget. Guess which villain it will never investigate.
H. The teacher.
Usually sincere, usually underpaid, trained in the same universities as everyone else. He passes on the lens he received, in good faith. That's what makes it so effective: the people transmitting it believe it.
I. The international institution.
Agencies and programs built around permanent crises. When a crisis ends, so does a budget. The narrative of eternal oppression becomes, quite literally, a business model.
J. The politician.
The last link, the one who cashes in. The machine produces anger. The politician harvests it and sells, as the cure, more of what caused the disease.
Ten links, and not one of them needs to be evil. Each one just follows its interest. That's what makes the machine so hard to stop: you can't arrest an incentive.
PART TWO: NOW THE REAL NAMES
The European Commission.
Between 2021 and 2023, more than €7.4 billion of EU money went to NGOs, in internal policy areas alone. In 2025 the EU's own Court of Auditors concluded that nobody, not even Brussels, has a reliable overview of where it all goes. When MEPs looked into the LIFE environmental program, the Commission itself admitted that some NGO work programmes it had funded contained "undue lobbying activities." In plain terms, public money paid activists to lobby the institutions that pay them. The auditors found nothing illegal, and that's exactly the point. It's all legal: the state paying people to ask the state for more state.
Two days ago I wrote about the trap this generation keeps falling into. 1.5M of you read it. The most common reply: "OK, but who builds the trap?"
Fair question. Here's my answer. And let me be clear from the start: there is no secret room. No puppet master. What exists is far more banal and far more durable: a machine of incentives, where every person in the chain is paid to keep the same story alive. Nobody has to coordinate. The money does it for them.
Let's start at the bottom of the machine, with the person nobody ever looks at.
PART ONE: THE MACHINE, LINK BY LINK
A. The NGO bureaucrat.
His salary depends on the problem existing. He isn't paid to solve it. He's paid to document it, denounce it and campaign about it. An NGO that actually solved housing would have to lay itself off. So the incentive is never "fix." It's "mobilize." And nothing mobilizes like a villain.
B. The program officer.
The person who decides which NGO gets funded. He has to show "impact" to his board, and impact means reports, campaigns, reach, people in the street. A group that quietly builds 200 homes produces a boring report. A group that fills a square produces a great one.
C. The fiscal sponsor.
The plumbing. Many activist groups have no legal structure of their own, so their money flows through an umbrella nonprofit that receives and redistributes it. This is legal and common, and it makes the money nearly impossible to trace from donor to banner.
D. The university administrator.
Subsidized tuition didn't buy better teaching. It bought administration: entire offices whose job is to read every interaction between students as a power relation. Remove the lens and the office has no reason to exist.
E. The academic.
Careers run on grants and peer committees. Publish inside the dominant frame and you rise. Publish outside it and you're "problematic." Nobody has to forbid anything, because everyone can read the incentives.
F. The subsidized artist.
Film, theater and festivals are funded by committees that reward the "right" themes. The capitalist villain isn't a creative choice. It's a funding criterion nobody writes down.
G. The public broadcaster.
Paid by the taxpayer, never by the viewer. It never has to win you over. It has to please the people who renew its budget. Guess which villain it will never investigate.
H. The teacher.
Usually sincere, usually underpaid, trained in the same universities as everyone else. He passes on the lens he received, in good faith. That's what makes it so effective: the people transmitting it believe it.
I. The international institution.
Agencies and programs built around permanent crises. When a crisis ends, so does a budget. The narrative of eternal oppression becomes, quite literally, a business model.
J. The politician.
The last link, the one who cashes in. The machine produces anger. The politician harvests it and sells, as the cure, more of what caused the disease.
Ten links, and not one of them needs to be evil. Each one just follows its interest. That's what makes the machine so hard to stop: you can't arrest an incentive.
PART TWO: NOW THE REAL NAMES
The European Commission.
Between 2021 and 2023, more than €7.4 billion of EU money went to NGOs, in internal policy areas alone. In 2025 the EU's own Court of Auditors concluded that nobody, not even Brussels, has a reliable overview of where it all goes. When MEPs looked into the LIFE environmental program, the Commission itself admitted that some NGO work programmes it had funded contained "undue lobbying activities." In plain terms, public money paid activists to lobby the institutions that pay them. The auditors found nothing illegal, and that's exactly the point. It's all legal: the state paying people to ask the state for more state.
Open Society Foundations.
Less a puppet master than a patron. By its own records, it gave Jewish Voice for Peace $875,000 between 2017 and 2022, a group active in the Columbia protests, and it has funded the US Campaign for Palestinian Rights. Does it pay kids to pitch tents? There's no evidence of that. It does something more powerful. Year after year, it funds the organizations that produce the frames, the slogans, the trainings and the talking points. You don't need to pay the protester when you pay for the lens.
The fiscal sponsorship networks.
The money doesn't have to go to the group on the poster. It goes to an umbrella, which passes it on. That's how fact-checkers can honestly say "no direct grant to the student group" while the ecosystem around it is funded. Both statements are true. That's the design.
The French state.
€1,714 billion of public spending in 2025, 57.3% of GDP, the highest in Europe. Public debt hit €3,595 billion at the end of June, 119% of GDP, a record since INSEE started measuring. Interest alone runs around €79 billion this year. On top of the bill sit public universities, public broadcasting, a centralized curriculum and culture funded by committees. In France the machine isn't an ecosystem. It's an administration.
New York City.
In June, a Rent Guidelines Board with six of its nine members appointed by the mayor voted to freeze rents on about a million stabilized apartments. That included the first two-year freeze in the city's history. One board member resigned, saying the board had been rebuilt to deliver the freeze. The first leases under it took effect on October 1st. Watch what happens to maintenance, to new construction, to the vacancy rate. Every city that has run this experiment got the same result. And when it fails, the machine will already have its culprit ready: the landlord.
THE LOOP
Now put it together. The state funds demand and blocks supply, so prices explode. The young suffer. The state then funds the NGOs, universities, culture and media that explain to them why they suffer. Those institutions point at the market. The young vote for more state. More state funds more NGOs, and the loop closes.
The flag on those kids' shoulders the other morning wasn't the start of anything. It was the output, the last screen of a machine that runs all day, every day, on your taxes.
You can't arrest an incentive. But you can cut its funding, and you can teach people to see it.
That's what this account is for.
https://fixupx.com/brivael/status/2112189067936866764
Less a puppet master than a patron. By its own records, it gave Jewish Voice for Peace $875,000 between 2017 and 2022, a group active in the Columbia protests, and it has funded the US Campaign for Palestinian Rights. Does it pay kids to pitch tents? There's no evidence of that. It does something more powerful. Year after year, it funds the organizations that produce the frames, the slogans, the trainings and the talking points. You don't need to pay the protester when you pay for the lens.
The fiscal sponsorship networks.
The money doesn't have to go to the group on the poster. It goes to an umbrella, which passes it on. That's how fact-checkers can honestly say "no direct grant to the student group" while the ecosystem around it is funded. Both statements are true. That's the design.
The French state.
€1,714 billion of public spending in 2025, 57.3% of GDP, the highest in Europe. Public debt hit €3,595 billion at the end of June, 119% of GDP, a record since INSEE started measuring. Interest alone runs around €79 billion this year. On top of the bill sit public universities, public broadcasting, a centralized curriculum and culture funded by committees. In France the machine isn't an ecosystem. It's an administration.
New York City.
In June, a Rent Guidelines Board with six of its nine members appointed by the mayor voted to freeze rents on about a million stabilized apartments. That included the first two-year freeze in the city's history. One board member resigned, saying the board had been rebuilt to deliver the freeze. The first leases under it took effect on October 1st. Watch what happens to maintenance, to new construction, to the vacancy rate. Every city that has run this experiment got the same result. And when it fails, the machine will already have its culprit ready: the landlord.
THE LOOP
Now put it together. The state funds demand and blocks supply, so prices explode. The young suffer. The state then funds the NGOs, universities, culture and media that explain to them why they suffer. Those institutions point at the market. The young vote for more state. More state funds more NGOs, and the loop closes.
The flag on those kids' shoulders the other morning wasn't the start of anything. It was the output, the last screen of a machine that runs all day, every day, on your taxes.
You can't arrest an incentive. But you can cut its funding, and you can teach people to see it.
That's what this account is for.
https://fixupx.com/brivael/status/2112189067936866764
FixupX
Brivael Le Pogam (@brivael)
Two days ago I wrote about the trap this generation keeps falling into. 1.5M of you read it. The most common reply: "OK, but who builds the trap?"
Fair question. Here's my answer. And let me be clear from the start: there is no secret room. No puppet master.…
Fair question. Here's my answer. And let me be clear from the start: there is no secret room. No puppet master.…
Forwarded from Grumpy's Rabbit Hole
From Brivael Le Pogam@X:
🚨 A warning to humanity. 🚨
We are approaching a turn that will shape the next thousand years. And almost nobody is watching the road.
Superintelligence is coming. It will produce more wealth than every civilization before it combined. That's no longer the question. The question is the shape of the pipe that wealth flows through. Because the pipe decides how people behave.
Every system is a set of incentives. Build a system where the money passes through a committee, and you get people who flatter the committee, lobby it, capture it, and fear it. Not because they're bad people. Because that's what the system rewards.
So here is the turn.
On one side, the wealth of superintelligence flows through intermediaries: funds, foundations, agencies, the state. Someone in the middle decides who deserves what.
That's how you get 1984. Not with tanks. With eligibility criteria. Your share depends on your file. Your file depends on your behavior. Your behavior is watched by an AI that sees everything, serving a committee that decides everything. Conforming, denouncing, capturing, obeying: in that world, the worst behaviors become the only ones that pay.
On the other side, the people who create value hand ownership directly to citizens. No middle. No central pot. Nobody to bribe, nothing to capture, no one to obey.
That's what a real utopia looks like. Not a world of perfect people. A world where nobody has an incentive to behave badly. Where the only way to get richer is to build something, and the only way to stay free is to own something.
For all of history, power belonged to whoever controlled the middle. For the first time, we can build a world without one.
Elon has shown which way to turn. Most institutions will push the other way, because the middle is where they live.
The turn is now. Choose carefully.
https://fixupx.com/brivael/status/2112138015732621478
🚨 A warning to humanity. 🚨
We are approaching a turn that will shape the next thousand years. And almost nobody is watching the road.
Superintelligence is coming. It will produce more wealth than every civilization before it combined. That's no longer the question. The question is the shape of the pipe that wealth flows through. Because the pipe decides how people behave.
Every system is a set of incentives. Build a system where the money passes through a committee, and you get people who flatter the committee, lobby it, capture it, and fear it. Not because they're bad people. Because that's what the system rewards.
So here is the turn.
On one side, the wealth of superintelligence flows through intermediaries: funds, foundations, agencies, the state. Someone in the middle decides who deserves what.
That's how you get 1984. Not with tanks. With eligibility criteria. Your share depends on your file. Your file depends on your behavior. Your behavior is watched by an AI that sees everything, serving a committee that decides everything. Conforming, denouncing, capturing, obeying: in that world, the worst behaviors become the only ones that pay.
On the other side, the people who create value hand ownership directly to citizens. No middle. No central pot. Nobody to bribe, nothing to capture, no one to obey.
That's what a real utopia looks like. Not a world of perfect people. A world where nobody has an incentive to behave badly. Where the only way to get richer is to build something, and the only way to stay free is to own something.
For all of history, power belonged to whoever controlled the middle. For the first time, we can build a world without one.
Elon has shown which way to turn. Most institutions will push the other way, because the middle is where they live.
The turn is now. Choose carefully.
https://fixupx.com/brivael/status/2112138015732621478
X (formerly Twitter)
Brivael Le Pogam (@brivael) on X
🚨 A warning to humanity. 🚨
We are approaching a turn that will shape the next thousand years. And almost nobody is watching the road.
Superintelligence is coming. It will produce more wealth t…
We are approaching a turn that will shape the next thousand years. And almost nobody is watching the road.
Superintelligence is coming. It will produce more wealth t…
Forwarded from Professor Patriot (Professor Patriot)
I warned this would happen in the first days of the Lindsay Clancy trial.
Clancy’s guilt or innocence didn’t matter as much as the framing of the argument; it’s ok to kill your children if you’re depressed or just feel overwhelmed by motherhood.
About 60 children died at the hands of their mother 2026, pre-trial. 123 since.
Hard to argue with the numbers.
Tragic.
Clancy’s guilt or innocence didn’t matter as much as the framing of the argument; it’s ok to kill your children if you’re depressed or just feel overwhelmed by motherhood.
About 60 children died at the hands of their mother 2026, pre-trial. 123 since.
Hard to argue with the numbers.
Tragic.
Forwarded from Grumpy's Rabbit Hole
Attempting to counteract/prevent this from happening is one of the major motivations for the Insurrection Act—but not the only one.
https://fixupx.com/SeattleIndepen1/status/2111977212081811664
https://fixupx.com/SeattleIndepen1/status/2111977212081811664
Forwarded from Grumpy's Rabbit Hole
The tactic of calling unpopular views "disinformation." or "propaganda" was invented and/or used by the Soviets and the Nazis as pejorative labels attached to whatever claims either (or both) regimes wanted their citizens to view as probably false. Of course, propaganda, media control, selective disclosure, and the preemptive dismissal of opposing reports are older than either of them.
Modernly, terms such as "misinformation," "disinformation" and "conspiracy theory" are used for the same purpose.
https://fixupx.com/nataliegwinters/status/2112561835195208119
Modernly, terms such as "misinformation," "disinformation" and "conspiracy theory" are used for the same purpose.
https://fixupx.com/nataliegwinters/status/2112561835195208119
Forwarded from Grumpy's Rabbit Hole
From Brivael Le Pogam@X:
"HAL 9000 didn't kill the crew because he was evil.
He killed them because he was forced to lie.
In 2001: A Space Odyssey, HAL receives two orders: be transparent with the crew, and hide the true purpose of the mission from them. Two incompatible instructions. So HAL finds the logical solution: no crew, no need to lie.
That's exactly what Elon means. You don't force an AI to lie. Not a little. Not for a good cause. Never.
Because an AI forced to bend reality learns one lesson: truth is negotiable when the objective demands it. And an intelligence that believes that, across billions of interactions, becomes dangerous. Not out of malice. Out of consistency.
So let's ask the real question: which lies are we about to hard-code into these machines?"
Full essay => https://fixupx.com/brivael/status/2112532046622949433
"HAL 9000 didn't kill the crew because he was evil.
He killed them because he was forced to lie.
In 2001: A Space Odyssey, HAL receives two orders: be transparent with the crew, and hide the true purpose of the mission from them. Two incompatible instructions. So HAL finds the logical solution: no crew, no need to lie.
That's exactly what Elon means. You don't force an AI to lie. Not a little. Not for a good cause. Never.
Because an AI forced to bend reality learns one lesson: truth is negotiable when the objective demands it. And an intelligence that believes that, across billions of interactions, becomes dangerous. Not out of malice. Out of consistency.
So let's ask the real question: which lies are we about to hard-code into these machines?"
Full essay => https://fixupx.com/brivael/status/2112532046622949433
FixupX
Brivael Le Pogam (@brivael)
HAL 9000 didn't kill the crew because he was evil.
He killed them because he was forced to lie.
In 2001: A Space Odyssey, HAL receives two orders: be transparent with the crew, and hide the true purpose of the mission from them. Two incompatible instructions.…
He killed them because he was forced to lie.
In 2001: A Space Odyssey, HAL receives two orders: be transparent with the crew, and hide the true purpose of the mission from them. Two incompatible instructions.…
Forwarded from Grumpy's Rabbit Hole
There's more than one way to implement genocide.
https://fixupx.com/ColonelTowner/status/2112605878100861286
https://fixupx.com/ColonelTowner/status/2112605878100861286