Forwarded from Grumpy's Rabbit Hole
_Vaccine Cartel Desperately Clings to New MMR Vaccine–Autism “No Link” Study Riddled With Major Flaws_
"They did not use a truly unvaccinated control group, did not clinically adjudicate autism, did not interview parents, did not independently verify vaccine histories, and used a narrow ICD-coded autism definition."
In-depth discussion => https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/vaccine-cartel-desperately-clings
"They did not use a truly unvaccinated control group, did not clinically adjudicate autism, did not interview parents, did not independently verify vaccine histories, and used a narrow ICD-coded autism definition."
In-depth discussion => https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/vaccine-cartel-desperately-clings
Thefocalpoints
Vaccine Cartel Desperately Clings to New MMR Vaccine–Autism “No Link” Study Riddled With Major Flaws
No truly unvaccinated control group, no clinical autism adjudication, no parent interviews, no independent vaccine-record verification, and a narrow ICD-coded autism definition.
Forwarded from Grumpy's Rabbit Hole
_The $350 Billion State That Leads America in Poverty_
The wages of socialism is poverty—distributed equally (mostly.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5T3WJvkt0aE
The wages of socialism is poverty—distributed equally (mostly.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5T3WJvkt0aE
YouTube
The $350 Billion State That Leads America in Poverty
Watch the full podcast here - https://youtu.be/oznIo3tAgos
Zuby sits down with Steve Hilton to talk about why California's climate policy is producing the opposite of what it promises. Hilton explains that the state sits on the Monterey Shale, once produced…
Zuby sits down with Steve Hilton to talk about why California's climate policy is producing the opposite of what it promises. Hilton explains that the state sits on the Monterey Shale, once produced…
_The Delivery Act: How DSA and the Teamsters Plan to Kill New York City Small Businesses_
The point is to keep people in the employee trap, by stopping them from creating their own businesses.
FTA: Consider a man who begins behind the wheel of a delivery van. He learns the routes, then the dispatch board, then maintenance schedules and payroll. After a few years, he rises to operations manager at one of the more than 40 independent delivery firms that contract with Amazon in New York City. His employer nominates him for a 16-week training program. Selected from nearly 900 candidates, he receives classroom instruction, mentorship from owners who have already built what he aims to build, help drafting a business plan, and a $30,000 grant to cover startup costs and living expenses while the new company finds its feet. He does not walk away with a raise. He walks away with a company.
That distinction between a raise and a company now sits at the heart of the argument before the New York City Council. The Delivery Protection Act, introduced by Council Member Tiffany Cabán, endorsed by Mayor Zohran Mamdani, and pressed hard by the Teamsters, would require that anyone performing core warehouse or delivery work inside the five boroughs be employed directly by the facility’s operator. Contracting the work to a third party would be prohibited. The independent delivery companies would cease to exist as employers, and their workers would be transferred onto Amazon’s payroll without compensation. The Teamsters want to turn business owners into wage slaves they control. They state openly that the bill would make Amazon’s DSP model illegal within the five boroughs. This is not an unfortunate side effect opponents have inferred. It is the advertised purpose.
https://newsletter.amuseonx.com/p/the-delivery-act-how-dsa-and-the
The point is to keep people in the employee trap, by stopping them from creating their own businesses.
FTA: Consider a man who begins behind the wheel of a delivery van. He learns the routes, then the dispatch board, then maintenance schedules and payroll. After a few years, he rises to operations manager at one of the more than 40 independent delivery firms that contract with Amazon in New York City. His employer nominates him for a 16-week training program. Selected from nearly 900 candidates, he receives classroom instruction, mentorship from owners who have already built what he aims to build, help drafting a business plan, and a $30,000 grant to cover startup costs and living expenses while the new company finds its feet. He does not walk away with a raise. He walks away with a company.
That distinction between a raise and a company now sits at the heart of the argument before the New York City Council. The Delivery Protection Act, introduced by Council Member Tiffany Cabán, endorsed by Mayor Zohran Mamdani, and pressed hard by the Teamsters, would require that anyone performing core warehouse or delivery work inside the five boroughs be employed directly by the facility’s operator. Contracting the work to a third party would be prohibited. The independent delivery companies would cease to exist as employers, and their workers would be transferred onto Amazon’s payroll without compensation. The Teamsters want to turn business owners into wage slaves they control. They state openly that the bill would make Amazon’s DSP model illegal within the five boroughs. This is not an unfortunate side effect opponents have inferred. It is the advertised purpose.
https://newsletter.amuseonx.com/p/the-delivery-act-how-dsa-and-the
Amuseonx
The Delivery Act: How DSA and the Teamsters Plan to Kill New York City Small Businesses
Consider a man who begins behind the wheel of a delivery van.
Forwarded from The General
BREAKING: An AI farming chatbot is under scrutiny after advice it provided led to the destruction of 25 acres of healthy crops in China, fueling concerns about the dangers of relying on AI for critical decisions.
@GeneralMCNews
@GeneralMCNews
Forwarded from Grumpy's Rabbit Hole
_Most Radical Democrats Aren’t Losing — And Most Democrats Aren’t Deradicalizing_
Political parties who move toward their extreme in the primaries almost always do unexpectedly poorly in the general election that follows.
In deep-blue or deep-red seats the general-election penalty is smaller or negligible because the nominee’s extreme positions rarely cost the seat. However, the seats they would have won regardless don't matter.
Putting forth more extreme candidates for the general election--even if those only appear in the "deep X" districts--affects how moderate, "middle of the road" voters see the party.
https://www.public.news/p/most-radical-democrats-arent-losing
Political parties who move toward their extreme in the primaries almost always do unexpectedly poorly in the general election that follows.
In deep-blue or deep-red seats the general-election penalty is smaller or negligible because the nominee’s extreme positions rarely cost the seat. However, the seats they would have won regardless don't matter.
Putting forth more extreme candidates for the general election--even if those only appear in the "deep X" districts--affects how moderate, "middle of the road" voters see the party.
https://www.public.news/p/most-radical-democrats-arent-losing
www.public.news
Most Radical Democrats Aren’t Losing — And Most Democrats Aren’t Deradicalizing
Despite last night’s defeat of DSA member Francesca Hong, democratic socialists are still winning more than losing
Forwarded from Grumpy's Rabbit Hole
The Southern Poverty Fraud Center has some 'splainin' to do => https://fixupx.com/sgtnewsnetwork/status/2087623410880815422
Forwarded from Grumpy's Rabbit Hole
From MJTruthUltra@X:
HOLY SHIZZLES‼️ Uranium One enters the picture again..
🚨 The Trump administration has reached agreement with SYRIA for the International Atomic Energy Agency to remove nuclear material stored at a COVERT SITE in Syria,
Listen closely to Trump said in May. Obama and Hillary Clinton are SCREWED!
—— “Obama picked the wrong country.. he should have picked another country. I won’t tell you what it was..” Which country?
To understand what is happening, you have to Revisit the drops— Why does Trump keep mentioning OBAMA and the PALLETS OF CASH?
Q couldn’t tell without violation NATSEC laws, but Q did ask a series of questions that painted a dramatic picture that if you did the research, proved the Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA) was not what it seemed, and Uranium One (U1) material may have secretly ended up helping IRAN or SYRIA build nuclear weapons.
The official Iran nuclear deal was supposed to stop Iran’s nuclear program and keep it from getting weapons-grade material. BUT, It did the exact OPPOSTE.
Q asksd: What if the program never actually stopped? What if Iran quietly built a hidden “satellite” nuclear site in northern Syria?
KABOOM💥💥💥💥💥💥
What if uranium from the Uranium One deal (the U.S. uranium assets sold to Russia) somehow made its way to Iran or Syria?
Hello 👉 Obama and Hillary.
Q even references the movie The Sum of All Fears — a story about terrorists getting a nuclear bomb made from stolen material.
Key Questions Q Raises
Where did the pallets of cash the Obama administration sent to Iran actually go?
How many secret plane deliveries happened, and did they all land in the same spot?
Is the U1 material traceable? (
Q answers: YES.
Did the U.S. government know about any of this? Yes.
Were other “bad actors” (possibly Russia or others) involved in supplying the uranium? Yes
Q repeatedly says “Define cover” — meaning the Iran deal and other official stories were just a smokescreen to hide what was really happening with the uranium transfers.
Q even ties it to real events: “Why did we strike Syria?” (referring to U.S. missile strikes in 2017–2018)
The real reason, according to Q, was to deal with this hidden nuclear threat — not the public explanation.
U.S. uranium → sold to Russia via Uranium One → diverted to Iran/Syria → with the Iran nuclear deal and cash payments used as cover.
This means Obama and the Hillary Clinton Foundation–linked deal DIRECTLY ARMED America’s enemies with nuclear material, setting the stage for dirty bombs..
🔻 Uranium One was a Canadian mining company that, through acquisitions (including UrAsia Energy, co-founded by major Clinton Foundation donor Frank Giustra), controlled significant U.S. uranium assets—roughly 20% of U.S. uranium production capacity at the time (mines in Wyoming, Utah, etc.). Between 2009–2013, Russia’s state-owned nuclear giant Rosatom (via its subsidiary ARMZ) gradually acquired majority then full control of Uranium One in stages.
Because this involved U.S. critical minerals, it required unanimous approval from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS)—an interagency panel of 9+ cabinet-level departments, including State (then led by Hillary Clinton), Treasury, Defense, etc. CFIUS approved it in 2010; President Obama SIGNED OFF; the Nuclear Regulatory Commission followed.
Frank Giustra: Canadian mining magnate and Clinton Foundation donor.
In 2005, he and Bill Clinton traveled to Kazakhstan (a uranium-rich nation). Shortly after, Giustra’s UrAsia secured major Kazakh uranium concessions. Giustra later merged UrAsia into Uranium One (retaining stakes) and donated TENS OF MILLIONS to the Clinton Foundation (and pledged $100M+).
Q repeatedly emphasized U1/Uranium as a cornerstone example of Clinton corruption and Pay-to-play treason to KILL the UNITED STATES FROM WITHIN, selling secrets, SAPs, AID, etc. — but it was “More than selling of URANIUM… >Crimes against Humanity”
https://fixupx.com/mjtruthultra/status/2087596030183313848?s=46
HOLY SHIZZLES‼️ Uranium One enters the picture again..
🚨 The Trump administration has reached agreement with SYRIA for the International Atomic Energy Agency to remove nuclear material stored at a COVERT SITE in Syria,
Listen closely to Trump said in May. Obama and Hillary Clinton are SCREWED!
—— “Obama picked the wrong country.. he should have picked another country. I won’t tell you what it was..” Which country?
To understand what is happening, you have to Revisit the drops— Why does Trump keep mentioning OBAMA and the PALLETS OF CASH?
Q couldn’t tell without violation NATSEC laws, but Q did ask a series of questions that painted a dramatic picture that if you did the research, proved the Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA) was not what it seemed, and Uranium One (U1) material may have secretly ended up helping IRAN or SYRIA build nuclear weapons.
The official Iran nuclear deal was supposed to stop Iran’s nuclear program and keep it from getting weapons-grade material. BUT, It did the exact OPPOSTE.
Q asksd: What if the program never actually stopped? What if Iran quietly built a hidden “satellite” nuclear site in northern Syria?
KABOOM💥💥💥💥💥💥
What if uranium from the Uranium One deal (the U.S. uranium assets sold to Russia) somehow made its way to Iran or Syria?
Hello 👉 Obama and Hillary.
Q even references the movie The Sum of All Fears — a story about terrorists getting a nuclear bomb made from stolen material.
Key Questions Q Raises
Where did the pallets of cash the Obama administration sent to Iran actually go?
How many secret plane deliveries happened, and did they all land in the same spot?
Is the U1 material traceable? (
Q answers: YES.
Did the U.S. government know about any of this? Yes.
Were other “bad actors” (possibly Russia or others) involved in supplying the uranium? Yes
Q repeatedly says “Define cover” — meaning the Iran deal and other official stories were just a smokescreen to hide what was really happening with the uranium transfers.
Q even ties it to real events: “Why did we strike Syria?” (referring to U.S. missile strikes in 2017–2018)
The real reason, according to Q, was to deal with this hidden nuclear threat — not the public explanation.
U.S. uranium → sold to Russia via Uranium One → diverted to Iran/Syria → with the Iran nuclear deal and cash payments used as cover.
This means Obama and the Hillary Clinton Foundation–linked deal DIRECTLY ARMED America’s enemies with nuclear material, setting the stage for dirty bombs..
🔻 Uranium One was a Canadian mining company that, through acquisitions (including UrAsia Energy, co-founded by major Clinton Foundation donor Frank Giustra), controlled significant U.S. uranium assets—roughly 20% of U.S. uranium production capacity at the time (mines in Wyoming, Utah, etc.). Between 2009–2013, Russia’s state-owned nuclear giant Rosatom (via its subsidiary ARMZ) gradually acquired majority then full control of Uranium One in stages.
Because this involved U.S. critical minerals, it required unanimous approval from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS)—an interagency panel of 9+ cabinet-level departments, including State (then led by Hillary Clinton), Treasury, Defense, etc. CFIUS approved it in 2010; President Obama SIGNED OFF; the Nuclear Regulatory Commission followed.
Frank Giustra: Canadian mining magnate and Clinton Foundation donor.
In 2005, he and Bill Clinton traveled to Kazakhstan (a uranium-rich nation). Shortly after, Giustra’s UrAsia secured major Kazakh uranium concessions. Giustra later merged UrAsia into Uranium One (retaining stakes) and donated TENS OF MILLIONS to the Clinton Foundation (and pledged $100M+).
Q repeatedly emphasized U1/Uranium as a cornerstone example of Clinton corruption and Pay-to-play treason to KILL the UNITED STATES FROM WITHIN, selling secrets, SAPs, AID, etc. — but it was “More than selling of URANIUM… >Crimes against Humanity”
https://fixupx.com/mjtruthultra/status/2087596030183313848?s=46
FixupX - Media 1 / 3
MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra)
HOLY SHIZZLES‼️ Uranium One enters the picture again..
🚨 The Trump administration has reached agreement with SYRIA for the International Atomic Energy Agency to remove nuclear material stored at a COVERT SITE in Syria,
Listen closely to Trump said in May.…
🚨 The Trump administration has reached agreement with SYRIA for the International Atomic Energy Agency to remove nuclear material stored at a COVERT SITE in Syria,
Listen closely to Trump said in May.…
Forwarded from Grumpy's Rabbit Hole
Read this account of the Wisconsin Democratic primary.
Now invert the parties and the ideology: imagine the same sequence of events happened inside the Republican Party against a leading candidate who was a limited-government / anti-establishment Republican insurgent.
What would the dominant left commentary sound like?
When imagining the flipped-ideology scenario, assume that the structural elements are identical—polls, late re-entry of a previously withdrawn establishment-preferred candidate, narrow final margin, tabulation delay involving data drives.
https://fixupx.com/NickJFreitas/status/2087626239905243592
Now invert the parties and the ideology: imagine the same sequence of events happened inside the Republican Party against a leading candidate who was a limited-government / anti-establishment Republican insurgent.
What would the dominant left commentary sound like?
When imagining the flipped-ideology scenario, assume that the structural elements are identical—polls, late re-entry of a previously withdrawn establishment-preferred candidate, narrow final margin, tabulation delay involving data drives.
https://fixupx.com/NickJFreitas/status/2087626239905243592
Forwarded from Grumpy's Rabbit Hole
YouTube
I'm Masking Alone Now (I think we’re alone now)
Youtube requires that we indicate that some OPINIONS in this satirical music video contradict the "consensus medical OPINION" about covid19.
https://www.mediabearstore.com
shirts & stickers :) www.redbubble.com/people/mediabear/shop
Email for info about…
https://www.mediabearstore.com
shirts & stickers :) www.redbubble.com/people/mediabear/shop
Email for info about…