Grumpy Rabbit
26 subscribers
14.5K photos
742 videos
11 files
11.7K links
Voluntaryist; financial trader; computer scientist; linguist. I'm not here just to "question authority," I'm here to deny the legitimacy of its very existence!
Download Telegram
Forwarded from The General
BREAKING: Elon Musk says he will cover the legal defense costs for any Epstein victim who names Epstein’s clients and is sued as a result.

@GeneralMCNews
🔥2
Forwarded from Grumpy's Rabbit Hole
👏1
Forwarded from Grumpy's Rabbit Hole
_The AI Maths Revolution Has Begun_

The "unsolved" Erdős math problems—that ChatGPT is reported to have "solved"—are not what they appear:

Firstly, one reason that some (but far from all) of them were unsolved was simply because they were not considered sufficiently important to be targeted for solution by great mathematicians.

Secondly, many of the ones that ChatGPT "solved" had already been reported as solved in human-published papers that had been overlooked. In those cases, ChatGPT had found those "solutions," and so had simply regurgitated them.

Thirdly, some of the ChatGPT-authored "proofs" have been challenged as incorrect—although many of the errors were subsequently repaired, either by humans, or by other tools.

And finally, computing every possible math proof is theoretically possible, for the same reason that every possible game of Chess or Go is theoretically computable: All mathematical theorems are deterministically derivable from the axioms of mathematics. That's a logically-required property of any and all axiom-based formal systems.

Of course, such "brute force" solutions currently exceed the capability of modern computational systems, which is why ChatGPT (and its competitors) instead use heuristics, pattern matching, and search (guided by training data.) Note that that's essentially how humans solve such problems.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKjfrFMjz08&list=WL&index=7
👍1
Forwarded from Grumpy's Rabbit Hole
The Newtonian Bureaucrats' first law of life: For every action, there is an equal and opposite mountain of paperwork—which a bureaucrat must either ensure never happens, or if it does, that he or she is not the one who must do the work.
Forwarded from The General
BREAKING: Prince William and Kate Middleton say they are “deeply concerned” by the revelations in the latest release of files related to Jeffrey Epstein.

@GeneralMCNews
Forwarded from The General
BREAKING: The New York Times has concluded that every surviving veteran of the U.S.S. Liberty attack is lying and antisemitic, and says that Israel was justified.

@GeneralMCNews
Forwarded from The General
BREAKING: Newly released Epstein documents confirm that an FBI agent deliberately removed a hard drive from the jail’s video recording system, wiping all prison footage from the time of Epstein’s death.

@GeneralMCNews
🤯1
Forwarded from Grumpy's Rabbit Hole
Let's have all of the evidence, all of the testimony, no matter whom it might accuse, no matter whom it might convict, nor whom it might acquit.

https://x.com/MyLordBebo/status/2020937530284130409
Forwarded from BioClandestine
So Trump hated Epstein/Maxwell, he kicked them off his properties, called them evil as early as 2006, helped law enforcement to bring charges against them, etc.

Then when Trump became President, Trump seized the island, and put them both in jail.

Meanwhile, Epstein was helping the Dems to take down Trump and prevent him from taking office, then helped the Dems attempt to remove Trump once he was in office, all while donating to and instructing Democrat politicians such as Plaskett and Jeffries.

For anyone with any level of objectivity whatsoever, the story is very clear. Not only were Trump and Epstein not buddies, they were enemies, and there was nobody Epstein feared more than Trump. Epstein was part of the Democrat elite and the Deep State brain trust that launched a coup against Trump.

Anyone who thought otherwise never had any clue what they were talking about. If there was even the tiniest sliver of evidence that the Dems could use against Trump, they would have leaked it before Trump reached the bottom of the escalator.

The reason the Dems/MSM didn’t bring up Epstein until the last second, is because they knew where this trail was going to end. The attempts to frame Trump were desperation and psychological projection.

Epstein is, and always has been, a Democrat problem, and those of us who have been preaching this, are not guessing.
Forwarded from Grumpy's Rabbit Hole
Forwarded from Grumpy's Rabbit Hole
😱1
Forwarded from BioClandestine
New court docs just came out confirming what we actual Epstein experts have been preaching the entire time.

Trump was not buddies with Epstein or Maxwell. In fact, Trump tried to help law enforcement go after Epstein in 2006.

The Left’s narrative was always a lie.
👍1
Forwarded from The General
BREAKING: Epstein jail guards reportedly used a fake body to fool the media waiting outside the prison, while the pedophile’s real corpse was quietly loaded into a van, according to the Epstein files.

@GeneralMCNews
😱1
Key fact: Men don't generally wear dresses for a reason that has nothing to do with the fact that dresses are seen as clothing for females. It's the other way around: They're seen as clothing for females because men generally refuse to wear them.

Given that, the pertinent question becomes why men might decline to wear dresses, even if there were no cultural taboo against it. The answer should be blatantly obvious.
Forwarded from BioClandestine
We had to sit here for YEARS and listen to every shitlib on the Internet act like they were experts on Epstein, after they formerly claimed Epstein was a kooky conspiracy theory.

You fools. You really thought you knew more about this topic than us? 😂
🔥1
Forwarded from BioClandestine
In addition to the facts, we have a logical argument that no one has ever been able to refute.

If Trump was implicated with Epstein, the Dems would not have needed to concoct the Russia hoax or any of the other lies about Trump.

If Trump was implicated, why didn’t the Dems mention Epstein a single time before 2016, 2020, during Biden’s term when they had control, or 2024? Why did they have to try to indict Trump for process crimes, the phony documents raid, and other nonsense?

Mueller looked under every single stone, investigated every person Trump ever came in contact with, and was looking for a reason to slap something on Trump. He found nothing. Trump is literally the single most vetted person in history.

If there was ever anything about Trump, the Dems would have released it before Trump won 2016, but there was never anything about Trump, hence why they had to make shit up.

The reason why the Democrat elite never brought up Epstein, is because Epstein was part of the Democrat elite, which is confirmed via Epstein’s email history. The Dems never wanted to bring any attention to Epstein, but Trump did before the 2016 election.

If Trump was implicated in crimes with Epstein, why would Trump bring up Epstein and Bill’s time on the island?

It’s a simple matter of logic that cannot be refuted. If there was ever any dirt on Trump, Obama’s cronies like Comey and Brennan would have leaked it, and Epstein never would have been covered up in the first place.
🤔1