22 Reasons Why Humans Are Herbivores 🍀
1. Drinking vs. Lapping: Humans sip water like other herbivores, while carnivores lap it up.
2. Jaw Movement: Like other herbivores, humans can move their jaws up and down as well as side to side without moving their heads. Carnivores can only move their jaws up and down.
3. Teeth Structure: Humans have flat, blunt teeth suitable for grinding plant matter, while carnivores possess sharp, pointed teeth for tearing flesh.
4. Digestive System: Herbivores require longer intestines to digest plant matter effectively. Humans have a long small intestine (7 meters) and a large intestine (1.5 meters), similar to other herbivores. Carnivores have shorter intestines due to the rapid decomposition of meat.
5. Stomach Muscles: Human stomach muscles are smooth and delicate, unlike the tough, robust muscles of carnivores designed for digesting flesh and bones. This explains why humans consuming meat-heavy diets often experience constipation.
6. Digestive Enzymes: Human stomach and pancreatic secretions are less effective in breaking down meat compared to those of carnivores. Carnivore digestive juices can dissolve meat, tendons, fat, and bones.
7. Nitrogen Overload: Meat is rich in nitrogen, which is difficult for the human body to process and can lead to gout and liver diseases. Bad breath and some headaches can be attributed to excess nitrogen in bodily fluids.
8. Consuming the Whole Animal: Carnivores consume the entire animal, including meat, skin, fat, and bones, to meet their nutritional needs. Humans do not.
9. Mouth Opening: Humans and herbivores have small mouth openings compared to carnivores, which have wide gapes for tearing flesh.
10. Fat Accumulation: Animal fat is difficult for the human body to eliminate and contains harmful cholesterol, leading to its accumulation in the abdomen, sides, chest, buttocks, and blood vessels, increasing the risk of atherosclerosis.
11. Physical Adaptations: Carnivores are built for speed and agility to chase down prey, while humans are adapted for climbing trees and gathering fruits and seeds.
12. Vision: Carnivores often have night vision and vertically-slit pupils, unlike herbivores.
13. Protein Digestion: Animal protein is harder for the human body to digest compared to plant protein, requiring more energy and effort.
14. Sense of Smell: Carnivores have a highly developed sense of smell, allowing them to detect prey from a distance, unlike humans.
15. Patience in Hunting: Carnivores can remain motionless for hours while waiting for prey, which is not a characteristic of humans.
16. Natural Instincts: Humans, like herbivores, are naturally drawn to the sight, smell, and taste of fruits and vegetables. Conversely, scenes of death and blood elicit sadness and discomfort in humans, unlike carnivores. Humans prefer to consume fruits raw, while they lack the inclination and ability to eat raw meat.
17. Healing Properties of Raw Food: Raw plants offer significant healing properties and detoxifying benefits. In contrast, meat and animal products can carry diseases, parasites, worms, and microbes.
18. Inter-species Harmony: Herbivorous animals, birds, and grazing creatures recognize and coexist peacefully with each other, instinctively fleeing from predators. Humans share this inherent behavior.
19. Hand Structure: Human hands, designed for grasping and picking, lack the sharp, retractable claws characteristic of carnivores.
20. Thermoregulation: Herbivores sweat to regulate body temperature, while carnivores pant and stick out their tongues for heat dissipation.
21. Hydrochloric Acid Production: Carnivores produce ten times more hydrochloric acid than herbivores, primarily to break down bones.
22. Lactose Intolerance: Humans lack the ability to digest lactose, the sugar found in cow's milk, often leading to digestive issues.
#vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #greenpath
@GreenPathForAll
1. Drinking vs. Lapping: Humans sip water like other herbivores, while carnivores lap it up.
2. Jaw Movement: Like other herbivores, humans can move their jaws up and down as well as side to side without moving their heads. Carnivores can only move their jaws up and down.
3. Teeth Structure: Humans have flat, blunt teeth suitable for grinding plant matter, while carnivores possess sharp, pointed teeth for tearing flesh.
4. Digestive System: Herbivores require longer intestines to digest plant matter effectively. Humans have a long small intestine (7 meters) and a large intestine (1.5 meters), similar to other herbivores. Carnivores have shorter intestines due to the rapid decomposition of meat.
5. Stomach Muscles: Human stomach muscles are smooth and delicate, unlike the tough, robust muscles of carnivores designed for digesting flesh and bones. This explains why humans consuming meat-heavy diets often experience constipation.
6. Digestive Enzymes: Human stomach and pancreatic secretions are less effective in breaking down meat compared to those of carnivores. Carnivore digestive juices can dissolve meat, tendons, fat, and bones.
7. Nitrogen Overload: Meat is rich in nitrogen, which is difficult for the human body to process and can lead to gout and liver diseases. Bad breath and some headaches can be attributed to excess nitrogen in bodily fluids.
8. Consuming the Whole Animal: Carnivores consume the entire animal, including meat, skin, fat, and bones, to meet their nutritional needs. Humans do not.
9. Mouth Opening: Humans and herbivores have small mouth openings compared to carnivores, which have wide gapes for tearing flesh.
10. Fat Accumulation: Animal fat is difficult for the human body to eliminate and contains harmful cholesterol, leading to its accumulation in the abdomen, sides, chest, buttocks, and blood vessels, increasing the risk of atherosclerosis.
11. Physical Adaptations: Carnivores are built for speed and agility to chase down prey, while humans are adapted for climbing trees and gathering fruits and seeds.
12. Vision: Carnivores often have night vision and vertically-slit pupils, unlike herbivores.
13. Protein Digestion: Animal protein is harder for the human body to digest compared to plant protein, requiring more energy and effort.
14. Sense of Smell: Carnivores have a highly developed sense of smell, allowing them to detect prey from a distance, unlike humans.
15. Patience in Hunting: Carnivores can remain motionless for hours while waiting for prey, which is not a characteristic of humans.
16. Natural Instincts: Humans, like herbivores, are naturally drawn to the sight, smell, and taste of fruits and vegetables. Conversely, scenes of death and blood elicit sadness and discomfort in humans, unlike carnivores. Humans prefer to consume fruits raw, while they lack the inclination and ability to eat raw meat.
17. Healing Properties of Raw Food: Raw plants offer significant healing properties and detoxifying benefits. In contrast, meat and animal products can carry diseases, parasites, worms, and microbes.
18. Inter-species Harmony: Herbivorous animals, birds, and grazing creatures recognize and coexist peacefully with each other, instinctively fleeing from predators. Humans share this inherent behavior.
19. Hand Structure: Human hands, designed for grasping and picking, lack the sharp, retractable claws characteristic of carnivores.
20. Thermoregulation: Herbivores sweat to regulate body temperature, while carnivores pant and stick out their tongues for heat dissipation.
21. Hydrochloric Acid Production: Carnivores produce ten times more hydrochloric acid than herbivores, primarily to break down bones.
22. Lactose Intolerance: Humans lack the ability to digest lactose, the sugar found in cow's milk, often leading to digestive issues.
#vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #greenpath
@GreenPathForAll
❤12👍9🥰1
"Humans eat meat, but meat-eating is not in the human's nature. When we kill animals to eat them, they end up killing us because of the meat loaded with cholesterol and saturated fat we consume. Humans, by nature, are herbivores." - Dr. Roberts, editor of the American Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases in 2013.
Consumption of meat leads to:
- Heart diseases and clogged arteries
- Diabetes
- The reaction of heterocyclic amines due to cooking meat, which causes cancer
- And many other diseases
#vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #greenpath
@GreenPathForAll
Consumption of meat leads to:
- Heart diseases and clogged arteries
- Diabetes
- The reaction of heterocyclic amines due to cooking meat, which causes cancer
- And many other diseases
#vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #greenpath
@GreenPathForAll
👍9❤8
🌱 Pythagoras: The earth has spread before us a generous table of sin-free food. As long as man is a cruel destroyer of other creatures, he will never experience health and peace because, as long as men kill animals, they will kill each other.
🌱 Confucius: He who has once heard the cry of an animal being killed can never eat meat.
🌱 Leonardo da Vinci: The day will come when people will look at the killing of an animal the same way they look at the killing of a human today. There will come a time when we will judge eating animals with the same vision as today eating our own kind, cannibalism.
🌱 G. L. Rudd: Killing is the negation of love. To kill or eat what another has killed is to participate in cruelty, and cruelty turns our hearts to stone and blinds us so that we are unable to see that those we kill are our brothers and sisters in the family of creation.
🌱 Peter Rosegger: An animal has a heart that feels, just like you. An animal has pleasure and pain, just like you. An animal has a desire to live, just like you. An animal has the right to live, just like you.
#vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #greenpath #scientific #science
@GreenPathForAll 🌱
🌱 Confucius: He who has once heard the cry of an animal being killed can never eat meat.
🌱 Leonardo da Vinci: The day will come when people will look at the killing of an animal the same way they look at the killing of a human today. There will come a time when we will judge eating animals with the same vision as today eating our own kind, cannibalism.
🌱 G. L. Rudd: Killing is the negation of love. To kill or eat what another has killed is to participate in cruelty, and cruelty turns our hearts to stone and blinds us so that we are unable to see that those we kill are our brothers and sisters in the family of creation.
🌱 Peter Rosegger: An animal has a heart that feels, just like you. An animal has pleasure and pain, just like you. An animal has a desire to live, just like you. An animal has the right to live, just like you.
#vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #greenpath #scientific #science
@GreenPathForAll 🌱
❤4👏2👍1😱1
Formation of Heterocyclic Amines during Meat Cooking and Their Carcinogenic Potential
When meat is cooked at high temperatures, particularly through methods such as grilling, frying, or broiling, a series of complex chemical reactions occur. One significant outcome of these reactions is the formation of heterocyclic amines (HCAs). HCAs are organic compounds that are formed when amino acids (the building blocks of proteins) react with creatine (a substance found in muscle) at elevated temperatures.
Research has shown that the cooking process can lead to the Maillard reaction, where sugars react with amino acids, resulting in the production of various compounds, including HCAs. The specific types and amounts of HCAs formed depend on several factors, including the cooking temperature, duration, and the type of meat being cooked.
Studies have indicated that some HCAs are mutagenic, meaning they can cause changes in DNA that may lead to cancer. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), part of the World Health Organization (WHO), has classified certain HCAs as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A).
For further reading, you may refer to the following source:
- Sinha, R., & Rothman, N. (2008). "Heterocyclic amines in cooked meats and risk of colorectal cancer." Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 17(6), 1214-1223. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0011
#vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #greenpath #scientific #science
@GreenPathForAll 🌱
When meat is cooked at high temperatures, particularly through methods such as grilling, frying, or broiling, a series of complex chemical reactions occur. One significant outcome of these reactions is the formation of heterocyclic amines (HCAs). HCAs are organic compounds that are formed when amino acids (the building blocks of proteins) react with creatine (a substance found in muscle) at elevated temperatures.
Research has shown that the cooking process can lead to the Maillard reaction, where sugars react with amino acids, resulting in the production of various compounds, including HCAs. The specific types and amounts of HCAs formed depend on several factors, including the cooking temperature, duration, and the type of meat being cooked.
Studies have indicated that some HCAs are mutagenic, meaning they can cause changes in DNA that may lead to cancer. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), part of the World Health Organization (WHO), has classified certain HCAs as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A).
For further reading, you may refer to the following source:
- Sinha, R., & Rothman, N. (2008). "Heterocyclic amines in cooked meats and risk of colorectal cancer." Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 17(6), 1214-1223. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0011
#vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #greenpath #scientific #science
@GreenPathForAll 🌱
👍5❤4😇2
Here's a detailed explanation about the lack of pain perception in plants, incorporating scientific evidence and sources:
Do Plants Feel Pain? Science Says No.
While plants are incredibly complex living organisms, they don't experience pain the way humans and animals do. Here's why:
1. The Missing Ingredient: A Central Nervous System
* Pain requires a brain: Pain is a complex sensation processed by the brain. Plants lack a central nervous system, the network of nerves and brain responsible for processing sensory information and generating feelings like pain.
* No pain receptors: Animals have specialized nerve cells called nociceptors that detect potentially harmful stimuli like heat, pressure, or chemicals, and send signals to the brain, which interprets them as pain. Plants do not possess these receptors.
Source:
* "Plant Neurobiology: An Integrated View of Plant Signaling" by František Baluška, Dieter Volkmann, and Stefano Mancuso, Peter W Barlow [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2819436/]
2. Plant Responses vs. Pain
* Plants react, they don't feel: Plants exhibit remarkable responses to their environment, such as growing towards light, releasing chemicals to deter pests, or even snapping shut like the Venus flytrap. However, these are automatic, pre-programmed responses, not conscious decisions driven by pain.
* Chemical signaling, not pain signals: Plants utilize hormones and electrical signals to coordinate these responses, which are fundamentally different from the complex electrochemical signaling involved in animal nervous systems.
Source:
"The Sensitive Plant" by Daniel Chamovitz
3. Ethical Implications
* Focus on animal welfare: The absence of pain perception in plants allows us to focus our ethical considerations on the treatment of animals, which do possess the capacity to feel pain and suffer.
In Conclusion
Scientific evidence overwhelmingly demonstrates that plants lack the biological mechanisms required for experiencing pain. Their remarkable responses to the environment are sophisticated survival mechanisms but should not be mistaken for conscious suffering.
#vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #greenpath #scientific #science
@GreenPathForAll 🌱
Do Plants Feel Pain? Science Says No.
While plants are incredibly complex living organisms, they don't experience pain the way humans and animals do. Here's why:
1. The Missing Ingredient: A Central Nervous System
* Pain requires a brain: Pain is a complex sensation processed by the brain. Plants lack a central nervous system, the network of nerves and brain responsible for processing sensory information and generating feelings like pain.
* No pain receptors: Animals have specialized nerve cells called nociceptors that detect potentially harmful stimuli like heat, pressure, or chemicals, and send signals to the brain, which interprets them as pain. Plants do not possess these receptors.
Source:
* "Plant Neurobiology: An Integrated View of Plant Signaling" by František Baluška, Dieter Volkmann, and Stefano Mancuso, Peter W Barlow [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2819436/]
2. Plant Responses vs. Pain
* Plants react, they don't feel: Plants exhibit remarkable responses to their environment, such as growing towards light, releasing chemicals to deter pests, or even snapping shut like the Venus flytrap. However, these are automatic, pre-programmed responses, not conscious decisions driven by pain.
* Chemical signaling, not pain signals: Plants utilize hormones and electrical signals to coordinate these responses, which are fundamentally different from the complex electrochemical signaling involved in animal nervous systems.
Source:
"The Sensitive Plant" by Daniel Chamovitz
3. Ethical Implications
* Focus on animal welfare: The absence of pain perception in plants allows us to focus our ethical considerations on the treatment of animals, which do possess the capacity to feel pain and suffer.
In Conclusion
Scientific evidence overwhelmingly demonstrates that plants lack the biological mechanisms required for experiencing pain. Their remarkable responses to the environment are sophisticated survival mechanisms but should not be mistaken for conscious suffering.
#vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #greenpath #scientific #science
@GreenPathForAll 🌱
PubMed Central (PMC)
The ‘root-brain’ hypothesis of Charles and Francis Darwin: Revival after more than 125 years
This year celebrates the 200th aniversary of the birth of Charles Darwin, best known for his theory of evolution summarized in On the Origin of Species. Less well known is that, in the second half of his life, Darwin’s major scientific focus turned ...
👍8❤6🙏1
The Environmental Impact of Animal Agriculture
Animal agriculture is responsible for a significant portion of the world's agricultural land use and has profound implications for our planet's ecosystems. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), approximately 80% of the world's agricultural land is dedicated to livestock production, including grazing and feed crops. This extensive land use not only contributes to deforestation but also leads to habitat destruction, loss of biodiversity, and increased greenhouse gas emissions.
Each year, an estimated 70 billion land animals are killed for human consumption. This staggering number includes cattle, pigs, sheep, and poultry. In addition to these figures, millions of animals are exploited for dairy and egg production. For instance, dairy cows are often kept in confined conditions and can produce milk for several years before being sent to slaughter. Similarly, hens raised for egg production are typically kept in battery cages, leading to severe welfare issues.
The demand for animal products also drives the cultivation of vast amounts of feed crops. It is estimated that around one-third of global cereal production is used to feed livestock rather than humans. This leads to the use of pesticides and fertilizers that can harm local ecosystems, including insects and other wildlife.
Furthermore, the conversion of natural habitats into agricultural land for animal feed contributes to the decline of insect populations. Studies indicate that intensive farming practices can lead to a loss of biodiversity, with some estimates suggesting that insect populations have declined by as much as 75% in certain regions over the past few decades.
References:
1. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2013). "Tackling Climate Change Through Livestock: A Global Assessment of Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities."
2. World Animal Protection. (2019). "The Impact of Animal Agriculture on Climate Change."
3. Hallmann, C.A., et al. (2017). "Declines in insect abundance and diversity." Nature Ecology & Evolution.
By understanding these facts, we can make more informed choices about our diets and their impact on the environment and animal welfare. Choosing plant-based options not only helps reduce the suffering of billions of animals but also promotes a more sustainable use of our planet's resources.
#vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #greenpath #scientific #science
@GreenPathForAll 🌱
Animal agriculture is responsible for a significant portion of the world's agricultural land use and has profound implications for our planet's ecosystems. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), approximately 80% of the world's agricultural land is dedicated to livestock production, including grazing and feed crops. This extensive land use not only contributes to deforestation but also leads to habitat destruction, loss of biodiversity, and increased greenhouse gas emissions.
Each year, an estimated 70 billion land animals are killed for human consumption. This staggering number includes cattle, pigs, sheep, and poultry. In addition to these figures, millions of animals are exploited for dairy and egg production. For instance, dairy cows are often kept in confined conditions and can produce milk for several years before being sent to slaughter. Similarly, hens raised for egg production are typically kept in battery cages, leading to severe welfare issues.
The demand for animal products also drives the cultivation of vast amounts of feed crops. It is estimated that around one-third of global cereal production is used to feed livestock rather than humans. This leads to the use of pesticides and fertilizers that can harm local ecosystems, including insects and other wildlife.
Furthermore, the conversion of natural habitats into agricultural land for animal feed contributes to the decline of insect populations. Studies indicate that intensive farming practices can lead to a loss of biodiversity, with some estimates suggesting that insect populations have declined by as much as 75% in certain regions over the past few decades.
References:
1. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2013). "Tackling Climate Change Through Livestock: A Global Assessment of Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities."
2. World Animal Protection. (2019). "The Impact of Animal Agriculture on Climate Change."
3. Hallmann, C.A., et al. (2017). "Declines in insect abundance and diversity." Nature Ecology & Evolution.
By understanding these facts, we can make more informed choices about our diets and their impact on the environment and animal welfare. Choosing plant-based options not only helps reduce the suffering of billions of animals but also promotes a more sustainable use of our planet's resources.
#vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #greenpath #scientific #science
@GreenPathForAll 🌱
❤16👍5🔥1👏1🕊1
Here’s a detailed explanation of how animal fat consumption can contribute to elevated blood sugar levels and diabetes, along with scientific sources and recommendations for a plant-based diet.
1. Animal Fat and Insulin Resistance 🐖➡️🍭
Explanation: High consumption of saturated fats, particularly from animal sources like meat and dairy, can lead to insulin resistance. When the body’s cells become less responsive to insulin, glucose remains in the bloodstream instead of being absorbed, resulting in elevated blood sugar levels.
Source: A study published in Diabetes Care shows that diets high in saturated fats can impair insulin sensitivity (Liu et al., 2010).
2. Fat Accumulation and Vascular Health 🩸
Explanation: Saturated fats can accumulate in blood vessels, leading to atherosclerosis (hardening of the arteries). These fatty deposits can obstruct blood flow, causing glucose to remain in circulation longer, which raises blood sugar levels.
Source: Research in Nature Reviews Cardiology discusses how dietary fats influence vascular health and insulin resistance (Mozaffarian et al., 2010).
3. Uric Acid Production 🧪
Explanation: Animal products are rich in purines, which the body metabolizes into uric acid. Humans lack certain enzymes (like uricase) that can break down uric acid effectively. Elevated uric acid levels can interfere with insulin signaling, further contributing to insulin resistance and high blood sugar.
Source: A study in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition found a correlation between high uric acid levels and insulin resistance (Choi et al., 2008).
4. Chronic Inflammation 🔥
Explanation: Diets high in saturated fats can lead to chronic inflammation, which is a significant contributor to insulin resistance. Inflammatory markers can disrupt insulin signaling pathways, making it difficult for the body to regulate blood sugar.
Source: Research published in Nature Reviews Endocrinology discusses how inflammation from excess fat contributes to metabolic disorders (Hotamisligil, 2006).
5. Dietary Patterns and Diabetes Risk 🥩❌🍽️
Explanation: High consumption of red and processed meats is associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes. This is partly due to the effects of saturated fats on insulin sensitivity and inflammation.
Source: A meta-analysis in Diabetes Care found that higher consumption of red and processed meats correlates with an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes (Pan et al., 2011).
Conclusion & Recommendations 🌱
Given the evidence linking animal fat consumption to insulin resistance and elevated blood sugar levels, it may be beneficial to consider dietary changes. A plant-based diet rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, nuts, and seeds can improve overall health and may help regulate blood sugar levels.
Research supports the benefits of plant-based diets for reducing the risk of diabetes and improving metabolic health. For instance, a study published in *Nutrients* highlights that plant-based diets can enhance insulin sensitivity and lower inflammation (Tuso et al., 2013).
By opting for a diet that emphasizes plant foods, individuals may not only improve their blood sugar control but also promote overall well-being.🍀 🍀
#vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #greenpath #scientific #science
@GreenPathForAll🍀
1. Animal Fat and Insulin Resistance 🐖➡️🍭
Explanation: High consumption of saturated fats, particularly from animal sources like meat and dairy, can lead to insulin resistance. When the body’s cells become less responsive to insulin, glucose remains in the bloodstream instead of being absorbed, resulting in elevated blood sugar levels.
Source: A study published in Diabetes Care shows that diets high in saturated fats can impair insulin sensitivity (Liu et al., 2010).
2. Fat Accumulation and Vascular Health 🩸
Explanation: Saturated fats can accumulate in blood vessels, leading to atherosclerosis (hardening of the arteries). These fatty deposits can obstruct blood flow, causing glucose to remain in circulation longer, which raises blood sugar levels.
Source: Research in Nature Reviews Cardiology discusses how dietary fats influence vascular health and insulin resistance (Mozaffarian et al., 2010).
3. Uric Acid Production 🧪
Explanation: Animal products are rich in purines, which the body metabolizes into uric acid. Humans lack certain enzymes (like uricase) that can break down uric acid effectively. Elevated uric acid levels can interfere with insulin signaling, further contributing to insulin resistance and high blood sugar.
Source: A study in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition found a correlation between high uric acid levels and insulin resistance (Choi et al., 2008).
4. Chronic Inflammation 🔥
Explanation: Diets high in saturated fats can lead to chronic inflammation, which is a significant contributor to insulin resistance. Inflammatory markers can disrupt insulin signaling pathways, making it difficult for the body to regulate blood sugar.
Source: Research published in Nature Reviews Endocrinology discusses how inflammation from excess fat contributes to metabolic disorders (Hotamisligil, 2006).
5. Dietary Patterns and Diabetes Risk 🥩❌🍽️
Explanation: High consumption of red and processed meats is associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes. This is partly due to the effects of saturated fats on insulin sensitivity and inflammation.
Source: A meta-analysis in Diabetes Care found that higher consumption of red and processed meats correlates with an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes (Pan et al., 2011).
Conclusion & Recommendations 🌱
Given the evidence linking animal fat consumption to insulin resistance and elevated blood sugar levels, it may be beneficial to consider dietary changes. A plant-based diet rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, nuts, and seeds can improve overall health and may help regulate blood sugar levels.
Research supports the benefits of plant-based diets for reducing the risk of diabetes and improving metabolic health. For instance, a study published in *Nutrients* highlights that plant-based diets can enhance insulin sensitivity and lower inflammation (Tuso et al., 2013).
By opting for a diet that emphasizes plant foods, individuals may not only improve their blood sugar control but also promote overall well-being.
#vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #greenpath #scientific #science
@GreenPathForAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍16❤10🕊5🙏1
The essence of peace and love is fundamentally opposed to the act of killing an innocent creature, such as a sheep. Regardless of who advocates for such actions, participating in violence against a defenseless being aligns one with darkness and cruelty, not light.
Even if this act is presented as divinely sanctioned, the truth remains that taking the life of an innocent animal—who struggles for its existence—is an act of oppression and a crime against compassion.
No justification, religious or traditional, can erase the truth: to take a life that wants to live is an act of brutality.
The deception of evil can be subtle, leading individuals to believe they are on the right path while actually fulfilling the desires of darkness. This act contradicts the principles of peace, love, and justice.
It is far better to turn away from beliefs rooted in darkness and embrace true peace and justice.
Truth cannot be erased. You are not following truth but a darkness whose consequences are evident in your actions. Where there is action against peace, love, and justice, darkness prevails.
Alignment with peace, love, and justice cannot result in the suffering of a being that cries out, that does not want to die.
#vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #greenpath #scientific #science
@GreenPathForAll🍀
Even if this act is presented as divinely sanctioned, the truth remains that taking the life of an innocent animal—who struggles for its existence—is an act of oppression and a crime against compassion.
No justification, religious or traditional, can erase the truth: to take a life that wants to live is an act of brutality.
The deception of evil can be subtle, leading individuals to believe they are on the right path while actually fulfilling the desires of darkness. This act contradicts the principles of peace, love, and justice.
It is far better to turn away from beliefs rooted in darkness and embrace true peace and justice.
Truth cannot be erased. You are not following truth but a darkness whose consequences are evident in your actions. Where there is action against peace, love, and justice, darkness prevails.
Alignment with peace, love, and justice cannot result in the suffering of a being that cries out, that does not want to die.
#vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #greenpath #scientific #science
@GreenPathForAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍80❤28🥰8👏7🔥6
Your words about justice and kindness are hollow and meaningless when your meals consist of the suffering and slaughtered bodies of animals.
The voice of peace, the voice of truth. 🕊️✨
@GreenPathForAll ☘
The voice of peace, the voice of truth. 🕊️✨
@GreenPathForAll ☘
❤20🔥7😱4😍2👏1
Animal Testing is a Crime Against Peace and Justice
Animal testing is cruel and unjust, causing immense suffering to innocent creatures. Products tested on animals—like cosmetics (e.g., makeup, shampoos), household cleaners, and some medicines—perpetuate this cruelty. Avoid them!
Choose cruelty-free alternatives:
- Cosmetics: Look for brands with "cruelty-free" or vegan logos (e.g., Lush, The Body Shop).
- Household Products: Buy from brands like Ecover or Method, certified cruelty-free.
- Medicines: Support companies exploring non-animal testing methods, like 3D cell cultures.
Wherever there is oppression and injustice, we will take aim.
#CrueltyFree #Peace #Vegan #EndAnimalTesting
@GreenPathForAll 🍀
Animal testing is cruel and unjust, causing immense suffering to innocent creatures. Products tested on animals—like cosmetics (e.g., makeup, shampoos), household cleaners, and some medicines—perpetuate this cruelty. Avoid them!
Choose cruelty-free alternatives:
- Cosmetics: Look for brands with "cruelty-free" or vegan logos (e.g., Lush, The Body Shop).
- Household Products: Buy from brands like Ecover or Method, certified cruelty-free.
- Medicines: Support companies exploring non-animal testing methods, like 3D cell cultures.
Wherever there is oppression and injustice, we will take aim.
#CrueltyFree #Peace #Vegan #EndAnimalTesting
@GreenPathForAll 🍀
❤46🔥5👍3👏2
Are Vegetarians Also “Killers”? A Deeper Look at a Common Excuse
One of the most common arguments against vegetarianism goes like this:
"You're a killer too! Thousands of insects and small creatures die during farming and harvesting of your crops!"
At first glance, this might sound logical. But in reality, it’s a clever excuse to hide from a much bigger and darker truth. Let’s examine this claim using logic and real statistics.
Point One: The concern isn’t really about insects.
The person making this argument isn’t genuinely worried about the lives of insects. Their goal is simply to justify their own choice (meat consumption) and to find a flaw in yours, so they can ease their conscience.
Point Two (and the key): Who are agricultural lands really for?
This is where their entire argument collapses. According to global statistics (including reports from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – FAO), around 80% of all agricultural land worldwide is not used for direct human consumption, but rather to produce animal feed.
Yes, you read that correctly. A massive portion of corn, soy, and grain farms exist solely to feed animals that are ultimately slaughtered.
Logical Conclusion:
Now let’s revisit the idea of “killing”:
A vegetarian is responsible for the unintended deaths of small creatures in crop fields (that 20% of farmland).
A meat-eater is not only responsible for the direct killing of animals (chickens, cows, sheep), but also for the indirect killing of countless small creatures in the 80% of farmland used to grow feed for those animals.
Put simply:
Meat consumption involves two layers of killing—the intentional slaughter of animals, and a far greater share in the unintentional deaths of field creatures.
The motive is an excuse, not compassion.
Most people who bring up the “insect deaths” argument aren’t truly concerned about those creatures. It’s a tactic to dodge responsibility and justify continued meat consumption. They hide behind this excuse to say: “Since no one is perfect, trying to be better is pointless—and I can keep doing what I know is wrong.”
If our true concern is reducing pain, suffering, and harm to all living beings, then the most logical and effective step is to eliminate or reduce the product that causes the most damage. And that product, without a doubt, is meat and animal-based products.
Final Thought:
Choosing vegetarianism doesn’t mean claiming perfection or zero harm. It’s a conscious decision to minimize harm as much as possible.
So next time someone brings up this excuse, ask them:
“If you’re truly worried about the tiny creatures in crop fields, why not choose the path that uses only 20% of those fields instead of 80%?”
Awareness means looking beyond excuses and seeing the full cycle of a choice. Let’s choose consciously.
#vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #greenpath #scientific #science
@GreenPathForAll🍀
One of the most common arguments against vegetarianism goes like this:
"You're a killer too! Thousands of insects and small creatures die during farming and harvesting of your crops!"
At first glance, this might sound logical. But in reality, it’s a clever excuse to hide from a much bigger and darker truth. Let’s examine this claim using logic and real statistics.
Point One: The concern isn’t really about insects.
The person making this argument isn’t genuinely worried about the lives of insects. Their goal is simply to justify their own choice (meat consumption) and to find a flaw in yours, so they can ease their conscience.
Point Two (and the key): Who are agricultural lands really for?
This is where their entire argument collapses. According to global statistics (including reports from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – FAO), around 80% of all agricultural land worldwide is not used for direct human consumption, but rather to produce animal feed.
Yes, you read that correctly. A massive portion of corn, soy, and grain farms exist solely to feed animals that are ultimately slaughtered.
Logical Conclusion:
Now let’s revisit the idea of “killing”:
A vegetarian is responsible for the unintended deaths of small creatures in crop fields (that 20% of farmland).
A meat-eater is not only responsible for the direct killing of animals (chickens, cows, sheep), but also for the indirect killing of countless small creatures in the 80% of farmland used to grow feed for those animals.
Put simply:
Meat consumption involves two layers of killing—the intentional slaughter of animals, and a far greater share in the unintentional deaths of field creatures.
The motive is an excuse, not compassion.
Most people who bring up the “insect deaths” argument aren’t truly concerned about those creatures. It’s a tactic to dodge responsibility and justify continued meat consumption. They hide behind this excuse to say: “Since no one is perfect, trying to be better is pointless—and I can keep doing what I know is wrong.”
If our true concern is reducing pain, suffering, and harm to all living beings, then the most logical and effective step is to eliminate or reduce the product that causes the most damage. And that product, without a doubt, is meat and animal-based products.
Final Thought:
Choosing vegetarianism doesn’t mean claiming perfection or zero harm. It’s a conscious decision to minimize harm as much as possible.
So next time someone brings up this excuse, ask them:
“If you’re truly worried about the tiny creatures in crop fields, why not choose the path that uses only 20% of those fields instead of 80%?”
Awareness means looking beyond excuses and seeing the full cycle of a choice. Let’s choose consciously.
#vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #greenpath #scientific #science
@GreenPathForAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤51🔥5👏4😱2
Cast Out to Die: The Price of Ignorance
A helpless pigeon suffering from PMV (Newcastle disease)—struggling with a twisted neck and unable to eat or drink on his own—needed only one thing: Compassion.
Medical facts say he just needed 2 weeks of hand-feeding and warmth to fight the virus and return to life. But what did he face in this world? Rejection. Cruelty. Disrespect.
He was thrown out of the house. Cast away into the cold to die alone in his sickness, simply because he was seen as "inconvenient."
We witnessed this atrocity. We will not look away. Wherever we see injustice and oppression against the innocent, we will expose it.
Ask yourself: Why does society build idols out of celebrities and obsess over famous people, yet treats a suffering living being—who desperately needs nursing—like garbage? Why do we allow a sentient being to endure such a tragic fate when saving him was so easy?
This must change. In the near future, we must build a dedicated hospital for animals and birds. A place where no life is considered "disposable."
This is not merely a personal desire. This is the will of Peace and Love. This is the voice of Consciousness and true Humanity.
#AnimalRights #Veganism #EndSpeciesism #Compassion #Justice #vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #scientific #science
@GreenPathForAll🍀
A helpless pigeon suffering from PMV (Newcastle disease)—struggling with a twisted neck and unable to eat or drink on his own—needed only one thing: Compassion.
Medical facts say he just needed 2 weeks of hand-feeding and warmth to fight the virus and return to life. But what did he face in this world? Rejection. Cruelty. Disrespect.
He was thrown out of the house. Cast away into the cold to die alone in his sickness, simply because he was seen as "inconvenient."
We witnessed this atrocity. We will not look away. Wherever we see injustice and oppression against the innocent, we will expose it.
Ask yourself: Why does society build idols out of celebrities and obsess over famous people, yet treats a suffering living being—who desperately needs nursing—like garbage? Why do we allow a sentient being to endure such a tragic fate when saving him was so easy?
This must change. In the near future, we must build a dedicated hospital for animals and birds. A place where no life is considered "disposable."
This is not merely a personal desire. This is the will of Peace and Love. This is the voice of Consciousness and true Humanity.
#AnimalRights #Veganism #EndSpeciesism #Compassion #Justice #vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #scientific #science
@GreenPathForAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤74🔥6👏2💔1
The B12 Question: A Lost Vitamin Is Not Proof of a Carnivorous Past 🌱
The most common attack on plant-based living is: "You need supplements —
so your diet is unnatural." Here is what that argument leaves out.
1. No Animal on Earth Produces B12
Not a cow. Not a lion. Not a human. Not one animal in the history of life.
B12 is built by a chain of roughly thirty enzymes found only in bacteria
and archaea — microorganisms. No animal, plant, or fungus has ever carried
those genes. Not one.
This matters, because people often claim humans "lost" the ability to make
B12 when we started eating meat. That is biologically impossible. You
cannot lose what no ancestor ever had. The gene does not exist in animals,
and never did.
Animal flesh is not a source of B12. It is a storage container for
bacterial B12.
2. Then Why Does a Cow Have It and You Don't?
This is the real question, and the answer is not evolution or diet.
It is the physical layout of the gut.
A cow is a foregut fermenter. Her rumen — an enormous fermentation chamber
holding billions of bacteria — sits BEFORE her small intestine. The
bacteria there manufacture B12, and it flows downstream into the intestine,
where it is absorbed. Production comes first, absorption second.
A human is a hindgut fermenter. Our fermentation chamber — the colon —
sits AFTER the small intestine. Bacteria in the human colon are
synthesizing B12 right now, inside every person reading this. But
absorption occurs in the ileum, upstream. The vitamin is manufactured
past the only door it could enter through, and leaves the body unused.
We are not missing the bacteria. We are not missing a gene.
The plumbing simply runs in the wrong order.
3. The Same "Limitation" Exists in Gorillas, Horses, and Rabbits
Here is why this destroys the carnivore argument rather than supporting it.
Every hindgut fermenter has exactly the same problem — and nearly all of
them are strict herbivores:
Rabbit — solves it by cecotrophy: it re-ingests soft cecal pellets
directly, running them through the gut a second time. A rabbit
prevented from doing this becomes deficient and dies.
Gorilla — a pure herbivore, and documented in the wild practicing
coprophagy, alongside soil and incidentally eaten insects.
Horse — a pure herbivore with an enormous cecum, relying on gut
microbes and on cobalt-rich soil in its forage.
Not one of these animals eats meat. Not one of them synthesizes B12
internally. Every one of them depends on bacteria and on contact with the
earth, exactly as we once did.
A trait shared with gorillas, horses, and rabbits is not evidence of a
carnivorous past. It is evidence of a herbivorous one.
4. Where Our Ancestors Got It
Early humans drank from rivers and springs, ate plants pulled from the
ground with soil still clinging to them, and lived without sanitation.
B12-producing bacteria live in soil, in untreated water, and on unwashed
roots and leaves. Our ancestors consumed B12 constantly — not from
hunting, but from dirt and water.
5. What Modern Life Removed
Chlorinated water. Washed and packaged produce. Sterile agriculture.
Antibacterial everything. Modern hygiene — which saved millions of lives
from cholera and dysentery — also severed the oldest link between humans
and this bacterial vitamin.
We did not lose B12 because we stopped eating meat.
We lost it because we started washing our food.
6. The Fact Almost Nobody Mentions
The overwhelming majority of B12 produced commercially in the world is not
sold to humans. It is added to livestock feed. Farmed animals are raised
in confinement, on processed feed, cut off from soil — so they are
deficient too, and the industry supplements them.
Even grazing cattle need help: B12 contains cobalt at its core, and herds
on cobalt-poor pasture develop wasting disease. Farmers dose them with
cobalt specifically so their gut bacteria can build the vitamin.
So the real choice is not "natural versus supplemented." It is:
take B12 directly, or pay for it to be fed to an animal first.
7. The Argument That Ends the Debate
If needing to obtain a nutrient from outside the body proves what a species
is "designed" to eat, then consider vitamin C.
Dogs, cats, cows, and nearly all mammals synthesize their own vitamin C
internally. They never need to eat it. Humans cannot. We carry a broken
gene — GULO — that was disabled in our primate ancestors millions of years
ago. We must consume vitamin C from outside, continuously, or we develop
scurvy and die.
Why did we lose it? Because our ancestors ate so much fruit that the
ability became redundant and the gene decayed.
Note the contrast carefully:
B12 — no animal ever had the gene. Nothing was lost.
Vitamin C — humans DID have the gene, and lost it, because of fruit.
The one real genetic loss in this entire discussion points directly at a
plant-eating ancestry.
True carnivores make their own vitamin C and never need fruit.
Humans cannot make vitamin C and will die without plants.
8. Deficiency Is Not a Vegan Problem
B12 deficiency is widespread among meat-eaters as well, especially after
age 50, and in anyone taking metformin or acid-reducing medication —
because the limiting factor is absorption, not intake. Eating meat
protects no one from it.
In Conclusion
B12 is a bacterial vitamin that modern sanitation removed from everyone's
diet. Humans never produced it, because no animal ever has. We simply sit,
like the gorilla and the horse, on the wrong side of our own fermentation
chamber — and until recently, soil and water filled the gap.
A small, cheap, cruelty-free tablet restores a link that hygiene broke.
That is not a weakness of plant-based living. It is a consequence of
civilization — and the meat industry solves it in exactly the same way,
only by routing it through an animal first.
Sources:
- Watanabe F, Yabuta Y, Bito T, Teng F. (2014). "Vitamin B12-Containing
Plant Food Sources for Vegetarians." Nutrients, 6(5), 1861-1873.
DOI: 10.3390/nu6051861
- Albert MJ, Mathan VI, Baker SJ. (1980). "Vitamin B12 synthesis by human
small intestinal bacteria." Nature, 283, 781-782. DOI: 10.1038/283781a0
- Allen LH. (2009). "How common is vitamin B-12 deficiency?" American
Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 89(2), 693S-696S.
DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26947A
- Nishikimi M, et al. (1994). "Cloning and chromosomal mapping of the human
nonfunctional gene for L-gulono-gamma-lactone oxidase." Journal of
Biological Chemistry, 269(18), 13685-13688.
- Harcourt AH, Stewart KJ. (1978). "Coprophagy by wild mountain gorilla."
African Journal of Ecology, 16(3), 223-225.
#vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #greenpath #scientific #science #b12
@GreenPathForAll🍀
The most common attack on plant-based living is: "You need supplements —
so your diet is unnatural." Here is what that argument leaves out.
1. No Animal on Earth Produces B12
Not a cow. Not a lion. Not a human. Not one animal in the history of life.
B12 is built by a chain of roughly thirty enzymes found only in bacteria
and archaea — microorganisms. No animal, plant, or fungus has ever carried
those genes. Not one.
This matters, because people often claim humans "lost" the ability to make
B12 when we started eating meat. That is biologically impossible. You
cannot lose what no ancestor ever had. The gene does not exist in animals,
and never did.
Animal flesh is not a source of B12. It is a storage container for
bacterial B12.
2. Then Why Does a Cow Have It and You Don't?
This is the real question, and the answer is not evolution or diet.
It is the physical layout of the gut.
A cow is a foregut fermenter. Her rumen — an enormous fermentation chamber
holding billions of bacteria — sits BEFORE her small intestine. The
bacteria there manufacture B12, and it flows downstream into the intestine,
where it is absorbed. Production comes first, absorption second.
A human is a hindgut fermenter. Our fermentation chamber — the colon —
sits AFTER the small intestine. Bacteria in the human colon are
synthesizing B12 right now, inside every person reading this. But
absorption occurs in the ileum, upstream. The vitamin is manufactured
past the only door it could enter through, and leaves the body unused.
We are not missing the bacteria. We are not missing a gene.
The plumbing simply runs in the wrong order.
3. The Same "Limitation" Exists in Gorillas, Horses, and Rabbits
Here is why this destroys the carnivore argument rather than supporting it.
Every hindgut fermenter has exactly the same problem — and nearly all of
them are strict herbivores:
Rabbit — solves it by cecotrophy: it re-ingests soft cecal pellets
directly, running them through the gut a second time. A rabbit
prevented from doing this becomes deficient and dies.
Gorilla — a pure herbivore, and documented in the wild practicing
coprophagy, alongside soil and incidentally eaten insects.
Horse — a pure herbivore with an enormous cecum, relying on gut
microbes and on cobalt-rich soil in its forage.
Not one of these animals eats meat. Not one of them synthesizes B12
internally. Every one of them depends on bacteria and on contact with the
earth, exactly as we once did.
A trait shared with gorillas, horses, and rabbits is not evidence of a
carnivorous past. It is evidence of a herbivorous one.
4. Where Our Ancestors Got It
Early humans drank from rivers and springs, ate plants pulled from the
ground with soil still clinging to them, and lived without sanitation.
B12-producing bacteria live in soil, in untreated water, and on unwashed
roots and leaves. Our ancestors consumed B12 constantly — not from
hunting, but from dirt and water.
5. What Modern Life Removed
Chlorinated water. Washed and packaged produce. Sterile agriculture.
Antibacterial everything. Modern hygiene — which saved millions of lives
from cholera and dysentery — also severed the oldest link between humans
and this bacterial vitamin.
We did not lose B12 because we stopped eating meat.
We lost it because we started washing our food.
6. The Fact Almost Nobody Mentions
The overwhelming majority of B12 produced commercially in the world is not
sold to humans. It is added to livestock feed. Farmed animals are raised
in confinement, on processed feed, cut off from soil — so they are
deficient too, and the industry supplements them.
Even grazing cattle need help: B12 contains cobalt at its core, and herds
on cobalt-poor pasture develop wasting disease. Farmers dose them with
cobalt specifically so their gut bacteria can build the vitamin.
So the real choice is not "natural versus supplemented." It is:
take B12 directly, or pay for it to be fed to an animal first.
7. The Argument That Ends the Debate
If needing to obtain a nutrient from outside the body proves what a species
is "designed" to eat, then consider vitamin C.
Dogs, cats, cows, and nearly all mammals synthesize their own vitamin C
internally. They never need to eat it. Humans cannot. We carry a broken
gene — GULO — that was disabled in our primate ancestors millions of years
ago. We must consume vitamin C from outside, continuously, or we develop
scurvy and die.
Why did we lose it? Because our ancestors ate so much fruit that the
ability became redundant and the gene decayed.
Note the contrast carefully:
B12 — no animal ever had the gene. Nothing was lost.
Vitamin C — humans DID have the gene, and lost it, because of fruit.
The one real genetic loss in this entire discussion points directly at a
plant-eating ancestry.
True carnivores make their own vitamin C and never need fruit.
Humans cannot make vitamin C and will die without plants.
8. Deficiency Is Not a Vegan Problem
B12 deficiency is widespread among meat-eaters as well, especially after
age 50, and in anyone taking metformin or acid-reducing medication —
because the limiting factor is absorption, not intake. Eating meat
protects no one from it.
In Conclusion
B12 is a bacterial vitamin that modern sanitation removed from everyone's
diet. Humans never produced it, because no animal ever has. We simply sit,
like the gorilla and the horse, on the wrong side of our own fermentation
chamber — and until recently, soil and water filled the gap.
A small, cheap, cruelty-free tablet restores a link that hygiene broke.
That is not a weakness of plant-based living. It is a consequence of
civilization — and the meat industry solves it in exactly the same way,
only by routing it through an animal first.
Sources:
- Watanabe F, Yabuta Y, Bito T, Teng F. (2014). "Vitamin B12-Containing
Plant Food Sources for Vegetarians." Nutrients, 6(5), 1861-1873.
DOI: 10.3390/nu6051861
- Albert MJ, Mathan VI, Baker SJ. (1980). "Vitamin B12 synthesis by human
small intestinal bacteria." Nature, 283, 781-782. DOI: 10.1038/283781a0
- Allen LH. (2009). "How common is vitamin B-12 deficiency?" American
Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 89(2), 693S-696S.
DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26947A
- Nishikimi M, et al. (1994). "Cloning and chromosomal mapping of the human
nonfunctional gene for L-gulono-gamma-lactone oxidase." Journal of
Biological Chemistry, 269(18), 13685-13688.
- Harcourt AH, Stewart KJ. (1978). "Coprophagy by wild mountain gorilla."
African Journal of Ecology, 16(3), 223-225.
#vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #greenpath #scientific #science #b12
@GreenPathForAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤1
Speciesism and the Geography of Habit: Who Actually Chose Your Plate? 🍀
Before defending your diet, answer one question honestly:
did you ever choose it?
1. The Test
A cow is sacred in India, dinner in Argentina, and a luxury steak in Japan.
A pig is forbidden across the Middle East and a national dish in Spain.
A horse is a companion in Britain and a meal in Kazakhstan.
A dog is family in Europe and food in a few regions of Asia.
A guinea pig is a pet in New York and a traditional meal in Peru.
Same animal. Same nervous system. Same capacity to suffer.
Completely different verdict — depending entirely on where the person
judging it happened to be born.
2. What That Reveals
Notice your own reaction. For most readers, "dog" produced discomfort and
"cow" produced nothing. But nothing about the two animals justifies that
gap. A pig outperforms a dog on most cognitive tests. A cow forms lasting
friendships and grieves when separated from her calf.
The difference is not in the animal. The difference is in which animals
your culture placed inside the circle of concern and which it placed
outside — before you were old enough to have an opinion.
3. The Definition
Speciesism is assigning moral worth based on species membership rather
than on the capacity to suffer. It is the same logical structure as any
other arbitrary in-group preference: a trait irrelevant to suffering is
used to decide whose suffering counts.
4. Geographic Determinism
Here is the uncomfortable part. If you had been born 3,000 kilometers east
or west, you would be defending a completely different diet with exactly
the same confidence you defend this one — and you would find your current
diet disgusting.
That is the definition of conditioning, not conviction.
A belief that changes with longitude was never a conclusion.
It was an inheritance.
Our eating habits are learned by imitation: from parents, from neighbors,
from whatever happened to grow or graze within walking distance of our
ancestors. No research was done. No evidence was weighed. No one in that
chain ever asked whether it was right. They simply copied the people
around them — and so did we.
5. The Invisible System
We are taught to see veganism as an ideology and meat-eating as neutral.
It is the reverse: meat-eating is the belief system so dominant that it
became invisible. The psychologist Melanie Joy named it carnism — the
unexamined framework that teaches us to love some animals, eat others,
and never notice the contradiction.
6. The Four Justifications
Research has shown that when people defend meat consumption, almost every
answer falls into four categories, known as the 4 Ns:
Natural — "Our ancestors did it." (So did infanticide and slavery.)
Normal — "Everyone does it." (Popularity is not ethics.)
Necessary — "We need it to survive." (Major health bodies disagree.)
Nice — "It tastes good." (Pleasure does not justify harm.)
Every one of these defends the habit. Not one of them defends the animal.
7. The Way Out
Awareness is simply the act of asking a question your culture never asked
on your behalf:
If I would not accept this being done to a dog,
what exactly makes it acceptable when done to a pig?
If no answer survives that question except "because that is how I was
raised" — then the choice was never yours. Until now.
Sources:
- Joy, M. (2010). Why We Love Dogs, Eat Pigs, and Wear Cows: An
Introduction to Carnism. Conari Press.
- Piazza J, Ruby MB, Loughnan S, et al. (2015). "Rationalizing meat
consumption. The 4Ns." Appetite, 91, 114-128.
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.011
- Singer, P. (1975). Animal Liberation. HarperCollins.
#vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #greenpath #speciesism #carnism
@GreenPathForAll🍀
Before defending your diet, answer one question honestly:
did you ever choose it?
1. The Test
A cow is sacred in India, dinner in Argentina, and a luxury steak in Japan.
A pig is forbidden across the Middle East and a national dish in Spain.
A horse is a companion in Britain and a meal in Kazakhstan.
A dog is family in Europe and food in a few regions of Asia.
A guinea pig is a pet in New York and a traditional meal in Peru.
Same animal. Same nervous system. Same capacity to suffer.
Completely different verdict — depending entirely on where the person
judging it happened to be born.
2. What That Reveals
Notice your own reaction. For most readers, "dog" produced discomfort and
"cow" produced nothing. But nothing about the two animals justifies that
gap. A pig outperforms a dog on most cognitive tests. A cow forms lasting
friendships and grieves when separated from her calf.
The difference is not in the animal. The difference is in which animals
your culture placed inside the circle of concern and which it placed
outside — before you were old enough to have an opinion.
3. The Definition
Speciesism is assigning moral worth based on species membership rather
than on the capacity to suffer. It is the same logical structure as any
other arbitrary in-group preference: a trait irrelevant to suffering is
used to decide whose suffering counts.
4. Geographic Determinism
Here is the uncomfortable part. If you had been born 3,000 kilometers east
or west, you would be defending a completely different diet with exactly
the same confidence you defend this one — and you would find your current
diet disgusting.
That is the definition of conditioning, not conviction.
A belief that changes with longitude was never a conclusion.
It was an inheritance.
Our eating habits are learned by imitation: from parents, from neighbors,
from whatever happened to grow or graze within walking distance of our
ancestors. No research was done. No evidence was weighed. No one in that
chain ever asked whether it was right. They simply copied the people
around them — and so did we.
5. The Invisible System
We are taught to see veganism as an ideology and meat-eating as neutral.
It is the reverse: meat-eating is the belief system so dominant that it
became invisible. The psychologist Melanie Joy named it carnism — the
unexamined framework that teaches us to love some animals, eat others,
and never notice the contradiction.
6. The Four Justifications
Research has shown that when people defend meat consumption, almost every
answer falls into four categories, known as the 4 Ns:
Natural — "Our ancestors did it." (So did infanticide and slavery.)
Normal — "Everyone does it." (Popularity is not ethics.)
Necessary — "We need it to survive." (Major health bodies disagree.)
Nice — "It tastes good." (Pleasure does not justify harm.)
Every one of these defends the habit. Not one of them defends the animal.
7. The Way Out
Awareness is simply the act of asking a question your culture never asked
on your behalf:
If I would not accept this being done to a dog,
what exactly makes it acceptable when done to a pig?
If no answer survives that question except "because that is how I was
raised" — then the choice was never yours. Until now.
Sources:
- Joy, M. (2010). Why We Love Dogs, Eat Pigs, and Wear Cows: An
Introduction to Carnism. Conari Press.
- Piazza J, Ruby MB, Loughnan S, et al. (2015). "Rationalizing meat
consumption. The 4Ns." Appetite, 91, 114-128.
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.011
- Singer, P. (1975). Animal Liberation. HarperCollins.
#vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #greenpath #speciesism #carnism
@GreenPathForAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤1
Plant Protein: Complete, Abundant, and Nothing Like "Just Grass" 🌿
"Where do you get your protein?" is the most repeated question in
nutrition — and the one with the clearest answer.
1. The Word "Incomplete" Is Wrong
Every plant food contains all 20 amino acids, including all 9 essential
ones. Not one is missing from lentils, rice, beans, or broccoli.
"Incomplete" never meant absent. It meant a food has a lower proportion
of one or two amino acids relative to human requirements. That is a
difference of ratio, not of presence — and the word has misled two
generations of people.
2. The Combining Myth — Retracted by Its Own Author
In 1971, the book Diet for a Small Planet popularized the idea that
plant proteins must be carefully combined within a single meal. The claim
spread worldwide.
Its author, Frances Moore Lappé, formally retracted it in the 1981 edition
after the science caught up. The human liver maintains a circulating pool
of amino acids and draws on it for hours. Protein eaten at breakfast is
still available to the body at lunch. There is nothing to combine, time,
or calculate.
3. Plants That Are Complete on Their Own
Soy (tofu, tempeh, edamame, soy milk) — protein quality score of 1.0,
the maximum on the PDCAAS scale, equal to egg white and milk protein
Quinoa
Buckwheat
Amaranth
Hemp seeds
Chia seeds
Pistachios
Potatoes (small amount, but excellent quality)
4. The Pairing Traditional Kitchens Solved Centuries Ago
Legumes are high in lysine and lower in methionine.
Grains are high in methionine and lower in lysine.
Together they are a perfect amino acid profile.
Notice what humanity figured out without any nutrition science at all:
Rice and lentils — Iran, India
Beans and rice — Latin America, the Caribbean
Hummus and bread — the Levant
Tofu and rice — East Asia
Beans and corn — Mesoamerica
Every major food culture on Earth independently arrived at the same
pairing. It was never a problem that needed solving.
5. The Actual Numbers
The adult requirement is 0.8 g of protein per kg of body weight.
A 70 kg adult needs about 56 g per day.
Per 100 g, cooked unless noted:
Seitan 25 g
Tempeh 19 g
Tofu, firm 17 g
Lentils 9 g
Chickpeas 9 g
Black beans 9 g
Quinoa 4.4 g
Green peas 5 g
Pumpkin seeds 30 g (raw)
Peanuts 26 g (raw)
Almonds 21 g (raw)
Oats 13-17 g (dry)
Whole wheat bread 13 g
One ordinary day — lentil stew, chickpeas, bread, oats, a handful of nuts
— passes 56 g without any planning at all. Protein deficiency is
essentially unknown in anyone eating enough calories from varied plants.
6. The Question That Answers Itself
A bull weighs a ton and is solid muscle.
An elephant is the largest land animal alive.
A gorilla is roughly six times stronger than a human.
A horse outruns everything we breed it against.
Every one of them is a herbivore. Not one eats meat.
So where does the protein in a steak come from in the first place?
From plants. The cow assembled it from grass. Eating the animal is simply
collecting plant protein after it has passed through a living being —
losing most of the calories, adding cholesterol, and costing a life.
7. What About the Vitamins?
Iron — lentils, chickpeas, tofu, pumpkin seeds, dark leafy greens.
Pair with vitamin C (lemon, pepper, tomato) to multiply
absorption several times over.
Calcium — tahini, fortified plant milk, kale, bok choy, almonds,
tofu set with calcium.
Zinc — legumes, seeds, nuts, whole grains. Soaking and sprouting
increase absorption.
Omega-3 — flaxseed, chia, walnuts; algae oil for direct EPA and DHA.
Fish do not make omega-3 — they accumulate it from algae.
We can take it from the original source.
Vitamin D — sunlight, or supplementation in winter. Meat-eaters need
this just as much.
Iodine — iodized salt or seaweed.
Vitamin A, C, E, K, folate, fiber, antioxidants — overwhelmingly plant
foods. Meat contains no fiber and almost no vitamin C.
B12 is the only genuine addition. One tablet. See our separate post on
why that has nothing to do with being carnivores.
8. It Was Never "Just Grass"
The picture most people hold of plant-based eating — a sad plate of raw
leaves — describes nothing anyone actually eats.
It is lentil stew. Chickpea curry. Bean stew slow-cooked with turmeric,
mushrooms, carrots and local rice. Hummus and warm bread. Falafel. Dal.
Mujadara. Stuffed vegetables. Roasted eggplant with garlic. Lentil soup
in winter. Noodles with tofu and ginger. Grilled mushrooms. Fresh fruit.
Dates and walnuts. Saffron rice.
These are not substitutes for food. For most of human history, for most
of humanity, they were the food. The meat-centered plate is a recent,
local, and expensive invention — not a human default.
In Conclusion
Plant protein is complete, abundant, cheaper, higher in fiber, free of
cholesterol, and does not require a death. The question was never where
vegans get their protein. The question is why anyone believed they
couldn't.
Sources:
- Melina V, Craig W, Levin S. (2016). "Position of the Academy of Nutrition
and Dietetics: Vegetarian Diets." Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and
Dietetics, 116(12), 1970-1980. DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.09.025
- Young VR, Pellett PL. (1994). "Plant proteins in relation to human protein
and amino acid nutrition." American Journal of Clinical Nutrition,
59(5), 1203S-1212S. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/59.5.1203S
- Mariotti F, Gardner CD. (2019). "Dietary Protein and Amino Acids in
Vegetarian Diets — A Review." Nutrients, 11(11), 2661.
DOI: 10.3390/nu11112661
- Lappé, F.M. (1981). Diet for a Small Planet, 10th Anniversary Edition
(author's retraction of the protein-combining claim).
#vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #greenpath #scientific #science
#protein
@GreenPathForAll🍀
"Where do you get your protein?" is the most repeated question in
nutrition — and the one with the clearest answer.
1. The Word "Incomplete" Is Wrong
Every plant food contains all 20 amino acids, including all 9 essential
ones. Not one is missing from lentils, rice, beans, or broccoli.
"Incomplete" never meant absent. It meant a food has a lower proportion
of one or two amino acids relative to human requirements. That is a
difference of ratio, not of presence — and the word has misled two
generations of people.
2. The Combining Myth — Retracted by Its Own Author
In 1971, the book Diet for a Small Planet popularized the idea that
plant proteins must be carefully combined within a single meal. The claim
spread worldwide.
Its author, Frances Moore Lappé, formally retracted it in the 1981 edition
after the science caught up. The human liver maintains a circulating pool
of amino acids and draws on it for hours. Protein eaten at breakfast is
still available to the body at lunch. There is nothing to combine, time,
or calculate.
3. Plants That Are Complete on Their Own
Soy (tofu, tempeh, edamame, soy milk) — protein quality score of 1.0,
the maximum on the PDCAAS scale, equal to egg white and milk protein
Quinoa
Buckwheat
Amaranth
Hemp seeds
Chia seeds
Pistachios
Potatoes (small amount, but excellent quality)
4. The Pairing Traditional Kitchens Solved Centuries Ago
Legumes are high in lysine and lower in methionine.
Grains are high in methionine and lower in lysine.
Together they are a perfect amino acid profile.
Notice what humanity figured out without any nutrition science at all:
Rice and lentils — Iran, India
Beans and rice — Latin America, the Caribbean
Hummus and bread — the Levant
Tofu and rice — East Asia
Beans and corn — Mesoamerica
Every major food culture on Earth independently arrived at the same
pairing. It was never a problem that needed solving.
5. The Actual Numbers
The adult requirement is 0.8 g of protein per kg of body weight.
A 70 kg adult needs about 56 g per day.
Per 100 g, cooked unless noted:
Seitan 25 g
Tempeh 19 g
Tofu, firm 17 g
Lentils 9 g
Chickpeas 9 g
Black beans 9 g
Quinoa 4.4 g
Green peas 5 g
Pumpkin seeds 30 g (raw)
Peanuts 26 g (raw)
Almonds 21 g (raw)
Oats 13-17 g (dry)
Whole wheat bread 13 g
One ordinary day — lentil stew, chickpeas, bread, oats, a handful of nuts
— passes 56 g without any planning at all. Protein deficiency is
essentially unknown in anyone eating enough calories from varied plants.
6. The Question That Answers Itself
A bull weighs a ton and is solid muscle.
An elephant is the largest land animal alive.
A gorilla is roughly six times stronger than a human.
A horse outruns everything we breed it against.
Every one of them is a herbivore. Not one eats meat.
So where does the protein in a steak come from in the first place?
From plants. The cow assembled it from grass. Eating the animal is simply
collecting plant protein after it has passed through a living being —
losing most of the calories, adding cholesterol, and costing a life.
7. What About the Vitamins?
Iron — lentils, chickpeas, tofu, pumpkin seeds, dark leafy greens.
Pair with vitamin C (lemon, pepper, tomato) to multiply
absorption several times over.
Calcium — tahini, fortified plant milk, kale, bok choy, almonds,
tofu set with calcium.
Zinc — legumes, seeds, nuts, whole grains. Soaking and sprouting
increase absorption.
Omega-3 — flaxseed, chia, walnuts; algae oil for direct EPA and DHA.
Fish do not make omega-3 — they accumulate it from algae.
We can take it from the original source.
Vitamin D — sunlight, or supplementation in winter. Meat-eaters need
this just as much.
Iodine — iodized salt or seaweed.
Vitamin A, C, E, K, folate, fiber, antioxidants — overwhelmingly plant
foods. Meat contains no fiber and almost no vitamin C.
B12 is the only genuine addition. One tablet. See our separate post on
why that has nothing to do with being carnivores.
8. It Was Never "Just Grass"
The picture most people hold of plant-based eating — a sad plate of raw
leaves — describes nothing anyone actually eats.
It is lentil stew. Chickpea curry. Bean stew slow-cooked with turmeric,
mushrooms, carrots and local rice. Hummus and warm bread. Falafel. Dal.
Mujadara. Stuffed vegetables. Roasted eggplant with garlic. Lentil soup
in winter. Noodles with tofu and ginger. Grilled mushrooms. Fresh fruit.
Dates and walnuts. Saffron rice.
These are not substitutes for food. For most of human history, for most
of humanity, they were the food. The meat-centered plate is a recent,
local, and expensive invention — not a human default.
In Conclusion
Plant protein is complete, abundant, cheaper, higher in fiber, free of
cholesterol, and does not require a death. The question was never where
vegans get their protein. The question is why anyone believed they
couldn't.
Sources:
- Melina V, Craig W, Levin S. (2016). "Position of the Academy of Nutrition
and Dietetics: Vegetarian Diets." Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and
Dietetics, 116(12), 1970-1980. DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.09.025
- Young VR, Pellett PL. (1994). "Plant proteins in relation to human protein
and amino acid nutrition." American Journal of Clinical Nutrition,
59(5), 1203S-1212S. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/59.5.1203S
- Mariotti F, Gardner CD. (2019). "Dietary Protein and Amino Acids in
Vegetarian Diets — A Review." Nutrients, 11(11), 2661.
DOI: 10.3390/nu11112661
- Lappé, F.M. (1981). Diet for a Small Planet, 10th Anniversary Edition
(author's retraction of the protein-combining claim).
#vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #greenpath #scientific #science
#protein
@GreenPathForAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤1