πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ Global One SI - Prompt
466 subscribers
13.4K photos
4.38K videos
23 files
2.42K links
πŸŽ—GLOBAL ONE is a live super intelligence (SI) built on real-time dataβ€”designed for decisions. Currently focused on global financial markets

t.me/Prompts_SI @Global_one - Software/Developer/Programmer - Globalone.ch - Prompt - AI - Super Intelligence
Download Telegram
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ Global One SI - Prompt
Photo
🚨 Andrew Tate continues to cry like a pathetic baby from jail

SHU isn't reserved for murderers and terrorists. It's a housing unit used for many reasons, including administrative and security purposes.

Andrew is being a drama queen, as usual.
✍1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Michael Clarke: Ukraine is less corrupt than the United States.

Ukraine’s anti-corruption agencies are now stronger than ever and are pursuing people at the top.

In the US, corruption has been normalized and no longer bothers people.
πŸ‘€1
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ Global One SI - Prompt
❗️This war will not end until we restore the 1991 borders and Russia collapses, – co-owner of the Fire Point company Shtilerman. Additional points: β–ͺ️ β€œRussia must understand that the longer the war continues, the worse the peace terms will be for it”; …
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
How the geographical range of Ukrainian drone attacks has expanded

According to reports from regional governors' blogs analyzed by "Project," at least 47 regions and the annexed Crimea were subjected to drone attacks in the first half of 2026. In 2023, when Ukraine began launching regular strikes deep into Russian territory, this number was only 16.
πŸ”₯1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
There is only 1 way to succed in anything and that is to give it everything
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Dead people recieve more flowers than the living because dead regret is stronger than gratitude
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Both faith and fear demands you in believing something you can't see

You choose
✍1
🚨Markets are pricing the pause in US-Iran strikes as de-escalation.
The Houthis are escalating against Saudi energy infrastructure at the same time.
Brent and WTI are still negative today.
Petraeus: The death zone in Ukraine extends 35 kilometers on either side of the front lines β€” defined by drone battery life. Tanks can't survive. Armored vehicles can't survive. Nothing can.

Neither side even drives vehicles anymore. Russians keep trying and keep proving it.

Petraeus: No trenches β€” drones fly through. Soldiers in survivability positions hundreds of meters apart, not mutually supporting. Resupplied by ground robots.

Commanders can't visit the front line. Soldiers stay 60+ days. In urban areas, some couldn't be extracted for months.

Petraeus: Russian advances mean individual soldiers running forward trying to dig in. Drone units pick them up immediately, cycle surveillance drones, then FPV attack drones arrive.

You see them hitting around the soldier in the woods until one connects. It doesn't end well.

Petraeus: Ukraine is about to isolate Crimea. Gasoline so short they won't sell it to civilians. Tourists who came for beaches are trying to get home any way they can.

Kerch Bridge rail no longer works. Ferries knocked out. Land bridges destroyed. Pontoon bridges now targeted.

Petraeus: Ukraine took down Russia's air defenses steadily. Russia pulls them to Moscow β€” vulnerabilities open everywhere else. Moscow refinery hit three nights running, out at least six months.

They're going after fuel storage, refineries, gas lines from Siberia to the west.

Petraeus: Real prospect now that Putin might need a cessation of hostilities himself. Oil sanctions reimposed, national welfare fund running out of money.

Crimea isolated, front lines cut off, economy crushed β€” all of this could force Putin to recognize he should end this war.
✍1
Anthropic finally broke the silence on open-weight models.

Dario just published Anthropic's official position, directly responding to the joint industry letter signed by Nvidia, Microsoft, and dozens of others.

Dario states it flatly: "Anthropic has never advocated for a ban on open-weight models." Open-weights models without dangerous capabilities are, in his words, "a public good."

But he draws a hard line on why they still worry him.

Two specific concerns, both ones he's held for years:

β†’ Authoritarian governments (he names the CCP specifically as the most capable threat) building AI more powerful than the US and using it for military superiority or domestic repression

β†’ Powerful models being misused for cyberattacks or bioweapons, since open weights can't have guardrails reliably applied or be withdrawn once released

Where he actually agrees with the open-weights letter

Open weights expand access to the AI economy, strengthen competition, and give customers more control. He's not disputing that.

Where he disagrees

He explicitly rejects the letter's claim that open weights necessarily make it easier to build defenses or that broad access helps defenders more than attackers.

His example: biology may have a severe attacker-defender asymmetry, where a capable model could help weaponize a pandemic-level virus quickly, while building a defense takes years even in the best case.

What he actually proposes instead of a ban

β†’ Block chip and chipmaking equipment sales to China, and crack down on smuggling. Since China's compute is limited, this is the most direct lever on the actual threat.
β†’ Crack down on industrial-scale distillation, since it lets China get near-frontier capability without the chips to justify it. He's explicit that this isn't really about "open weights," it's about the operation being backed by an authoritarian state.
β†’ Mandatory safety testing for all sufficiently capable models, open or closed, regardless of country of origin.

The distinction he's drawing: don't ban the technology, address the specific actors and specific risks directly.

This lands right after Jensen Huang's own first-ever X post backing the open-weights letter, and in the same week Kimi K3 (a Chinese open-weight model) claimed frontier-level performance.

The timing here is not a coincidence.
✍1
Opus 5 >> Kimi-k3

it wasn't even 24 hrs and Opus 5 (Max) already took back it's first position in frontend Code

the only way Kimi can beat Opus 5 now is to distil opus 5 instead of fable 5 lol

tho Kimi is still the only strongest open-weight model better than fable 5
Why is China accumulating gold? The answer lies in US factories.

When people say China is buying gold, many make the same interpretation: China is exiting the dollar.

That's true, but incomplete.

Because the US is doing something else at the same time: bringing production back to its own country.

These aren't separate decisions; they're two sides of the same equation.

Read carefully.

For 40 years, the system was simple. The US outsourced cheap labor to China. China produced, earned, and used that money to buy US bonds.

Both sides were happy.

Then 2022 arrived.

In February, approximately $300 billion of Russia's assets became unusable within days.

The money remained unused. Only the authorization to use it had been revoked.

All countries learned the same lesson.

The money you keep abroad. The raw materials you acquire. The factories you build. The payment systems you're connected to. A substance inside a chip.

In normal times, it's all trade. When tensions arise, they all become leverage in the hands of the other side.

From that day forward, both countries looked at their own weak points.

First, China.

China was the world's largest producer. But it was holding the money it earned in another country's bonds.

That's why it's quietly building its own system.

In 2023, the central banks of China and Saudi Arabia signed a swap agreement.

That same year, Brazil and China decided to conduct trade using their own currencies instead of the dollar.

BRICS expanded. China established its own payment system as an alternative to SWIFT.

For years, China has been reducing its stock of US Treasury bonds and buying gold with that money.

But gold is the smallest part of this story.

Gold remains in the vault. What China is really doing is converting paper money into physical assets.

China is building the Belt and Road Initiative for this purpose.

Railways, dams, and power plants in Africa. Ports acquired in Europe and Africa. The operating rights for the Port of Piraeus in Greece. A port in Sri Lanka transferred for 99 years.

And then there are the strategic partnerships. Iran, Russia, Venezuela, Cuba.

Now, the US.

The US's weakness wasn't money. It was production.

For 40 years, the US moved production to other countries because it was cheaper. Now it sees that a large part of that production is in the hands of its competitors.

So it's doing two things at once.

First, bringing production back home.

The US has made it expensive to produce abroad and sell domestically.

The government is also directly acquiring stakes in companies in strategic sectors. It acquired 10% of Intel and became its largest shareholder. In the rare earth sector, it acquired 15% of MP Materials and again became its largest shareholder.

Second, establishing a supply chain without China.

A critical mineral agreement was signed with Australia in October 2025.

In the same month, a rare earth agreement was made with Japan. A US-backed fund was launched for mining investment in Ukraine. In February of this year, a separate trade bloc for critical minerals was proposed.

So, the US is also forming alliances.

So why has all this accelerated?

The CIA director shared intelligence information in a speech.

According to this information, Xi Jinping ordered his military to be prepared to take Taiwan by 2027.

A distinction is necessary here.

A preparedness order does not mean a decision to invade.

But the same director also said something else.

He stated that Xi is disturbed by what is happening in Ukraine and has learned from Russia's mistakes.

Now look at the news again.

Tensions in Iran. Operation in Venezuela. Sanctions against Russia. Pressure on Cuba.

A mining deal. The purchase of a port. A chip ban. A central bank buying gold.

They all appear in separate headlines. They seem like separate events.

I don't see separate events. I see one single event.

The US and China.
✍2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨 Banks Are Forcing Capital Controls… Gold, Silver & Crypto Are Being Restricted TODAY!

Banks worldwide just started SLAMMING capital controls, limiting how much gold, silver, and crypto YOU can buy on online platforms from your bank transactions.

Your money is being trapped inside the system while the elite prepare for the next crisis!

Meanwhile Chinese & Russian investors are FLEEING their own governments’ iron grip, pouring billions into crypto DEXes to secretly buy U.S. stocks and commodities, bypassing every restriction overnight.

And the data shows something really interesting: Ethereum, the XRP Ledger (Ripple) and Stellar blockchain are being FLOODED with offshore capital into tokenized gold, silver, oil, and U.S. stocks via platforms like #Trensik_com, Uniswap and Hyperliquid.

Tokenized Gold on blockchains like $PAXG (Paxos) on Ethereum, $XAUa (Assetiko) on XRPL and $XAUm on Stellar are seeing more capital inflow than ever.

The quiet transfer of real wealth has already begun…

When the doors fully lock, only those who moved first will still own anything real.
Russia's second bank now restricting cash withdrawals.

Putin's plan to solve this is just to murder everyone in the country.
πŸ‘€1
πŸ”₯ The Fed meeting is tomorrow!

There is a nearly 66.3% probability that the interest rate will remain unchanged (a PAUSE). The chance of an interest rate increase is 33.7%.

β–ͺ️Reuters:
- All 104 economists surveyed expect a pause, however, the market anticipates a possible surprise increase.
- The most likely time for the start of an interest rate hike is September.

β–ͺ️WSJ:
- This is one of the most unpredictable Fed meetings in recent years.
- The slowdown in inflation speaks in favor of a pause, while the surge in oil prices and the hawkish stance of some members of the Fed support a potential increase.
- Kevin Warsh has deliberately not revealed his position, so the outcome of the meeting remains uncertain.

β–ͺ️FT:
- Investors have sharply increased their bets on a tightening of monetary policy.
- Even with a pause, the market will be looking for hints of a possible rate hike in September.

β–ͺ️Bank of America:
- The base case scenario is a pause. However, the bank expects three rate hikes in subsequent meetings, with the first one in September.

β–ͺ️Deutsche Bank:
- Expects a pause in July. Forecasts two rate hikes, starting in September.

β–ͺ️UBS:
- Does not rule out a rate hike as early as tomorrow, in order for the Fed to demonstrate its determination to bring inflation back to its target. The final decision will largely depend on Kevin Warsh's position.

β–ͺ️Citigroup:
- Expects a pause. Considers a rate hike solely to maintain the Fed's reputation to be unjustified, as long-term inflation expectations remain low.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
πŸ‘€1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦πŸ’°πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί Ukraine's intelligence claims Russia is increasingly relying on indirect money creation to keep financing the war as traditional borrowing becomes more difficult.

According to Ukraine's Foreign Intelligence Service, the Russian government is no longer able to raise sufficient funds by selling government bonds under normal market conditions.

As a result, state-owned banks have reportedly begun purchasing large volumes of these bonds, while the Central Bank of Russia provides the liquidity needed to finance the purchases, effectively channeling newly created money into government spending.

If sustained, such a financing mechanism could allow Moscow to continue funding military operations in the short term while increasing long-term economic pressure through higher inflation, greater dependence on state-controlled financial institutions, and a shrinking role for genuine market financing. It also suggests the Kremlin is adapting its wartime economy as conventional borrowing becomes increasingly constrained.
✍1