This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Some of us are born with something inside of us that refuses to be average
πΏ1
π₯BREAKING: China has begun producing lithography machines designed to challenge ASMLs monopoly on computer chip production.
This news comes after China's CXMT announced full production ramp of DDR5 memory.
This news comes after China's CXMT announced full production ramp of DDR5 memory.
Everyone's talking about the US chip ban. But the real restrictions were imposed by China.
I'll tell you about a component.
You've probably never heard of it.
It's in your phone's touchscreen. It's in satellite communications. It's in fiber optic cables.
It's in AI data centers, in the components that allow thousands of chips to communicate with each other.
Without that component, chips can work individually, but not together.
Approximately 70% of its production is in China.
This component is called indium.
Indium isn't mined on its own.
It's obtained as a byproduct when processing zinc ore. So, if you want to increase indium production, it's not enough to just look for more indium; you need to refine more zinc.
That's why it can't be accelerated by simply paying for it.
First, you need to grow another industry, and a large part of that industry is in China.
So what exactly does this component do in artificial intelligence?
Everyone is measuring the competition by chips. How many chips does each company have? How many parameters was used to train each model?
However, a data center isn't just a stack of chips.
When training a large model, thousands of chips are working simultaneously, constantly sending data to each other.
So those thousands of chips have to act like a single machine.
Within the same rack, chips communicate via copper wires. But as the cluster grows, data between racks is transmitted by light.
The lasers that produce that light are based on indium phosphide.
Adding chips doesn't change the outcome if the connection slows down, because the system operates at the speed of the slowest link.
China restricted exports of this material in February 2025.
In the following 14 months, China's indium exports globally fell by two-thirds, and to the US by 77 percent. The price of indium phosphide flakes rose from approximately $1,400 to $5,000.
The result can be seen in one company.
Lumentum, the American company that produces these connectors, quadrupled its production. Despite this, it has no stock left to sell until 2028.
Not because demand is high. Because it couldn't find raw materials.
To solve this bottleneck, Nvidia committed $2 billion each to Lumentum and its competitor Coherent. Lumentum is building a new facility in the US, and production will begin in mid-2028.
So, the world's most valuable chip company wrote checks to two suppliers to solve a material shortage, and the solution will begin at the earliest in two years.
Why isn't this being discussed?
Because chips are quantifiable. They have a brand, a price, and a market value. The number of chips a company buys becomes news.
The interconnect layer isn't visible. Nobody discloses how many optical modules they buy.
So the public is measuring the competition with the wrong unit.
When China imposed restrictions on rare earth elements, this was discussed, and counter-policies were developed.
The same move was made with indium, and it was hardly discussed.
It's the same weapon used without much fanfare.
Now let's return to the initial picture.
The US chip bans prevented China from accessing advanced AI chips, and this has largely worked.
But the two restrictions aren't preventing the same thing.
One stopped the chip itself. The other stopped the chips from working together.
Making a chip and making thousands of chips work together as a single machine are two separate tasks. In the first, China lags behind; in the second, it holds the gate.
Moreover, this isn't the only bottleneck.
When building a data center, it needs to be connected to electricity before the chip. Transformers make that connection.
China has approximately 60% of the global transformer production capacity. The US only meets about 20% of its own demand.
Orders for large power transformers can take up to 4 years. A data center, on the other hand, is a project planned to be built in 18 months.
I'll tell you about a component.
You've probably never heard of it.
It's in your phone's touchscreen. It's in satellite communications. It's in fiber optic cables.
It's in AI data centers, in the components that allow thousands of chips to communicate with each other.
Without that component, chips can work individually, but not together.
Approximately 70% of its production is in China.
This component is called indium.
Indium isn't mined on its own.
It's obtained as a byproduct when processing zinc ore. So, if you want to increase indium production, it's not enough to just look for more indium; you need to refine more zinc.
That's why it can't be accelerated by simply paying for it.
First, you need to grow another industry, and a large part of that industry is in China.
So what exactly does this component do in artificial intelligence?
Everyone is measuring the competition by chips. How many chips does each company have? How many parameters was used to train each model?
However, a data center isn't just a stack of chips.
When training a large model, thousands of chips are working simultaneously, constantly sending data to each other.
So those thousands of chips have to act like a single machine.
Within the same rack, chips communicate via copper wires. But as the cluster grows, data between racks is transmitted by light.
The lasers that produce that light are based on indium phosphide.
Adding chips doesn't change the outcome if the connection slows down, because the system operates at the speed of the slowest link.
China restricted exports of this material in February 2025.
In the following 14 months, China's indium exports globally fell by two-thirds, and to the US by 77 percent. The price of indium phosphide flakes rose from approximately $1,400 to $5,000.
The result can be seen in one company.
Lumentum, the American company that produces these connectors, quadrupled its production. Despite this, it has no stock left to sell until 2028.
Not because demand is high. Because it couldn't find raw materials.
To solve this bottleneck, Nvidia committed $2 billion each to Lumentum and its competitor Coherent. Lumentum is building a new facility in the US, and production will begin in mid-2028.
So, the world's most valuable chip company wrote checks to two suppliers to solve a material shortage, and the solution will begin at the earliest in two years.
Why isn't this being discussed?
Because chips are quantifiable. They have a brand, a price, and a market value. The number of chips a company buys becomes news.
The interconnect layer isn't visible. Nobody discloses how many optical modules they buy.
So the public is measuring the competition with the wrong unit.
When China imposed restrictions on rare earth elements, this was discussed, and counter-policies were developed.
The same move was made with indium, and it was hardly discussed.
It's the same weapon used without much fanfare.
Now let's return to the initial picture.
The US chip bans prevented China from accessing advanced AI chips, and this has largely worked.
But the two restrictions aren't preventing the same thing.
One stopped the chip itself. The other stopped the chips from working together.
Making a chip and making thousands of chips work together as a single machine are two separate tasks. In the first, China lags behind; in the second, it holds the gate.
Moreover, this isn't the only bottleneck.
When building a data center, it needs to be connected to electricity before the chip. Transformers make that connection.
China has approximately 60% of the global transformer production capacity. The US only meets about 20% of its own demand.
Orders for large power transformers can take up to 4 years. A data center, on the other hand, is a project planned to be built in 18 months.
β1
π¨π Global One SI - Prompt
Photo
So even if you solve the chip problem, even if you solve the connection problem, you can't connect the building to electricity.
The timeline doesn't add up either.
The US is banning the procurement of rare earth, magnets, tungsten, molybdenum, and tantalum from China for its defense industry by January 2027.
But two of the five materials China is restricting in February 2025 are already tungsten and molybdenum.
So China has already restricted the materials the US will ban. Indium isn't even on that list.
This isn't unique to artificial intelligence either.
A system's strength is measured not by its most impressive component, but by its narrowest point. And the bottleneck never stops where it's most talked about.
The US is ahead on the visible side of the race.
It's waiting in line on the invisible side.
The timeline doesn't add up either.
The US is banning the procurement of rare earth, magnets, tungsten, molybdenum, and tantalum from China for its defense industry by January 2027.
But two of the five materials China is restricting in February 2025 are already tungsten and molybdenum.
So China has already restricted the materials the US will ban. Indium isn't even on that list.
This isn't unique to artificial intelligence either.
A system's strength is measured not by its most impressive component, but by its narrowest point. And the bottleneck never stops where it's most talked about.
The US is ahead on the visible side of the race.
It's waiting in line on the invisible side.
β1
Forwarded from π’WTI, Brent Crude Oil, NGAS Trading π
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
βοΈAfter the UAV attack on July 25, the Tyumen Oil Refinery completely halted oil refining, β Reuters
As a result of the strikes, a fire engulfed the diesel hydrotreating unit with a capacity of 2.6 million tons per year, as well as the combined unit for producing high-octane motor gasolines. Repair timelines are currently unknown.
As a result of the strikes, a fire engulfed the diesel hydrotreating unit with a capacity of 2.6 million tons per year, as well as the combined unit for producing high-octane motor gasolines. Repair timelines are currently unknown.
π₯1
π¨π Global One SI - Prompt
Photo
π¨ Andrew Tate continues to cry like a pathetic baby from jail
SHU isn't reserved for murderers and terrorists. It's a housing unit used for many reasons, including administrative and security purposes.
Andrew is being a drama queen, as usual.
SHU isn't reserved for murderers and terrorists. It's a housing unit used for many reasons, including administrative and security purposes.
Andrew is being a drama queen, as usual.
β1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Michael Clarke: Ukraine is less corrupt than the United States.
Ukraineβs anti-corruption agencies are now stronger than ever and are pursuing people at the top.
In the US, corruption has been normalized and no longer bothers people.
Ukraineβs anti-corruption agencies are now stronger than ever and are pursuing people at the top.
In the US, corruption has been normalized and no longer bothers people.
π1
π¨π Global One SI - Prompt
Well, this chart is absolutely terrifying... A record amount of IPOs in 2026 as the billionaires rush to cash out. We saw the exact same behavior in 1999.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
SEC Chair Paul Atkins says there have been a record 400 IPOs in the last 12 months and he "feels good about it." π
π¨π Global One SI - Prompt
Nvidia $NVDA just had its single worst day selloff since May 2026 This comes as concern continues to grow over Nvidia's use of circular financing to fund its customers Back in the 2000 bubble, Cisco & Nortel used circular financing to overbuild the fiberβ¦
Did you know Nvidia $NVDA replaced Enron on the S&P 500 in November 2001.
π¨π Global One SI - Prompt
Did you know Nvidia $NVDA replaced Enron on the S&P 500 in November 2001.
Coincidence? Maybe. Maybe not π
π¨π Global One SI - Prompt
βοΈThis war will not end until we restore the 1991 borders and Russia collapses, β co-owner of the Fire Point company Shtilerman. Additional points: βͺοΈ βRussia must understand that the longer the war continues, the worse the peace terms will be for itβ; β¦
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
How the geographical range of Ukrainian drone attacks has expanded
According to reports from regional governors' blogs analyzed by "Project," at least 47 regions and the annexed Crimea were subjected to drone attacks in the first half of 2026. In 2023, when Ukraine began launching regular strikes deep into Russian territory, this number was only 16.
According to reports from regional governors' blogs analyzed by "Project," at least 47 regions and the annexed Crimea were subjected to drone attacks in the first half of 2026. In 2023, when Ukraine began launching regular strikes deep into Russian territory, this number was only 16.
π₯1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
There is only 1 way to succed in anything and that is to give it everything
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Dead people recieve more flowers than the living because dead regret is stronger than gratitude
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Both faith and fear demands you in believing something you can't see
You choose
You choose
β1
Forwarded from π’WTI, Brent Crude Oil, NGAS Trading π
π¨Markets are pricing the pause in US-Iran strikes as de-escalation.
The Houthis are escalating against Saudi energy infrastructure at the same time.
Brent and WTI are still negative today.
The Houthis are escalating against Saudi energy infrastructure at the same time.
Brent and WTI are still negative today.
Petraeus: The death zone in Ukraine extends 35 kilometers on either side of the front lines β defined by drone battery life. Tanks can't survive. Armored vehicles can't survive. Nothing can.
Neither side even drives vehicles anymore. Russians keep trying and keep proving it.
Petraeus: No trenches β drones fly through. Soldiers in survivability positions hundreds of meters apart, not mutually supporting. Resupplied by ground robots.
Commanders can't visit the front line. Soldiers stay 60+ days. In urban areas, some couldn't be extracted for months.
Petraeus: Russian advances mean individual soldiers running forward trying to dig in. Drone units pick them up immediately, cycle surveillance drones, then FPV attack drones arrive.
You see them hitting around the soldier in the woods until one connects. It doesn't end well.
Petraeus: Ukraine is about to isolate Crimea. Gasoline so short they won't sell it to civilians. Tourists who came for beaches are trying to get home any way they can.
Kerch Bridge rail no longer works. Ferries knocked out. Land bridges destroyed. Pontoon bridges now targeted.
Petraeus: Ukraine took down Russia's air defenses steadily. Russia pulls them to Moscow β vulnerabilities open everywhere else. Moscow refinery hit three nights running, out at least six months.
They're going after fuel storage, refineries, gas lines from Siberia to the west.
Petraeus: Real prospect now that Putin might need a cessation of hostilities himself. Oil sanctions reimposed, national welfare fund running out of money.
Crimea isolated, front lines cut off, economy crushed β all of this could force Putin to recognize he should end this war.
Neither side even drives vehicles anymore. Russians keep trying and keep proving it.
Petraeus: No trenches β drones fly through. Soldiers in survivability positions hundreds of meters apart, not mutually supporting. Resupplied by ground robots.
Commanders can't visit the front line. Soldiers stay 60+ days. In urban areas, some couldn't be extracted for months.
Petraeus: Russian advances mean individual soldiers running forward trying to dig in. Drone units pick them up immediately, cycle surveillance drones, then FPV attack drones arrive.
You see them hitting around the soldier in the woods until one connects. It doesn't end well.
Petraeus: Ukraine is about to isolate Crimea. Gasoline so short they won't sell it to civilians. Tourists who came for beaches are trying to get home any way they can.
Kerch Bridge rail no longer works. Ferries knocked out. Land bridges destroyed. Pontoon bridges now targeted.
Petraeus: Ukraine took down Russia's air defenses steadily. Russia pulls them to Moscow β vulnerabilities open everywhere else. Moscow refinery hit three nights running, out at least six months.
They're going after fuel storage, refineries, gas lines from Siberia to the west.
Petraeus: Real prospect now that Putin might need a cessation of hostilities himself. Oil sanctions reimposed, national welfare fund running out of money.
Crimea isolated, front lines cut off, economy crushed β all of this could force Putin to recognize he should end this war.
β1
Anthropic finally broke the silence on open-weight models.
Dario just published Anthropic's official position, directly responding to the joint industry letter signed by Nvidia, Microsoft, and dozens of others.
Dario states it flatly: "Anthropic has never advocated for a ban on open-weight models." Open-weights models without dangerous capabilities are, in his words, "a public good."
But he draws a hard line on why they still worry him.
Two specific concerns, both ones he's held for years:
β Authoritarian governments (he names the CCP specifically as the most capable threat) building AI more powerful than the US and using it for military superiority or domestic repression
β Powerful models being misused for cyberattacks or bioweapons, since open weights can't have guardrails reliably applied or be withdrawn once released
Where he actually agrees with the open-weights letter
Open weights expand access to the AI economy, strengthen competition, and give customers more control. He's not disputing that.
Where he disagrees
He explicitly rejects the letter's claim that open weights necessarily make it easier to build defenses or that broad access helps defenders more than attackers.
His example: biology may have a severe attacker-defender asymmetry, where a capable model could help weaponize a pandemic-level virus quickly, while building a defense takes years even in the best case.
What he actually proposes instead of a ban
β Block chip and chipmaking equipment sales to China, and crack down on smuggling. Since China's compute is limited, this is the most direct lever on the actual threat.
β Crack down on industrial-scale distillation, since it lets China get near-frontier capability without the chips to justify it. He's explicit that this isn't really about "open weights," it's about the operation being backed by an authoritarian state.
β Mandatory safety testing for all sufficiently capable models, open or closed, regardless of country of origin.
The distinction he's drawing: don't ban the technology, address the specific actors and specific risks directly.
This lands right after Jensen Huang's own first-ever X post backing the open-weights letter, and in the same week Kimi K3 (a Chinese open-weight model) claimed frontier-level performance.
The timing here is not a coincidence.
Dario just published Anthropic's official position, directly responding to the joint industry letter signed by Nvidia, Microsoft, and dozens of others.
Dario states it flatly: "Anthropic has never advocated for a ban on open-weight models." Open-weights models without dangerous capabilities are, in his words, "a public good."
But he draws a hard line on why they still worry him.
Two specific concerns, both ones he's held for years:
β Authoritarian governments (he names the CCP specifically as the most capable threat) building AI more powerful than the US and using it for military superiority or domestic repression
β Powerful models being misused for cyberattacks or bioweapons, since open weights can't have guardrails reliably applied or be withdrawn once released
Where he actually agrees with the open-weights letter
Open weights expand access to the AI economy, strengthen competition, and give customers more control. He's not disputing that.
Where he disagrees
He explicitly rejects the letter's claim that open weights necessarily make it easier to build defenses or that broad access helps defenders more than attackers.
His example: biology may have a severe attacker-defender asymmetry, where a capable model could help weaponize a pandemic-level virus quickly, while building a defense takes years even in the best case.
What he actually proposes instead of a ban
β Block chip and chipmaking equipment sales to China, and crack down on smuggling. Since China's compute is limited, this is the most direct lever on the actual threat.
β Crack down on industrial-scale distillation, since it lets China get near-frontier capability without the chips to justify it. He's explicit that this isn't really about "open weights," it's about the operation being backed by an authoritarian state.
β Mandatory safety testing for all sufficiently capable models, open or closed, regardless of country of origin.
The distinction he's drawing: don't ban the technology, address the specific actors and specific risks directly.
This lands right after Jensen Huang's own first-ever X post backing the open-weights letter, and in the same week Kimi K3 (a Chinese open-weight model) claimed frontier-level performance.
The timing here is not a coincidence.
β1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
If you are so sure, burn the ships
π₯1
Why is China accumulating gold? The answer lies in US factories.
When people say China is buying gold, many make the same interpretation: China is exiting the dollar.
That's true, but incomplete.
Because the US is doing something else at the same time: bringing production back to its own country.
These aren't separate decisions; they're two sides of the same equation.
Read carefully.
For 40 years, the system was simple. The US outsourced cheap labor to China. China produced, earned, and used that money to buy US bonds.
Both sides were happy.
Then 2022 arrived.
In February, approximately $300 billion of Russia's assets became unusable within days.
The money remained unused. Only the authorization to use it had been revoked.
All countries learned the same lesson.
The money you keep abroad. The raw materials you acquire. The factories you build. The payment systems you're connected to. A substance inside a chip.
In normal times, it's all trade. When tensions arise, they all become leverage in the hands of the other side.
From that day forward, both countries looked at their own weak points.
First, China.
China was the world's largest producer. But it was holding the money it earned in another country's bonds.
That's why it's quietly building its own system.
In 2023, the central banks of China and Saudi Arabia signed a swap agreement.
That same year, Brazil and China decided to conduct trade using their own currencies instead of the dollar.
BRICS expanded. China established its own payment system as an alternative to SWIFT.
For years, China has been reducing its stock of US Treasury bonds and buying gold with that money.
But gold is the smallest part of this story.
Gold remains in the vault. What China is really doing is converting paper money into physical assets.
China is building the Belt and Road Initiative for this purpose.
Railways, dams, and power plants in Africa. Ports acquired in Europe and Africa. The operating rights for the Port of Piraeus in Greece. A port in Sri Lanka transferred for 99 years.
And then there are the strategic partnerships. Iran, Russia, Venezuela, Cuba.
Now, the US.
The US's weakness wasn't money. It was production.
For 40 years, the US moved production to other countries because it was cheaper. Now it sees that a large part of that production is in the hands of its competitors.
So it's doing two things at once.
First, bringing production back home.
The US has made it expensive to produce abroad and sell domestically.
The government is also directly acquiring stakes in companies in strategic sectors. It acquired 10% of Intel and became its largest shareholder. In the rare earth sector, it acquired 15% of MP Materials and again became its largest shareholder.
Second, establishing a supply chain without China.
A critical mineral agreement was signed with Australia in October 2025.
In the same month, a rare earth agreement was made with Japan. A US-backed fund was launched for mining investment in Ukraine. In February of this year, a separate trade bloc for critical minerals was proposed.
So, the US is also forming alliances.
So why has all this accelerated?
The CIA director shared intelligence information in a speech.
According to this information, Xi Jinping ordered his military to be prepared to take Taiwan by 2027.
A distinction is necessary here.
A preparedness order does not mean a decision to invade.
But the same director also said something else.
He stated that Xi is disturbed by what is happening in Ukraine and has learned from Russia's mistakes.
Now look at the news again.
Tensions in Iran. Operation in Venezuela. Sanctions against Russia. Pressure on Cuba.
A mining deal. The purchase of a port. A chip ban. A central bank buying gold.
They all appear in separate headlines. They seem like separate events.
I don't see separate events. I see one single event.
The US and China.
When people say China is buying gold, many make the same interpretation: China is exiting the dollar.
That's true, but incomplete.
Because the US is doing something else at the same time: bringing production back to its own country.
These aren't separate decisions; they're two sides of the same equation.
Read carefully.
For 40 years, the system was simple. The US outsourced cheap labor to China. China produced, earned, and used that money to buy US bonds.
Both sides were happy.
Then 2022 arrived.
In February, approximately $300 billion of Russia's assets became unusable within days.
The money remained unused. Only the authorization to use it had been revoked.
All countries learned the same lesson.
The money you keep abroad. The raw materials you acquire. The factories you build. The payment systems you're connected to. A substance inside a chip.
In normal times, it's all trade. When tensions arise, they all become leverage in the hands of the other side.
From that day forward, both countries looked at their own weak points.
First, China.
China was the world's largest producer. But it was holding the money it earned in another country's bonds.
That's why it's quietly building its own system.
In 2023, the central banks of China and Saudi Arabia signed a swap agreement.
That same year, Brazil and China decided to conduct trade using their own currencies instead of the dollar.
BRICS expanded. China established its own payment system as an alternative to SWIFT.
For years, China has been reducing its stock of US Treasury bonds and buying gold with that money.
But gold is the smallest part of this story.
Gold remains in the vault. What China is really doing is converting paper money into physical assets.
China is building the Belt and Road Initiative for this purpose.
Railways, dams, and power plants in Africa. Ports acquired in Europe and Africa. The operating rights for the Port of Piraeus in Greece. A port in Sri Lanka transferred for 99 years.
And then there are the strategic partnerships. Iran, Russia, Venezuela, Cuba.
Now, the US.
The US's weakness wasn't money. It was production.
For 40 years, the US moved production to other countries because it was cheaper. Now it sees that a large part of that production is in the hands of its competitors.
So it's doing two things at once.
First, bringing production back home.
The US has made it expensive to produce abroad and sell domestically.
The government is also directly acquiring stakes in companies in strategic sectors. It acquired 10% of Intel and became its largest shareholder. In the rare earth sector, it acquired 15% of MP Materials and again became its largest shareholder.
Second, establishing a supply chain without China.
A critical mineral agreement was signed with Australia in October 2025.
In the same month, a rare earth agreement was made with Japan. A US-backed fund was launched for mining investment in Ukraine. In February of this year, a separate trade bloc for critical minerals was proposed.
So, the US is also forming alliances.
So why has all this accelerated?
The CIA director shared intelligence information in a speech.
According to this information, Xi Jinping ordered his military to be prepared to take Taiwan by 2027.
A distinction is necessary here.
A preparedness order does not mean a decision to invade.
But the same director also said something else.
He stated that Xi is disturbed by what is happening in Ukraine and has learned from Russia's mistakes.
Now look at the news again.
Tensions in Iran. Operation in Venezuela. Sanctions against Russia. Pressure on Cuba.
A mining deal. The purchase of a port. A chip ban. A central bank buying gold.
They all appear in separate headlines. They seem like separate events.
I don't see separate events. I see one single event.
The US and China.
β2